Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:45:24.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interrelationships between riboflavin and dietary energy and protein utilization in growing chicks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S. T. Chou ,
J. L. Sell  and
P. A. Kondra
S. T. Chou
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
J. L. Sell
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
P. A. Kondra
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Reduced intake of energy or protein per se decreased riboflavin requirement of the chicks under restricted feeding regimens.

2. In severe riboflavin deficiency (2·26 mg/kg diet), efficiency of utilization of both energy and protein was decreased significantly under ad lib. conditions of feeding.

3. Efficiency of utilization of energy (but not protein) was decreased significantly in border-line riboflavin deficiency (3·02 mg/kg diet), when chicks were fed ad lib.

4. Efficiency of protein utilization was decreased significantly in severe riboflavin deficiency when chicks received an energy-restricted diet supplying 80, 70 or 60 yo of the energy intake of the controls.

5. Neither energy nor protein utilization was affected by riboflavin deficiency when both energy and protein were restricted to 70 yo of that consumed by chicks fed ad lib. However, the riboflavin deficiency produced characteristic deficiency symptoms, namely heterophilia, curled-toe paralysis, and reduction in concentration of liver riboflavin.

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , November 1971 , pp. 323 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1971

References

REFERENCES

Appelgate, B. K. & Potter, L. M. (1963). Feedstuffs, Minneap. 35, no. 43, p. 62.Google Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1960). Official Methods of Analysis 9th ed., p. 669. Washington, DC:Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Burch, H. B., Lowry, O. H.,Padilla, A. M. & Combs, A. M. (1956). J. biol. Chem. 223, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, H. B., Hunter, F. E. Jr,Combs, A. M. & Schutz, B. A. (1960). J. biol. Chem. 235, 1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carew, L. B. Jr & Hill, F. W. (1964). J. Nutr. 83, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, A. B., Potter, L. M., Appelgate, B. K. & Leighton, A. T. Jr (1964). Poult. Sci. 43, 1307.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. (1955). Biometrics 11, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaunitz, H., Wiesinger, H., Blodi, F. C., Johnson, R. E. & Slanetz, C. A. (1954). J. Nutr. 52, 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, M. & Jukes, T. H. (1942). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 49, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannering, G. J., Lipton, M. A. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1941). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 46, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldham, H., Lounds, E. & Porter, T. (1947). J. Nutr. 34, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiser, R. & Pearson, P. B. (1949). J. Nutr. 38, 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarett, H. P., Klein, J. R. & Perlzweig, W. A. (1942). J. Nutr. 24, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarett, H. P. & Perlzweig, W. A. (1943). J. Nutr. 25, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods 5th ed., p. 237. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics 1st ed., p. 158. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc.Google Scholar