Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:49:10.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal variations in glucose metabolism of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.) estimated with [U-14C]glucose and [3-3H]glucose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

J. R. Luick ,
S. J. Person ,
R. D. Cameron  and
R. G. White
J. R. Luick
Affiliation:
Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99701, USA
S. J. Person
Affiliation:
Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99701, USA
R. D. Cameron
Affiliation:
Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99701, USA
R. G. White
Affiliation:
Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99701, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The pool size, space and rate of irreversible loss of glucose were estimated with primed infusions of [U-14C]glucose in reindeer cows within 6 h of being taken from outdoor pens or from free grazing in the field.

2. In conjunction with primed infusions of [U-14C]glucose, single injections of [3-3H]glucose were also used to estimate pool size, space, transfer rate, and turnover time of glucose.

3. Except in a period of severe undernutrition, the concentration of glucose in plasma was higher (range 0·76–1·40 mg/ml) than that recorded for other ruminants.

4. The size of the glucose pool (range 8–35 g) varied in parallel with plasma glucose concentration and was generally distributed in a space in excess of the extracellular fluid volume.

5. The lowest rates of irreversible loss of glucose (approximately 1·7 mg/min per kg0·75) were measured when cows were in mid pregnancy and when available food was scarce; the highest rate (5·5 mg/min per kg0·75) was found in cows during mid summer.

6. Changes in irreversible loss and transfer rate of glucose are interpreted in relation to changes in body composition (estimated in a parallel study), subjective assessment of available food and factors known to control glucose metabolism in other ruminants.

7. The difference between glucose transfer rate and rate of irreversible loss of glucose was used as an index of the rate of resynthesis of glucose from products of glucose catabolism. The rates of glucose resynthesis were highest during a period of rapid growth (4·52 mg/min per kg0·75 or 45% of the glucose transfer rate) and in mid and late pregnancy (respectively 4·14 and 4·28 mg/min per kg0·75 or 71 and 59% of the transfer rate).

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , March 1973 , pp. 245 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1973

References

REFERENCES

Annison, E. F., Brown, R. E., Leng, R. A., Lindsay, D. B. & West, C. B. (1967). Biochem. J. 104, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annison, E. F., Lindsay, D. B. & White, K. R. (1963). Biochem. J. 88, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. (1965). In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant p. 272 [Dougherty, R. W., editor]. Washington, DC: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Ballard, F. J., Hanson, R. W. & Kronfeld, D. S. (1969). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 28, 218.Google Scholar
Bassett, J. M. (1970). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 23, 903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, E. N. (1963). Am. J. Physiol. 204, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, E. N. & Hogue, D. E. (1967). Am. J. Physiol. 213, 1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, E. N., Roe, W. E. & Kon, K. (1966). Am. J. Physiol. 211, 793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1964). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 23, 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boda, J. M. (1964). Am. J. Physiol. 206, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, G. F. Jr. (1970). New Engl. J. Med. 282, 668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, G. P. Jr, Herrera, M. G., Morgan, A. P., Soeldner, J. S., Steinke, J., Levy, P. L., Reichard, G. A. Jr & Kipnis, D. M. (1966). J. clin. Invest. 45, 1751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, G. F. Jr & Owen, O. E. (1967). In Carbohydrate Metabolism and its Disorders p. 497 [Dickens, F., Randle, P. J. and Whelan, W. J., editors]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. D. & Luick, J. R. (1972). Can. J. Zool. 50, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coop, I. E. (1962). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dash, J. A. & Lindsay, D. B. (1967). J. Endocr. 37, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieterich, K. A. (1970). J. Am. vet. med. Ass. 157, 5.Google Scholar
Dieterich, R. A. & Luick, J. R. (1971). Lab. Anim. Sci. 21, 817.Google Scholar
Druri, S. M. (1960). Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. Sci. Res. Inst. Agr. of the Far North, Leningrad, no. 31.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. (1971). J. Anim. Sci. 33, 1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, E. J. H. (1963). Biochem. J. 88, 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, E. J. H. (1965). Br. vet. J. 121, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, W. S. (1937). J. biol. Chem. 120, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, W. A. & Phillips, R. W. (1968). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 27, no. 2, p. 557.Google Scholar
Huggett, A. St G. & Nixon, D. A. (1957). Biochem. J. 66, 12P.Google Scholar
Jarrett, I. G., Jones, G. B. & Potter, B. J. (1964). Biochem. J. 90, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. B. (1965). Analyt. Biochem. 12, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judson, G. J., Anderson, B., Luick, J. K. & Leng, R. A. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judson, G. J. & Leng, R. A. (1968). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 7, 354.Google Scholar
Karaev, G. I. (1961). In Reindeer Husbandry p. 129 [Zhigunov, P. S., editor]. Translated by M. Fleischman, US Department of Commerce. Jerusalem: Monson.Google Scholar
Kelsall, J. P. (1968). The Caribou. Ottawa: Queen's Printer.Google Scholar
Kleiber, M. (1961). The Fire of Life. New York and London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Klein, D. R. (1965). Ecol. Monogr. 35, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, D. R. (1948). J. Wildl. Mgmt 32, 350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, C. J. & Cowan, I. McT. (1962). Can. J. Zool. 40, 863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronfeld, D. S. (1958). Cornell Vet. 48, 394.Google Scholar
Kronfeld, D. S. & Raggi, F. (1964). Am. J. Physiol. 206, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronfeld, D. S., Ramberg, C. F. Jr & Shames, D. M. (1971). Am. J. Physiol. 220, 886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronfeld, D. S. & Simesm, M. G. (1961). Cornell Vet. 51, 478.Google Scholar
Kronfeld, D. S., Tombropoulos, E. G. & Kleiber, M. (1959). J. appl. Physiol. 14, 1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhota, J., Rieger, S. & Lazar, V. A. (1970). J. Wildl. Mgmt 34, 565.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I. & Pullar, J. D. (1963). Anim. Prod. 5, 1.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I. & Reid, G. W. (1963). Anim. Prod. 5, 11.Google Scholar
Leng, R. A. (1970). Adv. vet. Sci. 14, 209.Google Scholar
Levy, E. N. & Madden, E. A. (1933). N. Z. Jl Agric. 46, 267.Google Scholar
Lindsay, D. B. (1960). In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant p. 235 [Lewis, D., editor]. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Lindsay, D. B. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant p. 438 [Phillipson, A. T., editor]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Luick, J. R., Person, S. J., Cameron, R. D. & White, R. G. (1971). J. Anim. Sci. 33, 260 (abstract).Google Scholar
McEwan, E. H. (1968 a). Can. J. Zool. 46, 1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwan, E. H. (1968 b). Can. J. Zool. 46, 1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwan, E. H. & Wood, A. J. (1966). Can. J. Zool. 44, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Person, S. J., Luick, J. R., Cameron, R. D. &White, R. G. (1971). Proc. 22nd Alaska Sci. Conf., Alaska Div., Am. Ass. Advmt. Sci. Fairbanks. p. 101.Google Scholar
Reichard, G. A., Moury, N. F. Jr, Hochella, K. J., Patterson, A. L. & Weinhouse, S. (1963). J. biol. Chem. 238, 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, K. L. (1950). Aust. J. agric. Res. 1, 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, P. E. B. & Ford, E. J. H. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 26, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotter, G. W. (1964). Bull. Can. Wildl. Serv. Wildl. Mgmt Ser. 1, no. 18, p. 111.Google Scholar
Scotter, G. W. (1965). J. Range Mgmt 18, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setchell, B. P. & McClymont, G. L. (1955). Aust. vet. J. 31, 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjenneberg, S. & Slagsvold, L. (1968). Rein driften. Oslo/Bergen/Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Skoog, R. O. (1968). Ecology of the Caribou (Rangifer tarandus granti) in Alaska. PhD Dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Skuncke, F. (1969). Biol. Pap. Univ. Alaska no. 8.Google Scholar
Steel, J. W. & Leng, R. A. (1968). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 7, 342.Google Scholar
Steele, R., Wall, J. S., deBodo, R. C. & Altszuler, N. (1956). Am. J. Physiol. 187, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullrey, U. E., Youatt, W. G., Johnson, H. E., Fay, L. D., Purser, D. B., Schoepke, B. L. & Magee, W. T. (1971). J. Wildl. Mgmt 35, 732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, D. W., Head, H. H. & Wilcox, C. J. (1969). J. Dairy Sci. 52, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. G., Steel, J. W., Leng, R. A. & Luick, J. R. (1969). Biochem. J. 114, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar