Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:03:37.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of creatine supplementation on homocysteine levels and lipid peroxidation in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2008

Rafael Deminice*
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, CEP 14049-900Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Guilherme Vannucchi Portari
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, CEP 14049-900Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Helio Vannucchi
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, CEP 14049-900Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Alceu Afonso Jordao
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, CEP 14049-900Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: Rafael Deminice, fax +55 16 3602 4547, email deminice@ig.com.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hyperhomocysteinaemia is an independent risk factor for CVD. Recent data show a relationship between homocysteine (Hcy) and free radical formation. Since creatine synthesis is responsible for most of the methyl group transfers that result in Hcy formation, creatine supplementation might inhibit Hcy production and reduce free radical formation. The present study investigated the effects of creatine supplementation on Hcy levels and lipid peroxidation biomarkers. Thirty rats were divided into three groups: control group; diet with creatine group (DCr; 2 % creatine in the diet for 28 d); creatine overload plus diet with creatine group (CrO+D; 5 g creatine/kg by oral administration for 5 d+2 % in the diet for 23 d). Plasma Hcy was significantly lower (P < 0·05) in DCr (7·5 (sd 1·2) μmol/l) and CrO+D (7·2 (sd 1·7) μmol/l) groups compared with the control group (12·4 (sd 2·2) μmol/l). Both plasma thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS) (control, 10 (sd 3·4); DCr, 4·9 (sd 0·7); CrO+D, 2·4 (sd 1) μmol/l) and plasma total glutathione (control, 4·3 (sd 1·9); DCr, 2·5 (sd 0·8); CrO+D, 1·8 (sd 0·5) μmol/l) were lower in the groups that received creatine (P < 0·05). In addition, Hcy showed significant negative correlation (P < 0·05) with plasma creatine (r − 0·61) and positive correlation with plasma TBARS (r 0·74). Plasma creatine was negatively correlated with plasma TBARS (r − 0·75) and total peroxide (r − 0·40). We conclude that creatine supplementation reduces plasma Hcy levels and lipid peroxidation biomarkers, suggesting a protective role against oxidative damage. Modulating Hcy formation may, however, influence glutathione synthesis and thereby affect the redox state of the cells.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

Over the last few years, increasing evidence has shown that hyperhomocysteinaemia is an independent risk factor for the development of CVD(Reference Wyss and Schulze1, Reference Harbor-Gonçalves, Vaz and Bezzi2) and may be associated with neurodegenerative disease(Reference Obeid and Herrmann3, Reference Bender, Koch and Elstner4), diabetes(Reference Wijekoon, Brosnan and Brosnan5) and end-stage renal dysfunction(Reference Taes, Delanghe and De Vriese6, Reference Taes, Delanghe and De Bacquer7). Recent in vitro and animal studies have indicated an association between elevated homocysteine (Hcy) levels and the formation of reactive oxygen species, especially the superoxide anion (O2− ) and H2O2(Reference Huang, Hsu and Lin8Reference Weiss10), by the auto-oxidation of Hcy and/or cysteine(Reference Hogg11). Intracellular reactive oxygen species production may cause cellular damage(Reference Streck, Vieira and Wannmacher9) and disorders of the antioxidant defence system(Reference Blundell, Jones and Rose12), demonstrating a mechanistic connection between hyperhomocysteinaemia, oxidative stress and disease.

Hcy is an amino acid formed exclusively by demethylation of methionine(Reference Brosnan, Jacobs and Stead13). In Hcy synthesis, methionine is activated by ATP to form S-adenosylmethionine (SAM). SAM acts primarily as a universal methyl donor in the synthesis of methylated compounds such as neurotransmitters (adrenaline, noradrenaline), DNA, RNA, phosphatidylcholine and creatine(Reference Brosnan, da Silva and Brosnan14). A subproduct of these methylation reactions is S-adenosylhomocysteine, which is hydrolysed to adenosine and Hcy(Reference Selhub15). Hcy can be remethylated to form methionine by the action of the enzyme methionine synthase which uses N 5′10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate-reductase as a methyl donor. The catabolism of methionine is performed by trans-sulfuration, with Hcy reacting with serine to form cystathionine in an irreversible reaction catalysed by cystathione-β-synthase. Through this pathway, Hcy is converted to cysteine, an important amino acid in the synthesis of proteins and reduced glutathione (GSH)(Reference Brosnan, Jacobs and Stead13).

Creatine is a compound naturally found in food, especially meat and fish, although only half of the daily creatine requirement (about 1 g/d) comes from the diet, while the rest is endogenously synthesised in the liver(Reference Persky and Brazeau16). The first step in creatine synthesis involves the reversible transfer of the amidino group of arginine to glycine to form guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) and ornithine in a reaction catalysed by the enzyme l-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase in the kidneys. Next, the irreversible transfer of a methyl group from SAM to GAA is catalysed by the enzyme SAM:guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase(Reference Wyss and Kaddurah-Daouk17). Through this reaction, the endogenous synthesis of creatine consumes a considerable number of methyl groups. In humans, creatine synthesis has been reported to account for 70 % of Hcy formation(Reference Mudd and Poole18, Reference Mudd, Ebert and Scriver19). Wyss & Kaddurah-Daouk(Reference Wyss and Kaddurah-Daouk17) reported that this process utilises more SAM than all other methyltransferase reactions combined.

Thus, creatine synthesis and Hcy formation are metabolically connected(Reference Taes, Delanghe and De Vriese6) (Fig. 1). Creatine supplementation has been shown to down-regulate the synthesis of l-arginine : glycine amidinotransferase and consequently reduce endogenous formation of creatine, changing the methylation flux and reducing Hcy synthesis(Reference Taes, Delanghe and De Vriese6, Reference Stead, Au and Jacobs20). However, little is known about the possible interactions between methyl balance modulation and lipid peroxidation when Hcy production is decreased by creatine supplementation.

Fig. 1 Schematic presentation of the interaction of homocysteine and creatine metabolism in humans and animals: an increase in creatine intake inhibits the action of the enzyme l-arginine : glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT) required for reaction 1. As consequence, the pathway of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) is down-regulated and there is a decrease in homocysteine formation (reaction 2). Under normal conditions (normal creatine intake), methionine will interact with guanidinoacetate, forming homocysteine. THF, tetrahydrofolate; MS, methionine synthase; GNMT, glycine N-methyltransferase; GAMT, guanidinoacetate methyl-transferase; CβS, cystathionine-β-synthase; GSH, reduced glutathione; reaction 3, transmethylation; reaction 4, trans-sulfuration; reaction 5, remethylation.

The present study investigated the effects of two protocols of creatine supplementation on plasma levels of Hcy and amino acids involved in Hcy synthesis, and on oxidative stress in healthy rats.

Materials and methods

Animals and treatment

Thirty Wistar rats were obtained from the Central Animal House of the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, after approval by the institution's Ethics Committee of Animal Experimentation. The animals were kept in individual cages on a 12 h light–12 h dark cycle at a mean temperature of 22°C and were divided at random into three groups of ten rats each: control; diet with creatine (DCr); creatine overload plus diet with creatine (CrO+D). The animals had free access to food and water throughout the experiment.

Creatine supplementation was performed by adding 2 % monohydrate creatine (Acros Organics, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA) to the control diet (AIN-93)(Reference Reeves, Nielsen and Fahey21) for the DCr group for 4 weeks. The DCr+O group received monohydrated creatine (5 g/kg) by oral administration for the first 5 d, followed by maintenance with the 2 % creatine diet until the end of the 4-week period (adapted from Hultman et al. (Reference Hultman, Soderlund and Timmons22)). The animals received fresh food every 2 d. Food intake and weight were measured weekly throughout the study period.

At the end of 4 weeks, 24 h urine samples were collected from the metabolism cages before the animals were killed by decapitation. Blood was collected and centrifuged and plasma was stored at − 70°C. The liver and soleus muscle were removed, weighed, immediately frozen in liquid N2 ( − 196°C) and stored at − 70°C.

Measurement of metabolites

The determination of plasma Hcy levels involves preliminary pretreatment of the sample with S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase and dithiothreitol to release Hcy from the protein-bound form. Plasma Hcy, vitamin B12 and folate were determined by competitive immunoassay (IMMULITE® kit; DPC MedLab, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Plasma concentrations of methionine, sarcosine, glycine, serine, ornithine and cystathionine were determined by GC (GC-17A; Shimadzu®, Kyoto, Japan) with amino acid derivatisation by the EZ : Faast Amino Acid Analysis kit (Phenomenex®, Torrance, CA, USA).

Total GSH was determined in plasma and liver as described by Sedlack & Lindsay(Reference Sedlak and Lindsay23). TBARS and total peroxide, as parameters of lipid peroxidation, were determined in plasma and liver by the methods of Mihara & Uchiyama(Reference Mihara and Uchiyama24) and Södergren et al. (Reference Södergren, Nourooz-Zadeh and Berglund25), respectively. Plasma and liver α-tocopherol was determined by HPLC (LC-20A; Shimadzu®) as described by Jordão et al. (Reference Jordão, Chiarello and Arantes26).

Plasma, urine and muscle creatine was determined by the Jaffe reaction using a method adapted from Taussky(Reference Taussky27) and De Saedeleer & Marechal(Reference De Saedeleer and Marechal28). Samples were heated to convert creatine to creatinine, which reacts with picric acid in an alkaline medium, forming a reddish complex that is measured photometrically. For the assay, 600 μl of 44·4 mm-picric acid were added to 200 μl of the sample and homogenised. From each sample, 300 μl were added to two tubes containing 300 μl distilled water (A1 and B1). After heating one (A1) to 100°C for 1·5 h in a sealed vial, 1 ml of buffer solution containing 208 mm-sodium hydroxide, 12·7 mm-sodium tetraborate and a surfactant was added to all samples (A1 and B1). Readings were obtained with a spectrophotometer at 510 nm after incubation at 37°C for 10 min in a water-bath. Absorbances were defined as A1 and B1. After the addition of 100 μl of 11·4 mm-acetic acid and incubation at room temperature for 5 min, readings were obtained again and absorbances defined as A2 and B2. Creatine concentration was calculated by the formula (A1 − B1) − (A2 − B2) using a standard curve of 5 to 1000 μm-creatine carried out in triplicate. To determine urinary creatine, 200 μl urine were diluted 1:25 in 4·8 ml distilled water and processed as described above.

For the determination of muscle creatine, the soleus muscle was weighed, macerated in liquid N2 and homogenised in 1 ml distilled water. The homogenate was diluted to 5 ml by the addition of distilled water (1 : 5) and free creatine was determined by the procedure described above. Total muscle creatine was determined by phosphocreatine hydrolysis. For this procedure, 300 μl of muscle homogenate were heated to 65°C for 10 min in 0·4 μm-HCl and neutralised with 2 μm-NaOH, followed by the creatine measurement procedure described above. Total creatine corresponded to the sum of free creatine and phosphocreatine. Urinary creatinine was determined using an enzymic kit (LABTEST®; Labtest Diagnóstica, Lagoa Santa, Minas Gerais, Brazil).

Statistical analysis

Data are reported as mean values and standard deviations, and groups were compared by ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test. Correlation coefficients were calculated to determine possible within-group associations between variables. In all analyses, the level of significance was set at P < 0·05.

Results

Table 1 presents the general and biochemical characteristics of the animals in the present study. No significant differences in body-weight gain, food intake, urinary creatinine or intramuscular creatine concentrations were detected between groups. Plasma folate was significantly decreased in the CrO+D group, which received dietary and overload creatine, compared with the control group, the no-creatine control. There was a significant increase in plasma and urinary creatine, and in phosphocreatine concentrations for the DCr (dietary creatine only) and CrO+D groups compared with the control group. A significant increase of total creatine was observed only in the CrO+D group.

Table 1 Comparison of the general and biochemical characteristics of the control, dietary creatine (DCr) and creatine overload plus diet (CrO+D) groups after 4 weeks of experimentation

(Mean values and standard deviations)

PCr, phosphocreatine; tCr, total creatine.

a,b Mean values within a row with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test).

Figure 2 presents the plasma Hcy and methionine levels of the experimental groups after 4 weeks of creatine supplementation. A significant decrease in plasma Hcy was observed for the DCr (7·5 (sd 1·2) μmol/l) and CrO+D (7·2 (sd 1·7) μmol/l) groups compared with the control group (12·4 (sd 2·2) μmol/l). The reduction detected in the DCr and CrO+D groups compared with the control group was 39 and 41 %, respectively. In contrast, no differences were observed in methionine concentration. Significant negative correlations (P < 0·05) were detected between plasma Hcy and both plasma creatine (Fig. 3 (A)) and total intramuscular creatine (r − 0·44).

Fig. 2 Effects of 4 weeks of creatine supplementation on plasma homocysteine (Hcy) (A) and methionine (B) levels in the control, dietary creatine (DCr) and creatine overload plus diet (CrO+D) groups. Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. a,b Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test).

Fig. 3 Linear regression demonstrating a significant negative relationship (r − 0·61; P < 0·01) between homocysteine (Hcy) and plasma creatine (A), a significant positive relationship (r 0·74; P < 0·01) between plasma Hcy and thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS) (B) and a significant negative relationship (r − 0·75; P < 0·01) between plasma creatine and plasma TBARS (C). The graphs present the data for all experimental groups: control (■), dietary creatine (●) and creatine overload plus diet (△).

Table 2 presents the plasma concentrations of amino acids related to Hcy metabolism. A significant increase in glycine concentration was detected only in the CrO+D group compared with the others, whereas cystathionine was reduced in all groups supplemented with creatine compared with the control group. No differences in sarcosine, serine or ornithine were detected.

Table 2 Plasma levels of the amino acids involved in the metabolism of homocysteine for the control, dietary creatine (DCr) and creatine overload plus diet (CrO+D) groups after 4 weeks of experimentation

(Mean values and standard deviations)

a,b Mean values within a row with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test).

Table 3 presents the concentration of lipid peroxidation biomarkers and antioxidants in plasma and in liver. Plasma TBARS were significantly reduced after creatine supplementation, as was total plasma GSH. This reduction was not detected in the liver for the DCr group, however. No differences were observed for total peroxide concentration in plasma, or for α-tocopherol in liver or plasma (Table 3).

Table 3 Biomarkers of oxidative stress and the antioxidant defence system in the plasma and liver of the control, dietary creatine (DCr) and creatine overload plus diet (CrO+D) groups after 4 weeks of experimentation

(Mean values and standard deviations)

TBARS, thiobarbituric acid-reactive species; GSH, reduced glutathione.

a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test).

A significant correlation (P < 0·05) was detected between plasma Hcy and plasma TBARS concentration (Fig. 3 (B)) and a significant negative correlation between plasma creatine and plasma TBARS (Fig. 3 (C)). Significant negative correlations (P < 0·05) were also found between plasma total peroxide and plasma creatine (r − 0·40). In addition, significant correlations were detected between folate and Hcy (r 0·57). The amino acid glycine was correlated with Hcy concentration (r − 0·45), plasma total GSH (r − 0·54), plasma TBARS (r − 0·52) and total peroxides (r − 0·37). The amino acid cystathionine was correlated with Hcy concentration (r 0·50), total plasma (r 0·38) and liver (r 0·54) GSH.

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that the Hultman et al. (Reference Hultman, Soderlund and Timmons22) adapted protocol with an overload supplementation period led to significant increases in plasma (154 %) and total intramuscular creatine (18 %) concentrations for the CrO+D group in relation to the control group. In contrast, the addition of 2 % of creatine in the diet led to a significant increase just in plasma creatine (139 %) concentrations for the DCr group (Table 1). Hultman et al. (Reference Hultman, Soderlund and Timmons22), in a pioneering study on human subjects, demonstrated that supplementation with 20 g creatine/d for 6 d increased the intramuscular stores of creatine by 20 %. After this period, the concentration gradually decreased to baseline values, but elevated values of intramuscular creatine concentration were maintained for 30 d by ingestion of 2 g/d. The objective of the overload phase is to reach the maximal accumulation in muscular creatine; after this, the levels of muscle creatine can be maintained with relatively small dosages. Therefore, regimens of a loading phase followed by a maintenance phase appear to be effective in increasing total intramuscular creatine levels in rats.

Although there was a significant difference between the supplementation protocols in creatine levels, the same significant reductions in plasma Hcy concentrations were observed in both the DCr and CrO+D groups compared with the control group, with no changes in methionine concentration (Fig. 2 (B)), and significant negative correlations were seen between Hcy and plasma creatine (Fig. 3 (A)). Taken together, these data confirm the hypothesis that creatine supplementation reduces plasma Hcy levels in rats. Although no difference was detected between DCr and CrO+D animals, this was the first study to compare Hcy levels after applying different protocols of creatine supplementation. Previous animal studies have also detected reduced Hcy concentrations after creatine supplementation(Reference Taes, Delanghe and De Vriese6, Reference Stead, Au and Jacobs20). Stead et al. (Reference Stead, Au and Jacobs20) studied how methylation demand and Hcy formation were modulated by creatine and GAA intake, using rats receiving either 0·4 % creatine, 0·36 % GAA or a control diet. Hcy levels were reduced 25 % by creatine, and increased 50 % with GAA, while plasma methionine levels were unchanged. Taes et al. (Reference Taes, Delanghe and De Vriese6) also detected significant reductions in plasma Hcy levels in a group of nephrectomised rats fed 2 % creatine for 2 weeks, as well as a significant negative correlation between Hcy and plasma creatine.

