Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:17:11.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nitrogen retention in rats fed on diets enriched with arginine and glycine

2. Effect of diethyl ether anaesthesia on N retention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2007

H. S. Sitren
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA
H. Fisher
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Adult rats were subjected to a brief period of diethyl ether anaesthesia and were given diets with 200 or 100 g casein/kg with or without arginine plus glycine supplementation in the post-anaesthesia period. Nitrogen retention was measured as well as liver protein content and liver and muscle transaminase activities (l-aspartate aminotransferase (GOT), (EC 2.6.1.1), and l-alanine aminotransferase (GPT) (EC 2.6.1.2)).

2. Results demonstrated that anaesthesia-stressed rats consuming the high-protein diet with supplemental arginine and glycine retained twice as much N as did rats given the diet with 200 g casein/kg alone, for the first 5 d post-anaesthesia.

3. Anaesthesia-stressed animals consuming the diets with 100 g casein/kg with or without arginine plus glycine supplementation did not differ from each other in N retention.

4. Liver protein content increased after anaesthesia in rats given the high-protein diets; liver transaminase activity increased, whereas muscle transaminase activity decreased, in animals consuming the high protein diets.

5. Possible mechanisms to account for these results are discussed.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1977

References

REFERENCES

Aynsley-Green, A., Biebuyck, J. F. & Alberti, K. G. M. (1973). Diabetologia 9, 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, D. M. & Richardson, D. P. (1974). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 33, 21A.Google Scholar
Goodlad, G. A. J. & Munro, H. N. (1959). Biochem. J. 73, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katona, E. (1975). Chemico-Biol. Interact. 10, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumbers, J., Threlfall, C. J. & Stoner, H. B. (1969). Analyt. Biochem. 31, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, K., Duyck, C., Kendall, J. W. & Greer, M. A. (1964). Endocrinology 74, 981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, F. D. (1957). Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 13, 511.Google Scholar
Munro, H. N. (1966). In Wound Healing, p. 171 [Illingwort, C., editor]. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Nocenti, M. R. (1968). Acta anaesth. scand. 55, 74.Google Scholar
Sitren, H. S. & Fisher, H. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 37, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoren, L. (1974). Acta anaesth. scand. 55, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilston, W. J. & Cuthbertson, D. P. (1970). In Energy Metabolism in Trauma, p. 43 [Porter, R. and Knight, J., editors]. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar