Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:09:14.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceived barriers in trying to eat healthier – results of a pan-EU consumer attitudinal survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. M. Kearney  and
S. McElhone
J. M. Kearney*
Affiliation:
Institute of European Food Studies, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
S. McElhone
Affiliation:
Institute of European Food Studies, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
*
*Corresponding author: Dr J. Kearney, fax +353 1 670 9176, email iefs@iefs.ie
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information on the perceived difficulties in trying to eat a healthier diet is important in assisting those in nutrition education devise more effective programmes. The objective of this study was to determine the main perceived barriers that people have in trying to eat a healthy diet in the 15 member states of the European Union (EU). A cross-sectional study in which quota-controlled nationally representative samples of approximately 1000 adults (15 years upwards) from each member state completed a face-to-face interview-assisted questionnaire. The most frequently mentioned perceived barriers to healthy eating concerned time and taste factors. Time-related factors were more important for younger respondents and those with a higher level of education, who appear to regard taste as being compromised by healthy eating. Variation exists both between member states and between demographic groups in the frequency of barriers mentioned. A lack of knowledge about healthy eating was not selected by many as an important barrier. A major obstacle to nutrition education is the fact that 70 % of EU subjects believe their diets are already healthy. It may be that nutrition educators should concentrate on showing consumers how to evaluate their own diet appropriately in terms of fat, fibre, and fruit and vegetables. Food-based guidelines may be useful in this endeavour.

Keywords

European UnionBarriersHealthy eatingBeliefsSocio-demographics
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 81 , Issue S1 , June 1999 , pp. S133 - S137
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1999

References

Barnes, MS & Terry, RD (1991) Adherence to the cardiac diet: Attitudes of patients after myocardial infarction. Journal of American Dietetic Association 91, 1435–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brug, J, van Assema, P, Kok, G, Lenderink, T & Glanz, K (1994) Self-rated dietary fat intake: Association with objective assessment of fat, psychosocial factors and intention to change. Journal of Nutrition Education 26, 218–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, G (1992) Food and health: The experts agree. London: Consumers Association.Google Scholar
de Castro, JM (1997) Socio-cultural determinants of meal size and frequency. British Journal of Nutrition 77, (Suppl. 1), S39–S55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAOFAO (1996) Preparation and use of food-based dietary guidelines. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO consultation. Niscosia, Cyprus, Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Glanz, K, Kristal, AR, Sorenson, G, Palombo, R, Heimendinger, J & Probart, C (1993) Development and validation of measurers of psycho-social factors influencing fat and fibre-related behaviour. Preventative Medicine 22, 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, L (1993) Cultural and social acceptability of a healthy diet. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 47, 592–599.Google ScholarPubMed
Hulshof, KF, Lowik, MR, Kistemaker, C, Hermus, RJ, ten Hoor, F & Ockhuizen, T (1993) Comparison of dietary intake data with guidelines: some potential pitfalls (Dutch nutrition surveillance system). Journal of American College Nutrition 12, 176–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearney, M, Kearney, JM & Gibney, MJ (1997) Methods used to conduct a survey on consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health on nationally representative samples of adults from each member state of the European Union. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 51 (Suppl. 2), S3–S7.Google ScholarPubMed
Koikkalainen, M, Lappalainen, R &, Mykkänen, H (1996) Why cardiac patients do not follow the nutritionist's advice: barriers in nutritional advice perceived in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 18, 619–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lappalainen, R, Martinez, JA, Saba, A, Holm, L & Kearney, M (1997) Institute of European Food Studies – Pan-EU survey of consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 51, (Suppl. 2), S36–S40.Google Scholar
Lloyd, HM, Paisley, CM & Mela, DJ (1995) Barriers to the adoption of reduced-fat diets in a UK population. Journal of American Clinical Nutrition 95, 316–322.Google Scholar
MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food) (1994) The dietary and nutritional survey of British adults – Further analysis. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Mela, DJ (1993) Consumer estimates of the percentage energy from fat in common foods. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 47, 735–740.Google ScholarPubMed
Paisley, L, Lloyd, HM, Sparks, P & Mela, DJ (1995) Consumer perceptions of dietary changes for reducing fat intake. Nutrition Research 15, 1755–1766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raats, MM & Sparks, P (1995) Unrealistic optimism about diet related risks: Implications for interventions. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 54, 737–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudat, K (1992) MORI research-attitudes to food, health and nutrition messages among consumers and health professionals. In J Buttris, National Dairy Council (eds) Making sense of food. Getting the message across. Nutrition & Communication. (Proceedings of a conference held on 12 October 1992). London: National Dairy Council.Google Scholar