Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:12:06.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enzyme supplementation, degradation and metabolism of three U-14C-labelled cell-wall substrates in the fowl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

C. J. Savory
C. J. Savory
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An experimental model is described that was used for assessing in vivo effects in fowls of exogenous enzyme supplementation on the degradation of plant cell walls to metabolizable monosaccharide residues. It was based on tube-feeding U-14C-labelled cell-wall substrates, cellulose, spinach (Spinacia oleracea) or Festuca with and without enzyme treatments, and monitoring recovery of 14C radioactivity in exhaled carbon dioxide and excreta in the following 8 h. Normal digestion of cell-wall polysaccharides by endogenous microbial activity was also studied by pretreating birds with an antibiotic mixture intended to deplete their intestinal microflora. The results of this pretreatment appeared to confirm the existence of microbial degradation of cellulose in (conditioned) fowls. Judging from differences in 14CO2 production, effects of exogenous enzyme additions were greatly enhanced with all substrates by combining them with a wet pretreatment, thereby increasing the time-period available for them to act in aqueous conditions. However, estimations of digestibilities of cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin with dry and wet treatments, based on recovery of 14C in excreta, indicated that it was only cellulose digestion that was improved by the wet pretreatment. This suggests that degradation of cellulose, which appeared to be slowest, was limited by the dry treatments, whereas that of hemicellulose and pectin was not. Respective digestibilities of these three cell-wall components, from all treatments combined, were in the proportions 1:1.5:4·2.

Keywords

Plant cell-wall substratesCell-wall degradationEnzyme supplementationFowl
Type
Effects of Complex Carbohydrates on Nutrient Absortion
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , January 1992 , pp. 91 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1992

References

Annison, E. F., Hill, K. J. & Kenworthy, R. (1968)Volatile fatty acids in the digestive tract of the fowl. British Journal of Nutrition 22, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, R. W. (1965)Quantitative studies of digestion in the reticulo-rumen. The digestion of insoluble carbohydrates in the reticulo-rumen. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 25, 85–95.Google Scholar
Bell, D. J. & Bird, T. P. (1966)Urea and volatile base in the caeca and colon of the domestic fowl: the problem of their origin. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 18, 735–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chesson, A. (1987). Supplementary enzymes to improve the utilisation of pig and poultry diets. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition pp. 71–89 [Haresign, W and D. G. A., Cole, editors]. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, G. E., Eccleston, E., Kirkwood, S., Louis, C. F. & Bedbury, H. P. (1984)Cellulose digestion by domestic turkeys fed low or high fiber diets. Journal of Nutrition 114, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, S. C. (1988). The Growing Plant Cell Wall: Chemical and Metabolic Analysis. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Gasaway, W. C. (1976)Cellulose digestion and metabolism by captive rock ptarmigan. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 54A, 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffay, H. & Alvarez, J. (1961)Liquid scintillation counting of carbon-14. Use of ethanolamine-ethylene glycol monomethyl ether-toluene. Analytical Chemistry 33, 612–615.Google Scholar
McNab, J. M. (1973)The avian caeca: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal 29, 251–263.Google Scholar
Moss, R. & Parkinson, J. A. (1972) The digestion of heather (Calluna vulgaris) by red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus). British Journal of Nutrition 27, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunderson, C. L. (1985) Comparative metabolism of l-methionine, dl-methionine and dl-2-hydroxy 4-methylthiobutanoic acid by broiler chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 54, 621–633.Google Scholar
Saunderson, C. L. & Whitehead, C. C. (1987) N1methyl histidine excretion and [U-14C]amino acid oxidation in fully fed chickens from two lines selected for high and low body fat contents. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 86B, 419–422.Google Scholar
Savory, C. J. (1992) Metabolic fates of U-14C-labelled monosaccharides and an enzyme-treated cell-wall substrate in the fowl. British Journal of Nutrition 67, 103–114.Google Scholar
Savory, C. J. & Gentle, M. J. (1976) Changes in food intake and gut size in Japanese quail in response to manipulation of dietary fibre content. British Poultry Science 17, 571–580.Google Scholar
Savory, C. J. & Hodgkiss, J. P. (1984) Influence of vagotomy in domestic fowls on feeding activity, food passage, digestibility and satiety effects of two peptides. Physiology and Behavior 33, 937–944.Google Scholar
Walters, M. P., Kelleher, J., Findlay, J. M. & Srinivasan, S. T. (1989). Preparation and characterization of a [14C]cellulose suitable for human metabolic studies. British Journal of Nutrition 62, 121–129.Google Scholar