In contrast to the animal data, studies conducted in human subjects have been somewhat controversial. Norlund et al. (Reference Norlund, Grubb and Fex29) demonstrated a significant correlation between plasma Hcy and serum creatine, and suggested that creatine turnover may be a factor determining Hcy levels. Korzun(Reference Korzun30) studied healthy human subjects of both sexes who received creatine for 28 d and detected a small but significant reduction of Hcy levels compared with controls. In contrast, Steenge et al. (Reference Steenge, Verhoef and Greenhaff31), in a study on women ingesting either a placebo or 20 g creatine/d for 5 d plus 3 g creatine/d for 8 weeks, did not find a significant difference in Hcy concentrations in any of the groups after the intervention. These authors also concluded that 61 d creatine supplementation did not suppress endogenous synthesis to an extent that would affect plasma Hcy levels in healthy women. Taes et al. (Reference Taes, Delanghe and De Bacquer7) also found no changes in Hcy levels after creatine supplementation at 2 g/d for 28 d in chronic renal patients on haemodialysis, since the subjects were also receiving vitamins B6, B12 and folate. These authors also discussed the possibility that vitamin supplementation can mask the expected fall in Hcy levels in the presence of creatine supplementation. Thus, studies conducted on animals have demonstrated that inhibition of the endogenous methylation demand by creatine supplementation can reduce Hcy levels, but these results have not been reproduced in human subjects.

Creatine supplementation was associated with a decrease in folate concentration, different from Taes et al. (Reference Taes, Delanghe and De Vriese6) who found a folate-saving effect induced by creatine supplementation. The importance of folate in remethylation and for Hcy level is well known(Reference Taes, Delanghe and De Bacquer7, Reference Huang, Hsu and Lin8). House et al. (Reference House, O'Connor and Guenter32) related that folate is required in the metabolic pathway for several amino acids, including glycine, serine and methionine and showed a marked elevation in glycine concentration in prolonged folate deficiency. In the present study, the decrease in folate and increase in glycine concentrations in the CrO+D group demonstrate the modulation of the flux through remethylation induced by creatine supplementation. These mechanisms appear to be down-regulated to maintain the normal methionine levels (Fig. 2 (B)) while the repression on l-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase exerted by exogenous creatine permits conservation of the amino acid methionine(Reference Stead, Au and Jacobs20). However, further research is required confirming these hypotheses.

Recent studies have also demonstrated the importance of some amino acids on methionine metabolism(Reference Brosnan, da Silva and Brosnan14, Reference Fukada, Shimada and Morita33). Fukada et al. (Reference Fukada, Shimada and Morita33) showed the hypohomocysteinaemic effect of glycine and serine in animals loaded with an excess of methionine. In the present study, the glycine sparing effect in the CrO+D group compared with the control group (Table 2), along with the negative correlations between glycine and Hcy, suggests that the action of methyl-group acceptor of glycine is not required when Hcy formation is inhibited (Fig. 1, reaction 2). In addition, this sparing effect can also indicate an inhibition of the one-carbon unit-providing action of glycine to the N 5′10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate-dependent remethylation of Hcy (Fig. 1, reaction 5). Thus, it seems reasonable to consider the important role of glycine on Hcy-modulated metabolism induced by creatine supplementation.

Although some authors have demonstrated an association between hyperhomocysteinaemia and free radical formation(Reference Huang, Hsu and Lin8Reference Weiss10), the present study is the first to demonstrate that the reduction of plasma Hcy levels by creatine supplementation is associated with a significant reduction of plasma lipid peroxidation biomarkers (Table 3). Also, the significant negative correlations between plasma creatine and the plasma lipid peroxidation biomarkers (TBARS and total peroxide) (Fig. 3 (C)) are in vivo confirmation of in vitro findings on the potential of creatine to remove reactive oxygen species(Reference Lawler, Barnes and Wu34, Reference Sestili, Martinelli and Bravi35) and act as an antioxidant in a dose-dependent response. Lawler et al. (Reference Lawler, Barnes and Wu34) demonstrated a direct dose–response relationship of creatine concentration with superoxide anion (O2− ), peroxynitrite (OONO− ) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) as determined by the rate of renewal of the ABTS+ radical, and concluded that creatine has a significant role as an antioxidant. The authors state, however, that this potential appears to be lower than the normal physiological levels of GSH. Sestili et al. (Reference Sestili, Martinelli and Bravi35) also demonstrated that creatine has a direct antioxidant activity on cultured cells exposed to different oxidative agents. These authors verified that creatine, at doses similar to those detected in plasma after supplementation, had an antioxidant cytoprotective activity on three cell lines against three different oxidative agents: H2O2, OONO−  and tert-butylhydroperoxide (tB-OOH). In addition, the cytoprotection was independent of the antioxidant status of the catalase and glutathione peroxidase enzymes, suggesting a direct interaction between creatine and oxidant and/or free radicals. Souza et al. (Reference Souza, Oliveira and Pereira36) assayed the chemiluminescence of excited carbonyls in urine, as a measure of the extent of tissue lipid peroxidation. In a study on the effects of different types of exercise, they found that lipid peroxidation in individuals who performed force/hypertrophy training with creatine supplementation was significantly lower than in a placebo group, suggesting protective antioxidant effects of creatine. However, in the present study, the antioxidant effect found in the plasma was not observed in the liver, suggesting that the antioxidant effects of creatine can be different in these tissues. Several investigators have suggested, however, that the antioxidant effects of creatine can be attributed to indirect antioxidant mechanisms such as hydration, membrane stabilisation and improved energy capacity of the cell(Reference Wyss and Schulze1, Reference Persky and Brazeau16). The potential of creatine supplementation for the reduction of Hcy levels and consequently of cell toxicity that is demonstrated in the present study may also be an indirect form of the antioxidant action of this substance.

Hcy is the key intermediate in the coordination of the trans-sulfuration and remethylation pathways and its production may influence the synthesis and function of methionine and GSH(Reference Prudova, Bauman and Braun37). GSH is the most abundant thiol in the antioxidant defence system, directly acting to neutralise reactive oxygen species(Reference Feoli, Siqueira and Almeida38). In the present study, the significant reductions of liver and plasma GSH (Table 3) and cystathionine concentrations (Table 2), in addition to the significant correlation between these two compounds, suggested that modulation of the methyl balance and the consequent reduction of Hcy can down-regulate the trans-sulfuration pathway in a dose-dependent response. This might decrease GSH production, affecting the redox status of the cells. Martinov et al. (Reference Martinov, Vitvitsky and Mosharov39), in a mathematical modelling study of SAM metabolism in the liver, stated that when SAM levels are low, priority for this substrate goes to transmethylation reactions, promoting reduction of the trans-sulfuration pathway. These findings demonstrate the important relationship between the processes of methylation, Hcy formation and GSH formation.

In conclusion, creatine supplementation by the two protocols studied reduced plasma Hcy concentrations, possibly by modulating the methyl balance. This reduction of Hcy was associated with reduced lipid peroxidation biomarkers, suggesting the in vivo antioxidant cytoprotective effect of creatine. Alternatively, creatine supplementation might modulate the bioavailability of Hcy for the remethylation and trans-sulfuration processes, in turn influencing GSH synthesis, and affecting the redox status of the cells. Future studies should include a larger number of oxidative stress biomarkers and antioxidants, to determine the specific link with Hcy metabolism and changes induced by creatine supplementation.

Acknowledgements

We thank the technical laboratory Lívia Simões-Ambrosio, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, for help in the analysis of Hcy, vitamin B12 and folate.

The present study was supported by Brazilian funds from CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento do Ensino Superior), CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnológico) and FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Proc. 2006/00946-8).

R. D. was a post-graduate student and author of the work; G. V. P. collaborated with post-graduate student R. D., including collection and analysis of data and significant help in the laboratory; H. V. was chief of the Laboratory of Nutrition and co-chief of the scientific project; A. A. J. was chief of the Nutrition and Metabolism Laboratory, the scientific project and of the post-graduate students.

All the authors declare that there are no potential conflicts of interest.

References

1Wyss, M & Schulze, A (2002) Health implications of creatine: can oral creatine supplementation protect against neurological and atherosclerotic disease? Neuroscience 112, 243260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Harbor-Gonçalves, L, Vaz, LS & Bezzi, M (2005) Associação entre níveis plasmáticos de homocisteína e acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico (Association between plasma homocysteine levels and ischaemic cerebral vascular accident). Arq Neuropsiquiatr 63, 97103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Obeid, R & Herrmann, W (2006) Mechanisms of homocysteine neurotoxicity in neurodegenerative diseases with special reference to dementia. FEBS Lett 580, 29943005.Google Scholar
4Bender, A, Koch, W, Elstner, M, et al. (2006) Creatine supplementation in Parkinson disease: a placebo-controlled randomized pilot trial. Neurology 67, 12621264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Wijekoon, EP, Brosnan, ME & Brosnan, JT (2007) Homocysteine metabolism in diabetes. Biochem Soc Trans 35, 11751179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Taes, YE, Delanghe, JR, De Vriese, AS, et al. (2003) Creatine supplementation decreases homocysteine in an animal model of uremia. Kidney Int 64, 13311337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Taes, YE, Delanghe, JR, De Bacquer, D, et al. (2004) Creatine supplementation does not decrease total plasma homocysteine in chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 66, 24222428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Huang, RF, Hsu, YC, Lin, HL, et al. (2001) Folate depletion and elevated plasma homocysteine promote oxidative stress in rat livers. J Nutr 131, 3338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Streck, EL, Vieira, PS, Wannmacher, CM, et al. (2003) In vitro effect of homocysteine on some parameters of oxidative stress in rat hippocampus. Metab Brain Dis 18, 147154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Weiss, N (2005) Mechanisms of increased vascular oxidant stress in hyperhomocysteinemia and its impact on endothelial function. Curr Drug Metab 6, 2736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Hogg, N (1999) The effect of cyst(e)ine on the auto-oxidation of homocysteine. Free Radic Biol Med 27, 2833.Google Scholar
12Blundell, G, Jones, BG, Rose, FA, et al. (1996) Homocysteine mediated endothelial cell toxicity and its amelioration. Atherosclerosis 122, 163172.Google Scholar
13Brosnan, JT, Jacobs, RL, Stead, LM, et al. (2004) Methylation demand: a key determinant of homocysteine metabolism. Act Biol Pol 51, 405413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Brosnan, JT, da Silva, R & Brosnan, ME (2007) Amino acids and the regulation of methyl balance in humans. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 10, 5257.Google Scholar
15Selhub, J (1999) Homocysteine metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr 19, 217246.Google Scholar
16Persky, AM & Brazeau, GA (2001) Clinical pharmacology of the dietary supplement creatine monohydrate. Pharmacol Rev 53, 161176.Google ScholarPubMed
17Wyss, M & Kaddurah-Daouk, R (2000) Creatine and creatinine metabolism. Physiol Rev 80, 11071213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Mudd, SH & Poole, JR (1975) Labile methyl balances for normal humans on various dietary regimens. Metabolism 24, 721735.Google Scholar
19Mudd, SH, Ebert, MH & Scriver, CR (1980) Labile methyl group balances in the human: the role of sarcosine. Metabolism 29, 707720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Stead, LM, Au, KP, Jacobs, RL, et al. (2001) Methylation demand and homocysteine metabolism: effects of dietary provision of creatine and guanidinoacetate. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281, E1095E1100.Google Scholar
21Reeves, PG, Nielsen, FH & Fahey, GC Jr (1993) AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J Nutr 123, 19391951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Hultman, E, Soderlund, K, Timmons, JA, et al. (1996) Muscle creatine loading in men. J Appl Physiol 81, 232237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Sedlak, J & Lindsay, RH (1968) Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman's reagent. Anal Biochem 25, 192205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Mihara, M & Uchiyama, M (1978) Determination of malonaldehyde precursor in tissues by thiobarbituric acid test. Anal Biochem 86, 271278.Google ScholarPubMed
25Södergren, E, Nourooz-Zadeh, J, Berglund, L, et al. (1998) Re-evaluation of the ferrous oxidation in xylenol orange assay for the measurement of plasma lipid hydroperoxides. J Biochem Biophys Methods 18, 137146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Jordão, AA Jr, Chiarello, PG, Arantes, MR, et al. (2004) Effect of an acute dose of ethanol on lipid peroxidation in rats: action of vitamin E. Food Chem Toxicol 42, 459464.Google Scholar
27Taussky, HH (1954) A microcolorimetric determination of creatine in urine by the Jaffe reaction. J Biol Chem 208, 853861.Google Scholar
28De Saedeleer, M & Marechal, G (1984) Chemical energy usage during isometric twitches of frog sartorius muscle intoxicated with an isomer of creatine, β-guanidinopropionate. Pflugers Arch 402, 185189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Norlund, L, Grubb, A, Fex, G, et al. (1998) The increase of plasma homocysteine concentrations with age is partly due to the deterioration of renal function as determined by plasma cystatin C. Clin Chem Lab Med 36, 175178.Google Scholar
30Korzun, WJ (2004) Oral creatine supplements lower plasma homocysteine concentrations in humans. Clin Lab Sci 17, 102106.Google Scholar
31Steenge, GR, Verhoef, P & Greenhaff, PL (2001) The effect of creatine and resistance training on plasma homocysteine concentration in healthy volunteers. Arch Intern Med 161, 14551456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32House, JD, O'Connor, CP & Guenter, W (2003) Plasma homocysteine and glycine are sensitive indices of folate status in a rodent model of folate depletion and repletion. J Agric Food Chem 51, 44614467.Google Scholar
33Fukada, S, Shimada, Y, Morita, T, et al. (2006) Suppression of methionine-induced hyperhomocysteinemia by glycine and serine in rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 70, 24032409.Google Scholar
34Lawler, JM, Barnes, WS, Wu, G, et al. (2002) Direct antioxidant properties of creatine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 290, 4752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Sestili, P, Martinelli, C, Bravi, G, et al. (2006) Creatine supplementation affords cytoprotection in oxidatively injured cultured mammalian cells via direct antioxidant activity. Free Radic Biol Med 40, 837849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Souza, TP Jr, Oliveira, PR & Pereira, B (2005) Efeitos do exercício físico intenso sobre a quimioliminescencia urinária e malonaldeido plasmático (Effect of intense physical exercise on the urinary chemiluminescence and plasmatic malonaldehyde). Braz J Sports Med 11, 9196.Google Scholar
37Prudova, A, Bauman, Z, Braun, A, et al. (2006) S-adenosylmethionine stabilizes cystathionine β-synthase and modulates redox capacity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 64896494.Google Scholar
38Feoli, AM, Siqueira, I, Almeida, LM, et al. (2006) Brain glutathione content and glutamate uptake are reduced in rats exposed to pre- and postnatal protein malnutrition. J Nutr 36, 23572361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Martinov, MV, Vitvitsky, VM, Mosharov, EV, et al. (2000) A substrate switch: a new mode of regulation in the methionine metabolic pathway. J Theor Biol 204, 521532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Schematic presentation of the interaction of homocysteine and creatine metabolism in humans and animals: an increase in creatine intake inhibits the action of the enzyme l-arginine : glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT) required for reaction 1. As consequence, the pathway of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) is down-regulated and there is a decrease in homocysteine formation (reaction 2). Under normal conditions (normal creatine intake), methionine will interact with guanidinoacetate, forming homocysteine. THF, tetrahydrofolate; MS, methionine synthase; GNMT, glycine N-methyltransferase; GAMT, guanidinoacetate methyl-transferase; CβS, cystathionine-β-synthase; GSH, reduced glutathione; reaction 3, transmethylation; reaction 4, trans-sulfuration; reaction 5, remethylation.

Figure 1

Table 1 Comparison of the general and biochemical characteristics of the control, dietary creatine (DCr) and creatine overload plus diet (CrO+D) groups after 4 weeks of experimentation(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Effects of 4 weeks of creatine supplementation on plasma homocysteine (Hcy) (A) and methionine (B) levels in the control, dietary creatine (DCr) and creatine overload plus diet (CrO+D) groups. Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. a,b Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test).

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Linear regression demonstrating a significant negative relationship (r − 0·61; P < 0·01) between homocysteine (Hcy) and plasma creatine (A), a significant positive relationship (r 0·74; P < 0·01) between plasma Hcy and thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS) (B) and a significant negative relationship (r − 0·75; P < 0·01) between plasma creatine and plasma TBARS (C). The graphs present the data for all experimental groups: control (■), dietary creatine (●) and creatine overload plus diet (△).

Figure 4

Table 2 Plasma levels of the amino acids involved in the metabolism of homocysteine for the control, dietary creatine (DCr) and creatine overload plus diet (CrO+D) groups after 4 weeks of experimentation(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 5

Table 3 Biomarkers of oxidative stress and the antioxidant defence system in the plasma and liver of the control, dietary creatine (DCr) and creatine overload plus diet (CrO+D) groups after 4 weeks of experimentation(Mean values and standard deviations)