Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:39:22.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of maize oil on the fatty acid composition of tissues of calves with and without vitamin E

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2010

Ritva Poukka  and
Aili Oksanen
Ritva Poukka
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Medicine, Helsinki, Finland
Aili Oksanen
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Helsinki, Finland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Fatty acid levels were studied in the tissues of 1-week-old calves receiving maize oil (in filled milk) with and without supplementary α-tocopherol. The calves that were not given vitamin E developed muscular dystrophy.

2. Decreased amounts of linoleic acid and increased amounts of arachidonic acid were found in nearly all the lipid fractions of skeletal muscles, hearts, livers and kidneys of vitamin E-deficient calves. The concentration of the polyunsaturated fatty acids beyond arachidonic acid remained about the same in both groups. There was a significant decrease of 20:2Ω6 fatty acid in the phosphatidy1 choline, phosphatidy1 ethanolamine and free fatty acid fractions in the livers and kidneys of vitamin E-deficient calves.

3. It is suggested that vitamin E has an inhibitory effect on the desaturating but not on the chain-elongation enzymes of microsomes in the liver and kidney.

4. Maize-oil feeding had only a slight effect on erythrocyte fatty acid composition, and the erythrocyte haemolysis test was negative even in the vitamin E-deficient animals.

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , March 1972 , pp. 327 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1972

References

Adams, R. S., Gullickson, T. W., Sautter, H. J. & Gander, J. E. (1954). J. Dairy Sci. 37, 655.Google Scholar
Bernhard, K., Leisinger, S. & Pedersen, W. (1963). Helv. chim. Acta 46, 1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieri, J. G. (1964). Fedn Proc. Pedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 23, 394.Google Scholar
Bieri, J. G. & Poukka, R. K. H. (1970). J. Nutr. 100, 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & McGill, R. F. (1955). Vet. Revs Annot. 1, 91.Google Scholar
Bligh, E. G. & Dyer, W. J. (1959). Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 911.Google Scholar
Bowyer, D. E., Leat, W. M. F., Howard, A. N.. & Gresham, G. A. (1963). Biochim. biophys. Acta 70, 423.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. W. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, C. C., Desai, I. D. & Scott, M. L. (1964). J. Nutr. 83, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstetter, H. H., Sen, N. & Holman, R. T. (1965). J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 42, 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, L. M., Hill, D. C. & Jenkins, K. J. (1963). Poult. Sci. 42, 846.Google Scholar
Lindberg, P. & Orstadius, K. (1961). Acta vet. scand. 2, I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahadevan, V., Viswanathan, C. V. & Lundberg, W. O. (1966). J. Chromat. 24, 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcel, Y. L., Christiansen, K. & Holman, R. T. (1968). Biochim. biophys. Acta 164, 25.Google Scholar
Poukka, R. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poukka, R. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poukka, K., Vasenius, L. & Turpeinen, O. (1962). J. Lipid Res. 3, 128.Google Scholar
Vikrot, O. (1964). Actu med. scand. 175, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witting, L. A. (1967). Lipids 2, 107.Google Scholar
Witting, L. A. & Horwitt, M. K. (1967). Lipids 2, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witting, L. A., Theron, J. J. & Horwitt, M. K. (1967). Lipids 2, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar