Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:30:43.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of dietary cis 9, trans 11–18: 2, trans 10, cis 12–18: 2, or vaccenic acid (trans 11–18: 1) during lactation on body composition, tissue fatty acid profiles, and litter growth in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Juan J. Loor ,
Xiaobo Lin  and
Joseph H. Herbein
Juan J. Loor*
Affiliation:
Dairy Science Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA 24061-0315, USA Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, 206 ERML, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Xiaobo Lin
Affiliation:
Dairy Science Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA 24061-0315, USA Division of Atherosclerosis, Nutrition and Lipid Research, Department of Medicine, Washington School of Medicine, Box 8046, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
Joseph H. Herbein
Affiliation:
Dairy Science Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA 24061-0315, USA
*
*Corresponding Author: Dr Juan J. Loor, fax +1 217 244 5617, email jloor@uiuc.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Cis 9, trans 11 (c 9, t11)-18: 2 and trans 10, cis 12 (t10, c12)-18: 2 are the major conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers in dietary supplements which reduce milk fat content in nursing women. The present study evaluated the effects of each CLA isomer or vaccenic acid on body composition and tissue fatty acids during lactation in mice. Dams were fed 30 g rapeseed oil (control)/kg diet or 20 g control plus 10 g 18: 0, trans 11–18: 1 (t11–18: 1), c 9, t11–18: 2, or t10, c12–18: 2. Dietary t10, c12–18: 2 reduced food intake by 18 % and carcass fat weight of the dams by 49 % compared with the other treatments. Milk fat percentage ranked by treatment was 18: 0>t11–18: 1=c 9, t11–18: 2>t10, c12–18: 2. The sum of saturated 12: 0 to 16: 0 in milk fat was lower when c 9, t11–18: 2 was fed compared with the control, 18: 0, or t11–18: 1 treatments. Dietary t10, c12–18: 2 caused further reductions in milk fat 12: 0 to 16: 0. The proportion of CLA isomers was 3-fold greater in milk fat than in the carcasses of the dams. The pups nursing from the dams fed t10, c12–18: 2 had the lowest body weights and carcass fat, protein, and ash contents. Nursing from the dams fed c 9, t11–18: 2 also resulted in lower carcass fat compared with the 18: 0 or t11–18: 1 treatments. The ratios of cis 9–16: 1:16: 0 or cis 9–18: 1:18: 0, proxies for Δ9-desaturase activity, were markedly lower in the carcasses of the dams and pups fed t10, c12–18: 2. The ratio of 20: 4n-6:18: 2n-6, a proxy for Δ6- and Δ5-desaturase and elongase activity, in the liver of the dams and pups fed t10, c12–18: 2 also was lower. Dietary t11–18: 1 enhanced the content of c 9, t11–18: 2 in milk fat and carcasses. As in previous studies, the reduction in food intake by t10, c12–18: 2 could not entirely account for the marked decrease in carcass fat content and milk fat concentration. T10, c12–18: 2 probably had a negative effect on Δ9-desaturase and mammary de novo fatty acid synthesis. Although these effects need to be confirmed in lactating women, the results suggest that the consumption of supplements containing t10, c12–18: 2 should be avoided during the nursing period.

Keywords

Conjugated linoleic acidsVaccenic acidBody compositionMilk fatLactation
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 90 , Issue 6 , December 2003 , pp. 1039 - 1048
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2003

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1990) Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Arlington, VA: AOAC.Google Scholar
Assumpcão, R, Santos, F, Setta, C, et al. (2002) Trans fatty acids in maternal diet may impair lipid biosynthesis in mammary gland of lactating rats. Annals Nutr Met 46, 169–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauman, DE, Corl, BA, Baumgard, LH & Griinari, JM (2001) Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and the dairy cow. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, pp.221–250 [Garnsworthy, P and Wiseman, J, editors]. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgard, LH, Matitashvili, E, Corl, BA, Dwyer, DA & Bauman, DE (2002) trans -10, cis -12 conjugated linoleic acid decreases lipogenic rates and expression of genes involved in milk lipid synthesis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 85, 2155–2163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bee, G (2000 a) Dietary conjugated linoleic acids alter adipose tissue and milk lipids of pregnant and lactating sows. J Nutr 130, 2292–2298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bee, G (2000 b) Dietary conjugated linoleic acid consumption during pregnancy and lactation influences growth and tissue composition in weaned pigs. J Nutr 130, 2981–2989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bretillon, L, Chardigny, JM, Gregoire, S, Berdeaux, O & Sebedio, JL (1999) Effects of conjugated linoleic acid isomers on the hepatic microsomal desaturation activities in vitro. Lipids 34, 965–969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, Y, Kim, Y, Han, Y, Park, Y, Pariza, M & Ntambi, J (2000) The trans10, cis 12 isomer of conjugated linoleic acid downregulates stearoyl-CoA desaturase gene expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J Nutr 130, 1920–1924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christie, WW, Sebedio, JL & Juaneda, P (2001) A practical guide to the analysis of conjugated linoleic acid. Inform 12, 147–156.Google Scholar
De Deckere, EA, Van Amelsvoort, JM, McNeill, GP & Jones, P (1999) Effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers on lipid levels and peroxisome proliferation in the hamster. Br J Nutr 82, 309–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLany, JP, Blohm, F, Truett, AA, Scimeca, JA & West, DB (1999) Conjugated linoleic acid rapidly reduces body fat content in mice without affecting energy intake. Am J Physiol 276, R1172–R1179.Google ScholarPubMed
Eder, K, Slomma, N & Becker, K (2002) Trans-10, cis -12 conjugated linoleic acid suppresses the desaturation of linoleic and α-linolenic acids in HepG2 cells. J Nutr 132, 1115–1121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, M, Lin, X Odle, J & McIntosh, M (2002) Trans -10, cis -12 conjugated linoleic acid increases fatty acid oxidation in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. J Nutr 132, 450–455.Google ScholarPubMed
Folch, J, Lees, M & Sloane-Stanley, GM (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226, 497–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomez, FE, Bauman, DE, Ntambi, JM & Fox, BG (2003) Effects of sterculic acid on stearoyl-CoA desaturase in differentiating 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 300, 316–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jayan, GC & Herbein, JH (2000) Healthier dietary fat using trans -vaccenic acid. Nutr Food Sci 30, 304–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayan, GC, Herbein, JH, Wong, E & Keenan, TW (1998) Influence of unsaturated fatty acids on de novo fatty acid synthesis in mouse mammary epithelial cell cultures. FASEB J 12, A553.Google Scholar
Loor, JJ & Herbein, JH (1998) Exogenous conjugated linoleic acid isomers reduce bovine milk fat concentration and yield by inhibiting de novo fatty acid synthesis. J Nutr 128, 2411–2419.Google Scholar
Loor, JJ & Herbein, JH (2003) Reduced fatty acid synthesis and desaturation due to exogenous trans10, cis 12-CLA in cows fed oleic or linoleic oils. J Dairy Sci 86, 1354–1369.Google Scholar
Loor, JJ, Lin, X & Herbein, JH (2002) Dietary trans-vaccenic acid ( trans 11–18?:?1) increases concentration of cis 9, trans 11-conjugated linoleic acid (rumenic acid) in tissues of lactating mice and suckling pups. Reprod Nutr Dev 42, 85–99.10.1051/rnd:2002009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, A, Gibbs, J, Lyster, R & Baum, J (1978) Creamatocrit: simple clinical technique for estimating fat concentration and energy value of human milk. Br Med J 1, 1018–1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masters, N, McGuire, MA, Beerman, KA, Dasgupta, N & McGuire, MK (2002) Maternal supplementation with CLA decreases milk fat in humans. Lipids. 37, 133–138.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1995) Nutrient Requirements of Laboratory Animals, 4th revised ed., Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Ntambi, JM, Choi, Y, Park, Y, Peters, JM & Pariza, MW, (2002) Effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on immune responses, body composition and stearoyl-CoA desaturase. A review. Can J Appl Physiol 27, 617–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, M, Devery, R, Lawless, F, Murphy, J & Stanton, C, (2000) Milk fat conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) inhibits growth of human mammary MCF-7 cancer cells. Anticancer Res 20. 3591–3601.Google ScholarPubMed
Pariza, M, Park, Y & Cook, M, (2001) The biologically active isomers of conjugated linoleic acid. Prog Lipid Res 40, 283–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, Y, Storkson, JM, Albright, KJ, Liu, W & Pariza, MW (1999) Evidence that the trans -10, cis -12 isomer of conjugated linoleic acid induces body composition changes in mice. Lipids 34, 235–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollard, M, Gunstone, F, James, A & Morris, L (1980) Desaturation of positional and geometrical isomers of monoenoic fatty acids by microsomal preparations from rat liver. Lipids 15, 306–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulos, S, Sisk, M, Hausman, D, Azain, M & Hausman, G, (2001) Pre- and postnatal dietary conjugated linoleic acid alters adipose development, body weight gain and body composition in Sprague-Dawley rats. J Nutr 131, 2722–2731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryder, JW, Portocarrero, CP, Song, XM, et al. (2001) Isomer-specific antidiabetic properties of conjugated linoleic acid. Improved glucose tolerance, skeletal muscle insulin action, and UCP-2 gene expression. Diabetes 50, 1149–1157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS ® (2000) User's Guide?:?Statistics, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
Santora, J, Palmquist, D & Roehrig, K, (2000) Trans-vaccenic acid is desaturated to conjugated linoleic acid in mice. J Nutr 130, 208–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprecher, H (2000) Metabolism of highly unsaturated n -3 and n -6 fatty acids. Biochim Biophys Acta 1486, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teter, BB, Sampugna, J & Keeney, M (1990) Milk fat depression in C57Bl/6J mice consuming partially hydrogenated fat. J Nutr 120, 818–824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terpstra, AH (2001) Differences between humans and mice in efficacy of the body fat lowering effect of conjugated linoleic acid: role of metabolic rate. J Nutr 131, 2067–2068.Google Scholar
Terpstra, A, Beynen, A, Everts, H, Kocsis, S, Katan, M & Zock, P (2002) The decrease in body fat in mice fed conjugated linoleic acid is due to increases in energy expenditure and energy loss in the excreta. J Nutr 132, 940–945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viswanadha, S, Wark, WA, Loor, JJ & Herbein, JH (2002) Alterations in tissue weights and carcass composition of growing mice fed diets containing 0, 0·15, or 0·30?% t10, c12-conjugated linoleic acid. FASEB J 16, A1025.Google Scholar
Yang, L, Ying, S, Yeung, V, Huang, Y, Wang, H & Chen, Z (2002) Preferential incorporation of trans, trans-conjugated linoleic acid isomers into the liver of suckling rats. Br J Nutr 87, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed