Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:53:18.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of the chemical composition of lamb carcasses from multi-frequency impedance data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. S. Hegarty ,
M. J. McPhee ,
V. H. Oddy ,
B. J. Thomas  and
L. C. Ward
R. S. Hegarty
Affiliation:
Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
M. J. McPhee
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture Beef Centre, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
V. H. Oddy
Affiliation:
Cattle and Beef Industries Cooperative Research Centre, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
B. J. Thomas
Affiliation:
Centre for Medical and Health Physics, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4001, Australia
L. C. Ward
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis (MFBIA) was used to determine the impedance, reactance and resistance of 103 lamb carcasses (17·1–34·2 kg) immediately after slaughter and evisceration. Carcasses were halved, frozen and one half subsequently homogenized and analysed for water, crude protein and fat content. Three measures of carcass length were obtained. Diagonal length between the electrodes (right side biceps femoris to left side of neck) explained a greater proportion of the variance in water mass than did estimates of spinal length and was selected for use in the index L2/Z to predict the mass of chemical components in the carcass. Use of impedance (Z) measured at the characteristic frequency (Zc) instead of 50 kHz (Z50) did not improve the power of the model to predict the mass of water, protein or fat in the carcass. While L2/Z50 explained a significant proportion of variation in the masses of body water (r2 0·64), protein (r2 0.34) and fat (r20·35), its inclusion in multi-variate indices offered small or no increases in predictive capacity when hot carcass weight (HCW) and a measure of rib fat-depth (GR) were present in the model. Optimized equations were able to account for 65–90% of the variance observed in the weight of chemical components in the carcass. It is concluded that single frequency impedance data do not provide better prediction of carcass composition than can be obtained from measures of HCW and GR. Indices of intracellular water mass derived from impedance at zero frequency and the characteristic frequency explained a similar proportion of the variance in carcass protein mass as did the index L2/Z50.

Keywords

Carcass compositionBioelectrical impedanceLamb
Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 79 , Issue 2 , February 1998 , pp. 169 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1998

References

Ackmann, JA & Seitz, MA (1984) Methods of complex impedance measurements in biological tissue. CRC Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 11, 281–311.Google Scholar
Berg, EP & Marchello, MJ (1994) Bioelectrical impedance analysis for the prediction of fat-free mass in lambs and lamb carcasses. Journal of Animal Science 72, 322–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, RT & Butterfield, RM (1976) New Concepts of Cattle Growth. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Cornish, BH, Ward, LC & Thomas, BJ (1992) Measurement of extracellular and total body water of rats using multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. Nutrition Research 12, 657–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, JR, King, JWB & Brodie, DA (1988) A note on the use of impedance measurements for the prediction of carcass composition in lambs. Animal Production 47, 311–315.Google Scholar
Deurenberg, P, Tagliabue, A & Schouten, FJM (1995) Multi-frequency impedance for the prediction of extracellular water and total body water. British Journal of Nutrition 73, 349–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Waart, FG, Li, R & Deurenberg, P (1993) Comparison of body composition assessments by bioelectrical impedance and by anthropometry in premenopausal Chinese women. British Journal of Nutrition 69, 657–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, KR & Lukaski, HC (1996) Whole-body impedance – what does it measure?. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 64, Suppl., 388s-396s.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, TL, Cui, C, Thomas, BJ, Ward, LC, Quirk, PC, Crawford, D & Shepherd, RW (1994) Evaluation of bioelectric impedance as a measure of body composition in children and adults in health and disease. Nutrition 10, 221–224.Google Scholar
Hopkins, DL & Hegarty, RS (1995) Relationship between bioimpedance and muscle mass in chilled lamb carcasses. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 55, 117–119.Google Scholar
Jenkins, TG, Leymaster, KA & Turlington, LM (1988) Estimation of fat-free soft tissue in lamb carcasses and resistive impedance measurements. Journal of Animal Science 66, 2174–2179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehayias, JJ (1993) Aging and body composition: possibilities for future studies. Journal of Nutrition 123, 454–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Löfgren, B (1951). The electrical impedance of a complex tissue and its relation to changes in volume and fluid distribution: study on rat kidneys. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 23, Suppl. 81, 1–51.Google Scholar
McNeill, GM, Fowler, PA, Maughan, RJ, McGaw, BA, Fuller, MF, Gvozdanovic, D & Gvozdanovic, S (1991) Body fat in lean and overweight women estimated by six methods. British Journal of Nutrition 65, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nevill, AM & Holder, RG (1995) Body mass index: a measure of fatness or leanness?. British Journal of Nutrition 73, 507–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, RA, Fearon, KCH, Watson, W, Hume, R & Shenkin, A (1990) Assessment of body composition by bioelectrical impedance compared with anthropometry, total body potassium and tritiated water dilution. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 49, 195A.Google Scholar
Ross, JG, Preston, RL & Bartle, SJ (1992) Evaluation of sodium thiosulphate as an extracellular water marker in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 70, 434–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sainz, RD & Tulloh, NM (1990) Measurement of body composition in farm animals: research and practical applications. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 15, 196–201.Google Scholar
Searle, TW & Graham, NMcC (1975) Studies of weaner sheep during and after a period of weight stasis. II. Body composition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Settle, RG, Foster, KR, Epstein, BR & Mullen, JL (1980) Nutritional assessment: whole-body impedance and body fluid compartments. Nutrition and Cancer 2, 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slanger, WD, Marchello, MJ, Busboom, JR, Meyer, HH, Mitchell, LA, Hendrix, WF, Mills, RR & Warnock, WD (1994) Predicting total weight of retail-ready lamb cuts from bioelectrical impedance measurements taken at the processing plant. Journal of Animal Science 72, 1467–1474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, SP, Bramley, PN, Heighton, R, Green, JH, Horsman, A, Losowsky, MS & Smith, MA (1993) Estimation of body composition from bioelectrical impedance of body segments: comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. British Journal of Nutrition 69, 645–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, DC, Baird, T, Scrimgeour, CM, McClure, G, Halliday, HL, Reid, MMcC & Rennie, MJ (1991) Total body water measurement in very low birth weight infants using bioelectrical impedance. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 51, 39A.Google Scholar