Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:56:31.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Power of Peers: How Transnational Advocacy Networks Shape NGO Strategies on Climate Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Jennifer Hadden  and
Lorien Jasny
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What explains variation in the tactical choices of non-governmental organizations (NGOs)? This article uses network autocorrelation models to establish how the tactical choices of climate change NGOs are shaped by their embeddedness in transnational advocacy networks. Specifically, it finds that NGOs are more likely to adopt protest tactics when adjacent organizations – those with whom they have direct ties – have already done so. The choices of equivalent organizations – those that occupy similar relational roles in the network – do not appear to be influential. Qualitative evidence also shows that NGOs are affected by relational pressure from their peers, which alters their perception of costs and benefits. These findings enhance understanding of how networks influence actors’ behavior and offer insights into the relational processes that generate protest in global politics.

Keywords

climate changeNGOsnetworkssocial movementsenvironmental politics
Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 637 - 659
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland (email: jhadden1@umd.edu); Department of Politics, University of Exeter (email: l.jasny@exeter.ac.uk). The authors wish to particularly thank Carter Butts, Mark Lubell, Jonas Tallberg, Aseem Prakash, Sarah Bush, Jessica Green, Sarah Stroup and Sidney Tarrow for useful feedback on this article. We also thank participants in the Environmental Politics of Governance Workshop, the Political Networks Conference, and the DC IR Workshop for stimulating comments and discussion. Data replication sets are available at http://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS and online appendices are available at https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123416000582.

References

Andrews, Kenneth, and Edwards, Bob. 2004. Advocacy Organizations in the US Political Process. Annual Review of Sociology 30:479–506.Google Scholar
Anselin, Luc. 2013. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Barakso, Maryann. 2010. Brand Identity and the Tactical Repertoires of Advocacy Organizations. In Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action, edited by Aseem Prakash and Mary Kay Gugerty, 155–176. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 2011. Empire of Humanity: A History of Humanitarianism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank, and Leech, Beth. 1998. Basic Interests, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bernauer, Thomas, and Gampfer, Robert. 2013. Effects of Civil Society Involvement on Popular Legitimacy of Global Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Change 23 (2):439–449.Google Scholar
Betsill, Michele M. 2008. Environmental NGOs in the Kyoto Protocol Negotiations: 1995–1997. In NGO Diplomacy, edited by Michele M. Betsill and Elisabeth Corell, 43–66. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beyers, Jan, and Braun, Caelesta. 2014. Ties that Count: Explaining Interest Group Access to Policy-Makers. Journal of Public Policy 34 (1):93–121.Google Scholar
Bob, Clifford. 2005. The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bob, Clifford. 2010. The Market for Human Rights. In Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action, edited by Aseem Prakash and Mary Kay Gugerty, 133–154. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borgatti, Steven, and Everett, Martin. 1997. Network Analysis of 2-Mode Data. Social Networks 19 (2):243–269.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, Christenson, Dino, and Hitt, Matthew. 2013. Quality Over Quantity: Amici Influence and Judicial Decision Making. American Political Science Review 107 (3):446–460.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald. 1987. Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion Versus Structural Equivalence. American Journal of Sociology 92 (3):1287–1335.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald, and Talmud, Ilan. 1993. Market Niche. Social Networks 15 (1):133–149.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald, and Doreian, Patrick. 1982. Testing a Structural Model of Perception: Conformity and Deviance with Respect to Journal Norms in Elite Sociological Methodology. Quality and Quantity 16 (2):109–150.Google Scholar
Busby, Joshua W. 2010. Moral Movements and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bush, Sarah. 2011. International Politics and the Spread of Quotas for Women in Legislatures. International Organization 65 (1):103–137.Google Scholar
Buthe, Tim, Major, Solomon, and Souza, André de Mello e. 2012. The Politics of Private Foreign Aid: Humanitarian Principles, Economic Development Objectives, and Organizational Interests in NGO Private Aid Allocation. International Organization 56 (4):571–607.Google Scholar
Butts, Carter T. 2008. Social Network Analysis with SNA. Journal of Statistical Software 24 (6):1–51.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Charli. 2014. Lost Causes: Agenda Vetting in Global Issue Networks and the Shaping of Human Security. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Charli, Duygulu, Sirin, Montgomery, Alexander H., and Rapp, Anna. 2014. Explaining the Advocacy Agenda: Insights from the Human Security Network. International Organization 68 (2):449–470.Google Scholar
Chandler, David. 2001. The Road to Military Humanitarianism: How the Human Rights NGOs Shaped a New Humanitarian Agenda. Human Rights Quarterly 23 (3):678–700.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey. 2005. International Institutions and Socialization in Europe. International Organization 59 (4):801–826.Google Scholar
Clark, Ann Marie, Friedman, Elisabeth J., and Hochstetler, Kathryn. 1998. The Sovereign Limits of Global Civil Society: A Comparison of NGO Participation in UN World Conferences on the Environment, Human Rights, and Women. World Politics 51 (1):1–35.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth, and Minkoff, Deborah. 2004. Beyond the Iron Law: Rethinking the Place of Organizations in Social Movement Research. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Sarah Soule and Hanspeter Kriesi, 155–170. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander, and Ron, James. 2001. The NGO Scramble. International Security 27 (1):5–39.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russel J. 1994. The Green Rainbow: Environmental Groups in Western Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Gerald F. 1991. Agents Without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill Through the Intercorporate Network. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (4):586–613.Google Scholar
Diani, Mario. 2003. Networks and Social Movements: A Research Program. In Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, edited by Mario Diani and Doug McAdam, 299–319. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul, and Powell, Walter W.. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48 (20):147–160.Google Scholar
Doreian, Patrick, Batagelj, Vladimir, and Ferligoj, Anuska. 2005. Generalized Blockmodeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dow, Malcolm M. 2007. Galton’s Problem as Multiple Network Autocorrelation Effects: Cultural Trait Transmission and Ecological Constraint. Cross-Cultural Research 41 (4):336–363.Google Scholar
Earl, Jennifer, Martin, Andrew, McCarthy, John, and Soule, Sarah. 2004. The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action. Annual Review of Sociology 30:65–80.Google Scholar
Elhorst, J. Paul. 2010. Applied Spatial Econometrics: Raising the Bar. Spatial Economic Analysis 5 (1):9–28.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. Manifesto for a Relational Society. American Journal of Sociology 103 (2):281–317.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1993. International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization and Science Policy. International Organization 47 (4):565–597.Google Scholar
Fowler, James, Heaney, Michael, Nickerson, David, Padgett, John, and Sinclair, Betsy. 2011. Causality in Social Networks. American Politics Research 39 (2):437–480.Google Scholar
Friedkin, Noah. 1998. A Structural Theory of Social Influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galaskiewicz, Joseph, and Burt, Ronald. 1991. Interorganization Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (1):88–105.Google Scholar
Galaskiewicz, Joseph, and Wasserman, Stanley. 1989. Mimetic Processes Within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test. Administrative Science Quarterly 34 (3):454–479.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeffrey, and Jasper, James M.. 2004. Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning, and Emotion. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structures: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91 (3):481–510.Google Scholar
Gujarati, Damoder N. 2009. Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Hadden, Jennifer. 2015. Networks in Contention: The Divisive Politics of Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie. 2008. Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem. International Organization 62 (4):689–716.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Montgomery, Alexander H.. 2006. Power Positions. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (1):3–27.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, Kahler, Miles, and Montgomery, Alexander H.. 2009. Network Analysis for International Relations. International Organization 63 (3):559–592.Google Scholar
Haines, Herbert. 1984. Black Radicalization and the Funding of Civil Rights: 1957-1970. Social Problems 32 (1):31–43.Google Scholar
Heaney, Michel, and Lorenz, Geoffrey. 2013. Coalition Portfolios and Interest Group Influence Over the Policy Process. Interest Groups and Advocacy 2 (2):251–277.Google Scholar
Henning, Christian. 2009. Networks of Power in the CAP System of the EU-15 and EU-27. Journal of Public Policy 29 (2):153–177.Google Scholar
Hertel, Shareen. 2006. Unexpected Power: Conflict and Change Among Transnational Activists. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Matthew. 2008. Where the States Are: Environmental NGOs and the UN Climate Negotiations. In Transnational Activism in the UN and EU: A Comparative Study, edited by Jutta Joachim and Birgit Locher, 29–42. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Hunter, Robert. 1979. Warriors of the Rainbow: A Chronicle of the Greenpeace Movement. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Imig, Doug, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2001. Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ingold, Karin, and Leifeld, Philip. 2016. Structural and Institutional Determinants of Influence Reputation: A Comparison of Collaborative and Adversarial Policy Networks in Decision Making and Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (1):1–18.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, and Nexon, Daniel. 1999. Relations Before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics. European Journal of International Relations 5 (3):291–332.Google Scholar
Joachim, Jutta. 2003. Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women’s Rights. International Studies Quarterly 47 (2):247–274.Google Scholar
Joachim, Jutta, and Locher, Birgit. 2008. Transnational Activism in the UN and EU: A Comparative Study. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Johnson, Erica, and Prakash, Aseem. 2007. NGO Research Program: A Collective Action Perspective. Policy Science 40 (2):221–240.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 2009. Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Politics. In Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance, edited by Miles Kahler, 1–22. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
King, Brayden, and Soule, Sarah. 2008. Competition and Resource Partitioning in Three Social Movement Industries. American Journal of Sociology 113 (6):1568–1610.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud, and Rucht, Dieter. 2002. Protest Event Analysis. In Methods of Social Movement Research, edited by Bert Klandermans and Susan Staggenborg, 231–259. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lecy, Jesse D., Mitchell, George E., and Schmitz, Hans Peter. 2010. Advocacy Organizations, Networks, and the Firm Analogy. In Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action, edited by Aseem Prakash and Mary Kay Gugerty, 229–251. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leenders, Roger. 2002. Modeling Social Influence Through Network Autocorrelation: Constructing the Weight Matrix. Social Networks 24 (1):21–47.Google Scholar
Lunn, David, Jackson, Chris, Best, Nicky, Thomas, Andrew, and Spiegelhalter, David. 2012. The BUGS Book: A Practical Introduction to Bayesian Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, Kuperman, Ranan D., Terris, Lesley, and Talmud, Ilan. 2006. Structural Equivalence and International Conflict: A Social Network Analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (5):1–26.Google Scholar
Marsden, Peter, and Podolny, Joel. 1990. Dynamic Analysis of Network Diffusion Processes. In Social Networks Through Time, edited by Jeroen Weesie and Henk Flap, 197–214. Utrecht: ISOR/Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar
Marsden, Peter, and Friedkin, Noah. 1993. Network Studies of Social Influence. Sociological Methods and Research 22 (1):127–151.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and Schaffer-Boudet, Hillary. 2012. Putting Social Movements in Their Place. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer. 1977. Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory. American Journal of Sociology 82 (6):1212–1241.Google Scholar
Meyer, John, Frank, David John, Hironaka, Ann, Schofer, Evan, and Tuma, Nancy Brandon. 1997. The Structuring of a World Environmental Regime, 1870–1990. International Organization 51 (4):623–651.Google Scholar
Mische, Ann. 2003. Cross-Talk in Movements: Rethinking the Culture-Network Link. In Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, edited by Mario Diani and Doug McAdam, 258–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, George, and Schmitz, Hans Peter. 2014. Principled Instrumentalism: A Theory of Transnational NGO Behavior. Review of International Studies 40 (3):487–504.Google Scholar
Mizruchi, Mark. 1989. Similarity of Political Behavior Among Large American Corporations. American Journal of Sociology 95 (2):401–424.Google Scholar
Mizruchi, Mark, and Neuman, Eric J.. 2008. The Effect of Density on the Level of Bias in the Network Autocorrelation Model. Social Networks 30:190–200.Google Scholar
Murdie, Amanda. 2013. The Ties that Bind: A Network Analysis of Human Rights International Nongovernmental Organizations. British Journal of Political Science 44 (1):1–27.Google Scholar
Murdie, Amanda, and Davis, David R.. 2011. Shaming and Blaming: Using Events Data to Assess the Impact of Human Rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly 56 (1):1–16.Google Scholar
Murdie, Amanda, and Peksen, Dursun. 2014. The Impact of Human Rights INGO Shaming on Humanitarian Intervention. Journal of Politics 76 (1):215–228.Google Scholar
Neuman, Eric J., and Mizruchi, Mark S.. 2010. Structure and Bias in the Network Autocorrelation Model. Social Networks 32:290–300.Google Scholar
Oatley, Thomas, Winecoff, Kindred, Pennock, Andrew, and Danzman, Sarah Bauerle. 2013. The Political Economy of Global Finance: A Network Model. Perspectives on Politics 11 (1):133–153.Google Scholar
Paez, Antonio, Scott, Darren M., and Volz, Erik. 2008. Weight Matrices for Social Influence Analysis: An Investigation of Measurement Errors and Their Effect on Model Identification and Estimation Quality. Social Networks 30:309–317.Google Scholar
Pappi, Franz Urban, and Henning, Christian H. C. A.. 1998. Policy Networks: More Than a Metaphor? Journal of Theoretical Politics 10 (4):553–575.Google Scholar
Patterson, Matthew, Hoffman, Matthew, Betsill, Michele, and Bernstein, Steven. 2013. The Micro-Foundations of Policy Diffusion Towards Complex Climate Governance: An Analysis of the Transnational Carbon Emissions Trading Network. Comparative Political Studies 47 (3):420–449.Google Scholar
Prakash, Aseem, and Gugerty, Mary Kay. 2010. Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. 1998. Reversing the Gunsights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Landmines. International Organization 52 (3):613–644.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. 2003. Transnational Civil Society and Advocacy in World Politics. World Politics 55 (4):579–606. Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2010. Rethinking Advocacy Organizations? A Critical Comment. In Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action, edited by Aseem Prakash and Mary Kay Gugerty, 283–94. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everet. 1995. The Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert, and Dalton, Russel J.. 2002. A Global Network? Transnational Cooperation Among Environmental Groups. The Journal of Politics 64 (2):510–533.Google Scholar
Ron, James, Ramos, Howard, and Rodgers, Kathleen. 2005. Transnational Information Politics: NGO Human Rights Reporting, 1986–2000. International Studies Quarterly 49 (3):557–587.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B., and Schenker, Nathaniel. 1987. Logit-Based Estimation for Binomial Data Using the Jeffreys Prior. Sociological Methodology 17 (1):131–144.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan, and Prakash, Aseem. 2004. Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest Between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights. International Studies Quarterly 48 (1):143–175.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2009. The Power of Networks in International Politics. In Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance, edited by Miles Kahler, 228–247. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Jackie, and Wiest, Dawn. 2012. Social Movements in the World-System: The Politics of Crisis and Transformation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Smith, Tony E. 2008. Estimation Bias in Spatial Models with Strongly Connected Weight Matrices. Geographical Analysis 41:307–332.Google Scholar
Soule, Sarah. 2004. Diffusion Processes Within and Across Movements. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Sarah Soule and Hanspeter Kriesi, 294–310. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Strang, David, and Tuma, Nancy Brandon. 1993. Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Diffusion. American Journal of Sociology 99 (3):614–639.Google Scholar
Stroup, Sarah. 2012. Borders Among Activists: International NGOs in the United States, Britain, and France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas, Dellmuth, Lisa M., Agné, Hans, and Duit, Andreas. 2015. NGO Influence in International Organizations: Information, Access, and Exchange. British Journal of Political Science (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2011. Power in Movement. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uba, Katrin, and Uggla, Fredrik. 2011. Protest Actions Against the European Union, 1992–2007. West European Politics 34 (2):384–393.Google Scholar
UNFCCC. 2010a. Promoting the Principles of the Aarhus Convention in the Lead up to During and After the United Nations Climate Change Conference 2009, Copenhagen. Available from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/smsn/igo/088.pdf, accessed 25 March 2013.Google Scholar
UNFCCC. 2010b. Report of the Subsidiary Body for Implementation on its Thirty-Third Session, held in Cancun from 30 November to 4 December 2010. New York, NY. Available from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/sbi/eng/27.pdf, accessed 25 March 2013.Google Scholar
Walker, Edward, Martin, Andrew, and McCarthy, John. 2008. Confronting the State, the Corporation, and the Academy: The Influence of Institutional Targets on Social Movement Repertoires. American Journal of Sociology 114 (1):35–76.Google Scholar
Wang, Dan, and Soule, Sarah. 2012. Social Movement Organizational Collaboration: Networks of Learning and the Diffusion of Protest Tactics, 1960–1995. The American Journal of Sociology 117 (6):1674–1722.Google Scholar
Wang, Wei, Neuman, Eric J., and Newman, Daniel A.. 2014. Statistical Power of the Social Network Autocorrelation Model. Social Networks 38 (1):88–99.Google Scholar
Ward, Michael D., Stovel, Katherine, and Sacks, Audrey. 2011. Network Analysis in Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science 14:245–264.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Stanley, and Faust, Katherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, Wendy. 2012. Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Hadden and Jasny Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OTDDYP
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Hadden and Jasny supplementary material

Appendix

Download Hadden and Jasny supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 293.1 KB