Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:37:02.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State First? A Disaggregation and Empirical Interrogation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2020

David Andersen Open the ORCID record for David Andersen [Opens in a new window]  and
Jonathan Doucette Open the ORCID record for Jonathan Doucette [Opens in a new window]
David Andersen*
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus C, Denmark
Jonathan Doucette
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus C, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: dandersen@ps.au.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This letter is the first to systematically scrutinize the multifaceted claim that a strong state promotes democratic development. It analyzes new Varieties of Democracy data from 1789 to 2015 to specify and examine eight different versions of this ‘state-first’ argument in analyses that span the entire era of modern democracy. The authors document that high levels of bureaucratic quality at the time of the first democratic transition and during democratic spells are positively associated with democratic survival and deepening. By contrast, state capacity has no robust effects on democratic survival or deepening and does not condition the impact of bureaucratic quality. These findings underline the importance of particular features of a strong state as well as the importance of a disaggregated approach. They imply that democratic development is better aided by strengthening the impartiality of bureaucratic organizations than by building capacity for territorial control.

Keywords

state–democracy nexusbureaucratic qualitystate capacitydemocratic survivaldemocratic deepening
Type
Letter
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 408 - 415
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, D and Doucette, J (2020) “Replication Data for: State First? A Disaggregation and Empirical Interrogation”, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/O7R8FT, Harvard Dataverse, VERSION 1. UNF:6:yTxQGOA/u3iqb1RcsJWntA==[fileUNF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, D and Krishnarajan, S (2019) Economic crises, bureaucratic quality, and democratic breakdown. Government and Opposition 54(4), 715–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, D et al. (2014a) State capacity and political regime stability. Democratization 21(7), 1305–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, D, Møller, J and Skaaning, S-E (2014b) The state–democracy nexus: conceptual distinctions, theoretical perspectives, and comparative approaches. Democratization 21(7), 1203–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C, Miller, M and Rosato, S (2013) A complete data set of political regimes, 1800–2007. Comparative Political Studies 46(2), 1523–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, M and Chang, E (2006) State building and democratization in sub-Saharan Africa. Comparative Political Studies 39(9), 1059–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, M et al. (2019a) V-Dem Codebook v9, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Coppedge, M et al. (2019b) V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset v9, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Cornell, A and Lapuente, V (2014) Meritocratic administration and democratic stability. Democratization 21(7), 1286–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Arcy, M and Nistotskaya, M (2017) State first, then democracy: using cadastral records to explain governmental performance in public goods provision. Governance 30(2), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, RA (1971) Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlström, C and Lapuente, V (2017) Organizing Leviathan: Politicians, Bureaucrats, and the Making of Good Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucette, J and Andersen, D (2020) Replication data for: State first? A disaggregation and empirical interrogation. Available from https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/O7R8FT, Harvard Dataverse, DRAFT VERSION, UNF:6:yTxQGOA/u3iqb1RcsJWntA== [fileUNF].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin, J (2012) Is there a necessary condition for democracy? The role of state capacity in postcommunist countries. Comparative Political Studies 45(7), 903–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, F (2005) ‘Stateness’ first. Journal of Democracy 16(1), 84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjerlow, H et al. (2018) Stairways to Denmark: does the sequence of state-building and democratization matter for economic development? Varieties of Democracy Working Paper Series 2018, 72.Google Scholar
Huntington, SP (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lapuente, V and Rothstein, B (2014) Civil war Spain versus Swedish harmony: the quality of government factor. Comparative Political Studies 47(10), 1416–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, JJ and Stepan, A (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzuca, S and Munck, G (2014) State or democracy first? Alternative perspectives on the state–democracy nexus. Democratization 21(7), 1221–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzuca, SL (2010) Access to power versus exercise of power: reconceptualizing the quality of democracy in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development 45(3), 334–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, J and Skaaning, S-E (2011) Requisites of Democracy – Conceptualization, Measurement, and Explanation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G (2010) Democracy, Agency, and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R and Shin, D (2001) Democratization backwards: the problem of third-wave democracies. British Journal of Political Science 31(2), 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaaning, S-E, Gerring, J and Bartusevicius, H (2015) A lexical index of electoral democracy. Comparative Political Studies 48(12), 1491–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C (1992) Coercion, Capital, and European States, 990–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tilly, C (2007) Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNSD United Nations Statistics Division (2013) ‘Methodology’. Available from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/Google Scholar
Ziblatt, D (2017) Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Andersen and Doucette Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/O7R8FT
Link
Supplementary material: File

Andersen and Doucette supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Andersen and Doucette supplementary material(File)
File 435 KB