Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:52:14.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Hideaki Kumahara ,
Yves Schutz ,
Makoto Ayabe ,
Mayumi Yoshioka ,
Yutaka Yoshitake ,
Munehiro Shindo ,
Kojiro Ishii  and
Hiroaki Tanaka
Hideaki Kumahara
Affiliation:
Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Laboratory of Human Performance and Fitness, Graduate School of Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Yves Schutz*
Affiliation:
Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Makoto Ayabe
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Human Performance and Fitness, Graduate School of Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Mayumi Yoshioka
Affiliation:
Molecular Endocrinology and Oncology Research Center, Laval University Medical Center and Laval University, Quebec, Canada
Yutaka Yoshitake
Affiliation:
Department for Interdisciplinary Studies of Lifelong Sport and Physical Activity, National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya, Kanoya, Kagoshima, Japan
Munehiro Shindo
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sports and Health Science, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
Kojiro Ishii
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Human Performance and Fitness, Graduate School of Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Hiroaki Tanaka
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sports and Health Science, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Yves Schutz, fax +41 21 692 55 95, email Yves.Schutz@iphysiol.unil.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Assessing the total energy expenditure (TEE) and the levels of physical activity in free-living conditions with non-invasive techniques remains a challenge. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of a new uniaxial accelerometer for assessing TEE and physical-activity-related energy expenditure (PAEE) over a 24 h period in a respiratory chamber, and to establish activity levels based on the accelerometry ranges corresponding to the operationally defined metabolic equivalent (MET) categories. In study 1, measurement of the 24 h energy expenditure of seventy-nine Japanese subjects (40 (SD 12) years old) was performed in a large respiratory chamber. During the measurements, the subjects wore a uniaxial accelerometer (Lifecorder; Suzuken Co. Ltd, Nagoya, Japan) on their belt. Two moderate walking exercises of 30 min each were performed on a horizontal treadmill. In study 2, ten male subjects walked at six different speeds and ran at three different speeds on a treadmill for 4 min, with the same accelerometer. O2 consumption was measured during the last minute of each stage and was expressed in MET. The measured TEE was 8447 (SD 1337) kJ/d. The accelerometer significantly underestimated TEE and PAEE (91·9 (SD 5·4) and 92·7 (SD 17·8) % chamber value respectively); however, there was a significant correlation between the two values (r 0·928 and 0·564 respectively; P<0·001). There was a strong correlation between the activity levels and the measured MET while walking (r2 0·93; P<0·001). Although TEE and PAEE were systematically underestimated during the 24 h period, the accelerometer assessed energy expenditure well during both the exercise period and the non-structured activities. Individual calibration factors may help to improve the accuracy of TEE estimation, but the average calibration factor for the group is probably sufficient for epidemiological research. This method is also important for assessing the diurnal profile of physical activity.

Keywords

AccelerometerDaily energy expenditurePhysical activityRespiration chamber
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 91 , Issue 2 , February 2004 , pp. 235 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2004

References

Bassett, DR Jr, Ainsworth, BE, Swartz, AM, Strath, SJ, O'Brien, WL & King, GA (2000) Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32, S471–S480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bland, JM & Altman, DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouten, CV, Verboeket-Van de Venne, WP, Westerterp, KR, Verduin, M & Janssen, JD (1996) Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water. J Appl Physiol 81, 1019–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouten, CV, Westerterp, KR, Verduin, M & Janssen, JD (1994) Assessment of energy expenditure for physical activity using a triaxial accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26, 1516–1523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bray, MS, Wong, WW, Morrow, JR Jr, Butte, NF & Pivarnik, JM (1994) Caltrac versus calorimeter determination of 24-h energy expenditure in female children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26, 1524–1530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brozek, J, Grande, F, Anderson, JT & Keys, A (1963) Densitometric analysis of body composition: Review of some quantitative assumptions. Ann NY Acad Sci 110, 113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, KY & Sun, M (1997) Improving energy expenditure estimation by using a triaxial accelerometer. J Appl Physiol 83, 2112–2122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Du Bois, BS & Du Bois, EF (1916) Clinical calorimetry: a formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Med 17, 863–871.Google Scholar
Ebina, N, Shimada, M, Tanaka, H et al. (2002) Comparative study of total energy expenditure in Japanese men using doubly labeled water method against activity record, heart rate monitoring, and accelerometer methods. Jpn J Phys Fitness Sports Med 51, 151–164 (In Japanese: English abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esparza, J, Fox, C, Harper, IT et al. (2000) Daily energy expenditure in Mexican and USA Pima indians: low physical activity as a possible cause of obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehling, PC, Smith, DL, Warner, SE & Dalsky, GP (1999) Comparison of accelerometers with oxygen consumption in older adults during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31, 171–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fields, DA, Goran, MI & McCrory, MA (2002) Body-composition assessment via air-displacement plethysmography in adults and children: a review. Am J Clin Nutr 75, 453–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleisch, A (1951) Le métabolisme basal standard et sa détermination au moyen du "Metabocalculator" (Basal standard metabolic rate and its determination by means of the "Metabocalculator"). Helv Med Acta 18, 23–44.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization/United Nations University (1985) Energy and Protein Requirements. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. Technical Report Series no. 724 Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Freedson, PS, Melanson, E & Sirard, J (1998) Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30, 777–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujimoto, S, Watanabe, T, Sakamoto, A, Yukawa, K & Morimoto, K (1968) Studies on the physical surface area of Japanese. 18. Calculation formulas in three stages over all ages. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi 23, 443–450(In Japanese: English abstract).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, JA & Benedict, FG (1919) A Biometric Study of Basal Metabolism in Man. Publication no. 279. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute Washington.Google Scholar
Haymes, EM & Byrnes, WC (1993) Walking and running energy expenditure estimated by Caltrac and indirect calorimetry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25, 1365–1369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Health Promotion and Nutrition Division, Health Service Bureau, Ministry of Health and Welfare (1996) Recommended Dietary Allowances for the Japanese, 5th revision 20–24. Tokyo: Dai-ichi shuppan Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Jequier, E & Schutz, Y (1983) Long-term measurements of energy expenditure in humans using a respiration chamber. Am JClin Nutr 38, 989–998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, JA, Baukol, PA & Westerterp, KR (2001) Validation of the Tracmor triaxial accelerometer system for walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33, 1593–1597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, JA, Eberhardt, NL & Jensen, MD (1999) Role of nonexercise activity thermogenesis in resistance to fat gain in humans. Science 283, 212–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Gonzalez, MA, Martinez, JA, Hu, FB, Gibney, MJ & Kearney, J (1999) Physical inactivity, sedentary lifestyle and obesity in the European Union. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 23, 1192–1201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meijer, EP, Goris, AH, Wouters, L & Westerterp, KR (2001) Physical inactivity as a determinant of the physical activity level in the elderly. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25, 935–939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meijer, GA, Westerterp, KR, Koper, Hten Hoor, F (1989) Assessment of energy expenditure by recording heart rate and body acceleration. Med Sci Sports Exerc 21, 343–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagamine, S & Suzuki, S (1964) Anthropometry and body composition of Japanese young men and women. Hum Biol 36, 8–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Nichols, JF, Morgan, CG, Sarkin, JA, Sallis, JF & Calfas, KJ (1999) Validity, reliability, and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometer as a measure of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31, 908–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pate, RR, Pratt, M, Blair, SN et al. (1995) Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. J Am Med Assoc 273, 402–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravussin, E & Bogardus, C (2000) Energy balance and weight regulation: genetics versus environment. Br J Nutr 83, S17–S20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, JD & Reid, DD (1952) Standards for the basal metabolism of normal people in Britain. Lancet 1, 940–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schutz, Y, Ravussin, E, Diethelm, R & Jequier, E (1982) Spontaneous physical activity measured by radar in obese and control subject studied in a respiration chamber. Int J Obes 6, 23–28.Google Scholar
Schutz, Y, Weinsier, RL & Hunter, GR (2001) Assessment of free-living physical activity in humans: an overview of currently available and proposed new measures. Obes Res 9, 368–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, I, Kawakami, N & Shimizu, H (1997) Accuracy of calorie counter method to assess daily energy expenditure and physical activities in athletes and nonathletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 37, 131–136.Google ScholarPubMed
Terrier, P, Aminian, K & Schutz, Y (2001) Can accelerometry accurately predict the energy cost of uphill/downhill walking? Ergonomics 44, 48–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinsier, RL, Hunter, GR, Heini, AF, Goran, MI & Sell, SM (1998) The etiology of obesity: relative contribution of metabolic factors, diet, and physical activity. Am J Med 105, 145–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamada, S & Baba, Y (1990) Validity of daily energy expenditure estimated by calorie counter combined with accelerometer. J Univ Occup Environ Health 12, 77–82 (In Japanese: English abstract).Google ScholarPubMed