Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:40:58.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relative biological potencies of retinyl palmitate and β-carotene for the milk-fed lamb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

O. Faruque
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Australia
D. M. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Thirty-four cross-bred newborn lambs were used. A high-protein diet (25% protein calories) was supplemented daily with retinyl palmitate (range, 13.75–440 μg/kg live weight 24 h), or with β-carotene (range, 68.5–2200 μg/kg live weight 24 h) for 21 days.

2. Live-weight gain was not increased by supplementing the basal diet with either retinyl palmitate or β-carotene.

3. The relative weights of β-carotene and retinyl palmitate (expressed as retinol) that were required to produce equivalent concentrations of retinol in the serum varied from 5:1 to 25:1, and for the liver (retinal + retinyl esters, expressed as retinol) the ratio varied from 3:1 to 9:1.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1970

References

Bessey, O. A., Lowry, O. H., Brock, M. J. & Lopez, J. A. (1946). J. biol. Chem. 166, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faruque, O. & Walker, D. M. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausheer, W., Moor, H., Nobile, S., Mueller, P. B. & Wagner, H. (1964). In Schweiz. Lebensmittelbuch. Vol. 1, 5th ed., p. 655. Bern: Eidg Drucksachen-und Material Centrale.Google Scholar
Myers, G. S. Jr, Eaton, H. D. & Rousseau, J. E. Jr (1959), J. Anim. Sci. 18, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, J. E. Jr, Eaton, H. D., Teichman, R., Helmboldt, C. F., Jungherr, E. L., Bacon, E. L. & Beall, G. (1956). J. Dairy Sci. 39, 1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar