Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:45:35.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of bread volume on glycaemic response and satiety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2007

Pat Burton  and
Helen J. Lightowler
Pat Burton*
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Food Science Group, School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK
Helen J. Lightowler
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Food Science Group, School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Mrs Pat Burton, fax +44 1865 483242, email Patmargburton@brookes.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The role of carbohydrates in health and disease has received a high profile in recent years, in particular the glycaemic index (GI) as a physiological classification of carbohydrate foods. A common carbohydrate source in the UK is white bread, which is considered to have a high GI value and low satiety value. In the present study, the possibility of favourably altering the GI of white bread by manipulating bread structure (loaf form) was investigated. In a randomised repeated-measures design, ten subjects were tested for glycaemic and satiety responses to four loaves of varying volume, but of consistent macronutrient content. Peak plasma glucose levels and GI values were shown to be significantly reduced by lowering loaf volume (P=0·007, P<0·001 respectively). In addition, a greater satiety index (SI) was seen with decreased loaf volume (P<0·001). In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that reducing the volume of white bread, which is generally considered to be high-GI and low-SI, can favourably alter metabolic and appetite responses. Relatively small differences in the GI of regularly consumed starch foods have been shown to have beneficial effects on health.

Keywords

Glycaemic indexSatietyLoaf volumeGastric emptying rate
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 96 , Issue 5 , November 2006 , pp. 877 - 882
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2006

References

Achour, L, Flourie, B, Briet, F, Franchisseur, C, Bornet, F, Champ, M, Rambaud, JC & Messing, B (1997) Metabolic effects of digestible and partially indigestible cornstarch: a study in the absorptive and postabsorptive periods in healthy humans. Am J Clin Nutr 66, 1151–1159.Google Scholar
Alvarado, M, Pacheco-Delahaye, E, Schnell, M & Hevia, P (1999) Dietary fiber in industrial tomato residue and its effects on glycaemic response and seric cholesterol in rats. Arch Latinoam Nutr 49, 138–142.Google ScholarPubMed
Amend, T & Belitz, HD (1991) Microstructural studies of gluten and a hypothesis on dough formation. Food Structure 10, 277–288.Google Scholar
Astrup, A & Raben, A (1995) Carbohydrate and obesity. Int J Obes 19, S27–S37.Google Scholar
Bland, JM & Altman, DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i, 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornet, FRJ, Fontvieille, AM, Rizkalla, S, Colonna, P, Blayo, A, Mercier, C & Slama, G (1989) Insulin and glycemic responses in healthy humans to native starches processed in different ways: correlation with in vitro alpha-amylase hydrolysis. Am J Clin Nutr 50, 315–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand, JC, Colagiuri, S, Crossman, S, Allen, A, Roberts, DCK & Truswell, AS (1991) Low-glycemic index foods improve long-term glycemic control in NIDDM. Diabetes Care 14, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand-Miller, J, Foster-Powell, K & Colagiuri, S (2003 a) The New Glucose Revolution. New York: Marlowe and Company.Google Scholar
Brand-Miller, JC, Hayne, S, Petocz, P & Colagiuri, S (2003 b) Low-glycemic index diets in the management of diabetes. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 26, 2261–2267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebbeling, CB, Leidig, MM, Sinclair, KB, Hangen, J & Ludwig, DDS (2003) A reduced-glycemic load diet in the treatment of adolescent obesity. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157, 773–779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Federation of Bakers (2005) The British Bread and Bakery Snacks Market. Factsheet no. 3. Accessed 20 June 2006. http://www.bakersfederation.org.uk/publications/FS3 - UK Bakery Market.pdf.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization & World Health Organization (1998) Carbohydrates in Human Nutrition. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. Rome FAO.Google Scholar
Foster-Powell, K, Holt, SHA & Brand-Miller, JC (2002) International table of glycemic index and glycaemic load values: 2002. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 5–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, G, Leeds, A, Trew, G, Margara, R & Dornhorst, A (1998) Insulin sensitivity in women at risk of coronary heart disease and the effect of a low glycemic diet. Metabolism 47, 1245–1251.Google Scholar
Granfeldt, Y, Bjorck, I & Hagander, B (1991) On the importance of processing conditions, product thickness and egg addition for the glycemic and hormonal responses to pasta: a comparison with bread made from pasta ingredients. Eur J Clin Nutr 45, 489–499.Google Scholar
Granfeldt, Y, Eliasson, AC & Bjorck, I (2000) An examination of the possibility of lowering the glycemic index of oat and barley flakes by minimal processing. J Nutr 130, 2207–2214.Google Scholar
Granfeldt, Y, Wu, CL & Bjorck, I (2006) Determination of glycaemic index; some methodological aspects related to the analysis of carbohydrate load and characteristics of the previous evening meal. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallfrisch, J & Behall, KM (2000) Mechanisms of the effects of grains on insulin and glucose responses. J Am Coll Nutr 19, 320S–325S.Google Scholar
Hayta, M & Alpaslan, M (2001) Effects of processing on biochemical and rheological properties of wheat gluten proteins. Nahrung 5, 304–308.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoebler, C, Karinthi, A, Chiron, H, Champ, M & Barry, JL (1999) Bioavailability of starch in bread rich in amylose: metabolic responses in healthy subjects and starch structure. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 360–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoebler, C, Karinthi, A, Devaux, MF, Guillon, F, Gallant, DJG, Bouchet, B, Melegari, C & Barry, JL (1998) Physical and chemical transformations of cereal food during oral digestion in human subjects. Br J Nutr 80, 429–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, SHA, Brand-Miller, JC & Stitt, PA (2001) The effects of equal-energy portions of different breads on blood glucose levels, feelings of fullness and subsequent food intake. J Am Diet Assoc 101, 767–773.Google Scholar
Holt, SHA, Miller, JCB, Petocz, P & Farmakalidis, E (1995) A satiety index of common foods. Eur J Clin Nutr 49, 675–690.Google ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, DJA, Wolever, TMS, Jenkins, AL, Giordano, C, Giudici, S, Thompson, LU, Kalmusky, J, Josse, RG & Wong, GS (1986) Low glycemic response to traditionally processed wheat and rye products: bulgur and pumpernickel bread. Am J Clin Nutr 43, 516–520.Google Scholar
Jenkins, DJA, Wolever, TMS, Taylor, RH, Barker, H, Fielden, H, Baldwin, JM, Bowling, AC, Newman, HC, Jenkins, AL & Goff, DV (1981) Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin Nutr 34, 362–366.Google Scholar
Langkilde, AM, Champ, M & Andersson, H (2002) Effects of high-resistant-starch banana flour (RS(2)) on in vitro fermentation and the small-bowel excretion of energy, nutrients, and sterols: an ileostomy study. Am J Clin Nutr 75, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S, Willett, WC, Stampfer, MJ, Hu, FB, Franz, M, Sampson, L, Hennekens, CH & Manson, JE (2000) A prospective study of dietary glycemic load, carbohydrate intake, and risk of coronary heart disease in US women. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 1455–1461.Google Scholar
Noakes, M, Clifton, PM, Nestel, PJ, LeLeu, R & McIntosh, G (1996) Effect of high-amylose starch and oat bran on metabolic variables and bowel function in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia. Am J Clin Nutr 64, 944–951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rashmi, S & Urooj, A (2003) Effect of processing on nutritionally important starch fractions in rice varieties. Int J Food Science Nutr 54, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, MD, Currie, JM, Morgan, LM, Jewell, DP & Frayn, KN (2003) Prior short-term consumption of resistant starch enhances postprandial insulin sensitivity in healthy subjects. Diabetologia 46, 659–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velangi, A, Fernandes, G & Wolever, TMS (2005) Evaluation of a glucose meter for determining the glycemic responses of foods. Clin Chim Acta 356, 191–198.Google Scholar
Wolever, TMS (1990) The glycemic index. World Rev Nutr Diet 62, 120–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolever, TMS, Katzmanrelle, L, Jenkins, AL, Vuksan, V, Josse, RG & Jenkins, DJA (1994) Glycemic index of 102 complex carbohydrate foods in patients with diabetes. Nutr Res 14, 651–669.Google Scholar
Wolever, TMS & Mehling, C (2002) High-carbohydrate-low-glycaemic index dietary advice improves glucose disposition index in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Br J Nutr 87, 477–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolever, TMS & Mehling, C (2003) Long-term effect of varying the source or amount of dietary carbohydrate in postprandial plasma glucose, insulin, triacylglycerol, and free fatty acid concentrations in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Am J Clin Nutr 77, 612–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed