Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:14:54.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation and predictors of the Omega-3 Index in the UK Biobank

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2022

Jan Philipp Schuchardt*
Affiliation:
The Fatty Acid Research Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, USA Institute of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany
Nathan Tintle
Affiliation:
The Fatty Acid Research Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, USA Department of Population Health Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois – Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Jason Westra
Affiliation:
The Fatty Acid Research Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
William S. Harris
Affiliation:
The Fatty Acid Research Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, USA Department of Internal Medicine, Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Jan Philipp Schuchardt, email schuchardt@nutrition.uni-hannover.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information on the Omega-3 Index (O3I) in the United Kingdom (UK) is scarce. The UK-Biobank (UKBB) contains data on total plasma n3-PUFA% and DHA% measured by NMR. The aim of our study was to create an equation to estimate the O3I (eO3I) from these data. We first performed an inter-laboratory experiment with 250 random blood samples in which the O3I was measured in erythrocytes by GC, and total n3 % and DHA% were measured in plasma by NMR. The best predictor of eO3I included both DHA% and a derived metric, the total n3 %–DHA%. Together these explained 65 % of the variability (r = 0·832, P < 0·0001). We then estimated the O3I in 117 108 UKBB subjects and correlated it with demographic and lifestyle variables in multivariable-adjusted models. The mean eO3I was 5·58 % (sd 2·35 %) in this UKBB cohort. Several predictors were significantly correlated with eO3I (all P < 0·0001). In general order of impact and with directionality (–, inverse and +, direct): oily-fish consumption (+), fish oil supplement use (+), female sex (+), older age (+), alcohol use (+), smoking (–), higher waist circumference and BMI (–), lower socioeconomic status and less education (–). Only 20·5 % of eO3I variability could be explained by predictors investigated, and oily fish consumption accounted for 7·0 % of that. With the availability of the eO3I in the UKBB cohort, we will be in a position to link risk for a variety of diseases with this commonly used and well-documented marker of n3-PUFA biostatus.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

A large number of epidemiological, clinical and experimental studies have been conducted over the past few decades investigating the role of long-chain n3-PUFA for health. In particular, EPA (20:5) and DHA (22:6) are viewed to have beneficial effects for CVD(Reference Hu, Hu and Manson1Reference Harris, Tintle and Imamura3), cancer(Reference Harris, Tintle and Imamura3,Reference Liu, Li and Hou4) , diabetes(Reference Ma, Li and Zheng5,Reference Qian, Ardisson Korat and Imamura6) , the metabolic syndrome(Reference Liu, Chen and Wang7), dementia or Alzheimer’s disease(Reference Kosti, Kasdagli and Kyrozis8) and depression(Reference Deyama, Ishikawa and Yoshikawa9). However, results from randomised trials exploring the potential protective nature of n3-PUFA on disease outcomes across this spectrum vary from beneficial to null(Reference Bernasconi, Wiest and Lavie10). Because of the inability of relatively short-term (years, not decades) intervention studies to reveal the adverse effects of subclinical nutritional deficiencies, a clearer picture of the relationships between n3-PUFA and risk for human disease may be achieved using prospective observational data based on n3-PUFA biomarkers rather than dietary intake data as the exposure.

The n3-PUFA biostatus can be assessed in a variety of lipid pools. First, n3-PUFA can be measured across numerous blood compartments including erythrocytes, whole plasma, whole blood, platelets, leukocytes and plasma lipid classes (i.e. phospholipids, cholesteryl esters, TAG and free FA). Erythrocytes are perhaps best suited to quantify long-term n3-PUFA blood levels since n3-PUFA in erythrocytes are constant over weeks and months compared with total plasma fatty acids or plasma phospholipid fatty acids where stability is only observed over days(Reference Harris and Thomas11). In addition, the n3-PUFA content of erythrocytes is similar to that of many organs including the heart, intestines and muscle, while FA in different compartments are less correlated with levels in these organs(Reference Fenton, Gurzell and Davidson12).

The Omega-3 Index (O3I) – defined as the EPA + DHA content of erythrocytes as a percentage of total identified FA(Reference Harris and Von Schacky13) – has proven to be a suitable marker for measuring the n3-PUFA biostatus. In addition to the aforementioned reasons, it also has the lowest intra-individual variability compared with other markers such as plasma or plasma phospholipids. Originally proposed as a risk factor for fatal CHD, O3I risk categories were high (< 4 %), intermediate (4–6 %) and low (> 8 %)(Reference Harris and Von Schacky13).

Despite its importance, to our knowledge, only two countries have quantified n3-PUFA levels in formal national health surveys. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the USA reported plasma fatty acid levels as concentrations (µmol/l), whereas the Canadian Health Measures Survey used erythrocytes and reported national O3I levels(Reference Demonty, Langlois and Greene-Finestone14). The latter found that the mean O3I was comparatively low at 4·5 %. Data from other studies show that the average O3I is also in the low range in countries such as the USA, Italy or Germany and not as high as in Japan or South Korea, where mean O3I levels are in a desirable range. Comprehensive data on the O3I status are not available in the United Kingdom (UK); however, with data from the UK Biobank now available(Reference Collins15,Reference Sudlow, Gallacher and Allen16) , the n3-PUFA biostatus in that country may now theoretically be determined. However, the plasma FA data from the UK Biobank were expressed as concentrations or as a percentage of total plasma fatty acids, so how these metrics compare with the O3I is unclear.

The first aim of our study was to develop an equation to estimate the O3I (eO3I) from the NMR data of the UK Biobank so as to be able to compare UK O3I levels with those in other countries. The second aim was to examine the cross-sectional relations of the eO3I with important demographic (age, ethnic group, sex), anthropometric (BMI, waist circumference (WC)) and lifestyle (fish oil supplement use, (oily) fish consumption, alcohol use, smoking, etc.) factors to help define the determinants of the eO3I. To accomplish these aims, we first performed an inter-laboratory experiment to compare NMR-derived FA data with the O3I using GC-derived data. With a conversion equation thus generated, eO3I values were computed and then correlated in multivariable-adjusted models with demographic and lifestyle variables.

Methods

UK Biobank

UK Biobank is a prospective, population-based cohort of approximately 500 000 individuals recruited between 2007 and 2010. Baseline data were collected at twenty-two centres across England, Wales and Scotland(17). Baseline data derived from questionnaires, biological samples and physical measurements were collected on all participating individuals, with longitudinal monitoring occurring via a mix of in-person and Electronic Medical Record data(Reference Collins15,Reference Sudlow, Gallacher and Allen16) . The participants completed a touchscreen questionnaire, which collected information on socio-demographic characteristics, diet and lifestyle factors. Anthropometric measurements were taken using standardised procedures. The touchscreen questionnaire and other resources are shown on the UK Biobank website (http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk). UK Biobank has ethical approval (Ref. 11/NW/0382) from the North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee as a Research Tissue Bank. This approval means that researchers do not require separate ethical clearance and can operate under the Research Tissue Bank approval. All participants gave electronic signed informed consent. The UK Biobank study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki.

A random sample of approximately 125 000 participants was selected for biomarker assessment using NMR (Nightingale Health Plc.)(Reference Würtz, Raiko and Magnussen18) which included some plasma FA. Usable NMR data were available from 117 938 participants. After removing individuals with missing information on BMI, socio-economic status (SES) or alcohol use (n 830), the final sample size for this study was 117 108 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Flow chart for the inter-laboratory experiment to create an Omega-3 Index (O3I) prediction equation and calculation of the estimated Omega-3 Index (eO3I) from the UK Biobank data (for details see text). SES, socio-economic status.

Inter-laboratory experiment

An inter-laboratory experiment was undertaken to gather data for the creation of an O3I prediction equation (Fig. 1). Random blood samples (n 250) received at OmegaQuant Analytics) for routine testing of the O3I were used for this study. EDTA blood tubes were spun to isolate the erythrocyte fraction which was then analysed for the O3I by GC as previously described(Reference DeFina, Bassett and Finley19). The plasma from these samples, which is normally discarded, was stored at –80°C. Once 250 had been collected (over about 2 weeks), the plasma aliquots were sent on dry ice for NMR analysis at the Nightingale lab. The data received from this analysis (n 242, 8 being technically inadequate) included multiple biometrics(Reference Würtz, Havulinna and Soininen20) which were subsequently used as predictors of the O3I as described below.

Statistical methods

Generating a prediction model for the estimated Omega-3 Index

As noted, the O3I is the sum of DHA and EPA in erythrocytes expressed as a percentage of total erythrocyte FA. The relevant NMR data for this study were plasma DHA and total n3-PUFA (each expressed as a percentage of total FA). No data on other n3-PUFA were available. Thus, we began by examining predictions of the O3I by total n3-PUFA%, DHA% and non-DHA n3-PUFA% (i.e. total n3-PUFA – DHA%). In order to maximise predictive ability and account for potential non-linearity and/or moderating effects, quadratic terms for each predictor plus an interaction term were evaluated for evidence of improved fit using a significance level of 0·05. The remaining 246 biometric measurements(Reference Würtz, Havulinna and Soininen20) including 168 absolute levels and eighty-one ratio measures across cholesterol metabolism, amino acids, ketones, glycolysis metabolites and other fatty acids were then added to the model one at a time for evidence of improved fit, using a Bonferroni-adjusted significance level of 0·05/246 = 0·0002 as the criterion for addition to the predictive model. Three individuals with extreme DHA%/non-DHA% were temporarily excluded from the analyses to improve model fitting (two individuals with DHA% < 1 and one individual with DHA% > 4 and non-DHA% > 5 based on visual inspection of the boxplots (1·5 times IQR rule)) yielding a model-building sample size of 239. The final model was evaluated using R 2, residual standard error and the distribution of residuals. Values of the eO3I were then imputed by making stochastic draws from the predicted sampling distributions (final predictive model) as described by Rubin for data missing at random(Reference Rubin21). Sensitivity analyses were conducted considering extreme values of the observed DHA% and logarithmic transformations of the predictor and response variables to ensure robustness of the models to outliers and skewness(Reference Tintle, Chance and McGaughey22).

The estimated Omega-3 Index and participant characteristics

We used eO3I data generated as described above to investigate its relationship with fourteen sample characteristics. These variables were behaviour independent: demographic (sex, age, ethnic group, deprivation index, urbanicity, education), anthropometric (BMI, WC) and behaviour related: diet (frequency of oily and non-oily fish consumption), regular fish oil use, smoking, alcohol use and exercise (Table 1). BMI was classified according to the WHO into ‘normal weight’, ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’. Since only 0·52 % of the cohort was underweight, this category was ignored. For WC categories, the cohort was divided into quartiles. No information on fish portion sizes or cooking methods, or on the EPA + DHA content of fish oil supplements (or dosage, potency and frequency of intake) was collected. Townsend deprivation index scores were derived from national census data about car ownership, household overcrowding, owner occupation and unemployment aggregated for residential postcodes(Reference Mackenbach23). Higher deprivation index scores indicate greater degrees of socio-economic deprivation. Our analysis used national quintiles of the deprivation index instead of continuous scores(24). Four groups of education were formed: College (or University degree, other professional qualifications), Associates (A or AS level or equivalent), SE (O level, General Certificate of Secondary Education, Certificate of Secondary Education, National Vocational Qualifications, Higher National Diploma, Higher National Certificate or equivalent) and none. We analysed the bivariate relationships between the eO3I and each of the fourteen sample characteristics considering multiple imputations in the estimation of standard errors. A fully adjusted linear model predicted the eO3I by each of the fourteen sample characteristics simultaneously, again accounting for multiple imputation in the estimation of standard errors. Model R 2 was computed. In order to estimate the contribution of each predictor towards model R 2 , each of the fourteen sample characteristics was then removed from the model (one at a time) and computing the difference in R 2 between the full and drop-one model. Parallel analyses were conducted for plasma percentage DHA (direct NMR measurement), without the need for multiple imputation. All analyses were conducted using standard statistical modelling functions with graphs from ggplot2, using R version 4.1.2. and used a 0·05 statistical significance threshold.

Table 1. Demographics of the UK Biobank sample (n 117 108)

(Numbers and percentages; mean values and standard deviations)

Results

Generating a prediction equation based on the inter-laboratory experiment

In models predicting the O3I by a single variable, percentage DHA was a better predictor (r 2 = 0·65) than total n3 (r 2 = 0·60). We then added non-DHA% to the model with DHA%, yielding a model with r 2 = 0·67. Residuals showed a reasonably normal distribution (online Supplementary Fig. 1). Quadratic terms and an interaction between DHA% and non-DHA% were added to the model, but none showed evidence of improvement (P = 0·41 (quadratic DHA%); P = 0·80 (quadratic non-DHA%); P = 0·20 (interaction DHA and non-DHA%)). Log-transforming the O3I and/or DHA% and non-DHA% prior to fitting the regression equation did not improve the r 2 values (61–65 %) with little visible improvement in the normality of outliers (details not shown). Thus, the untransformed, additive model with two terms was determined to be the final prediction model (Table 2) which includes β-coefficients for term: eO3I = 2·629 × NMR DHA% + 0·4673 × NMR non-DHA% − 0·1014. The correlation of the eO3I v. observed O3I values was 0·823 on the complete dataset of n 242, including three extreme values which were not included in the initial model-building step (Fig. 2).

Table 2. Regression model predicting the Omega-3 Index (n 239)

(Beta-coefficients and standard errors)

Model summary statistics: residual SE (1·217); r 2 = 0·673; r = 0·823.

Fig. 2. Predicted Omega-3 Index (eO3I) v. actual Omega-3 Index (O3I). The line of identity (y = x) is plotted. All values are percentage of total erythrocyte FA. Final r = 0·823.

Demographics of the UK Biobank sample

The demographics of the analysed UK Biobank sample are in Table 1. The cohort had a mean age of 57 years with slightly more women than men. The individuals were overwhelmingly White and lived in urban areas. The mean deprivation index was −1·3, meaning that, on average, this sample was somewhat less deprived than typical in the UK (which would be an index of 0). The plurality of individuals was overweight, followed by normal weight and then obese.

Most individuals in the cohort stated that they regularly ate fish. Non-oily fish is slightly preferred compared with oily fish. Almost half of the individuals stated that they ate non-oily fish 1×/week. However, the proportion of individuals who consumed oily fish 1×/week was also quite high at 38 %. Regular fish oil supplement use was reported by 31 %. Most of the study participants reported some regular alcohol use. More than half of the individuals were non-smokers, some were ex-smokers and a few continued to smoke.

Predicted Omega-3 Index in the UK Biobank sample

An inter-laboratory experiment was undertaken in which 250 samples were analysed using different methods (plasma DHA% and non-DHA% by NMR; erythrocyte O3I by GC) at different laboratories (Nightingale and OmegaQuant Analytics). In this experiment, the mean of plasma DHA% from the NMR analysis was 2·1 % (sd 0·6 %) while the plasma non-DHA% was 2·1 % (sd 0·9 %). The mean GC-based O3I was 6·5 % (sd 2·2 %). All three measurements showed modest right skewness.

The mean eO3I was 5·58 % for all 117 938 individuals in this UK Biobank cohort. We used multiple (i.e. 10) imputations for each person using the prediction equation in Table 2 in order to compute the SD. The sd ignoring the multiple imputation step was 1·89 %, whereas with imputations it was 2·25 %, reflecting the variability from different analytical methods (NMR v. GC), different sample types (plasma v. erythrocyte) and different n3-PUFA (DHA v. EPA + DHA).

Correlates of the estimated Omega-3 Index in the UK Biobank sample (Table 3)

Table 3. Associations of demographic characteristics and the estimated Omega-3 Index (eO3I) in unadjusted and adjusted (for all variables in Table 1) analyses (n 117 108)

(Mean values and standard deviations; 95 % confidence intervals)

With the exceptions of rurality/urbanicity, virtually every metric included in Table 3 was statistically significantly correlated with the eO3I (P < 0·0001). For the behaviour-independent demographic variables, both sex and age were strongly associated with the eOI3 (Table 3 and Fig. 3(a)). The eO3I in men was 0·62 percentage points lower than in women before, and 0·38 % lower after adjustment. Additionally, the eO3I increased with age. Compared with the 40–50 year-age-group (reference group), the eO3I in the 50–60 year-, and 60–70 year-age-group increased by 0·29 and 0·64 %, respectively. After adjustment, the eO3I was still directly associated with age (0·14 and 0·34 %, respectively).

Fig. 3. Predicted Omega-3 Index (eO3I) by (a) age and sex, (b) waist circumference (WC) and (c) oily fish and fish oil consumption. (d) Percentage of people with an eO3I ≥ 8 % depending on oily fish and fish oil consumption. All pairwise comparisons (male v. female in each age group, sex-specific age groups, all WC categories, fish oil v. no fish oil in different oily fish consumption groups and between different oily fish consumption groups) were P < 0·0001.

There was an inverse association between the eO3I and BMI, both before and after adjustment (Table 3). Compared with normal weight people, the mean eO3I was 0·4 and 0·88 % lower in the overweight and obese individuals, respectively. These differences were somewhat attenuated after adjustment but remained 0·13 or 0·38 %, respectively.

Associations between WC and eO3I were examined as a further body fat variable (Table 3 and Fig. 3(b)). Compared with the reference group, there was a monotonic decrease in the eO3I across WC quartiles. In the group with the highest WC, the eO3I was reduced by 1·13 % (adjusted, 0·55 %) compared with the reference group.

With regard to ethnic group, the eO3I in Blacks and Asians was not significantly different from that in Whites. ‘Other’ ethnic groups (3 % of the total) had higher eO3I than Whites (0·94 %, adjusted, 1·03 %).

SES (as reflected by the deprivation index) was inversely associated with the eO3I. Compared with the group of least deprived individuals, the eO3I decreased continuously as the deprivation index increased. The most deprived group showed a 0·13 % lower eO3I after adjustment compared with the least deprived group.

Another SES-related metric is the level of education. Compared to the group with the highest professional qualification (College, reference), the eO3I was lower in each successive group of educational achievement. At the extremes, individuals with the least education had a mean eO3I of 0·42 % (adjusted, 0·23 %) lower than the reference group.

As expected, regular consumption of oily fish and taking fish oil supplements were the strongest behaviour-related associations with the eO3I (Table 3, Fig. 3(c)). The mean eO3I of people who took fish oil and ate oily fish at least 2×/week (n 8279) was 7·34 %, but only 36 % of them had an eO3I ≥ 8 % (Fig. 3(d)). The fourteen characteristics examined in this study together explained about 21 % of the variability in the eO3I (Table 4). Regular oily fish intake alone explained 7 % of the 21 %, or about 34 % of the total. Compared with non-consumers of oily fish (reference), even less than one serving of oily fish per week was associated with a 0·77 % higher eO3I (0·47 % after adjustment). As oily fish consumption continued to increase, so did the eO3I, with 1 portion of oily fish per week being associated with a 1·56 % higher eO3I (adjusted, 1·11 %) and 2·64 % higher eO3I (adjusted, 2·12 %) with two or more portions of oily fish per week. Non-oily fish consumption was more weakly associated with the eO3I, explaining less than 1 % of the eO3I variability (Table 4). After adjustment, the difference in eO3I between those who report never eating non-oily fish and those consuming at least two portions of non-oily fish per week was only 0·49 %.

Table 4. R 2 values for the participant’s characteristics on the variability of eO3I (Percentages)

* The new model R 2 for the remaining thirteen variables when predicting eO3I. Variables are ranked according to their independent contribution on the total variability.

Uniquely explained variability is computed as the difference in the model without the variable compared with the full model with all fourteen variables (overall model).

On average, individuals who reported regular fish oil supplement use had a 0·97 % higher eO3I than individuals who did not. Even after adjustment for all the other factors in Table 3, it was still 0·68 % higher. The impact of fish oil supplementation on the eO3I was additive with the number of oily fish servings per week (Fig. 3(c)). People who reported taking a fish oil supplement and consuming two or more oily fish meals per week had a mean eO3I of 7·3 % (sd 2·7 %) compared with 4·1 % (sd 1·7 %) for those at the other extreme consuming neither (P < 0·0001). Fish oil intake explained ∼9 % of the total explained variability in the eO3I (Table 4).

Alcohol use also showed associations with the n3-PUFA biostatus. Compared to the group with the lowest alcohol use (none, reference group), the eO3I was increased with higher alcohol use. The highest alcohol use (daily) had a 0·4 % higher eO3I (adjusted, 0·3 %) compared with the reference group.

Smoking was negatively associated with the eO3I. Smokers had a 0·86 % lower eO3I compared with non-smokers, even after adjustment (0·58 %).

The level of exercise showed a weak but still significant inverse relationship to the eO3I. Compared to the group with the lowest level of physical activity (reference group), the eO3I was only lower in the group with the highest level of physical activity (adjusted, 0·15 %).

The plasma DHA% measured by NMR showed the same patterns/relationships with regard to all fourteen characteristics as did the eO3I (online Supplementary Table 1). However, all together, these predictors accounted for approximately 30 % of the variability in DHA% (online Supplementary Table S2), compared with only around 20 % for the eO3I (Table 4). For both DHA and eO3I, oily fish consumption and fish oil supplement use explained most of the variation.

Discussion

In order to be able to investigate relationships between n3-PUFA and health or disease measures on populational level, it is preferable to use a biomarker of n3-PUFA status rather than an estimate of dietary intake from a questionnaire as recently recommended(Reference Elagizi, Lavie and O’Keefe25). This is because biomarker levels are objectively measured, precise and reflect not only dietary intake but also in vivo metabolic conversions that cannot be captured with memory-based dietary intake surveys. The UK Biobank provides a large database to investigate such associations due to its extensive health data and number of participants. Since the O3I, which is a common metric to evaluate the n3-PUFA biostatus, was not measured directly in the UK Biobank, our goal was to develop a prediction model for the O3I in order to convert the data that do exist on n3-PUFA biostatus (plasma DHA% and total n3 % from NMR) into the eO3I. We found very good agreement (r = 0·82) between the estimated O3I values (eO3I) and the actual O3I. The eO3I equation was built on data from 242 samples, which were not included in the UK Biobank. We assumed, since the same lab (Nightingale) and method (NMR) were used for the UK Biobank analyses and for our inter-laboratory test, that the conversion equation should be applicable to UK Biobank data.

Estimated Omega-3 Index in the UK Biobank in comparison with other countries

In the UK, there are no datasets from which a national, average O3I can be determined. A 2016 global survey reported ‘very low’ n3-PUFA levels in erythrocytes (< 4 % EPA + DHA of total FA) for the UK using data averaged from five published studies including a total of 461 individuals(Reference Stark, van Elswyk and Higgins26). The mean eO3I in the UK Biobank cohort of 117 938 individuals was 5·58 %, and thus, it is significantly higher than that estimated by Stark et al. The eO3I in the UK Biobank is comparable to that of countries such as Germany (5·8 %) or the USA (5·44 %), as shown in a recent report(Reference Schuchardt, Cerrato and Ceseri27). Nevertheless, an average O3I of 5·58 % is still well below the optimal of ≥ 8 %. People who regularly ate oily fish and took supplemental fish oil had a significantly higher n3-PUFA biostatus. The mean eO3I of people who took fish oil and ate oily fish at least 2×/week (n 8279) was 7·34 % (sd 2·66 %), and 35·7 % (n 2957) of them had an eO3I ≥ 8 %. Thus, even among this group with the highest oily fish + supplement use, an optimal eO3I was not the norm.

Predictors of the estimated Omega-3 Index in the UK Biobank cohort

Various factors besides EPA + DHA intake can affect O3I levels. Several other authors have explored this question(Reference Block, Harris and Pottala28Reference de Groot, van Boxtel and Schiepers31). Since not all comparative studies in the literature used the O3I as a metric, the general term ‘n3-PUFA biostatus’ is used below, which means the eO3I in relation to this study.

Consistent with our results, previous studies have already observed that female sex is positively associated with the n3 biostatus(Reference de Groot, Emmett and Meyer32Reference Harris, Pottala and Varvel35). It has been suggested that a healthier diet (e.g. higher consumption of fish or plant n3-PUFA) and lifestyle (e.g. no smoking) could be a reason for the higher n3-PUFA biostatus in women(Reference Harris, Pottala and Lacey33). However, the influence of factors such as smoking or (oily) fish and fish oil supplement intake and obesity were all considered in our model, and even after the adjustment there remained a significant and biologically relevant difference in the eO3I between the sexes. Other factors independent of lifestyle (e.g. genetics and metabolism) may also play a role. The reason for a higher n3-PUFA biostatus in females could be due to enhanced production of EPA + DHA from the precursor FA α-linolenic acid (C18:3), a conversion mediated at least in part by oestrogen(Reference Harris, Tintle and Manson36Reference Giltay, Gooren and Toorians38). In a series of studies, Burdge and Wootton(Reference Burdge and Wootton37,Reference Burdge, Jones and Wootton39) concluded that oestrogen up-regulates delta-6 desaturase, which is the rate-limiting step in the conversion from α-linolenic acid to EPA and DHA. However, intakes of n3-PUFA were not controlled for over the entire study period, so a higher background consumption of preformed EPA + DHA cannot be ruled out(Reference Hodson, Skeaff and Fielding40). In a study by Giltay et al. (Reference Harris, Tintle and Manson36Reference Giltay, Gooren and Toorians38) in postmenopausal women who received hormone replacement therapy, the level of DHA in plasma cholesteryl esters increased by 20 %, which was attributed to the oestrogenic effect.

Although not addressed in this study, genotype could play a role in determining n3-PUFA biostatus. This, however, is controversial with some studies reporting an effect of a ‘heritability’ score(Reference Harris, Pottala and Lacey33) on the O3I, whereas others found no association with the O3I of any given SNP(Reference Kalsbeek, Veenstra and Westra41). We hope to investigate a possible genetic influence on the level of eO3I in future UK Biobank studies.

An age-related influence on the n3-PUFA biostatus is also known and has been established in several studies(Reference de Groot, van Boxtel and Schiepers31,Reference Harris, Pottala and Lacey33,Reference Wagner, Simon and Morio42) . The reason for increased n3-PUFA biostatus in older individuals may be a function of decreased n3-PUFA turnover in tissues in older individuals(Reference Plourde, Chouinard-Watkins and Vandal43), but it does not appear to simply be the result of higher fish intake or supplement use as these were included in the adjusted model.

Our data are in line with comparable epidemiological studies which also found inverse associations between anthropometric markers such as the BMI(Reference Sands, Reid and Windsor44) or WC(Reference Harris, Pottala and Lacey33,Reference Wagner, Simon and Morio42) and n3-PUFA biostatus. In obese individuals, the eO3I in the present cohort was 0·38 % lower than that of normal weight individuals. The associations between WC and n3-PUFA biostatus appeared to be even stronger than those with BMI with a 0·55 % lower eO3I in the group with highest WC compared with the reference group. Since WC is a direct reflection specifically of abdominal obesity, WC is now thought to be superior to BMI as a predictor of cardio-metabolic diseases(Reference Nevill, Duncan and Myers45). As to potential mechanisms, Cazolla et al. proposed that increased oxidative stress in obese individuals could lead to a reduction in the levels of EPA and DHA in erythrocyte membranes(Reference Cazzola, Rondanelli and Russo-Volpe46). This was based on their observation that erythrocytes from obese individuals were more susceptible to oxidative stress than those from normal weight subjects. A disturbed hepatic PUFA metabolism may also contribute to a lower n3-PUFA biostatus. Animal studies found that obesity and diabetes resulted in reduced expression of key enzymes involved in the synthesis of EPA + DHA from α-linolenic acid(Reference Wang, Botolin and Xu47).

Several lifestyle variables were also associated with n3-PUFA biostatus. Consistent with the literature(Reference Block, Harris and Pottala28,Reference Harris, Pottala and Lacey33,Reference Wagner, Simon and Morio42,Reference Zehr, Segovia and Shah48Reference Sala-Vila, Harris and Cofán50) , we found a strong negative influence of smoking on the n3-PUFA biostatus. Increased oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation, caused by smoking, may destroy long-chain PUFA such as EPA and DHA in cell membrane phospholipids and, thus, influence their levels in the body(Reference Polidori, Mecocci and Stahl51,Reference Morrow, Frei and Longmire52) . The possibility that this relationship is explained by differences in fish consumption and/or supplement use between smokers and non-smokers seems unlikely given the inclusion of these variables in the adjusted analysis. We also observed that the n3-PUFA biostatus was directly related to alcohol use, since the eO3I increased along with the reported frequency of alcohol use. Some studies also found alcohol use as an independent predictor of the n3-PUFA biostatus(Reference Di Giuseppe, Lorgeril and Salen53), while others did not(Reference Block, Harris and Pottala28,Reference Wagner, Simon and Morio42) . In the study by di Giuseppe, a positive influence of alcohol was only found in women and predominantly with wine drinking (and not beer or spirits). Since the UK Biobank does not provide information on the type of alcoholic beverages, a further differentiated analysis is not possible at this point. One can speculate that individuals who drink more alcohol may also eat more fish, and there was a modest association between oily fish eaters and drinking alcohol (e.g. 60 % of daily alcohol users eat oily fish at least once/week v. 50 % of monthly/hardly ever alcohol users). However, as with all of the potential determinants of the eO3I discussed here, significant associations with alcohol use remained after multivariable adjustment. In contrast, exercise in the UK Biobank cohort was only weakly associated with n3-PUFA biostatus. Small but significant differences were only found between the group with the highest and lowest reported minutes per week of physical exercise. In line with our results, a previous study(Reference von Schacky, Kemper and Haslbauer54) found significantly lower O3I levels in German national elite winter endurance athletes (mean O3I: 4·97 %) or National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes in the USA (mean O3I: 4·33 %)(Reference Ritz, Rogers and Zabinsky55) compared with the general population in Germany (mean O3I: 5·8 %) and the USA (mean O3I: 5·44 %)(Reference Schuchardt, Cerrato and Ceseri27). In contrast to our results, a cross-sectional study showed that exercise time, exercise capacity and heart rate recovery directly correlated with the O3I in patients with coronary artery disease(Reference Moyers, Farzaneh-Far and Harris56). At present, it is not clear why intense exercise may be associated with lower n3-PUFA status.

The consumption of preformed EPA and DHA has the greatest influence on the n3-PUFA biostatus, as various other studies have already shown(Reference Block, Harris and Pottala28,Reference Harris, Pottala and Lacey33,Reference Wagner, Simon and Morio42,Reference Sands, Reid and Windsor44) . The highest v. the lowest oily fish intake was associated with an unadjusted increase in the eO3I of 2·6 %, decreasing only to 2·2 % after adjustment. Fish oil supplement use had the second greatest effect in our study (i.e. 1 % increase; 0·67 % adjusted). The adjusted value was approximately equal to that (0·5 %) of consuming < 4 servings of oily fish per month. Since daily consumption of the most generic fish oil supplement would provide about 300 mg of EPA + DHA per day (about 2100 mg per week), and one serving of an oily fish like salmon would provide roughly 1000 mg of EPA + DHA per week, the smaller effect of the eO3I of reported supplement use here suggests that the respondents in this cohort may have either overestimated what ‘regular’ fish oil consumption means or underestimated their fish intake. These limitations are elaborated on below. Suffice it to say, that as noted above, people reporting both > 2 oily fish meals per week AND fish oil supplement use had an adjusted eO3I of 7·34 % compared with the 4·08 % of the reference group consuming no fish or supplements.

The deprivation index – a measure of SES – was also identified as an inverse and independent predictor of the n3-PUFA biostatus confirming past studies(Reference Harris, Pottala and Lacey33). Individuals with a higher SES tend to behave healthier, have a lower BMI and smoke less(Reference Cutler and Lleras-Muney57), and they have a healthier diet, which also includes higher fish and seafood consumption(Reference Heuer, Krems and Moon58,Reference Dijkstra, Neter and Brouwer59) . However, several of these factors were considered in our adjusted model, and the inverse relationship between the eO3I and the deprivation index remained significant. Statistical modelling can never fully account for the myriad of behavioural, environmental and dietary factors associated with differences in SES. We also identified education as a strong independent predictor for eO3I as have others(Reference Wagner, Simon and Morio42). The association between education and the eO3I was still significant even after adjustment for the deprivation index.

Strength and limitations

The strength of the study is clearly the very large and fairly well-characterised cohort and an objectively measured biomarker of n3-PUFA status. However, the study has a number of potential limitations. First, the eO3I had to be extrapolated from plasma n3-PUFA measures done by NMR. The imprecision arising from this extrapolation (accounted for with multiple imputations of the eO3I) diminished the ability of the suite of variables we included to predict n3-PUFA biostatus. Specifically, the fourteen factors explained 30 % of the variability in plasma DHA% but only 20 % of the eO3I variability. Thus, some relationships may have been missed as a result of using the eO3I. Another limitation is the relatively narrow age range of participants, from 40 to 70 years. Thus, our data on the eO3I cannot be extrapolated to other age groups. Obviously, these data only apply to the UK or perhaps ‘western’ populations in general (given the similarity in eO3I values seen here and in other countries(Reference Schuchardt, Cerrato and Ceseri27)), but they do not apply to countries with diets and lifestyles differing markedly from those in the UK.

Finally, self-reported fish consumption data are prone to under- and over-reporting. Given a general understanding of ‘fish as a healthy food’, people are more likely to over-report their fish consumption. In the UK Biobank study, no portion sizes of oily and non-oily fish consumption were collected which could, theoretically, have allowed more precise associations between fish intake and eO3I to be observed. In addition, no other data on fish oil supplement intake were collected (e.g. dosage, potency and frequency of intake). These variables therefore only provided a rough estimate of the actual consumption of fish and fish oil. As usual, data from cross-sectional studies cannot reveal causal relationships. Our data are thus only hypothesis generating.

Conclusion

The results of this investigation allow for the first time an estimation of the average O3I in the UK. Second, they largely confirm previously observed predictors of the O3I, namely oily fish consumption, fish oil intake, sex, age, WC, BMI and various lifestyle variables. A recent study with the UK Biobank showed that fish oil supplementation was associated with reduced risk for CVD outcomes and all-cause mortality(Reference Li, Zhong and Liu60). With the ability to derive an eO3I as a metric for the n3-PUFA biostatus, it will now be possible to investigate its relationship with risk for multiple diseases such as CVD, type 2 diabetes mellitus or neurodegenerative disorders in the UK Biobank.

Acknowledgements

This research received no external financial support.

J. P. S.: investigation, conceptualisation and writing – original draft preparation. W. S. H.: investigation, conceptualisation, data curation, methodology, supervision and writing – reviewing and editing. N. T.: validation, data curation and writing – review and editing. J. W.: validation and data curation. All authors have read and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript.

W. S. H. holds stock in OmegaQuant Analytics. The other authors declare no conflict of interests.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material referred to in this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114522003282

References

Hu, Y, Hu, FB & Manson, JE (2019) Marine n-3 supplementation and cardiovascular disease: an updated meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials involving 127 477 participants. JAHA 8, e013543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Gobbo, LC, Imamura, F, Aslibekyan, S, et al. (2016) ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid biomarkers and coronary heart disease: pooling project of 19 cohort studies. JAMA Intern Med 176, 11551166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, WS, Tintle, NL, Imamura, F, et al. (2021) Blood n-3 fatty acid levels and total and cause-specific mortality from 17 prospective studies. Nat Commun 12, 2329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, J, Li, X, Hou, J, et al. (2021) Dietary intake of n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of cancer: meta-analysis of data from 32 studies. Nutr Cancer 73, 901913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, M-Y, Li, K-L, Zheng, H, et al. (2021) n-3 index and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 174, 102361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, F, Ardisson Korat, AV, Imamura, F, et al. (2021) n-3 fatty acid biomarkers and incident type 2 diabetes: an individual participant-level pooling project of 20 prospective cohort studies. Diabetes Care 44, 11331142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, R, Chen, L, Wang, Y, et al. (2020) High ratio of ω-3/ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids targets mTORC1 to prevent high-fat diet-induced metabolic syndrome and mitochondrial dysfunction in mice. J Nutr Biochem 79, 108330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosti, RI, Kasdagli, MI, Kyrozis, A, et al. (2022) Fish intake, n-3 fatty acid body status, and risk of cognitive decline: a systematic review and a dose-response meta-analysis of observational and experimental studies. Nutr Rev 80, 14451458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deyama, S, Ishikawa, Y, Yoshikawa, K, et al. (2017) Resolvin D1 and D2 reverse lipopolysaccharide-induced depression-like behaviors through the mTORC1 signaling pathway. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 20, 575584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernasconi, AA, Wiest, MM, Lavie, CJ, et al. (2021) Effect of n-3 dosage on cardiovascular outcomes: an updated meta-analysis and meta-regression of interventional trials. Mayo Clin Proc 96, 304313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, WS & Thomas, RM (2010) Biological variability of blood n-3 biomarkers. Clin Biochem 43, 338340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, JI, Gurzell, EA, Davidson, EA, et al. (2016) Red blood cell PUFAs reflect the phospholipid PUFA composition of major organs. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 112, 1223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, WS & Von Schacky, C (2004) The n-3 index: a new risk factor for death from coronary heart disease? Prev Med 39, 212220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demonty, I, Langlois, K, Greene-Finestone, LS, et al. (2021) Proportions of long-chain ω-3 fatty acids in erythrocyte membranes of Canadian adults: results from the Canadian Health Measures Survey 2012–2015. Am J Clin Nutr 113, 9931008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, R (2012) What makes UK Biobank special? Lancet 379, 11731174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sudlow, C, Gallacher, J, Allen, N, et al. (2015) UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med 12, e1001779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UK Biobank Baseline Assessment (2022) https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/about-our-data/baseline-assessment (accessed September 2022).Google Scholar
Würtz, P, Raiko, JR, Magnussen, CG, et al. (2012) High-throughput quantification of circulating metabolites improves prediction of subclinical atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J 33, 23072316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeFina, LF, Bassett, MH, Finley, CE, et al. (2016) Association between n-3 fatty acids and serum prostate-specific antigen. Nutr Cancer 68, 5862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Würtz, P, Havulinna, AS, Soininen, P, et al. (2015) Metabolite profiling and cardiovascular event risk. Circulation 131, 774785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, DB (1987) Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tintle, N, Chance, BL, McGaughey, K, et al. (2021) Intermediate Statistical Investigations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mackenbach, JP (1988) Health and deprivation. Inequality North Health Policy 10, 207.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics, National Records of Scotland & Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (2017) 2011 Census Aggregate Data (Data downloaded: 1 February 2017). https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011census/2011censusdata (accessed June 2022).Google Scholar
Elagizi, A, Lavie, CJ, O’Keefe, E, et al. (2021) An update on n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and cardiovascular health. Nutrients 13, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, KD, van Elswyk, ME, Higgins, MR, et al. (2016) Global survey of the n-3 fatty acids, docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid in the blood stream of healthy adults. Prog Lipid Res 63, 132152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuchardt, JP, Cerrato, M, Ceseri, M, et al. (2022) Red blood cell fatty acid patterns from 7 countries: focus on the n-3 index. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 179, 102418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, RC, Harris, WS & Pottala, JV (2008) Determinants of blood cell n-3 fatty acid content. Open Biomark J 1, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flock, MR, Skulas-Ray, AC, Harris, WS, et al. (2013) Determinants of erythrocyte n-3 fatty acid content in response to fish oil supplementation: a dose–response randomized controlled trial. JAHA 2, 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorgeril, M, Salen, P, Martin, J-L, et al. (2008) Interactions of wine drinking with n-3 fatty acids in patients with coronary heart disease: a fish-like effect of moderate wine drinking. Am Heart J 155, 175181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Groot, RH, van Boxtel, MP, Schiepers, OJ, et al. (2009) Age dependence of plasma phospholipid fatty acid levels: potential role of linoleic acid in the age-associated increase in docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid concentrations. Br J Nutr 102, 10581064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Groot, RH, Emmett, R & Meyer, BJ (2019) Non-dietary factors associated with n-3 long-chain PUFA levels in humans - a systematic literature review. Br J Nutr 121, 793808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, WS, Pottala, JV, Lacey, SM, et al. (2012) Clinical correlates and heritability of erythrocyte eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acid content in the Framingham Heart Study. Atherosclerosis 225, 425431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itomura, M, Fujioka, S, Hamazaki, K, et al. (2008) Factors influencing EPA + DHA levels in red blood cells in Japan. Vivo 22, 131135.Google ScholarPubMed
Harris, WS, Pottala, JV, Varvel, SA, et al. (2013) Erythrocyte n-3 fatty acids increase and linoleic acid decreases with age: observations from 160 000 patients. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 88, 257263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, WS, Tintle, NL, Manson, JE, et al. (2021) Effects of menopausal hormone therapy on erythrocyte n-3 and n-6 PUFA concentrations in the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 113, 17001706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burdge, GC & Wootton, SA (2003) Conversion of α-linolenic acid to palmitic, palmitoleic, stearic and oleic acids in men and women. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Essent Fatty Acids 69, 283290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giltay, EJ, Gooren, LJG, Toorians, AWFT, et al. (2004) Docosahexaenoic acid concentrations are higher in women than in men because of estrogenic effects. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 11671174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burdge, GC, Jones, AE & Wootton, SA (2002) Eicosapentaenoic and docosapentaenoic acids are the principal products of α-linolenic acid metabolism in young men*. Br J Nutr 88, 355363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodson, L, Skeaff, CM & Fielding, BA (2008) Fatty acid composition of adipose tissue and blood in humans and its use as a biomarker of dietary intake. Prog Lipid Res 47, 348380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalsbeek, A, Veenstra, J, Westra, J, et al. (2018) A genome-wide association study of red-blood cell fatty acids and ratios incorporating dietary covariates: Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort. PLoS One 13, e0194882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, A, Simon, C, Morio, B, et al. (2015) n-3 index levels and associated factors in a middle-aged French population: the MONA LISA-NUT Study. Eur J Clin Nutr 69, 436441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plourde, M, Chouinard-Watkins, R, Vandal, M, et al. (2011) Plasma incorporation, apparent retroconversion and β-oxidation of 13C-docosahexaenoic acid in the elderly. Nutr Metab 8, 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sands, SA, Reid, KJ, Windsor, SL, et al. (2005) The impact of age, body mass index, and fish intake on the EPA and DHA content of human erythrocytes. Lipids 40, 343347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nevill, AM, Duncan, MJ & Myers, T (2022) BMI is dead; long live waist-circumference indices: but which index should we choose to predict cardio-metabolic risk? Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 32, 16421650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cazzola, R, Rondanelli, M, Russo-Volpe, S, et al. (2004) Decreased membrane fluidity and altered susceptibility to peroxidation and lipid composition in overweight and obese female erythrocytes. J Lipid Res 45, 18461851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Botolin, D, Xu, J, et al. (2006) Regulation of hepatic fatty acid elongase and desaturase expression in diabetes and obesity. J Lipid Res 47, 20282041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zehr, KR, Segovia, A, Shah, M, et al. (2019) Associations of medium and long chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids with blood pressure in Hispanic and non-Hispanic smokers and nonsmokers. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 144, 1015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoge, A, Bernardy, F, Donneau, A-F, et al. (2018) Low n-3 index values and monounsaturated fatty acid levels in early pregnancy: an analysis of maternal erythrocytes fatty acids. Lipids Health Dis 17, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala-Vila, A, Harris, WS, Cofán, M, et al. (2011) Determinants of the n-3 index in a Mediterranean population at increased risk for CHD. Br J Nutr 106, 425431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polidori, MC, Mecocci, P, Stahl, W, et al. (2003) Cigarette smoking cessation increases plasma levels of several antioxidant micronutrients and improves resistance towards oxidative challenge. Br J Nutr 90, 147150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrow, JD, Frei, B, Longmire, AW, et al. (1995) Increase in circulating products of lipid peroxidation (F2-isoprostanes) in smokers. Smoking as a cause of oxidative damage. N Engl J Med 332, 11981203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Giuseppe, R, Lorgeril, M, Salen, P, et al. (2009) Alcohol consumption and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in healthy men and women from 3 European populations. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 354362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Schacky, C, Kemper, M, Haslbauer, R, et al. (2014) Low n-3 Index in 106 German elite winter endurance athletes: a pilot study. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 24, 559564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritz, PP, Rogers, MB, Zabinsky, JS, et al. (2020) Dietary and biological assessment of the n-3 status of collegiate athletes: a cross-sectional analysis. PLoS One 15, e0228834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyers, B, Farzaneh-Far, R, Harris, WS, et al. (2011) Relation of whole blood n-3 fatty acid levels to exercise parameters in patients with stable coronary artery disease (from the heart and soul study). Am J Cardiol 107, 11491154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutler, DM & Lleras-Muney, A (2010) Understanding differences in health behaviors by education. J Health Econ 29, 128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heuer, T, Krems, C, Moon, K, et al. (2015) Food consumption of adults in Germany: results of the German National Nutrition Survey II based on diet history interviews. Br J Nutr 113, 16031614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkstra, SC, Neter, JE, Brouwer, IA, et al. (2014) Adherence to dietary guidelines for fruit, vegetables and fish among older Dutch adults; the role of education, income and job prestige. J Nutr Health Aging 18, 115121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Z-H, Zhong, W-F, Liu, S, et al. (2020) Associations of habitual fish oil supplementation with cardiovascular outcomes and all cause mortality: evidence from a large population based cohort study. BMJ 368, m456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Flow chart for the inter-laboratory experiment to create an Omega-3 Index (O3I) prediction equation and calculation of the estimated Omega-3 Index (eO3I) from the UK Biobank data (for details see text). SES, socio-economic status.

Figure 1

Table 1. Demographics of the UK Biobank sample (n 117 108)(Numbers and percentages; mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 2

Table 2. Regression model predicting the Omega-3 Index (n 239)(Beta-coefficients and standard errors)

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Predicted Omega-3 Index (eO3I) v. actual Omega-3 Index (O3I). The line of identity (y = x) is plotted. All values are percentage of total erythrocyte FA. Final r = 0·823.

Figure 4

Table 3. Associations of demographic characteristics and the estimated Omega-3 Index (eO3I) in unadjusted and adjusted (for all variables in Table 1) analyses (n 117 108)(Mean values and standard deviations; 95 % confidence intervals)

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Predicted Omega-3 Index (eO3I) by (a) age and sex, (b) waist circumference (WC) and (c) oily fish and fish oil consumption. (d) Percentage of people with an eO3I ≥ 8 % depending on oily fish and fish oil consumption. All pairwise comparisons (male v. female in each age group, sex-specific age groups, all WC categories, fish oil v. no fish oil in different oily fish consumption groups and between different oily fish consumption groups) were P < 0·0001.

Figure 6

Table 4. R2 values for the participant’s characteristics on the variability of eO3I (Percentages)

Supplementary material: File

Schuchardt et al. supplementary material

Schuchardt et al. supplementary material

Download Schuchardt et al. supplementary material(File)
File 200.2 KB