Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:59:19.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of varying protein and energy intakes on the growth and body composition of pigs

1. The effects of energy intake at constant, high protein intake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

I. Kyriazakis  and
G. C. Emmans
I. Kyriazakis
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, The Scottish Agricultural College Edinburgh, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
G. C. Emmans
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, The Scottish Agricultural College Edinburgh, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The objective of the present experiment was to define the form of the relationship between varying levels of energy intake at constant, high protein intake and the performance of young pigs. By doing so it was expected that we could distinguish between four models that predict the pig's responses to its diet as rates of protein and lipid retention. Forty young pigs were assigned at 12 kg live weight either to an initial slaughter group (n 8) or to one of four allowances of starch intake at a constant intake of a high-protein feed (with 345 g crude protein (nitrogen x 6.25)/kg food). Half the pigs were killed after 4 weeks and half after 8 weeks on the treatments; at each slaughter point on each treatment half the pigs were entire males and half were females. Increasing the intake of starch (energy) resulted in significant increases in the rates of live weight, empty-body, protein and lipid gains of pigs slaughtered at both stages. There was no minimum positive lipid: protein ratio in the gain of the pigs. Male pigs deposited more protein and less lipid than females but this effect of sex on protein and lipid retention was seen only on the two highest allowances of starch intake. The calculated efficiency of protein utilization increased with increasing starch intake up to a maximum of 0.81, when probably the energy: protein in the diet became non-limiting. The results led to the rejection of two of the models that predict the rates of protein and lipid retention as responses to protein and energy intake, but the two remaining models could not be rejected, at least qualitatively.

Keywords

Body compositionProtein utilizationEnergy intakeProtein intakeProtein retentionPigs
Type
Protein and Energy Metabolism
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , November 1992 , pp. 603 - 613
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1992

References

Agricultural Research Council (1981). The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Batterham, E. S. (1990). Prediction of the dietary energy value of diets and raw materials for pigs. In Feedstuff Evaluation, pp. 267–281 [Wiseman, J. and Cole, D. J. A., editors]. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. L., Campbell, R. G., Williams, I. H., James, K. J. & Davies, G. T. (1986). Simulation of energy and amino acid utilisation in the pig. Research and Development in Agriculture 3, 121–145.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. (1988). Nutrient constraints to lean tissue accretion in farm animals. Nutrition Research Review 1, 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. G. & Taverner, M. R. (1988). Genotype and sex effects on the relationship between energy intake and protein deposition in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 66, 676–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. & Curic, D. M. (1983). The influence of feeding level from 20 to 45 kg liveweight on the performance and body composition of female and entire male pigs. Animal Production 36, 193–199.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. & Curic, D. M. (1985 a). The influence of feeding level on the protein requirement of pigs between 20 and 45 kg liveweight. Animal Production 40, 489–496.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Taverner, M. R. & Curic, D. M. (1985 b). Effects of sex and energy intake between 48 and 90 kg liveweight on protein deposition in growing pigs. Animal Production 40, 497–503.Google Scholar
Ellis, M., Smith, W. C., Henderson, R., Whittemore, C. T., Laird, R. & Phillips, P. (1983). Comparative performance and body composition of control and selection line Large White pigs. 3. Three low feeding scales for a fixed time. Animal Production 37, 253–258.Google Scholar
Emmans, G. C. (1981). A model for the growth and feed intake of ad libitum fed animals particularly poultry. In Computers in Animal Production. British Society of Animal Production Occasional Publication no. 5, pp. 103–110 [Hillyer, G. M., Whittemore, C. T. and Gunn, R. G., editors]. Thames Ditton: BSAP.Google Scholar
Emmans, G. C. & Fisher, C. (1986). Problems in nutritional theory. In Nutrient Requirements of Poultry and Nutrition Research. Poultry Symposium no. 19, pp. 9–39 [Fisher, C. and Boorman, K. N., editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Fowler, V. R., Fuller, M. R., Close, W. H. & Whittemore, C. T. (1980). Energy requirements for the growing pig. In Energy Metabolism, pp. 151–156 [Mount, L. E., editor]. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M. R. & Crofts, R. M. J. (1977). The protein sparing effect of carbohydrate. 1. Nitrogen retention of growing pigs in relation to diet. British Journal of Nutrition 38, 479–488.Google Scholar
Kita, K., Muramatsu, T., Tasaki, I. & Okumura, J. (1989). Influence of dietary non-protein intake on whole body protein turnover in chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 61, 235–244.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I. & Emmans, G. C. (1992). The effects of varying protein and energy intakes on the growth and body composition of pigs: 2. The effects of varying both energy and protein intake. British Journal of Nutrition 68, 615–625.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I., Emmans, G. C. & Whittemore, C. T. (1990). Diet selection in pigs: Choices made by growing pigs given foods of different concentrations. Animal Production 51, 189–199.Google Scholar
Rao, D. S. & McCracken, K. J. (1990). Effect of protein intake on energy and nitrogen balance and chemical composition of gain in growing boars of high genetic potential. Animal Production 51, 389–397.Google Scholar
Stranks, M. H., Cooke, B. C., Fairbairn, C. B., Fowler, N. G., Kirby, P. S., McCracken, K. J., Morgan, C. A., Palmer, F. G. & Peers, D. G. (1988). Nutrient allowances for growing pigs. Research and Development in Agriculture 5, 71–88.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. (1983). Development of recommended energy and protein allowances for growing pigs. Agricultural Systems 11, 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. & Fawcett, R. H. (1976). Theoretical aspects of a flexible model to simulate protein and lipid growth in pigs. Animal Production 22, 87–96.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T., Tullis, J. B. & Emmans, G. C. (1988). Protein growth in pigs. Animal Production 46, 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar