Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T19:49:46.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Autocratic Legislatures and Expropriation Risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2015

Abstract

An important question for international investors concerns the relationship between political institutions and property rights. Yet a debate remains over whether authoritarian institutions promote favorable investment climates. Using data on oil nationalization in a sample of autocracies, this study finds that legislatures are correlated with lower expropriation risk in non-personalist dictatorships, but a higher risk of nationalization in personalist regimes. The results show a consistent pattern between authoritarian institutions and property protections, for which context matters.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Political Science, West Virginia University (email: matthew.wilson@mail.wvu.edu); Department of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University (email: josephgwright@gmail.com). Online appendices and data replication sets are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123415000149.

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albertus, Michael, and Menaldo, Victor. 2012. If You’re Against Them You’re With Us: The Effect of Expropriation on Autocratic Survival. Comparative Political Studies 45 (8):9731003.Google Scholar
Alnasrawi, Abbas. 1994. The Economy of Iraq: Oil, Wars, Destruction of Development and Prospects, 1950–2010. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Thorsten, Clarke, George, Groff, Alberto, Keefer, Philip, and Walsh, Patrick. 2001. New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15 (1):165176.Google Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa. 2010. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Svolik, Milan W.. 2013. The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships. Journal of Politics 75 (2):300316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and van de Walle, Nicolas. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cheibub, Jose Antonio, Gandhi, Jennifer, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2010. Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited. Public Choice 143:67101.Google Scholar
Clapham, Christopher. 1985. Third World Politics: An Introduction. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Przeworski, Adam. 2007. Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats. Comparative Political Studies 40 (11):12791301.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Sandcastles and Paradigms: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara, Wright, Joseph, and Frantz, Erica. 2014. Autocratic Regimes: A New Data Set. Perspectives on Politics 12 (2):313331.Google Scholar
Gehlbach, Scott, and Keefer, Philip. 2012. Private Investment and the Institutionalization of Collective Action in Autocracies: Ruling Parties and Legislatures. Journal of Politics 74 (2):621635.Google Scholar
Guriev, Sergei, Kolotilin, Anton, and Sonin, Konstantin. 2011. Determinants of Nationalization in the Oil Sector: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 27 (2):301323.Google Scholar
Haber, Stephen, Razo, Armando, and Maurer, Noel. 2003. The Politics of Property Rights: Political Instability, Credible Commitments, and Economic Growth in Mexico, 1876–1929. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haddad, George M. [1965] 1971. Revolutions and Military Rule in the Middle East: The Arab States Pt. I: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Jordan, Vol. 2. New York: Robert Speller & Sons Publishers.Google Scholar
Hadenius, Axel, and Teorell, Jan. 2007. Pathways from Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 18:143156.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hazlett, Chad. 2014. Kernel Regularized Least Squares: Reducing Misspecification Bias with a Flexible and Interpretable Machine Learning Approach. Political Analysis 22 (2):143168.Google Scholar
Hajzler, Christopher. 2012. Expropriation of Foreign Direct Investments: Sectoral Patterns from 1993 to 2006. Review of World Economics 148 (1):119149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartlyn, Jonathan. 1998. The Trujillo Regime in the Dominican Republic. In Sultanistic Regimes, edited by Houchang E. Chehabi and Juan J. Linz, 85112. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H., and Rosberg, Carl G.. 1982. Personal Rule in Black Africa: Prince, Autocrat, Prophet, Tyrant. Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Nathan. 2008. Political Risk, Democratic Institutions, and Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of Politics 70 (4):10401052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Nathan M. 2012. What do Legislatures in Authoritarian Regimes Do?, Blog. Available from pages.wustl.edu/nathanjensen/articles/3419, accessed 15 May 2014.Google Scholar
Jensen, Nathan M., Malesky, Edmund, and Weymouth, Stephen. 2014. Unbundling the Relationship Between Authoritarian Legislatures and Political Risk. British Journal of Political Science 44 (3):655684.Google Scholar
Justesen, Mogens K. 2014. Better Safe Than Sorry: How Property Rights and Veto Players Jointly Affect Economic Growth. Comparative Politics 46 (2):147167.Google Scholar
Justesen, Mogens K., and Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter. 2013. Institutional Interactions and Economic Growth: The Joint Effects of Property Rights, Veto Players and Democratic Capital. Public Choice 157 (3–4):449474.Google Scholar
Kobrin, Stephen J. 1980. Foreign Enterprise and Forced Divestment in LDCs. International Organization 34 (1):6588.Google Scholar
Kobrin, Stephen J.. 1984. Expropriation as an Attempt to Control Foreign Firms in LDCs: Trends from 1960 to 1979. International Studies Quarterly 28 (3):329348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2008. Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule. Comparative Political Studies 41 (4/5):715741.Google Scholar
Malesky, Edmund, and Schuler, Paul. 2010. Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament. American Political Science Review 104 (3):482502.Google Scholar
Malesky, Edmund, Abrami, Regina, and Zheng, Yu. 2011. Institutions and Inequality in Single-Party Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Vietnam and China. Comparative Politics 43 (4):409427.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2002. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002. Version p4v2002e [Computer File]. Available from http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/index.htm, accessed 15 May 2014.Google Scholar
Melton, James. 2014. Credibly Committing to Property Rights: The Roles of Reputation, Institutions, and the Constitution, working paper. Available from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ uc-tqjm0/Files/melton propertyrights.pdf, accessed 15 May 2014.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel S. 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Minor, Michael S. 1994. The Demise of Expropriation as an Instrument of LDC Policy 1980–1992. Journal of International Business Studies 25 (1):177188.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington Jr. 1966. Social Origins of Democracy and Dictatorship: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1989. Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History 49 (4):803832.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2006. Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank’s Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. Journal of Economic Literature 44 (4):973987.Google Scholar
Smith, Benjamin. 2005. Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence Under Single-Party Rule. World Politics 57 (3):421451.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2009. Power Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science 53 (2):477494.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan W.. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Truex, Rory. 2014. Representation Within Bounds. PhD Thesis, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Turits, Richard Lee. 2003. Foundations of Despotism: Peasants, the Trujillo Regime, and Modernity in Dominican History. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jessica L. 2008. Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve. International Organization 62:3564.Google Scholar
Weymouth, Stephen. 2011. Political Institutions and Property Rights: Veto Players and Foreign Exchange Commitments in 127 Countries. Comparative Political Studies 44 (2):211240.Google Scholar
Wiarda, Howard J. 1968. Dictatorship and Development: The Methods of Control in Trujillo’s Dominican Republic. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, John. 1990. What Washington Means by Policy Reform. Latin American Adjustment: How Much has Happened 7:720.Google Scholar
Wilson, Matthew. 2014. A Discreet Critique of Discrete Regime Type Data. Comparative Political Studies 47 (5):689714.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 2008. Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment. American Journal of Political Science 52 (2):322343.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S1

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S1(PDF)
PDF 521.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S2

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S2(File)
File 41.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S3

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S3(File)
File 154.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S4

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S4(File)
File 3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S5

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S5(File)
File 67.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S6

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S6(File)
File 26.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S7

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S7(File)
File 678.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S8

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S8(File)
File 683.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S9

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S9(File)
File 4.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S10

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S10(File)
File 35 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S11

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S11(File)
File 2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S12

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S12(File)
File 5.2 MB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S13

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S13(File)
File 2.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S14

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S14(File)
File 798 Bytes
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S15

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S15(File)
File 1.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S16

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S16(File)
File 43.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S17

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S17(File)
File 1.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wilson and Wright supplementary material S18

Data set and Appendix

Download Wilson and Wright supplementary material S18(File)
File 2.2 KB