Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:41:12.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of fructo-oligosaccharide-supplemented infant cereal: a double-blind, randomized trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Nancy Moore ,
Cewin Chao ,
Li-Ping Yang ,
Heidi Storm ,
Maria Oliva-Hemker  and
Jose M. Saavedra
Nancy Moore*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Cewin Chao
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Li-Ping Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Heidi Storm
Affiliation:
Nestlé Nutrition Institute, Glendale, CA, USA
Maria Oliva-Hemker
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Jose M. Saavedra
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Nestlé Nutrition Institute, Glendale, CA, USA
*
*Corresponding author:Ms Nancy Moore, fax +1 410 379 5881, email nabmoore@comcast.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) may have potential benefits, since they exhibit many soluble dietary fibre-like properties. Foods currently available for weaning infants are generally low in fibre content and lack these potential benefits. Data documenting tolerance of FOS in weaning foods are greatly lacking. Our present objective was to evaluate the tolerance and gastrointestinal effects of FOS-supplemented infant cereal used as a daily addition to the diet of healthy infants. Healthy infants were randomly assigned to receive either 0·75 g FOS per serving of cereal or placebo for 28 d. The primary outcome of interest was gastrointestinal tolerance, which was assessed by daily parental reporting of functional variables for 28 d, including stool patterns and signs and symptoms of gastrointestinal tolerance. Secondary outcomes were also measured including: cereal intake (g cereal and g FOS/d), stool pH, changes in anthropometric measurements and adverse events. The study population included a total of fifty-six infants, age range 16·2–46·2 weeks with a mean age of 32·5 (sd 8·9) weeks; twenty-nine infants were randomized to the control group (age 31·8 (sd 9·0) weeks) and twenty-seven to the FOS-supplemented group (34·7 (sd 8·9) weeks). Average daily total intake per infant and average intake per serving were similar in both groups. Average FOS consumption was 0·74 (sd 0·39) g/d and as high as 3·00 g/d. Stool consistency was less likely to be described as ‘hard’, and more likely to be described as ‘soft’ or ‘loose’, in the FOS v. control group. The mean number of stools per infant was 1·99 (sd 0·62) per d in the FOS-supplemented group compared with 1·58 (sd 0·66) in the control group (P=0·02). There were no differences between the groups in reporting for crying, spitting-up or colic. No differences were found for stool pH. FOS-supplements added to cereal were well tolerated in doses of up to 3·00 g/d. FOS consumption led to more regular and softer stools, without diarrhoea, as well as less-reported frequency of symptoms associated with constipation such as hard stools or skipped days without stool. The present study is one of few studies documenting tolerance to increased fibre intake in the form of FOS as part of a weaning food.

Keywords

Fructo-oligosaccharidesStool characteristicsInfant cerealWeaning foods
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , September 2003 , pp. 581 - 587
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2003

References

Abi-Hanna, A, Moore, N, Yolken, R & Saavedra, J (1998) Long term consumption of infant formulas with live probiotic bacteria; safety and tolerance. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 7, A84.Google Scholar
Agostoni, C, Riva, E & Giovannini, M (1995) Dietary fiber in weaning foods of young children. Pediatrics 96, 1002–1005.Google Scholar
Alexy, U (1999) Macronutrient intake of 3-to-36 month old German infants and children: results of the DONALD study. Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study. Ann Nutr Metab 43, 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics (1995) A summary of conference recommendations on dietary fiber in childhood. The role of dietary fiber in childhood. Pediatrics 96, 1023–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Dietetic Association (1997) Position of ADA: Health implications of dietary fiber. J Am Diet Assoc 97, 1157–1159.Google Scholar
Boehm, G, Casetta, P, Jelinek, J, Negretti, F, Stahl, B & Marini, A (2002) Supplementation of bovine milk formula with an oligosaccharide mixture increases counts of faecal bifidobacteria in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child 86, F178–F181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cadranel, S & Coussement, P (1995) Tolerance study with oligofructose for school children. Proceedings of First Orafti Research Conference. Hospital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola. Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Dwyer, JT (1995) Dietary fiber for children: How much? Pediatrics 96, 1019–1022.Google Scholar
Garleb, KA, Snook, JT, Marcon, MJ, Wolf, BW & Johnson, WA (1996) Effect of fructooligosaccharides containing enteral formulas on subjective tolerance factors, serum chemistry panels, and faecal bifidobacteria in healthy male adult subjects. Microb Ecol Health Dis 9, 279–285.3.3.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, GR, Willis, C & Van, Loo J (1994) Non-digestible oligosaccharides and bifidobacteria: implications for health. Int Sugar J 96, 381–387.Google Scholar
Hampl, JS, Betts, NM & Benes, BA (1998) The ‘age + 5’ rule: comparison of dietary fiber among 4–10 year old children. J Am Diet Assoc 98, 1418–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidaka, H, Eida, T, Takizawa, T, Tokunaga, T & Yashiro, Y (1986) Effects of fructooligosaccharides on intestinal flora and human health. Bifid Microflora 5, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modler, HW, McKellar, RC & Yaguchi, M (1990) Bifidobacteria and bifidogenic factors. Can Inst Food Sci Technol J 23, 29–41.Google Scholar
Moro, G, Minoli, I, Mosca, M, et al. (2002) Dose-related bifidogenic effects of galacto- and fructooligosaccharides in formula-fed term infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 34, 291–295.Google Scholar
Roberfroid, MB & Delzenne, NM (1998) Dietary fructans. Annu Rev Nutr 18, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rumessen, JJ, Bode, S, Hamberg, O & Gudmand-Hoyer, E (1990) Fructans of Jerusalem artichokes: Intestinal transport, absorption, fermentation, and influence on blood glucose, insulin, and c-peptide response in healthy subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 52, 675–681.Google Scholar
Spiegel, JE, Rose, R, Karabell, P, Frankos, VH & Schmitt, DF (1994) Safety and benefits of fructooligosaccharides as food ingredients. Food Technol 1, 85–89.Google Scholar
Van den, Heuvel, EGHM,, Muys T, van Dokkum, W & Schaafsma, G (1999) Oligofructose stimulates calcium absorption in adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 69, 544–548.Google Scholar
Van Loo, J, Coussement, P, De Leenheer, L, Hoebregs, H & Smits, G (1995) On the presence of inulin and oligofructose as natural ingredients in the Western diet. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 35, 525–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, L (2000) Complex carbohydrates and sugars. Pediatrics 106, 5.Google Scholar
Williams, C (1995) Importance of dietary fiber in childhood. J Am Diet Assoc 95, 1140–1146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, CL & Bollella, M (1995) The role of dietary fiber in childhood. Is a high fiber diet safe for children? Pediatrics 96, 1014–1019.Google Scholar
Williams, CL, Bollella, M & Wynder, EL (1995) The role of dietary fiber in childhood. A new recommendation for dietary fiber in childhood. Pediatrics 96, 985–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, Y & Yonekubo, A (1993) A survey of physical growth, nutritional intake, fecal properties and morbidity of infants as related to feeding methods. Shoni Hoken Kenkya 52, 465–471.Google Scholar