Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T01:43:25.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

In Vitro Digested Ingredients as Substitute for Ileal Digesta in Assessing Protein Fermentation Potential in Growing Pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2025

Hanlu Zhang
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
John W. Cone
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Arie K. Kies
Affiliation:
ArieKiesAdvies, Druten, The Netherlands
Wouter H. Hendriks
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Nikkie van der Wielen*
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Understanding protein fermentation in the hindgut of pigs is essential due to its implications for health, and ileal digesta is commonly used to study this process in vitro. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of utilizing in vitro digested residues as a replacement for ileal digesta in evaluating the protein fermentation potential. In vitro residues from cottonseed meal, maize germ meal, peanut meal, rapeseed cake, rapeseed meal, soybean meal and sunflower meal were analysed using a modified gas production (GP) technique and curve fitting model to determine their fermentation dynamics and compare with the use of ileal digesta. Significant variations were observed in GP parameters between in vitro digested residues, indicating differences in nitrogen utilization by faecal microbiota. Soybean meal and sunflower meal exhibited the highest maximum GP rates (Rmax), with values of 29.5 ± 0.6 and 28.0 ± 1.2 mL/h, respectively, while maize germ meal showed slowest protein utilization (17.3 ± 0.2 mL/h). A positive relationship was found between the Rmax of in vitro residues and ileal digesta (R2 = 0.85, P < 0.01). However, GP potential (GPs) showed a tendency for a negative relationship (R2 = 0.39, P < 0.1), likely due to narrow observed GPs values and the presence of varied endogenous proteins in ileal digesta. Our results demonstrate the potential of using in vitro digested residues as a substitute for ileal digesta in assessing the fermentation potential of protein ingredients, particularly regarding the rate of protein fermentation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society