Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:26:15.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Hayek's Pessimism: Reason, Tradition and Bounded Constructivist Rationalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Barbara M. Rowland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two competing themes – traditionalism and constitutional design – lead to inconsistency in F. A. Hayek's work. This inconsistency and its implications for understanding his thought are examined. It is shown that his failure to reconcile these conflicting emphases reflects uncertainty about the proportions of reasoned choice and unreflective rule-following in human decisions. This uncertainty is traced to Hayek's growing pessimism about modern man's ability to preserve the market and the traditions upon which the market rests. Once Hayek's pessimism is set aside, the implications of his work on tradition can be developed in a more useful direction. Realization that reason rests on a non-rational matrix and that people's choices affect that matrix should not lead towards embrace and veneration of the past, but towards emphasis on the necessity of responsible political choice in the present and future.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 221 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For discussion of this distinction, see Downing, L. and Thigpen, R., ‘Ideology and Truth-Seeking in Liberal Theory. The Case of Ackerman's Social Justice in the Liberal State’, Review of Politics, 46 (1984), 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Barry, N., ‘Hayek on Liberty’ in Gray, J. and Pelczynski, Z., eds, Conceptions of Liberty in Political Philosophy (London: Athlone Press, 1984).Google Scholar

3 Gray, J., ‘F. A. Hayek on Liberty and Tradition’, Journal of Libertarian Studies, 4 (1980), 119–37, p. 120.Google Scholar

4 Brittan, S., The Role and Limits of Government: Essays in Political Economy (Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1983).Google Scholar

5 Gray, J., Hayek on Liberty (London: Basil Blackwell, 1986), p. 120.Google Scholar

6 Letwin, S., ‘The Achievement of Friedrich A. Hayek’, in Machlup, F., ed., Essays on Hayek (New York: New York University Press, 1976), 147–67.Google Scholar

7 Lowi, Theodore, The End of Liberalism (New York: Norton, 1969).Google Scholar

8 Hayek, F. A., The Political Order of a Free People (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), p. 99.Google Scholar

9 Vaughn, K., ‘Can Democratic Society Reform Itself? The Limits of Constructive Change’ (paper presented to Mont Pélèrin Society, 09 1982).Google Scholar

10 Hayek, F. A., The Constitution of Liberty (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960), p. 36.Google Scholar

11 In this respect, Hayek's work can be usefully compared with that of Burke.

12 Hayek, F. A., The Road to Serfdom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1944), pp. 17, 18.Google Scholar

13 Hayek, , Constitution of Liberty, p. 291.Google Scholar

14 Hayek, F. A., Rules and Order (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973), p. 5.Google Scholar

15 Hayek, , Constitution of Liberty, pp. 183–4.Google Scholar

16 Hayek, , Constitution of Liberty, p. 284.Google Scholar

17 Hayek, , Rules and Order, p. 3.Google Scholar

18 Hayek, , Political Order, p. 105.Google Scholar

19 Hayek, , Political Order, p. 152.Google Scholar

20 Barry, , ‘Hayek on Liberty’, p. 280.Google Scholar

21 Hayek, , Road to Serfdom, p. 166.Google Scholar

22 Hayek, , Rules and Order, p. 5.Google Scholar

23 Hayek, F. A., The Counter-Revolution of Science (Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1979), p. 149.Google Scholar

24 Hayek, , Rules and Order, p. 6.Google Scholar

25 Hayek, F. A., Knowledge, Evolution, and Society (London: Adam Smith Institute, 1984), p. 56.Google Scholar

26 Hayek, , Rules and Order, p. 5.Google Scholar

27 Hayek, F. A., The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1952).Google Scholar

28 Gray, , Hayek on Liberty, p. 24.Google Scholar

29 Hayek, F. A., The Mirage of Social Justice (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), p. 25Google Scholar; cited in Gray, , Hayek on Liberty, p. 24.Google Scholar

30 Gray, , Hayek on Liberty, pp. 24–5.Google Scholar

31 Hayek, F. A., Individualism and Economic Order (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948), p. 22, p. 19.Google Scholar

32 Hayek, F. A., New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978), p. 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33 Hayek, , The Political Order, p. 157.Google Scholar

34 Hayek, , The Political Order, pp. 162, 163.Google Scholar

35 Hayek, , The Political Order, p. 176.Google Scholar

36 Barrett, R., Culture and Conduct (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1984), p. 77.Google Scholar

37 Hayek, , The Political Order, p. 155.Google Scholar

38 Hayek, F. A., Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967), p. 111.Google Scholar

39 Hayek, , The Political Order, p. 155.Google Scholar

40 Hayek, , The Political Order, p. 161.Google Scholar

41 These controversies are addressed in Rowland, B., Ordered Liberty and the Constitutional Framework: The Political Thought of Friedrich A. Hayek (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1987).Google Scholar

42 Hayek, , The Political Order, p. 157.Google Scholar

43 Hayek, , Constitution of Liberty, pp. 398, 394.Google Scholar

44 Hayek, , The Political Order, p. 169.Google Scholar

45 Hayek, , The Political Order, p. 168.Google Scholar

46 Hayek, , The Political Order, pp. 160, 163.Google Scholar

47 Hayek, , Individualism, p. 24, n. 23.Google Scholar

48 Hayek, , Constitution of Liberty, p. 399.Google Scholar

49 Hayek, , Individualism, p. 8.Google Scholar

50 Hayek, , The Political Order, p. 105.Google Scholar

51 Hayek, , The Political Order, p. 105.Google Scholar

52 Hayek, , New Studies, p. 96.Google Scholar

53 Hayek, , Rules and Order, p. 56.Google Scholar

54 Hayek, , Road to Serfdom, p. 240.Google Scholar

55 Hayek, , Rules and Order, p. 4.Google Scholar

56 Hayek, , Constitution of Liberty, p. 11.Google Scholar

57 Hayek, , Constitution of Liberty, p. 11.Google Scholar

58 See Hamowy, Ronald, ‘Law and the Liberal Society: F. A. Hayek's Constitution of Liberty’, Journal of Libertarian Studies, 2 (1978), 287–97.Google Scholar

59 Brittan, , The Role and Limits of Government, p. 63.Google Scholar

60 Hayek, , Constitution of Liberty, p. 12.Google Scholar

61 Hayek, , Constitution of Liberty, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar

62 Hayek, , Constitution of Liberty, p. 6.Google Scholar

63 Hayek, , Road to Serfdom, p. 212.Google Scholar

64 Hayek, , Constitution of Liberty, p. 13.Google Scholar

65 Hayek, , Constitution of Liberty, pp. 261, 263, 287, 292, 342, 355, 365.Google Scholar

66 Hayek, , Knowledge, Evolution, and Society, pp. 40, 46, 56.Google Scholar

67 Hayek, , Road to Serfdom, p. 17.Google Scholar

68 Hayek, , Individualism, p. 19.Google Scholar

69 Hayek, , Road to Serfdom, p. 17.Google Scholar

70 Barry, , ‘Hayek on Liberty’, p. 280.Google Scholar

71 Hayek, , Road to Serfdom, p. 164.Google Scholar

72 Hayek, , Road to Serfdom, p. 212.Google Scholar

73 Hayek, , Knowledge, Evolution, and Society, p. 55.Google Scholar

74 Hayek, , Knowledge, Evolution, and Society, p. 43.Google Scholar

75 Hayek, , Knowledge, Evolution, and Society, p. 48.Google Scholar

76 Hayek, , Knowledge, Evolution, and Society, p. 44.Google Scholar

77 Hayek, , Studies, p. 194.Google Scholar

78 Hayek, , The Mirage of Social Justice, p. 74.Google Scholar

79 Hayek, , Political Order, p. 167.Google Scholar

80 Hayek, F. A., ‘The Origins and Effects of our Morals: a Problem for Science’, in Nishiyama, C. and Leube, K., eds, The Essence of Hayek (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1984), p. 330.Google Scholar

81 Hayek, , ‘The Origins and Effects’, p. 318.Google Scholar

82 It might be argued that this depends on the sense in which individualism is being used. In Hayek's ontological perspective, all social action is individual action, even if it is difficult to explain particular phenomena in terms of individual actions. My own position here – and a central idea in this article – is that Hayek loses sight of his initial ontological position, leading him towards a conservative, almost mystical position regarding tradition. While one may not be able to explain the content of tradition as the result of particular individual choices, it nevertheless remains true that it is only through the acts and words of human agents that tradition exists. Hayek's fear of choices hostile to the traditions he defends prevents him from developing important implications of his ontological individualism.

83 This position on the content of tacit knowledge in a liberal society is controversial. Many analysts of liberalism argue that the liberal tradition lacks a conception of the good or of individual virtue. While space does not allow discussion of the controversy here, recent work challenges the ‘neutral’ conception of the liberal tradition. William Galston, for example, maintains that liberalism rests upon and, indeed, requires some degree of character or virtue in its citizenry. (See, for discussion, Galston's paper, ‘Liberal Virtues’, delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 1987. I cite this paper with Professor Galston's kind permission.) My position is that ideas about that liberal character, and how it is to be attained, form a part of the tacit knowledge of individuals in liberal societies. The tacit nature of these ideas may account for the limited attention they have received from contemporary liberals.

84 Kitwood, T., ‘“Personal Identity” and Personal Integrity’, in Weinreich-Haste, H. and Locke, D., eds, Morality in the Making (New York: Wiley, 1983), p. 228.Google Scholar

85 Hayek, , Rules and Order, p. 69.Google Scholar

86 Shils, E., Tradition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981), p. 205.Google Scholar

87 Barrett, , Culture and Conduct, p. 73.Google Scholar

88 MacIntyre, A., After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984), p. 222.Google Scholar

89 Barrett, , Culture and Conduct, p. 213.Google Scholar

90 Barrett, , Culture and Conduct, p. 211.Google Scholar

91 Hayek, , Political Order, p. 167.Google Scholar

92 Hayek, , Road to Serfdom, p. 212.Google Scholar

93 Simon, Herbert A., ‘Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science’, American Political Science Review, 79 (1985), 293–304, p. 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

94 Goody, J., ‘Literacy and Moral Rationality’, in Stent, G., ed., Morality as a Biological Phenomenon (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980).Google Scholar

95 Markl, H., ‘Report on Group Discussion’Google Scholar, in Stent, , ed., Morality as a Biological Phenomenon, p. 226.Google Scholar

96 Simon, , ‘Human Nature in Politics’, p. 302.Google Scholar