Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:57:39.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of added PGX®, a novel functional fibre, on the glycaemic index of starchy foods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2011

Jennie C. Brand-Miller*
Affiliation:
Boden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition and Exercise, School of Molecular Bioscience, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW2006, Australia
Fiona S. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Boden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition and Exercise, School of Molecular Bioscience, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW2006, Australia
Roland J. Gahler
Affiliation:
Factors Group R&D, Calgary, AB, Canada
Veronica Kacinik
Affiliation:
Canadian Centre for Functional Medicine, Coquitlam, BC, Canada
Michael R. Lyon
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Food, Nutrition and Health Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada Canadian Centre for Functional Medicine, Coquitlam, BC, Canada
Simon Wood
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Food, Nutrition and Health Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada InovoBiologic, Inc., Calgary, AB, Canada
*
*Corresponding author: Professor J. C. Brand-Miller, email jennie.brandmiller@sydney.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The development of lower-glycaemic index (GI) foods requires simple, palatable and healthy strategies. The objective of the present study was to determine the most effective dose of a novel viscous fibre supplement (PGX®) to be added to starchy foods to reduce their GI. Healthy subjects (n 10) consumed glucose sugar (50 g in water × 3) and six starchy foods with a range of GI values (52–72) along with 0 (inert fibre), 2·5 or 5 g granular PGX® dissolved in 250 ml water. GI testing according to ISO Standard 26 642-2010 was used to determine the reduction in GI. PGX® significantly reduced the GI of all six foods (P < 0·001), with an average reduction of 19 % for the 2·5 g dose and 30 % for the 5 g dose, equivalent to a reducing the GI by 7 and 15 units, respectively. Consuming small quantities of the novel functional fibre PGX®, mixed with water at the start of a meal, is an effective strategy to reduce the GI of common foods.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Postprandial hyperglycaemia and compensatory hyperinsulinaemia are factors linked to the development of lifestyle-related chronic diseases, including obesity(Reference Metzger, Lowe and Dyer1), type 2 diabetes(Reference Salmeron, Ascherio and Rimm2) and CHD(Reference Liu, Willett and Stampfer3). Carbohydrates are the only food constituents that directly increase blood glucose concentration, yet the proportion of dietary energy consumed as carbohydrate is not linked either positively or negatively to disease risk(Reference Halton, Willett and Liu4Reference McKeown, Meigs and Liu6). In contrast, a large body of evidence suggests that dietary fibre and glycaemic index (GI)/glycaemic load (a measure of the glycaemic effect of the diet) have independent effects on the risk of chronic disease(Reference Brand, Colagiuri and Crossman7Reference Schulze, Manson and Ludwig11). Developing palatable, high-fibre, low-GI foods is therefore a new challenge for the food industry.

Quality rather than quantity of fibre is a more important influence on postprandial glycaemia and the GI of foods. Indeed, among 121 foods of varying composition but equivalent energy content, increasing amounts of fibre predicted a marginally positive, rather than inverse, relationship to acute glycaemia and insulinaemia(Reference Bao, Atkinson and Petocz12). Soluble fibres that develop viscosity in solution are more likely to be associated with reduced glycaemia. Indeed, the higher the viscosity, the greater the improvement in glucose and lipid metabolism(Reference Jenkins, Wolever and Leeds13). Unfortunately, in practice, both palatability and acceptability of functional fibres decline with increasing viscosity(Reference Ellis, Apling and Leeds14). In this context, PGX®, a highly viscous polysaccharide complex, has been developed that demonstrates a delayed onset of peak viscosity, allowing for a more acceptable and easy-to-use functional fibre(Reference Harding, Smith and Lawson15). Jenkins et al. (Reference Jenkins, Kacinik and Lyon16, Reference Jenkins, Kacinik and Lyon17) have demonstrated that PGX® reduces glycaemia in a dose-dependent manner when added to a glucose drink and carbohydrate-containing foods. Since the effect of viscous fibre may vary according to the conditions in the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract, we undertook a series of studies to investigate the effectiveness of two doses of PGX® dissolved in water on lowering the GI of a range of common starchy foods.

Materials and methods

The viscous polysaccharide used in the present study is sold as PolyGlycopleX® or PGX® (α-d-glucurono-α-d-manno-β-d-manno-β-D-gluco, α-l-gulurono-β-d-mannurono, β-d-gluco-β-d-mannan; PGX®; InovoBiologic, Inc., Calgary, AB, Canada). It is manufactured from highly purified polysaccharides derived from konjac, sodium alginate and xanthan gum by a proprietary process (EnviroSimplex®), forming a complex with a viscosity higher than any currently known individual polysaccharide. Although PGX® complex formation takes place at secondary and tertiary levels, the primary structures of the natural polysaccharides remain unchanged(Reference Harding, Smith and Lawson15). The final product is 87 % dietary fibre, of which 82 % is soluble. Previous studies have indicated that PGX® is well tolerated in human subjects(Reference Carabin, Lyon and Wood18), has a no observed adverse effect level of 50 000 parts per million(Reference Matulka, Lyon and Wood19) and has no mutagenic or genotoxic effects(Reference Marone, Lyon and Gahler20).

Subjects

A pool of twelve healthy subjects (seven females), with a mean age of 26·1 (sd 5·2) years and a BMI of 22·4 (sd 2·0) kg/m2, was recruited through the Sydney University Glycemic Index Research Service volunteer roster. Entry criteria included BMI < 25 kg/m2, fasting blood glucose < 5·5 mmol/l and no medication or supplements known to alter carbohydrate metabolism. The study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the University of Sydney Human Ethics Committee (protocol no. 12 029). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Study design

The study was undertaken according to the ISO Standard for GI testing(21). After a 10–12 h fast, ten subjects (from the pool of twelve) consumed in random order eighteen test meals (six different foods with three doses of PGX®) and three reference meals (50 g glucose in 250 ml water given on three separate occasions). Of the twelve subjects, six consumed all six food sets, four subjects consumed five sets and two consumed only three sets. Each dose of PGX® was dissolved in 2 ×  250 ml water (0, 2·5 or 5 g) and consumed simultaneously with a 50 g carbohydrate portion of the following six starchy foods: white bread (Tip Top Wonderwhite; Goodman Fielder, Ryde, NSW, Australia), white rice (Uncle Ben's Jasmine Rice; Mars Canada, Bolton, Ontario, Canada), boiled potato (McCain Purely Potato Cubes; McCains, Wendouree, VIC, Australia), French fries (McCain Superfries; McCains), cornflakes (Kellogg's, Melbourne, VIC, Australia) and oat porridge (Quaker Quick Oats; Peterborough, Ontario, Canada). For the control meal (0 dose PGX®), 5 g of a non-viscous dietary fibre (inulin, Orafti®; Beneo, Tienen, Belgium) were used in place of PGX®. Subjects consumed the meals with a washout period of at least 2 d between the tests. On arrival at the metabolic kitchen, subjects were weighed and two fasting blood samples were taken. The test meal and water containing PGX® were consumed simultaneously at an even pace within 10–12 min. Because PGX® develops viscosity slowly, the solutions were only slightly viscous by 10–12 min ( < 1000 cps; S Wood, unpublished results). Further blood samples were taken at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min.

Blood glucose analysis

Fingerprick blood samples (0·8 ml) from warmed hands were collected into Eppendorf tubes containing 10 U heparin, centrifuged and the plasma stored on ice until same-day analysis in duplicate using a glucose hexokinase assay (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Sydney, NSW, Australia) for an automatic centrifugal spectrophotometric analyser (Roche/Hitachi 912®; Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh, Mannheim, Germany) with internal controls.

Statistical analysis

For each test, the incremental area under the curve was calculated according to the trapezoidal method. Any area under the baseline (fasting value) was ignored. In each study, the results were analysed using a general linear model (ANOVA) for the incremental area under the curve, with treatment or food and time as fixed factors and subject as a random factor. PASW Statistics 18 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. Results are expressed as means with their standard errors.

Results

All test meals were palatable and well tolerated, and no adverse events were reported. The effect of PGX® at 0, 2·5 and 5 g doses on the GI of the six foods is illustrated in Fig. 1. There were significant differences among the doses (P < 0·001), and each dose was significantly different from every other dose (P < 0·001). There was no significant food × dose interaction, indicating that each dose affected each food in the same way. On average, a dose of 2·5 g reduced the GI by 14 units (i.e. by 16–22 % depending on the food) and a dose of 5 g reduced the GI by 24 units (28–35 % depending on the food). Using the logarithm of the GI, each dose of PGX® had a similar percentage reduction (21 % for the 2·5 g dose and 33 % for the 5 g dose), irrespective of the food (i.e. the food × dose interaction was again not significant). This model was as good as the previous model using the GI alone and the percentage reduction.

Fig. 1 Glycaemic index (GI) of starchy foods with 0 (□), 2·5 () and 5 g () of PGX® fibre. Values are means (n 10), with standard errors represented by vertical bars (n 10). All dose levels were significantly different from each other, irrespective of food type (P < 0·001; ANOVA). * Mean value was significantly different from that of the no dose condition (P < 0·001). † Mean Value was significantly different from that of the 2·5 g dose condition (P < 0·001). Without PGX®, the mean GI values were as follows: bread 70 (sem 3); rice 84 (sem 4); potatoes (boiled) 70 (sem 4); French fries 65 (sem 4); cornflakes 82 (sem 4); instant oats 76 (sem 4).

Discussion

The present study shows that small quantities of PGX® dissolved in water and consumed with common starchy foods have clinically important dose-related effects on postprandial glycaemia. The smaller dose (2·5 g) reduced the blood glucose response to starchy foods by 21 % and the higher dose (5 g) by 33 %. PGX® reduced the GI of the foods by between 14 and 24 units (depending on the dose), irrespective of the food type. Notably, high-GI foods such as rice (GI = 84 in the present study) and intermediate-GI, higher-fat foods such as French fries (GI = 65 in the present study) were associated with a similar reduction in GI. All meals were well tolerated, with no reported gastrointestinal discomfort.

Alternative methods of incorporating PGX® are also effective in the context of single foods and mixed meals. Jenkins et al.(Reference Jenkins, Kacinik and Lyon16) demonstrated that sprinkling the product on the food just before consumption or direct inclusion during manufacture was successful in reducing glycaemia. They calculated that each gram of PGX® had the ability to reduce the GI by approximately 7 units. The term ‘glycaemic reduction index potential’ was used to describe this ability and allow comparisons among studies and different fibre preparations. In the present study, PGX® had a glycaemic reduction index potential value of 5–6 units, perhaps because PGX® was consumed in water with the meal rather than directly incorporated into the food.

The magnitude of the reduction in glycaemia achieved with PGX® is superior to many other commercially available functional fibre preparations(Reference Jenkins, Wolever and Leeds13). Inulin, for example, is commonly added to commercial foods as a prebiotic fibre(Reference Abrams, Griffin and Hawthorne22) but the 5 g dose used as the control (0 g PGX®) in the present study had no apparent effect on lowering GI. Cornflakes, for example, with 5 g inulin (0 dose of PGX®) generated a GI of 82, a value very close to the average of 81 in the published literature(Reference Atkinson, Foster-Powell and Brand-Miller23). Psyllium fibre can be consumed in solution or incorporated into foods such as breakfast cereal to reduce cholesterol absorption, but a 5 g dose produces only a modest 14 % reduction in postprandial glycaemia(Reference Pastors, Blaisdell and Balm24). In contrast, 5 g PGX® produced a 33 % reduction in the present study. β-Glucans (5 g) derived from oats consumed as a beverage reduced glycaemia by < 20 % when consumed with a bread meal(Reference Biorklund, van Rees and Mensink25). High-viscosity guar gum (approximately 5 g) can achieve a very high 50 % reduction when intimately mixed with a meal but it is not effective when viscosity is low(Reference Leclere, Champ and Boillot26).

The effectiveness of various fibre preparations has been directly related to their ability to create viscosity(Reference Jenkins, Wolever and Leeds13). Nonetheless, guar gum is so highly viscous in solution that its applications are limited due to stickiness and difficulties in incorporating the product into normal food processing operations. In contrast, the present study shows that PGX® reduces glycaemia very effectively when consumed in water before significant gelling has taken place. Guar is also notable for its capacity to produce excessive gastrointestinal discomfort(Reference Ellis, Apling and Leeds14). In a double-blind, randomised controlled trial (n 54), gastrointestinal symptoms after PGX® supplementation were rated as mild to moderate and generally well tolerated(Reference Carabin, Lyon and Wood18).

In previous trials, we have demonstrated that the effectiveness of PGX® is dependent on dose, timing of consumption and physical form. Consumption within 15 min of the start of the meal, but not at 45 or 60 min, reduced glycaemia just as effectively as when taken with the meal. In contrast, PGX® consumed as capsules did not produce acute lowering of glycaemia, but had important ‘second meal’ effects, improving glucose tolerance at breakfast time when consumed with the previous evening meal.

Reducing postprandial glycaemia and dietary glycaemic load is a recent target in the management and prevention of obesity and type 2 diabetes(Reference Ceriello27, Reference Buyken, Mitchell and Ceriello28). A reduction in dietary GI and glycaemic load led to greater weight loss over 12 weeks(Reference McMillan-Price, Petocz and Atkinson29) and improved maintenance of weight loss in a large European study(Reference Larsen, Dalskov and van Baak30). High-GI meals and diets are of greater concern in insulin-resistant individuals who must increase insulin secretion in order to re-establish glucose homeostasis, increasing the burden on the β-cell and therefore the risk of type 2 diabetes. In healthy adults, daily consumption of 5 g PGX® for 3 weeks was associated with improved insulin sensitivity and higher levels of peptide YY, a hormone that reduces hunger(Reference Reimer, Pelletier and Carabin31). In adolescents, PGX® in solution (5 g) was shown to reduce energy intake from a pizza meal given 90 min later(Reference Vuksan, Panahi and Lyon32). In diabetic rats, PGX® was found to improve glycaemic control and protein glycation, most probably due to the insulin secretagogue effects of increased glucagon-like peptide 1(Reference Grover, Koetzner and Wicks33). The ability of PGX® to reduce the glycaemic response may be a simple, effective ingredient in the designing of lower-GI diets.

In conclusion, granular PGX® consumed in water with common starchy foods such as potatoes, bread and rice has biologically important dose-related effects on acute postprandial glycaemia. As little as 5 g reduced blood glucose responses over 120 min by 33 % and reduced the GI of foods by 24 units.

Acknowledgements

Financial support of the study and supply of PGX® were provided by InovoBiologic, Inc. PGX®, PolyGlycopleX® and ENVIROSIMPLEX® are trademarks of InovoBiologic, Inc. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. The authors' contributions were as follows: J. C. B.-M., S. W. and F. S. A. were responsible for the design of the study, collection and analysis of the data and writing of the manuscript; R. J. G., M. R. L. and V. K. contributed to the design of the study and writing of the manuscript. Conflict of interest: J. C. B.-M. received financial remuneration for the preparation of the manuscript; F. S. A. was employed by the University of Sydney to undertake the studies; R. J. G. owns the Factors Group of Companies, which retains an interest in PGX®; V. K. is an employee of the Canadian Centre for Functional Medicine; M. R. L. receives consulting fees from the Factors Group of Companies; S. W. receives consulting fees from InovoBiologic, Inc.

References

1Metzger, BE, Lowe, LP, Dyer, AR, et al. (2008) Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 358, 19912002.Google ScholarPubMed
2Salmeron, J, Ascherio, A, Rimm, EB, et al. (1997) Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of NIDDM in men. Diabetes Care 20, 545550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Liu, S, Willett, WC, Stampfer, MJ, et al. (2000) A prospective study of dietary glycemic load, carbohydrate intake, and risk of coronary heart disease in US women. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 14551461.Google Scholar
4Halton, TL, Willett, WC, Liu, S, et al. (2006) Low-carbohydrate-diet score and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med 355, 19912002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Beulens, JWJ, de Bruijne, LM, Stolk, RP, et al. (2007) High dietary glycemic load and glycemic index increase risk of cardiovascular disease among middle-aged women: a population-based follow-up study. J Am Coll Cardiol 50, 1421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6McKeown, NM, Meigs, JB, Liu, S, et al. (2004) Carbohydrate nutrition, insulin resistance, and the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Diabetes Care 27, 538546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Brand, JC, Colagiuri, S, Crossman, S, et al. (1991) Low-glycemic index foods improve long-term glycemic control in NIDDM. Diabetes Care 14, 95101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Willett, W, Manson, J & Liu, S (2002) Glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 274S280S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9McKeown, NM, Meigs, JB, Liu, S, et al. (2009) Dietary carbohydrates and cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. J Am Coll Nutr 28, 150158.Google Scholar
10Halton, TL, Willett, WC, Liu, S, et al. (2006) Potato and French fry consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 284290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Schulze, MB, Manson, JE, Ludwig, DS, et al. (2004) Sugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in young and middle-aged women. JAMA 292, 927934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Bao, J, Atkinson, F, Petocz, P, et al. (2011) Prediction of postprandial glycemia and insulinemia in lean, young, healthy adults: glycemic load compared with carbohydrate content alone. Am J Clin Nutr 93, 984996.Google Scholar
13Jenkins, D, Wolever, T, Leeds, A, et al. (1978) Dietary fibres, fibre analogues, and glucose tolerance: importance of viscosity. Br Med J 1, 13921394.Google Scholar
14Ellis, P, Apling, E, Leeds, A, et al. (1981) Guar bread: acceptability and efficacy combined. Studies on blood glucose, serum insulin and satiety in normal subjects. Br J Nutr 46, 267276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Harding, SE, Smith, IH, Lawson, CJ, et al. (2010) Studies on macromolecular interactions in ternary mixtures of konjac glucomannan, xanthan gum and sodium alginate. Carbohydr Polym 83, 329338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Jenkins, A, Kacinik, V, Lyon, M, et al. (2010) Effect of adding the novel fiber, PGX®, to commonly consumed foods on glycemic response, glycemic index and GRIP: a simple and effective strategy for reducing post prandial blood glucose levels – a randomized, controlled trial. Nutr J 9, 58.Google Scholar
17Jenkins, A, Kacinik, V, Lyon, M, et al. (2010) Reduction in postprandial glycemia by the novel viscous polysaccharide PGX, in a dose-dependent manner, independent of food form. J Am Coll Nutr 29, 9298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Carabin, I, Lyon, M, Wood, S, et al. (2009) Supplementation of the diet with the functional fiber PolyGlycoplex® is well tolerated by healthy subjects in a clinical trial. Nutr J 8, 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Matulka, R, Lyon, M, Wood, S, et al. (2009) The safety of PolyGlycopleX® (PGX®) as shown in a 90-day rodent feeding study. Nutr J 8, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Marone, PA, Lyon, M, Gahler, R, et al. (2009) Genotoxicity studies of PolyGlycopleX (PGX) - a novel dietary fiber. Int J Toxicol 28, 318331.Google Scholar
21International Standards Organisation (2010) ISO 26642-2010. Food products – determination of the glycaemic index (GI) and recommendation for food classification In: International Standards Organisation.Google Scholar
22Abrams, SA, Griffin, IJ, Hawthorne, KM, et al. (2005) A combination of prebiotic short- and long-chain inulin-type fructans enhances calcium absorption and bone mineralization in young adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 471476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Atkinson, F, Foster-Powell, K & Brand-Miller, J (2008) International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values. Diabetes Care 31, 22812283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Pastors, J, Blaisdell, P, Balm, T, et al. (1991) Psyllium fiber reduces rise in postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 53, 14311435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Biorklund, M, van Rees, A, Mensink, RP, et al. (2005) Changes in serum lipids and postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations after consumption of beverages with [beta]-glucans from oats or barley: a randomised dose-controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 12721281.Google Scholar
26Leclere, C, Champ, M, Boillot, J, et al. (1994) Role of viscous guar gums in lowering the glycemic response after a solid meal. Am J Clin Nutr 59, 914921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Ceriello, A (2004) Postprandial glucose regulation and diabetic complications. Arch Intern Med 164, 20902095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Buyken, A, Mitchell, P, Ceriello, A, et al. (2010) Optimal dietary approaches for prevention of type 2 diabetes: a life-course perspective. Diabetologia 53, 406418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29McMillan-Price, J, Petocz, P, Atkinson, F, et al. (2006) Comparison of 4 diets of varying glycemic load on weight loss and cardiovascular risk reduction in overweight and obese young adults: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 166, 14661475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Larsen, TM, Dalskov, S-M, van Baak, M, et al. (2010) Diets with high or low protein content and glycemic index for weight-loss maintenance. N Engl J Med 363, 21022113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Reimer, RA, Pelletier, X, Carabin, IG, et al. (2010) Increased plasma PYY levels following supplementation with the functional fiber PolyGlycopleX in healthy adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 11861191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Vuksan, V, Panahi, S, Lyon, M, et al. (2009) Viscosity of fiber preloads affects food intake in adolescents. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 19, 498503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Grover, GJ, Koetzner, L, Wicks, J, et al. (2010) Effects of the soluble fiber complex PolyGlycoplex® on glycemic control, insulin secretion, and GLP-1 levels in Zucker diabetic rats. Life Sci 88, 392399.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Glycaemic index (GI) of starchy foods with 0 (□), 2·5 () and 5 g () of PGX® fibre. Values are means (n 10), with standard errors represented by vertical bars (n 10). All dose levels were significantly different from each other, irrespective of food type (P < 0·001; ANOVA). * Mean value was significantly different from that of the no dose condition (P < 0·001). † Mean Value was significantly different from that of the 2·5 g dose condition (P < 0·001). Without PGX®, the mean GI values were as follows: bread 70 (sem 3); rice 84 (sem 4); potatoes (boiled) 70 (sem 4); French fries 65 (sem 4); cornflakes 82 (sem 4); instant oats 76 (sem 4).