Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:26:49.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of dietary patterns among Norwegian postmenopausal women using plasma carotenoids as biomarkers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2015

Marianne S. Markussen
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Marit B. Veierød
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Amrit K. Sakhi
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
Merete Ellingjord-Dale
Affiliation:
Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
Rune Blomhoff
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Giske Ursin*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Lene F. Andersen
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
*
*Corresponding author: G. Ursin, email giske.ursin@kreftregisteret.no
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A number of studies have examined dietary patterns in various populations. However, to study to what extent such patterns capture meaningful differences in consumption of foods is of interest. In the present study, we identified important dietary patterns in Norwegian postmenopausal women (age 50–69 years, n 361), and evaluated these patterns by examining their associations with plasma carotenoids. Diet was assessed by a 253-item FFQ. These 253 food items were categorised into forty-six food groups, and dietary patterns were identified using principal component analysis. We used the partial correlation coefficient (radj) and multiple linear regression analysis to examine the associations between the dietary patterns and the plasma carotenoids α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lutein, lycopene and zeaxanthin. Overall, four dietary patterns were identified: the ‘Western’; ‘Vegetarian’; ‘Continental’; ‘High-protein’. The ‘Western’ dietary pattern scores were significantly inversely correlated with plasma lutein, zeaxanthin, lycopene and total carotenoids ( − 0·25 ≤ radj≤ − 0·13). The ‘Vegetarian’ dietary pattern scores were significantly positively correlated with all the plasma carotenoids (0·15 ≤ radj≤ 0·24). The ‘Continental’ dietary pattern scores were significantly inversely correlated with plasma lutein and α-carotene (radj= − 0·13). No significant association between the ‘High-protein’ dietary pattern scores and the plasma carotenoids was found. In conclusion, the healthy dietary pattern, the ‘Vegetarian’ pattern, is associated with a more favourable profile of the plasma carotenoids than our unhealthy dietary patterns, the ‘Western’ and ‘Continental’ patterns.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 

Our diet has an important role in promoting health and preventing disease. Traditionally, nutritional epidemiology has focused on the intake of single food items or single nutrients, and not on the entire diet( Reference Michels and Schulze 1 ). However, there is a complex relationship between diet and disease. Since we consume foods and nutrients in different combinations, analysing food consumption as dietary patterns is a complementary approach to understand the diet–disease relationship( Reference Newby and Tucker 2 ). There is a unique dietary culture in every country that is reflected in the dietary patterns, and few studies have been conducted on empirically derived food patterns in adult Norwegian women( Reference Lockheart, Steffen and Rebnord 3 Reference Engeset, Alsaker and Ciampi 5 ). Use of nutritional biomarkers in the evaluation of dietary patterns could provide knowledge on whether the derived patterns are meaningful. A number of studies have investigated the associations between dietary patterns and nutritional biomarkers( Reference Hann, Rock and King 6 Reference Lipsky, Cheon and Nansel 16 ). A dietary pattern that is interpreted as a healthy dietary pattern has been reported to be positively associated with serum carotenoids, vitamin C and folate( Reference Hann, Rock and King 6 , Reference Neuhouser, Patterson and King 7 , Reference Weinstein, Vogt and Gerrior 9 , Reference Kant and Graubard 10 , Reference Talegawkar, Johnson and Carithers 13 ). Carotenoids in blood are classified into concentration biomarkers and have been widely used as nutritional biomarkers for fruit and vegetable intake( Reference Jenab, Slimani and Bictash 17 ). Of the approximately 600 carotenoids found in plant species( Reference Hammond and Renzi 18 ), only α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lutein, lycopene and zeaxanthin have been found in appreciable concentrations in human plasma( Reference Maiani, Caston and Catasta 19 ). Different populations tend to have different carotenoid profiles depending on their fruit and vegetable intake and lifestyle factors such as smoking status and BMI( Reference Alberg 20 Reference Al-Delaimy, Ferrari and Slimani 22 ).

The aims of the present study were to (1) identify important dietary patterns in Norwegian postmenopausal women and (2) examine the association between the dietary patterns and plasma carotenoid concentrations. We hypothesised that a healthy dietary pattern is associated with a more favourable profile of the plasma carotenoids than an unhealthy dietary pattern.

Methods

Study sample

The subjects in the present study were women participating in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP), a government-funded national screening programme administered by the Cancer Registry of Norway( Reference Hofvind, Wang and Thoresen 23 ). All Norwegian women aged 50–69 years were invited to a bilateral two-view mammogram biennially. The participation rate in the NBCSP was 77 %( Reference Hofvind, Geller and Vacek 24 ), with about 250 000 women being invited per year. In 2006/2007, the NBCSP invitation letter for mammographic screening included a question on willingness to complete a dietary questionnaire. A total of 67 527 women agreed to participate. In 2008, a consent form and a FFQ were sent to a random sample of 10 000 of these women. A total of 6974 returned the FFQ; of these, forty-six were not filled in and, therefore, excluded from the study. We further excluded 158 women who had missing data on height and weight, five women who had missing data on age and forty-one women who had missing data on smoking status. Furthermore, twenty women were excluded because of improbable height and weight status (seven with self-reported height < 125 cm and thirteen with self-reported weight < 30 or >170 kg). We excluded fifteen women because their age was not in the range of 50–69 years, four women because of BMI < 15 or >50 kg/m2; and 204 women because of implausible energy intake ( < 2100 or >15 000 kJ/d). This left us with a total sample of 6481 women (NBCSP subsample). Of the initial sample of 6974 women, more than 90 % agreed to provide saliva and blood samples. A self-collection kit containing necessary equipment for collecting both saliva and fingertip blood samples on a filter paper was sent to 4597 women. We received 3258 saliva and 3263 blood samples. Funding was available for a subset of laboratory analyses. The main focus of the parent study was breast cancer and mammographic density( Reference Ellingjord-Dale, dos-Santos-Silva and Grotmol 25 ); therefore, analyses of blood samples were restricted to women who also had an analogue mammogram (n 632) and who fulfilled the inclusion criteria for that study (n 387). In addition, we restricted analyses to women who followed the instructions given for the storage of blood samples. We were then left with blood samples from a subsample of 361 women in whom the carotenoid analyses were conducted. Thus, we had both dietary and plasma carotenoid data from these 361 women. The present study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Regional Ethics Committee and the Norwegian Data Inspectorate. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Dietary assessment

A sixteen-page, 253-item FFQ was designed to capture the habitual food intake among Norwegian adults the preceding year, with an extra focus on the intake of fruit, vegetables, antioxidant-rich foods and beverages. It was based on a previously validated 180-item FFQ designed to cover the total energy intake in the Norwegian population( Reference Andersen, Solvoll and Johansson 26 ), which was later expanded to a 270-item FFQ to cover the most antioxidant-rich foods and beverages in Norway( Reference Carlsen, Lillegaard and Karlsen 27 ). Energy and food intake estimated from the 270-item FFQ was validated. Energy intake was evaluated against independent measures of energy expenditure using the ActiReg® system (PreMed AS) (motion detection), whereas 7 d weighed food records were used to study the relative validity of food and nutrient intake( Reference Carlsen, Lillegaard and Karlsen 27 , Reference Carlsen, Karlsen and Lillegaard 28 ). The correlation coefficient between energy intake and energy expenditure was 0·54. Correlation coefficients between the FFQ and the weighed food records were 0·41 for berries, 0·61 for fruit and 0·38 for vegetables( Reference Carlsen, Lillegaard and Karlsen 27 ). This FFQ was also validated for ranking individuals according to their usual intake of fruit, juices and vegetables by using the method of triads with two independent and specific biomarkers of fruit and vegetables, the FFQ and 7 d weighed food records. The validity coefficients ranged from 0·60 to 0·94( Reference Carlsen, Karlsen and Lillegaard 28 ). We revised the 270-item FFQ, by removing seventeen items that were seldom or never eaten, resulting in a 253-item FFQ. For each food item, participants indicated their frequency of consumption ranging from never/seldom to several times per d. The portion size per consumption was asked in household units such as slices, glasses, cups, pieces, spoons and teaspoons. When a respondent only answered about the frequency of consumption, but not the portion size, the food item was given the smallest portion size. If only the amount of the food item was given, the frequency was set to 0. The questionnaire also collected information about dietary supplements, age, height, weight, smoking status, physical activity, illnesses and medication. Daily intake of energy, nutrients and foods was computed using the food database AE-07 and KBS software system (version 4.9 2008; KBS) developed at the Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Norway. The food database AE-07 is based on the 2006 edition of the Norwegian food composition table (http://www.norwegianfoodcomp.no) supplemented with data from other tables and calculated recipes. Intakes from supplements were included in the calculations.

The 253 food items were categorised into forty-six food groups based on similarity in ingredients, nutrient profile or culinary usage (Table 1).

Table 1 Food groupings used in the dietary pattern analysis

Blood collection and carotenoid analyses

A self-collection kit containing necessary equipment and a detailed instruction on how to collect fingertip blood samples on a filter paper were sent to the participants by mail. The first two spots on the filter paper were impregnated with a proprietary stabilising solution (Vitas AS). The blood samples were collected after fasting overnight, and each participant collected capillary blood sample from a fingertip directly on the filter paper (Whatman 903 paper; GE Healthcare), which subsequently dried for 8 h. The filter paper with the dried blood spots (DBS cards) was stored in an airtight alumina bag together with a silica drying medium (Whatman) and mailed by regular mail to the study centre. The DBS cards were stored at − 80°C at the study centre. Quantification of carotenoids in the DBS was performed by the contract laboratory Vitas AS. In short, five punches of 3·2 mm from each DBS were punched into vials, distilled water was added and mixed, proteins were precipitated, and carotenoids extracted with isopropanol as an internal standard (β-apo-8-carotenal; Sigma-Aldrich). HPLC–UV analysis was performed on an 1100-series HPLC system with a 1260 diode array detector (453 nm; Agilent Technologies). Separation was performed on a 3 μm YMC C30 column (150 mm × 4·6 mm inner diameter; YMC). Calibration was performed by analysing DBS calibrators spotted with full blood with known concentrations of carotenoids: lutein; zeaxanthin; β-cryptoxanthin; α-carotene; β-carotene; lycopene. The known concentrations are obtained by the analysis of serum from the same full blood. The calibrator for these values was NIST SRM-1950 (National Institute of Standards and Technology). A fixed haematocrit value of 2 was used to convert from DBS to plasma values. Quality control samples of DBS were run alongside the study samples. The total variation (CV%, n 50) for these quality control samples ranged from 7·8 to 9·0 % for lutein, β-carotene, lycopene and β-cryptoxanthin; 21·0 % for the low-abundant zeaxanthin; and 20·1 % for α-carotene. The total carotenoid concentration in plasma was calculated as the sum of the individual carotenoid concentrations quantified in this analysis.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the characteristics of the study sample (n 361) and the NBCSP subsample (without the study sample, n 6120). We studied the differences between the study sample and the NBCSP subsample by independent-samples t test for continuous variables and Pearson's χ2 test for categorical variables.

Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to derive the dietary patterns based on the correlation matrix of the forty-six food groups. Before extracting the components, the suitability for using PCA was assessed by the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy and Bartlett's test of sphericity( Reference Tabachnick and Fidell 29 ). The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value was 0·63, which is above the suggested minimum of 0·50( Reference Hutcheson and Sofroniou 30 ), and Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (P< 0·001), supporting the suitability of the data for PCA. To determine the number of meaningful components to retain, we considered the eigenvalue-one criterion, the scree test, the proportion of the variance accounted for and the interpretability criterion( Reference Michels and Schulze 1 ). For interpretation purposes, varimax rotation was performed on the retained components. We considered food groups with a factor loading whose absolute value was ≥ 0·3 to load on that component. Finally, each woman's score was calculated for each of the retained components. We interpreted the retained components as dietary patterns and labelled them according to the more or less healthy combinations of food groups.

The plasma carotenoids were loge-transformed, and the correlations between these plasma carotenoids and the identified dietary patterns were estimated by bivariate (Pearson) and partial correlation coefficients (r adj), adjusting for age (continuous), total energy intake (continuous), BMI (continuous), smoking status (yes/no), intake of vitamin supplements (yes/no) and alcohol intake (continuous). The partial correlation coefficients are presented with 95 % CI based on 1000 bootstrap samples. The associations between loge-transformed plasma carotenoids (response variables) and the dietary patterns were further studied by multiple linear regressions. The women's scores for each dietary pattern were categorised into quartiles. The regression models included the same covariates as in the calculation of partial correlation coefficients. To test for trend, the dietary pattern was modelled as a continuous variable in the regression analyses. We report adjusted back-transformed marginal means of plasma carotenoids (μmol/l) with 95 % CI.

All tests were two-sided and P< 0·05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corporation).

Results

Table 2 presents the selected characteristics of women in the study sample (n 361) and the NBCSP subsample (without the study sample, n 6120). There was a significant difference in age between the two samples (P= 0·001), although the mean values were quite similar (57·1 years in the study sample and 57·9 years in the NBCSP subsample). No significant differences were found regarding BMI, alcohol intake, energy intake and multivitamin use (0·53 ≤ P≤ 0·87), while the proportion of smokers was significantly lower in the study sample than in the NBCSP subsample (14 v. 20 %, P= 0·005). Furthermore, women in the study sample were significantly higher educated (P= 0·01) than those in the NBCSP subsample. Plasma carotenoid levels for the study sample are also presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Selected characteristics and plasma carotenoid concentrations in the study sample and in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) subsample (Medians, means, standard deviations and ranges; number of subjects and percentages)

* The NBCSP subsample without the study sample (n 6481 − 361 = 6120).

n 323 for the study sample and n 5340 for the NBCSP subsample not selected for the present substudy.

n 361 for the study sample and n 6119 for the NBCSP subsample not selected for the present substudy.

The forty-six food groups that formed the basis for the PCA are presented in Table 1. We identified four major dietary patterns, all with eigenvalues ≥ 2·0. The scree plot showed a clear break point, justifying the retaining of the four dietary patterns. The four retained dietary patterns accounted for 6·1, 6·1, 5·7 and 5·1 %, respectively, of the total variance. The four dietary patterns with food groups having factor loadings with absolute values ≥ 0·3 are presented in Table 3. The first dietary pattern was labelled ‘Western’ because of the high positive loadings for potatoes, cakes and desserts, refined grains, high-fat dairy products, sauce, sweet spreads, margarine, sugar-sweetened beverages, cheese, whole grains and low-fat dairy products. The second dietary pattern was labelled ‘Vegetarian’ because of high loadings for herbs and spices, vegetables, vegetarian food, salad dressings, soya sauce, rice, legumes, nuts and seeds, tea, fruits and berries, and whole grains. The third pattern was labelled ‘Continental’ because of high loadings for tomato sauce, pasta, fat-rich potatoes, processed meat, pizza, sweets, red meat and game, mustard, salty snacks, wine, and rice. The fourth pattern was labelled ‘High-protein’ because of high loadings for fish, meat dishes, eggs, vegetables, red meat and game, processed meat, poultry, and mayonnaise.

Table 3 Factor loadings* for the four dietary patterns found in the principal component analysis (n 361)

* Factor loadings between − 0·30 and 0·30 are not listed.

Table 4 presents the adjusted partial correlation coefficient between the four dietary pattern scores and the plasma carotenoids, and the adjusted means of plasma carotenoids across the quartiles of dietary pattern scores in order to study potential trends. Pearson's correlation coefficients were also calculated, but are not presented since these were similar to the adjusted partial correlation coefficients. The ‘Western’ pattern scores were significantly inversely correlated with plasma lutein, zeaxanthin, lycopene and total carotenoids ( − 0·25 ≤ r adj≤ − 0·13). We found a significant decreasing trend across the quartiles of the Western pattern scores only for plasma lycopene (P trend< 0·001). Mean lycopene decreased from 0·263 μmol/l in the lowest score quartile to 0·196 μmol/l in the highest score quartile (a 25 % decrease). The ‘Vegetarian’ pattern scores were significantly positively correlated with all the plasma carotenoids (0·15 ≤ r adj≤ 0·24), and with significant increasing trends across the quartiles (P trend≤ 0·01). Mean total carotenoids increased from 1·030 μmol/l in the lowest score quartile to 1·399 μmol/l in the highest score quartile (a 36 % increase). The ‘Continental’ pattern scores were inversely correlated with most of the plasma carotenoids, although only significant for lutein and α-carotene (r adj= − 0·13). We found a significant decreasing trend for both lutein and α-carotene across the quartiles of the ‘Continental’ pattern (P trend≤ 0·05). This pattern had a non-significant positive correlation with plasma lycopene (r adj= 0·10, P trend= 0·07). Finally, no significant correlations between the ‘High-protein’ pattern and the plasma carotenoids were found ( − 0·07 ≤ r adj≤ 0·07).

Table 4 Partial correlation coefficients (r adj) between the dietary patterns and plasma carotenoids*, and adjusted mean levels of plasma carotenoids (μmol/l) across the quartiles (Q) of dietary pattern scores (n 361) (Partial correlation coefficients and 95 % confidence intervals§, and adjusted mean values and 95 % confidence intervals)

* Loge-transformed.

Reported means (μmol/l) were back-transformed from the estimated marginal means.

Analyses were adjusted for age (continuous), total energy (continuous), BMI (continuous), smoking status (yes/no), alcohol (continuous) and multivitamin supplements (yes/no).

§ Presented with 95 %CI based on 1000 bootstrap samples.

Discussion

In the present subsample of middle-aged postmenopausal Norwegian women, we identified four main dietary patterns: ‘Western’; ‘Vegetarian’; ‘Continental’; ‘High-protein’. Furthermore, we found that the healthy ‘Vegetarian’ pattern was associated with a more favourable profile of the plasma carotenoids than the more unhealthy ‘Western’ and ‘Continental’ patterns. We found no significant associations between the ‘High-protein’ pattern and the plasma carotenoids.

Studies on dietary patterns derived from PCA for women in this age group are limited. Dietary patterns will never be exactly the same across studies; however, in most populations, a healthy (‘Prudent’) pattern and a less healthy (‘Western’) pattern have been identified( Reference Ocke 31 ). Our ‘Western’ pattern is, to some extent, similar to ‘Western’ patterns found in previous studies, which is usually characterised by high loadings of red meat, processed meat, butter, potatoes, refined grains and high-fat dairy products( Reference Chocano-Bedoya, O'Reilly and Lucas 32 Reference Nimptsch, Malik and Fung 34 ). We labelled our ‘Prudent’ pattern the ‘Vegetarian’ pattern since all the food groups with high loadings represented in this pattern are plant-based. Similar patterns have been reported by other researchers. A study conducted on active and retired female teachers from California found five dietary patterns, and one, labelled ‘Plant-based’, was characterised by high loadings of fruit and vegetables( Reference Link, Canchola and Bernstein 35 ). An Australian study of young, middle-aged and older women identified six dietary patterns, of which two, ‘Cooked vegetables’ and ‘Fruit’, had high loadings of vegetables and fruits, respectively( Reference Mishra, McNaughton and Ball 36 ). Our ‘Continental’ pattern is, to some extent, similar to the ‘Pasta and meat’ pattern found in the Italian European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort( Reference Pala, Sieri and Masala 37 ), and to the ‘High protein, high-fat’ pattern found in California( Reference Link, Canchola and Bernstein 35 ). Furthermore, in a study of middle-aged Norwegian women (age 41–55 years, n 35 554) on dietary patterns and lifestyle factors, one of the patterns had high loadings of rice, pasta, red meat and meat products, pizza, chocolate, and salty snacks( Reference Engeset, Alsaker and Ciampi 5 ).

The ability to measure habitual food intake accurately is difficult when the assessment relies on self-reported dietary data. We used plasma carotenoids as objective biomarkers to see whether the obtained dietary patterns were meaningful. The negative associations that we found between the ‘Western’ pattern and the plasma carotenoids are as expected, since neither fruits nor vegetables were represented among the food groups with high loadings in this pattern. In contrast, there was a significant increasing trend in the mean total plasma carotenoid values from the lowest to the highest quartile of ‘Vegetarian’ pattern scores. Comparisons with other studies are limited, as only a few studies have investigated the association between empirically derived dietary patterns and plasma carotenoids. Our findings are consistent with those of a study conducted among men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study in the USA( Reference Hu, Rimm and Smith-Warner 38 ), showing that the ‘Prudent’ pattern was positively and the ‘Western’ pattern was negatively associated with plasma carotenoids. Pearson's correlation coefficients between the ‘Prudent’ pattern and different plasma carotenoids ranged from 0·03 to 0·26, whereas for the ‘Western’ pattern ranged from − 0·26 to − 0·06. These estimates are in the same range as those found in the present study. Our findings are also consistent with those of Talegawkar et al. ( Reference Talegawkar, Johnson and Carithers 13 ) who studied African American men and women in the southern USA and identified four dietary patterns by cluster analysis (‘Fast food’, ‘Southern’, ‘Prudent’ and ‘Juice’), and found that subjects belonging to the more unhealthy patterns had lower concentrations of serum carotenoids than those belonging to the more healthy patterns. A study of men and women aged >65 years in the UK reported higher plasma carotenoids among the participants with a healthy dietary pattern compared with those with more unhealthy patterns( Reference Pryer, Cook and Shetty 39 ).

For the ‘Continental’ pattern, the highest factor loading was for tomato sauce. Lycopene is found in high concentrations in tomatoes, and food processing and cooking improves intestinal absorption( Reference Wang 40 ). As expected, we found an indication of a positive association between plasma lycopene and this pattern, and an increasing trend in the plasma lycopene of women from the lowest to the highest quartile of the ‘Continental’ pattern scores. Hendrickson et al. ( Reference Hendrickson, Willett and Rosner 41 ) developed empirical prediction models (where foods were weighted according to their relation to biological nutrient levels) for plasma carotenoids, and found that the individual food explaining the largest percentage of variation in plasma lycopene was tomato sauce. Maiani et al. ( Reference Maiani, Caston and Catasta 19 ) reported that in France, the Republic of Ireland, the UK, The Netherlands and Spain, the major foods contributing to lycopene intake in adults are fresh tomatoes, canned tomatoes, tomato soup, pizza and tomato purée, which tend to have a low content of other carotenoids. As in the ‘Western’ pattern, fruits and vegetables were not among the food groups with high positive loadings in the ‘Continental’ pattern. In fact, fruits and berries had a high negative loading ( − 0·33), and we found significant inverse associations between this pattern and plasma lutein and α-carotene.

Finally, for the ‘High-protein’ pattern, we did not find any associations with the plasma carotenoids, even though vegetables were represented by high factor loadings. The reason for why there was no association between the plasma carotenoids and this pattern is uncertain, but may be due to over-reporting of vegetables. In a study of 3730 pregnant Finnish women, Arkkola et al. ( Reference Arkkola, Uusitalo and Kronberg-Kippila 42 ) found seven dietary patterns. In the ‘Traditional bread’ pattern, berry juice was the only carotenoid-rich food group represented by factor loadings >0·3; however, it had no impact on the association between this pattern and the plasma carotenoids (r 0·06).

The present study holds some limitations. Validated FFQ are accepted as a tool in nutritional epidemiological investigations( Reference Newby and Tucker 2 ), despite known measurement errors, both random and systematic( Reference Schatzkin and Kipnis 43 , Reference Kristal, Peters and Potter 44 ). As in all studies using self-reported dietary intake data, measurement errors are inevitable. FFQ require that the respondents remember the amount and frequency of intake of a substantial amount of food items, as a result of which there arise numerous cognitive difficulties( Reference Subar, Thompson and Smith 45 ). A general under-reporting of food intake, especially among overweight participants, is a well-known limitation of self-reported dietary intake( Reference Patterson, Kristal and Tinker 46 , Reference Neuhouser, Tinker and Shaw 47 ). Over-reporting of ‘healthy foods’ related to social desirability has also been reported( Reference Hebert, Clemow and Pbert 48 ). A FFQ may also cover less of the total diet of some individuals than others due to the closed food list. Such measurement errors may distort the composition of the food groups in a dietary pattern, and may have made it more difficult to discern distinctive patterns. Whether this could have biased the associations between the dietary patterns and the plasma carotenoids is more difficult to predict. In general, measurement errors tend to obscure the associations.

Many subjective decisions are made when assessing dietary patterns. This can have a direct impact on the number and type of dietary patterns derived. The first decision is how to group the food items, and then whether to adjust the food group variables for energy before entry into the PCA. Furthermore, decision has to be made regarding the criteria for determining how many components to extract (i.e. the eigenvalue cut-off and the break point in the scree plot) as well as the method of rotating the selected components. Northstone et al. ( Reference Northstone, Ness and Emmett 49 ) found differences between the dietary patterns obtained using unadjusted and energy-adjusted (by the residual method( Reference Willett 50 )) food group variables in the PCA; however, these differences did not have any major impact on their further analysis of the associations with nutrient intakes and birth weight. They concluded that ‘it is sufficient to make energy adjustment when analysing the effects of the dietary patterns on the outcome of interest’. Smith et al. ( Reference Smith, Emmett and Newby 51 ) found no benefit associated with using energy-adjusted gram weights or percentage energy contribution as the input variable strategy, and their recommendation was to use weights of foods to describe underlying dietary patterns in a population. Thus, we did not adjust the food group variables for energy. By using the correlation matrix of the forty-six food group variables in the PCA, and not the covariance matrix, the variables were standardised. The three components retained from the PCA accounted for 23·0 % of the total variance. This is consistent with the results of other studies that have used comparable methods where the explained variance was 21–26 % for four components( Reference Pala, Sieri and Masala 37 , Reference Northstone and Emmett 52 Reference Lioret, McNaughton and Crawford 54 ). The percentage of the variance of the food group variables that is explained by the components depends on the number of variables included. We had forty-six food groups as input variables to the PCA. With even more aggregation of the food groups, it is likely that we would have accounted for a higher proportion of the variance, but the level of detail would be reduced, which was undesirable.

When comparing the characteristics of the subjects in the study sample and the NBCSP subsample, we found significant differences in age, education and smoking status. The age in the study sample was 57·1 v. 57·9 years in the NBCSP subsample. Although the difference was significant, the difference was rather small, and although theoretically possible, we think it is unlikely that this slight age difference has introduced selection bias in the present study. The proportion of smokers was lower in the study sample than in the NBCSP subsample (14 v. 20 %), and the subjects in the study sample were somewhat higher educated. Smokers are known to make poorer food choices and consume a more energy-dense diet that is inferior in nutritional quality to that of non-smoking adults( Reference Cade and Margetts 55 , Reference Dyer, Elliott and Stamler 56 ). The present results from a slightly ‘healthier’ population may, therefore, not be generalisable to all women participating in the NBCSP. However, to what extent these differences in smoking and education resulted in any selection bias that affected our findings is not obvious. With a healthier population, we could speculate that the population may be more homogeneous, which may have impaired our ability of finding any dietary patterns, whether healthy or unhealthy.

In conclusion, we identified four dietary patterns: ‘Western’; ‘Vegetarian’; ‘Continental’; ‘High-protein’. All the plasma carotenoids were positively associated with the ‘Vegetarian’ pattern, while inverse associations were observed between most of the plasma carotenoids and the ‘Western’ and ‘Continental’ patterns. There were no associations between the ‘High-protein’ pattern and the plasma carotenoids. These results show that our healthy dietary pattern, the ‘Vegetarian’ pattern, is associated with a more favourable profile of the plasma carotenoids than our unhealthy dietary patterns, the ‘Western’ and ‘Continental’ patterns. Empirically derived dietary patterns are associated with some uncertainty since they are influenced by the measurement errors in the underlying methods of dietary assessment. Therefore, measurement of nutritional biomarkers can be a useful tool for validating dietary patterns.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by the Research Council of Norway (to G. U., grant no. 196999). The Research Council of Norway had no role in the design and analysis of the study or in the writing of this article.

The authors' contributions are as follows: M. S. M carried out the calculation of the daily intake of energy, nutrients and foods; performed the statistical analyses; and drafted the manuscript; M. B. V. contributed to the statistical analysis, interpretation of the data and revision of the manuscript; A. K. S. contributed to the collection and quality assurance of the blood and saliva samples, the discussion of the results, and the development of the manuscript; M. E.-D. collected the data (blood and saliva samples) and commented on the manuscript; R. B. contributed to the planning of the study, the discussion of the results, and the development of the manuscript; G. U. designed the study, obtained the funding, planned and executed the data collection, and participated in the discussion of the results and development of the manuscript; L. F. A. contributed to the interpretation of the data and revision of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

None of the authors have any financial or other interests concerning the outcomes of the investigation or any conflicts of interest to declare.

References

1 Michels, KB & Schulze, MB (2005) Can dietary patterns help us detect diet–disease associations? Nutr Res Rev 18, 241248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Newby, PK & Tucker, KL (2004) Empirically derived eating patterns using factor or cluster analysis: a review. Nutr Rev 62, 177203.Google Scholar
3 Lockheart, MS, Steffen, LM, Rebnord, HM, et al. (2007) Dietary patterns, food groups and myocardial infarction: a case–control study. Br J Nutr 98, 380387.Google Scholar
4 Sommer, C, Sletner, L, Jenum, AK, et al. (2013) Ethnic differences in maternal dietary patterns are largely explained by socio-economic score and integration score: a population-based study. Food Nutr Res 57 (epublication 8 July 2013).Google Scholar
5 Engeset, D, Alsaker, E, Ciampi, A, et al. (2005) Dietary patterns and lifestyle factors in the Norwegian EPIC cohort: the Norwegian Women and Cancer (NOWAC) study. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 675684.Google Scholar
6 Hann, CS, Rock, CL, King, I, et al. (2001) Validation of the Healthy Eating Index with use of plasma biomarkers in a clinical sample of women. Am J Clin Nutr 74, 479486.Google Scholar
7 Neuhouser, ML, Patterson, RE, King, IB, et al. (2003) Selected nutritional biomarkers predict diet quality. Public Health Nutr 6, 703709.Google Scholar
8 Newby, PK, Muller, D & Tucker, KL (2004) Associations of empirically derived eating patterns with plasma lipid biomarkers: a comparison of factor and cluster analysis methods. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 759767.Google Scholar
9 Weinstein, SJ, Vogt, TM & Gerrior, SA (2004) Healthy Eating Index scores are associated with blood nutrient concentrations in the third National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 576584.Google Scholar
10 Kant, AK & Graubard, BI (2005) A comparison of three dietary pattern indexes for predicting biomarkers of diet and disease. J Am Coll Nutr 24, 294303.Google Scholar
11 Panagiotakos, DB, Pitsavos, C, Skoumas, Y, et al. (2007) The association between food patterns and the metabolic syndrome using principal components analysis: the ATTICA Study. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 979987; quiz 997.Google Scholar
12 Nettleton, JA, Schulze, MB, Jiang, R, et al. (2008) A priori-defined dietary patterns and markers of cardiovascular disease risk in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Am J Clin Nutr 88, 185194.Google Scholar
13 Talegawkar, SA, Johnson, EJ, Carithers, TC, et al. (2008) Serum carotenoid and tocopherol concentrations vary by dietary pattern among African Americans. J Am Diet Assoc 108, 20132020.Google Scholar
14 McNaughton, SA, Mishra, GD & Brunner, EJ (2009) Food patterns associated with blood lipids are predictive of coronary heart disease: the Whitehall II study. Br J Nutr 102, 619624.Google Scholar
15 Bogl, LH, Pietilainen, KH, Rissanen, A, et al. (2013) Association between habitual dietary intake and lipoprotein subclass profile in healthy young adults. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 23, 10711078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Lipsky, LM, Cheon, K, Nansel, TR, et al. (2012) Candidate measures of whole plant food intake are related to biomarkers of nutrition and health in the US population (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2002). Nutr Res 32, 251259.Google Scholar
17 Jenab, M, Slimani, N, Bictash, M, et al. (2009) Biomarkers in nutritional epidemiology: applications, needs and new horizons. Hum Genet 125, 507525.Google Scholar
18 Hammond, BR Jr & Renzi, LM (2013) Carotenoids. Adv Nutr 4, 474476.Google Scholar
19 Maiani, G, Caston, MJ, Catasta, G, et al. (2009) Carotenoids: actual knowledge on food sources, intakes, stability and bioavailability and their protective role in humans. Mol Nutr Food Res 53, Suppl. 2, S194S218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Alberg, A (2002) The influence of cigarette smoking on circulating concentrations of antioxidant micronutrients. Toxicology 180, 121137.Google Scholar
21 Vioque, J, Weinbrenner, T, Asensio, L, et al. (2007) Plasma concentrations of carotenoids and vitamin C are better correlated with dietary intake in normal weight than overweight and obese elderly subjects. Br J Nutr 97, 977986.Google Scholar
22 Al-Delaimy, WK, Ferrari, P, Slimani, N, et al. (2005) Plasma carotenoids as biomarkers of intake of fruits and vegetables: individual-level correlations in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 13871396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 Hofvind, SS, Wang, H & Thoresen, S (2003) The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: re-attendance related to the women's experiences, intentions and previous screening result. Cancer Causes Control 14, 391398.Google Scholar
24 Hofvind, S, Geller, B, Vacek, PM, et al. (2007) Using the European guidelines to evaluate the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Eur J Epidemiol 22, 447455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25 Ellingjord-Dale, M, dos-Santos-Silva, I, Grotmol, T, et al. (2015) Vitamin D intake, month at mammography and mammographic density in Norwegian women aged 50–69. Submitted. Google Scholar
26 Andersen, LF, Solvoll, K, Johansson, LR, et al. (1999) Evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire with weighed records, fatty acids, and α-tocopherol in adipose tissue and serum. Am J Epidemiol 150, 7587.Google Scholar
27 Carlsen, MH, Lillegaard, IT, Karlsen, A, et al. (2010) Evaluation of energy and dietary intake estimates from a food frequency questionnaire using independent energy expenditure measurement and weighed food records. Nutr J 9, 37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 Carlsen, MH, Karlsen, A, Lillegaard, IT, et al. (2011) Relative validity of fruit and vegetable intake estimated from an FFQ, using carotenoid and flavonoid biomarkers and the method of triads. Br J Nutr 105, 15301538.Google Scholar
29 Tabachnick, BG & Fidell, FL (2007) Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th ed. New York: Pearson Education Publications.Google Scholar
30 Hutcheson, G & Sofroniou, N (1999) The Multivariate Social Scientist. London: Sage.Google Scholar
31 Ocke, MC (2013) Evaluation of methodologies for assessing the overall diet: dietary quality scores and dietary pattern analysis. Proc Nutr Soc 72, 191199.Google Scholar
32 Chocano-Bedoya, PO, O'Reilly, EJ, Lucas, M, et al. (2013) Prospective study on long-term dietary patterns and incident depression in middle-aged and older women. Am J Clin Nutr 98, 813820.Google Scholar
33 Weismayer, C, Anderson, JG & Wolk, A (2006) Changes in the stability of dietary patterns in a study of middle-aged Swedish women. J Nutr 136, 15821587.Google Scholar
34 Nimptsch, K, Malik, VS, Fung, TT, et al. (2014) Dietary patterns during high school and risk of colorectal adenoma in a cohort of middle-aged women. Int J Cancer 134, 24582467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Link, LB, Canchola, AJ, Bernstein, L, et al. (2013) Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk in the California Teachers Study cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 98, 15241532.Google Scholar
36 Mishra, GD, McNaughton, SA, Ball, K, et al. (2010) Major dietary patterns of young and middle aged women: results from a prospective Australian cohort study. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 11251133.Google Scholar
37 Pala, V, Sieri, S, Masala, G, et al. (2006) Associations between dietary pattern and lifestyle, anthropometry and other health indicators in the elderly participants of the EPIC-Italy cohort. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 16, 186201.Google Scholar
38 Hu, FB, Rimm, E, Smith-Warner, SA, et al. (1999) Reproducibility and validity of dietary patterns assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire. Am J Clin Nutr 69, 243249.Google Scholar
39 Pryer, JA, Cook, A & Shetty, P (2001) Identification of groups who report similar patterns of diet among a representative national sample of British adults aged 65 years of age or more. Public Health Nutr 4, 787795.Google Scholar
40 Wang, XD (2012) Lycopene metabolism and its biological significance. Am J Clin Nutr 96, 1214S1222S.Google Scholar
41 Hendrickson, SJ, Willett, WC, Rosner, BA, et al. (2013) Food predictors of plasma carotenoids. Nutrients 5, 40514066.Google Scholar
42 Arkkola, T, Uusitalo, U, Kronberg-Kippila, C, et al. (2008) Seven distinct dietary patterns identified among pregnant Finnish women – associations with nutrient intake and sociodemographic factors. Public Health Nutr 11, 176182.Google Scholar
43 Schatzkin, A & Kipnis, V (2004) Could exposure assessment problems give us wrong answers to nutrition and cancer questions? J Natl Cancer Inst 96, 15641565.Google Scholar
44 Kristal, AR, Peters, U & Potter, JD (2005) Is it time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14, 28262828.Google Scholar
45 Subar, AF, Thompson, FE, Smith, AF, et al. (1995) Improving food frequency questionnaires: a qualitative approach using cognitive interviewing. J Am Diet Assoc 95, 781788; quiz 789–790.Google Scholar
46 Patterson, RE, Kristal, AR, Tinker, LF, et al. (1999) Measurement characteristics of the Women's Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol 9, 178187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47 Neuhouser, ML, Tinker, L, Shaw, PA, et al. (2008) Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative. Am J Epidemiol 167, 12471259.Google Scholar
48 Hebert, JR, Clemow, L, Pbert, L, et al. (1995) Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int J Epidemiol 24, 389398.Google Scholar
49 Northstone, K, Ness, AR, Emmett, PM, et al. (2008) Adjusting for energy intake in dietary pattern investigations using principal components analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 931938.Google Scholar
50 Willett, WC (2013) Nutritional Epidemiology, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
51 Smith, AD, Emmett, PM, Newby, PK, et al. (2013) Dietary patterns obtained through principal components analysis: the effect of input variable quantification. Br J Nutr 109, 18811891.Google Scholar
52 Northstone, K & Emmett, PM (2010) Dietary patterns of men in ALSPAC: associations with socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics, nutrient intake and comparison with women's dietary patterns. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 978986.Google Scholar
53 Kesse-Guyot, E, Bertrais, S, Peneau, S, et al. (2009) Dietary patterns and their sociodemographic and behavioural correlates in French middle-aged adults from the SU.VI.MAX cohort. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 521528.Google Scholar
54 Lioret, S, McNaughton, SA, Crawford, D, et al. (2012) Parents' dietary patterns are significantly correlated: findings from the Melbourne Infant Feeding Activity and Nutrition Trial Program. Br J Nutr 108, 518526.Google Scholar
55 Cade, JE & Margetts, BM (1991) Relationship between diet and smoking – is the diet of smokers different? J Epidemiol Community Health 45, 270272.Google Scholar
56 Dyer, AR, Elliott, P, Stamler, J, et al. (2003) Dietary intake in male and female smokers, ex-smokers, and never smokers: the INTERMAP study. J Hum Hypertens 17, 641654.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Food groupings used in the dietary pattern analysis

Figure 1

Table 2 Selected characteristics and plasma carotenoid concentrations in the study sample and in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) subsample (Medians, means, standard deviations and ranges; number of subjects and percentages)

Figure 2

Table 3 Factor loadings* for the four dietary patterns found in the principal component analysis (n 361)

Figure 3

Table 4 Partial correlation coefficients (radj) between the dietary patterns and plasma carotenoids*, and adjusted mean† levels of plasma carotenoids (μmol/l) across the quartiles (Q) of dietary pattern scores (n 361)‡ (Partial correlation coefficients and 95 % confidence intervals§, and adjusted mean values and 95 % confidence intervals)