Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:24:36.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oxidation of an indicator amino acid by young pigs receiving diets with varying levels of lysine or threonine, and an assessment of amino acid requirements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Kyu-Il Kim ,
James I. Elliott  and
Henry S. Bayley
Kyu-Il Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
James I. Elliott
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada
Henry S. Bayley
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The catabolism of [14C]phenylalanine was used to indicate the effects of varying the dietary level of lysine and threonine on the retention of dietary amino acids by 2-week-old pigs receiving diets containing skim milk and a mixture of free amino acids.

2. Reducing the dietary level of lysine from 16 to 12 g/kg had no influence on phenylalanine oxidation, reducing the lysine level from 12 to 11 then to 10 g/kg caused an almost linear increase in phenylalanine oxidation whereas further reduction to 9 or 8 g/kg resulted in a less-marked increase in phenylalanine oxidation. This showed that 12 g lysine/kg was required to maximize amino acid retention and indicated that lysine was conserved more effectively at low dietary concentrations than at dietary concentrations approaching the requirement.

3. Reducing the dietary level of threonine from 8 to 6 g/kg had no influence on phenylalanine oxidation, whereas further reduction to 4 g/kg caused a linear increase in phenylalanine catabolism showing that 6 g threonine/kg was required to maximize amino acid retention.

4. Reduction of the levels of lysine, threonine and methionine from the generous levels characteristic of a diet containing 240 g protein from skim milk/kg, to the requirement levels determined separately in the presence of the generous levels of all the other amino acids, resulted in a twofold increase in phenylalanine catabolism. This shows that the pig seems able to conserve limiting intakes of a single amino acid, but not if the intakes of two or three amino acids are limiting.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , September 1983 , pp. 391 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1981). The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Baker, D. H., Katz, G. S. & Easter, R. A. (1975). Journal of Animal Science 40, 851–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavez, E. R. & Bayley, H. S. (1976). British Journal of Nutrition 36, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, S. W. & Hegsted, D. M. (1976). Journal of Nutrition 106, 1089–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M. F., Livingstone, R. M., Baird, B. A. & Atkinson, T. (1979 a). British Journal of Nutrition 41, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M. F., Mennie, I. & Crofts, R. M. J. (1979 b). British Journal of Nutrition 41, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, H. D., Jensen, A. H., Terrill, S. W. & Becker, D. E. (1957). Journal of Animal Science 16, 558–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. I. & Bayley, H. S. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. I., McMillan, I. & Bayley, H. S. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. R., Becker, D. E., Harman, B. G., Norton, H. W. & Jensen, A. H. (1968). Journal of Animal Science 27, 1322–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. R., Becker, D. E., Jensen, A. H., Norton, H. W. & Harmon, B. G. (1965). Journal of Animal Science 24, 409–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1979). Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals no. 2, Nutrient Requirements of Swine, Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Reeds, P. J., Cadenhead, A., Fuller, M. F., Lobley, G. E. & McDonald, J. D. (1980). British Journal of Nutrition 43, 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, W. C. (1937). Science 86, 298–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, H. R., Culik, R. & Eckert, R. E. (1959). Journal of Nutrition 69, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, H. R., Rohdenburg, E. L. & Eckert, R. E. (1960). Journal of Nutrition 72, 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, A. K. & Hegsted, D. M. (1970). Journal of Nutrition 100, 1363–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seber, G. A. F. (1977). Linear Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Sugahara, M., Baker, D. H. & Scott, H. M. (1969). Journal of Nutrition 97, 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar