Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:24:23.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy exchanges associated with eating and rumination in sheep given grass diets of different physical forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

P. O. Osuji ,
J. G. Gordon  and
A. J. F. Webster
P. O. Osuji
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
J. G. Gordon
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
A. J. F. Webster
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Energy exchanges and other physiological functions associated with eating and rumination were determined in four experiments. Sheep were given chopped, dried grass (DGC), pelleted, dried grass (DGP) or fresh grass (FGC).

2. In Expt 1 a preliminary study was made using all three diets. The dry matter (DM) of DGP was eaten significantly faster than that of chopped diets. Sheep salivated most during eating and ruminated longest when given DGC. Rates of contraction for the reticulo-rumen did not differ significantly between diets during idling and rumination, but were significantly faster during eating with DGP. The apparent energy costs of eating were 17, 109 and 176 kJ/kg DM eaten for DGP, DGC and FGC respectively, but these probably underestimated the true energy cost.

3. Expt 2 compared DGP and DGC at two levels of intake. The mean energy costs of eating DGP and DGC were 23.5 and 267 kJ/kg DM respectively. There was no consistent relationship between the energy cost of eating and the duration of the meal. The proportion of time the sheep spent ruminating DGC was about 23% but less than 1% for DGP. There was no significant relationship between heat production and the time spent ruminating.

4. In Expt 3 four sheep were offered fresh grass and, later, an equivalent DM intake after the material had been dried. The sheep ate the dried meal significantly faster. The mean energy costs of eating were 208 and 346 kJ/kg DM for DGC and FGC respectively. In this experiment the sheep ruminated significantly longer when given FGC, and the energy cost of rumination was 0.11 kJ/min.

5. Increases in heat production during and after fistula-feeding were only 2–8% of those obtained during eating, indicating that nearly all the increase in heat production during eating could be attributed to the energy cost of eating per se.

6. The contribution of the energy costs of eating and rumination to the heat increment of feeding and the energy requirement for maintenance of sheep are discussed.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , July 1975 , pp. 59 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1975

References

Agricultural Research Council (1965). Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock No. 2, Ruminants. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Ash, R. W. & Kay, R. N. B. (1959). J. Physiol., Lond. 149, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1965). Official Methods of Analysis, 10th ed.Washington, DC: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 26, 383.Google Scholar
Bell, F. R. (1958). J. Physiol., Lond. 143, 46P.Google Scholar
Bell, F. R. (1960). Anim. Behav. 8, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1967). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants, 2nd ed.London: Hutchinson Scientific and Technical.Google Scholar
Brockway, J. M. (1965). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 11, p. 395.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E. (1965). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 11, p. 441.Google Scholar
Clapperton, J. L. (1964). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 47.Google Scholar
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. & Boyne, A. W. (1970). Analyst, Lond. 95, 181.Google Scholar
Ekern, A., Blaxter, K. L. & Sawers, D. (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J. G. (1955). Rumination in the sheep. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. G. (1968). Wld Rev. Nutr. Diet. 9, 251.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. G., Osuji, P. O. & Webster, A. J. F. (1972). J. Physiol., Lond. 227, 5P.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC. (1965). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 11, p. 231.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I. & Reid, G. W. (1963). Anim. Prod. 5, 1.Google Scholar
McLean, J. A. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 27, 597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osuji, P. O. (1971). Energy exchanges and related phenomena in sheep eating rations of different physical forms. MSc Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Osuji, P. O. (1973). Ruminant energy metabolism: an analysis of the heat increment of feeding in sheep. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Pullar, J. D. (1969). In International Encyclopaedia of Food and Nutrition, Vol. 17, p. 417 [Cuthbertson, D. P., editor]. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Ustjanzew, W. (1911). Biochem. Z. 37, 475.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Blaxter, K. L. & Smith, J. S. (1972). J. agric. Sci., Comb. 78, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. (1972). Proc. int. Symp. Envir. Physiol. p. 42.Google Scholar
Young, B. A. & Corbett, J. L. (1972). Aust. J. agric. Res. 23, 57.Google Scholar