Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:09:55.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of proanthocyanidin-rich hulls and proanthocyanidin extracts from bean (Vicia faba L.) hulls on nutrient digestibility and digestive enzyme activities in young chicks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

P. Yuste ,
M. Longstaff  and
C. McCorquodale
P. Yuste
Affiliation:
Instito de Alimentacion Animal, Cludad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain
M. Longstaff
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
C. McCorquodale
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Roslin, Midlothian
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Proanthocyanidins were prepared from three bean (Vicia faba L.) varieties by extracting hulls in aqueous acetone. The amounts of freeze-dried extracts recovered were 74, 89 and 97 g/kg hull for the varieties Brunette, Statissa and Minica respectively. Chicks (3 weeks old) were fed on a maize–soya-bean control diet or the same control diet substituted with either 30 g proanthocyanidin extracts/kg or 300 g proanthocyanidin-rich hulls/kg. Chicks were tube-fed diets twice daily for 4 d. Nutrient digestibilities were calculated from amounts present in diets and freeze-dried excreta with the aid of titanium dioxide as a marker. Enzyme activities were measured in digesta removed from the jejunum. Extracts of proanthocyanidins depressed the digestibility of protein by 34%, starch by 3% and had no effect on the digestibility of lipid. Proanthocyanidin-rich hulls depressed the digestibility of protein by 62%, starch by 6% and lipid by 4%. Digestive enzyme activities were depressed to the same extent by extracts and hulls, trypsin (EC 3.4.21.4) by 55 and 62%, α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) by 75 and 78% and lipase (EC 3.1.1.3) by 31 and 32% for proanthocyanidin-extract and proanthocyanidin-rich-hull diets respectively. The susceptibility of substrates as well as enzymes to the effects of proanthocyanidins is discussed.

Keywords

ProanthocyanidinNutrient digestibilityDigestive enzyme activityVicia fabaChick
Type
Dietary Effects on Intestinal Digestion
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , January 1992 , pp. 57 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1992

References

Bate-Smith, E. C. (1973) Tannins of herbaceous leguminosae. Phytochemistry 12, 1809–1812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bate-Smith, E. C. (1975) Phytochemistry of proanthocyanidins. Phytochemistry 14, 1107–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, J. C., Harber, C. D., McNab, J. M., Mitchell, G. G. & Scougall, R. K. (1981) Analytical Data of Poultry Feedstuffs. Agricultural Research Council's Poultry Research Centre, Occasional Publication no. 1, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
Butler, L. G., Price, M. C. & Brotherton, J. E. (1982) Vanillin assay for proanthocyanidins (condensed tannins): Modification of the solvent for estimation of the degree of polymerisation. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 30, 1087–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggum, B. O. (1980). Factors affecting the nutritional value of field beans (Vicia faba). In Vicia faba. Feeding Value, Processing and Viruses, pp. 107–123. [Bond, D. A., editor]. Brussels and Luxembourg: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Erlanger, B. F., Kokowsky, N. & Cohen, W. (1961) The preparation and properties of two new chromogenic substrates of trypsin. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 95, 271–278.Google ScholarPubMed
European Communities (1971) IV. Determination of crude oils and fats. Process A, Part 18. Animal Feeding stuffs. pp. 15–19. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Fuller, H. L., Potter, D. K. & Brown, A. R. (1966). The feeding value of grain sorghum in relationship to their tannin content. Georgia Agriculture Experimental Station Technical Bulletin no. NS 176, pp. 5–14. Athens: Georgia Agriculture Experimental Station.Google Scholar
Gohl, B. & Thomke, S. (1976) Digestibility coefficients and metabolizable energy of barley diets for layers as influenced by geographical area of production. Poultry Science 55, 2369–2374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, D. W. & Moseley, G. (1980) The effect of diets containing field beans of high and low polyphenolic content in the activity of digestive enzymes in the intestine of rats. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 255–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horigomé, T., Kumar, R. & Okamoto, K. (1988) Effects of condensed tannins prepared from leaves of fodder plants on digestive enzymes in vitro and in the intestine of rats. British Journal of Nutrition 60, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lever, M. (1972) A new reaction for colorimetric determination of carbohydrates. Analytical Biochemistry 47, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longstaff, M. & McNab, J. M. (1991a) The inhibitory effects of hull polysaccharides and tannins of field beans (Vicia faba L.) on the digestion of amino acids, starch and lipid and on digestive enzyme activities in young chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 65, 199–216.Google Scholar
Longstaff, M. & McNab, J. M. (1991b) The effect of concentration of tannin-rich field bean hulls (Vicia faba L.) on activities of lipase (EC 3.1.1.3) and α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) in digesta and pancreas and on the digestion of lipid and starch by young chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 66, 139–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longstaff, M., McBain, B. & McNab, J. M. (1991) The antinutritive effect of proanthocyanidin-rich and proanthocyanidin-free hulls from field beans of TME and on protein, starch and lipid digestion by intact and caecectomised cockerels. Animal Feed Science and Technology 34, 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkar, H. P. S., Singh, B. & Dawra, R. K. (1988). Effect of tannin-rich leaves of oak (Quercus incana) on various microbial enzyme activities of the bovine rumen. British Journal of Nutrition 60, 287–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marquardt, R. R., Ward, A. T., Campbell, L. D. & Cansfield, P. E. (1977). Purification identification and characterization of a growth inhibitor in faba beans (Vicia faba L. var. minor). Journal of Nutrition 107, 1313–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mole, S. & Waterman, P. G. (1985) Stimulatory effects of tannins and cholic acid on tryptic hydrolysis of proteins: ecological implications. Journal of Chemical Ecology 11, 1323–1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nitsan, Z. (1971) Vicia faba beans vs. soybean meal as a source of protein. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22, 252–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, C. M. (1985) Influence of caecectomy on digestibility of amino acids by roosters fed distillers' dried grains with solubles. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 104, 469–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, L. J., Hostich, L. N. & Chan, B. G. (1986) The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry 25, 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946) An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin 2, 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheffé, H. (1959) The Analysis of Variance. New York: John Wiley and Son.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. N. & Cochran, W. G. (1973) Statistical Methods 6th ed., p. 234. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar