Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:11:20.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of lactose on phosphate metabolism in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Hanna Dębiec
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Experimental Medicine, Hospital Monument Child's Health Centre, 04-736 Warsaw, Al. Dzieci Polskich 20, Poland
Roman Lorenc
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Experimental Medicine, Hospital Monument Child's Health Centre, 04-736 Warsaw, Al. Dzieci Polskich 20, Poland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Lactose, sucrose or maltose were administered to rats by gavage together with 32PO4, and blood 32P was determined.

2. PO4 uptake into blood was increased only when lactose and PO4 were administered into the gut.

3. Weaned male rats were fed on a control diet or a diet containing 30, 60 or 120 g lactose/kg. After a 5 d period of adaptation, a 6 d P balance was carried out. After a further 24 d blood levels of PO4, and calcium and PO4 uptake by brush-border membrane vesicles prepared from the renal cortex, were determined.

4. The absorption and retention of P were higher in lactose-fed rats. Faecal P excretion decreased with increasing dietary lactose content. Urinary P excretion was lower in the rats fed on 30 and 60 g lactose/kg whereas the 120 g lactose/kg diet increased urinary P.

5. Membrane vesicles isolated from rats fed on the diets containing 30 and 60 g lactose/kg showed a higher uptake of PO4, but with the 120 g lactose/kg diet uptake was lower than with membrane vesicles isolated from rats fed on the control diet.

6. A statistically significant increase in the serum PO4 level was observed in the rats fed on the diet with 120 g lactose/kg.

7. The presence of lactose in the diet caused a stirnulatory effect on PO4 absorption and retention.

Type
General Nutrition papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1988

References

Amine, E. K. & Hegsted, E. (1971). Journal of Nutrition 101, 927934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushnell, P. J. & De Luca, H. F. (1981). Science 211, 6163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlquist, A. & Thomson, D. L. (1964). Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 61, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dębiec, H. & Lorenc, R. S. (1984). In Epithelial Calcium and Phosphate Transport: Molecular and Cellular Aspects, pp. 241245 [Bronner, F. and Peterlik, H., editors]. New York: Alan R. Liss.Google Scholar
Dębiec, H. & Lorenc, R. S. (1985). Journal of Nutrition 115, 11681172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, C., Haase, W., Murer, H. & Kinne, R. (1979). Journal of Membrane Biochemistry 1, 203219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournier, P. L. & Dupuis, Y. (1962). Compte rendu de l'Académie des Sciences 255, 16491656.Google Scholar
Goldstein, R., Klein, T., Freirer, S. & Menczel, J. (1971). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 24, 12241231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grindler, E. M. & King, J. D. (1972). American Journal of Clinical Pathology 58, 376382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerman, M. R., Cohn, D. E., Tamayo, J. & Martin, K. J. (1983). Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 227, 9197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leichter, J. & Tolensky, A. F. (1975). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 28, 238241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lengman, F. W. (1961). American Journal of Physiology 200, 10511054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, R., Kinne, R. & Murer, H. H. (1979 a). Biochemical Journal 180, 465479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, R., Kinne, R., Murer, H. H., Fleisch, H. & Bonjur, J. P. (1979 b). Pflügers Archiv 380, 4752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullrich, K. J., Rumrich, G. & Kloss, S. (1977). Pflügers Archiv 372, 269274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilversmit, D. B. & Davis, K. (1950). Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 35, 155166.Google Scholar