Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:44:47.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in the weight, specific gravity and composition of the antlers of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

H. HyvÄrinen ,
R. N. B. Kay  and
W. J. Hamilton
H. HyvÄrinen
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
R. N. B. Kay
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
W. J. Hamilton
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organization, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Antlers were removed in September from 2-4-year-old red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Both well-fed penned stags and less. well-nourished grazing stags were studied.

2. For deer of the same age, both log antler weight and log antler specific gravity were related to body-weight in September and to body-weight gain between March and September. The antlers of 3- and 4-year-old stags were heavier and tended to be denser relative to body-weight and body-weight gain than those of 2-year-old stags.

3. For grazing stags of a given age, antler weight and specific gravity, and body-weight and body-weight gain, were progressively less in the three successive years of the study. This appeared to reflect increasing stocking rate over this period.

4. The composition of the antlers did not vary significantly between penned and grazing stags or with age. However the concentrations of ash, phosphorus and magnesium in dry matter showed significant positive correlations with specific gravity, that of zinc a significant negative correlation, while calcium, copper and manganese showed no significant correlation.

5. The antlers evidently provide a useful index of the changes in body-weight of the stags.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , November 1977 , pp. 301 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1977

References

REFERENCES

Arman, P., Kay, R. N. B., Goodall, E. D. & Sharman, G. A. M. (1974). J. Reprod. Fert. 37, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, W. J., Epling, G. P., Kainer, R. A. & Davis, R. W. (1968). Anat. Rec. 162, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bélanger, L. F., Choquette, L. P. E. & Cousineau, J. G. (1967). Calc. Tissue Res. 1, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, R. (1963). Naturaliste can. 90, 310.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Kay, R. N. B., Sharman, G. A. M., Cunningham, J. M. M. & Hamilton, W. J. (1974). Farming the Red Deer. Edinburgh: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Chapman, D. 1. (1975). Mammal Rev. 5, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R. L., Hartsook, E. W. & Whelan, J. B. (1968). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 129, 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallemagne, M. J. & Richelle, L. J. (1973). In Biological Mineralization, p. 23 [Zipkin, I. editor]. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Field, A. C., Suttle, N. F. & Nisbet, D. I. (1975). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 85, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, C. E., McEwan, L. C., Magruder, N. D., Ingram, R. H. & Swift, R. W. (1955). Bull. Pa agric. Exp. Stn no. 600, 1.Google Scholar
Gitelman, H. J. (1967). Analyt. Biochem. 18, 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goss, R. J. (1963). Publs Am. Ass. Advmt Sci. no. 75, p. 339.Google Scholar
Goss, R. J. (1970). Clin. Orthop. 69, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1974). Evolution 28, 191.Google Scholar
Grant, S. A. & Hunter, R. F. (1966). New Phytol. 65, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guggenheim, K. & Gaster, D. (1973). In Biological Mineralization, p. 443 [Zipkin, I. editor]. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S. (1931). Proc. Zool. Soc., Lond. 819.Google Scholar
Kuhlman, R. E., Rainey, R. & O'Neill, R. (1963). J. Bone Jt Surg. 45A, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloiy, G. M. O. (1968). The physiology of digestion and metabolism in the red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Meister, W. (1956). Anat. Rec. 124, 709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojanen, M., Haarakangas, H. & Hyvärinen, H. (1975). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 50A, 581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillippo, M., Lincoln, G. A. & Lawrence, C. B. (1972). J. Endocr. 53, xlviii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, A. G. (1965). In Technicon Symposium: Automation in Analytical Chemistry, p. 137 [Skeggs, L. T. editor]. New York: Mediad Inc.Google Scholar
Staines, B. W. (1970). The management and dispersion of a red deer population in Glen Dye, Kincardineshire. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Vogt, F. (1936). Neue Wege der Hege. Neudamm: Verlag J. Neumann.Google Scholar