Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:00:27.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of a mixture of organisms, Lactobacillus acidophilus or Streptococcus faecalis on cholesterol metabolism in rats fed on a fat- and cholesterol-enriched diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Michihiro Fukushima  and
Masuo Nakano
Michihiro Fukushima
Affiliation:
Department of Bioresource Chemistry, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080, Japan
Masuo Nakano
Affiliation:
Department of Bioresource Chemistry, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effect of a mixture of organisms (a probiotic mixture) comprising Bacillus, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Clostridium, Saccharomyces and Candida(107–8 colony-forming units/g rice bran of each component) on lipid metabolism was compared with that of L. acidophilus and that of S. faecalis. There were four treatment groups: rice bran (control), the mixture of organisms, L. acihphifus or S. faecds (30g/kg) were given to rats in a fat- and cholesterol-enriched diet for 4 weeks. The serum total cholesterol concentration of the group fed on the mixture of organisms was reduced by 15–33% compared with the other groups at the end of the 4week feeding period (P < 0·05). This group also had a lower hepatic cholesterol concentration (36–44%) than the two single-bacteria groups (P < 0·05). 3-Hydmxy-3-methylglutaryl-Co A reductase (NADPH; EC 1.1.1.34) activities of the mixed-organism and L. acidophifus groups were significantly lower (61–63%) than those of the other groups (P < 0·05); the activity of the S. faecalis group was also signikantly lower (42%) than that of the control group (P < 0·05). The faecal cholesterol and bile acid concentrations of the mixed-organism group increased compared with those of the L. acidophilus and S. faecalis groups (P < 0·05). The capacity of the mixed- organism cells to bind bile salt in vitro was significantly higher (approximately 50%) than that of the singlebacteria cells (P < 0·05). On the other hand, cholesterol micelle formation for the mixed-organism cells was significantly (approximately 9%) lower than that of the singlebacteria cells (P < 0·05). These results indicate that the mixture of organisms decreased the synthesis of cholesterol in the liver and increased the loss of steroids from the intestine, in rats. Thus, the mixture of organisms had a hypocholeaterolaemic role

Keywords

ProbioticsLactobacillus acidophilusStreptococcus faecalisCholesterol metabolismHMG-CoA reductase
Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 76 , Issue 6 , December 1996 , pp. 857 - 867
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1997

References

REFERENCES

American Institute of Nutrition (1977). Report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc Committee on Standards for Nutritional Studies. Journal of Nutrition 107, 1340–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. W., Deakins, D. A. & Bridges, S. R. (1990). Soluble fiber: hypocholesterolemic effects and proposed mechanisms. InDietary Fiber, pp. 339–363 [Kritchevsky, D., Bonfield, C.& Anderson, J. W., editors]. NewYork: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bottazzi, V., Zacconi, C., Gorzaea, E. & Paladino, M. (1986). Absorption of cholesterol by intestinal lactic acid bacteria. Annali di Microbiologia 36, 1–6.Google Scholar
Cardin, A. D., Witt, K. R., Chao, J., Margolius, H. S., Donaldson, V. H. & Jackson, R. L. (1984). Degradation of apolipoprotein B-100 of human plasma low density lipoproteins by tissue and plasma kallikreins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 259, 8522–8528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folch, J., Lees, M. & Sloane-Stanley, J. H. (1957). A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226,497–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukushima, M. & Nakano, M. (1995). The effect of a probiotic on faecal and liver lipid class in rats. British Journal of Nutrition 13, 701–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furushiro, M., Sawada, H., Hirai, K., Motoike, M., Sansaw, H., Kobayashi, S., Watanuki, M. & Yokokura, T. (1990). Blood pressure-lowering effect of extract from Lactobacillus cusei in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 54,2193–2198.Google Scholar
Gilliiand, S. E., Nelson, C. R. & Maxwell, C. (1985). Assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 49, 377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glomset, S. M. (1970). Physiological role of lecithincholesterol acyltransferase. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 23, 1129–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundy, S. M., Ahrens, E. H. Jr & Miettinen, T. A. (1965). Quantitative isolation and gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of total fecal bile acids. Journal of Lipid Research 6,397–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grunewald, K. K. (1982). Serum cholesterol levels in rats fed skim milk fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Journal of Food Science 47, 2078–2079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, R. E. & Holmlund, C. E. (1962). Binding of steroids by microorganisms. Journal of Bacteriology 84, 1254–1259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hepner, G., Fried, R., Jeor, St. S., Fusetti, L. & Morin, R. (1979). Hypocholesterolemic effect of yogurt and milk. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 32, 19–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishihara, K., Shin, R., Shiina, T., Yamamoto, H. & Isoda, M. (1989). Influence of intestinal bacteria on cholesterol metabolism. In Intestinal Flora and Bio-homeostasis, pp. 121–144 [Mitsuoka, T., editor]. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Scientific Societies Press.Google Scholar
Jaspers, D. A., Massey, L. K. & Luedecke, L. O. (1984). Effects of consuming yogurts prepared with three culture strains on human serum lipoproteins. Journal of Food Science 49, 1178–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaneko, I., Hazawa-Shimada, Y. & Endo, A. (1978). Inhibitory effects on lipid metabolism in cultured cells of ML-236B, a potent inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. European Journal of Biochembtry 87, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. H., Ikeda, I. & Sugano, M. (1991). Dietary cholesterol influences on various lipid indices and eicosanoid production in rats fed dietary fat desirable for the protection of ischemic heart disease. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology 37, 389–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lippe, G., Deana, R., Cavallini, L. & Galzigna, L. (1985). Inhibition of rat liver hydromethylglutaryl-CoA reductase by sulfhydryl reagents, coenzyme A esters synthetic compounds. Biochemical Pharmacology 34,3293–3297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsubara, Y., Sawabe, A. & Iizuka, Y. (1990). Structures of new linoroid glycosides in lemon (Citrus limon BURM. f.) peelings. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 54, 1143–1148.Google Scholar
Midtvedt, T. & Norman, A. (1972). Adsorption of bile acids to intestinal microorganisms. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica 80B, 202–210.Google Scholar
Nakano, M. & Fischer, W. (1977). The glycolipids of Lactobacillus casei DSM20021. Hoppe-Seyler's Zeitschrift für Physiologische Chemie 358, 1439–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1985). Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Institutes of Health Publication no. 85-23, revised ed., Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Ozawa, K. & Yokota, H. (1981). Effects of administration of Bacillus subtilis strain BN on intestinal flora of weanling piglets. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Science 43, 771–775.Google ScholarPubMed
Papa, C. M., McCarthy, R. D. & Kilard, A. (1982). Isolation and characterization of the non-ion dialyzable inhibitor of hepatic cholesterogenesis present in bovine milk. Milchwissenschaft 37,257–260.Google Scholar
Richardson, T. (1978). The hypercholesteremic effect of milk. Journal of Food Protection 41, 226–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, D. R. & Wells, M. A. (1969). The cholesterol solubilizing capacity of lecithins in aqueous solutions of bile salt. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 176, 828–835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shefer, S., Hauser, S., Lapar, V. & Mosbach, E. H. (1972). Diurnal variation of HMG-CoA reductase activity in rat intestine. Journal of Lipid Research 13, 571–573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems (1990). SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed., pp. 891–996. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Kaizu, H. & Yamauchi, Y. (1991). Effect of cultured milk on serum cholesterol concentrations in rats fed high-cholesterol diets. Animal Science and Technology 62, 565–571.Google Scholar
Tsuda, M., Ohkubo, T., Sase, M. & Katsunuma, T. (1982). Effect of intestinal flora on the metabolism of amino acids and proteins in mouse. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology 28, 315–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu-Ito, R., Oba, K. & Uritani, I. (1982). Some problems in the assay method of HMG-CoA reductase activity in sweet potato in the presence of other HMG-CoA utilizing enzymes. Agriculiural and Biological Chemistry 46, 2087–2091.Google Scholar