Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:52:42.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Comments on ‘Two Conceptions of Liberalism’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Hillel Steiner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

No one who has read either Rawls's Political Liberalism or my An Essay on Rights can fail to profit from the penetrating analysis to which Peter Jones has subjected them.

Disposed to agree with most of what he says about the former, I am also inclined – but as yet unable – to disagree with much of what he says about the latter. However, alongside his many acute criticisms on which I'll need to reflect further, Jones's report of two key moves in my argument requires some revision and may, therefore, warrant this brief early response.

Type
Notes and Comments
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 140 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jones, Peter, ‘Review Article: Two Conceptions of Liberalism, Two Conceptions of Justice’, British Journal of Political Science, 25 (1995), 515–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar