Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T23:15:14.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prognostic value of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria including systemic inflammation in patients with advanced cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2025

Bruna M. M. Rocha
Affiliation:
Molecular Biology and Nutrition Research Group, School of Medicine, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia 38405-320, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Josh McGovern
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, Scotland, UK
Carlos E. Paiva
Affiliation:
Palliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, SP, Brazil
Ross D. Dolan
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, Scotland, UK
Bianca S. R. Paiva
Affiliation:
Palliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, SP, Brazil
Daniel D. Preto
Affiliation:
Palliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, SP, Brazil
Barry J. Laird
Affiliation:
Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland, UK
Yara C. P. Maia*
Affiliation:
Molecular Biology and Nutrition Research Group, School of Medicine, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia 38405-320, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Donald C. McMillan
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, Scotland, UK
*
Corresponding author: Yara Cristina de Paiva Maia; Email: yara.maia@ufu.br

Abstract

An assessment of systemic inflammation and nutritional status may form the basis of a framework to examine the prognostic value of cachexia in patients with advanced cancer. The objective of the study was to examine the prognostic value of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria, including BMI, weight loss (WL) and systemic inflammation (as measured by the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS)), in advanced cancer patients. Three criteria were examined in a combined cohort of patients with advanced cancer, and their relationship with survival was examined using Cox regression methods. Data were available on 1303 patients. Considering BMI and the mGPS, the 3-month survival rate varied from 74 % (BMI > 28 kg/m2) to 61 % (BMI < 20 kg/m2) and from 84 % (mGPS 0) to 60 % (mGPS 2). Considering WL and the mGPS, the 3-month survival rate varied from 81 % (WL ± 2·4 %) to 47 % (WL ≥ 15 %) and from 93 % (mGPS 0) to 60 % (mGPS 2). Considering BMI/WL grade and mGPS, the 3-month survival rate varied from 86 % (BMI/WL grade 0) to 59 % (BMI/WL grade 4) and from 93 % (mGPS 0) to 63 % (mGPS 2). When these criteria were combined, they better predicted survival. On multivariate survival analysis, the most highly predictive factors were BMI/WL grade 3 (HR 1·454, P = 0·004), BMI/WL grade 4 (HR 2·285, P < 0·001) and mGPS 1 and 2 (HR 1·889, HR 2·545, all P < 0·001). In summary, a high BMI/WL grade and a high mGPS as outlined in the BMI/WL grade/mGPS framework were consistently associated with poorer survival of patients with advanced cancer. It can be readily incorporated into the routine assessment of patients.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fearon, K, Strasser, F, Anker, SD, et al. (2011) Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol 12, 489495.Google Scholar
Arends, J, Strasser, F, Gonella, S, et al. (2021) Cancer cachexia in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. ESMO Open 6, 118.Google Scholar
Bachmann, J, Heiligensetzer, M, Krakowski-Roosen, H, et al. (2008) Cachexia worsens prognosis in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 12, 11931201.Google Scholar
Arends, J, Bachmann, P, Baracos, V, et al. (2017) ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr 36, 1148.Google Scholar
Daly, LE, Dolan, RD, Power, DG, et al. (2020) Determinants of quality of life in patients with incurable cancer. Cancer 126, 28722882.Google Scholar
Kaasa, S, Loge, JH, Fayers, P, et al. (2008) Symptom assessment in palliative care: a need for international collaboration. J Clin Oncol 26, 38673873.Google Scholar
Cederholm, T, Jensen, GL, Correia, M, et al. (2019) GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition - a consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clin Nutr 38, 19.Google Scholar
Martin, L, Senesse, P, Gioulbasanis, I, et al. (2014) Diagnostic criteria for the classification of cancer-associated weight loss. J Clin Oncol 33, 9099.Google Scholar
Martin, L, Muscaritoli, M, Bourdel-Marchasson, I, et al. (2021) Diagnostic criteria for cancer cachexia: reduced food intake and inflammation predict weight loss and survival in an international, multi-cohort analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 12, 11891202.Google Scholar
Laird, BJ, Kaasa, S, McMillan, DC, et al. (2013) Prognostic factors in patients with advanced cancer: a comparison of clinicopathological factors and the development of an inflammation-based prognostic system. Clin Cancer Res 19, 54565464.Google Scholar
Dolan, RD, Daly, LE, Simmons, CP, et al. (2020) The relationship between ECOG-PS, mGPS, BMI/WL grade and body composition and physical function in patients with advanced cancer. Cancers 12, 1187.Google Scholar
Dolan, RD, Daly, L, Sim, WMJ, et al. (2020) Comparison of the prognostic value of ECOG-PS, mGPS and BMI/WL: implications for a clinically important framework in the assessment and treatment of advanced cancer. Clin Nutr 39, 28892895.Google Scholar
von Elm, E, Altman, DG, Egger, M, et al. (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370, 14531457.Google Scholar
McMillan, DC (2008) An inflammation-based prognostic score and its role in the nutrition-based management of patients with cancer. Proc Nutr Soc 67, 257262.Google Scholar
McGovern, J, Dolan, RD, Skipworth, RJ, et al. (2022) Cancer cachexia: a nutritional or a systemic inflammatory syndrome? Br J Cancer 6, 14.Google Scholar
Rocha, BMM, Dolan, RD, Paiva, CE, et al. (2022) Inflammation and performance status: the cornerstones of prognosis in advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 65, 348357.Google Scholar
Laird, BJ, McMillan, DC, Fayers, P, et al. (2013) The systemic inflammatory response and its relationship to pain and other symptoms in advanced cancer. Oncologist 18, 10501055.Google Scholar
Dolan, RD, Almasaudi, AS, Dieu, LB, et al. (2019) The relationship between computed tomography derived body composition, systemic inflammatory response, and survival in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 10, 111122.Google Scholar
Hacker, UT, Hasenclever, D, Baber, R, et al. (2022) Modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) is correlated with sarcopenia and dominates the prognostic role of baseline body composition parameters in advanced gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer patients undergoing first-line treatment from the phase III EXPAND trial. Ann Oncol 22, 670676.Google Scholar
MacDonald, N, Easson, AM, Mazurak, VC, et al. (2003) Understanding and managing cancer cachexia. J Am Coll Surg 197, 143161.Google Scholar
Wallengren, O, Iresjo, BM, Lundholm, K, et al. (2015) Loss of muscle mass in the end of life in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 23, 7986.Google Scholar
Malietzis, G, Currie, AC, Johns, N, et al. (2016) Skeletal muscle changes after elective colorectal cancer resection: a longitudinal study. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 25392547.Google Scholar
Zhang, X, Tang, M, Zhang, Q, et al. (2021) The GLIM criteria as an effective tool for nutrition assessment and survival prediction in older adult cancer patients. Clin Nutr 40, 12241232.Google Scholar
Brown, D, Loeliger, J, Stewart, J, et al. (2023) Relationship between global leadership initiative on malnutrition (GLIM) defined malnutrition and survival, length of stay and post-operative complications in people with cancer: a systematic review. Clin Nutr 42, 255268.Google Scholar
Matsui, R, Rifu, K, Watanabe, J, et al. (2023) Impact of malnutrition as defined by the GLIM criteria on treatment outcomes in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr 42, 615624.Google Scholar