Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:43:02.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Avermectin* residues in sheep and cattle dung and their effects on dung-beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) colonization and dung burial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

K. G. Wardhaugh  and
R. J. Mahon
K. G. Wardhaugh*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Canberra, Australia
R. J. Mahon
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Canberra, Australia
*
CSIRO Division of Entomology, G.P.O. Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Data from dung-baited pitfall traps show that dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) do not discriminate against dung from sheep or cattle treated with avermectin. On the contrary, for a period post-treatment, dung from animals treated with avermectin attracted more beetles than dung from untreated animals. This effect was more marked with cattle dung than with sheep dung. The period of enhanced attractiveness of sheep dung was restricted to dung produced during the first day after treatment, whereas with cattle dung, the effect was still evident in faeces produced 25 days after treatment. Cattle dung produced from 3–25 days post-treatment caused 100% mortality in newly hatched larvae of the bushfly, Musca vetustissima Walker (Diptera:Muscidae). In dung of day 35, mortality was 93.6%. Dung collected from sheep from 1–6 days after treatment also caused 100% mortality of fly larvae, but by day 28, no toxic effects were detectable. Field observations on the colonization of cattle pats confirmed the enhanced attractiveness of dung from treated animals and suggested that departure rates from treated dung were lower than those from untreated dung. Treated pats supported higher beetle populations than untreated pats and burial was more rapid. The potentially serious implications of the enhanced attractiveness of avermectincontaminated dung are discussed in relation to the survival of dung beetle communities.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 333 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

In this paper the drugs Ivomec® and Avomec® (Merck Sharp and Dohme, MSD Agvet, P.O. Box 79, Granville, New South Wales, 2142, Australia) are referred to by the generic term avermectin.

References

Anderson, J.R., Merritt, R.W. & Loomis, E.C. (1984) The insectfree cattle dropping and its relationship to dung fouling of rangeland pastures. Journal of Economic Entomology 77, 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, G.W. (1985) Animal health applications of ivermectin. Southwestern Entomologist Supplement No. 7, 43–50.Google Scholar
Campbell, W.C. (1989) Ivermectin and Abamectin. 363 pp. New York, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, W.C., Fisher, M.H., Stapley, E.O., Albers-Schonberg, G. & Jacob, T.A. (1983) Ivermectin: a potent new antiparasitic agent. Science 221, 823–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cupp, E.W., Bernado, M.J., Kiszewski, A.E., Collins, R.C., Taylor, H.R., Aziz, M.A. & Greene, B.M. (1986) The effects of ivermectin on transmission of Onchocerca volvulus. Science 231, 740–742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, A.V.L., Doube, B.M. & McLennan, P.D. (1988) Habitat associations and seasonal abundance of coprophilous Coleoptera (Staphylinidae, Hydrophylidae, Histeridae) in the Hluhluwer region of South Africa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 78, 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doube, B.M. (1983) The habitat preference of some bovine dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Hluhluwe Game Reserve, South Africa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 73, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Double, B.M. & Giller, P.S. (1990) A comparison of two types of trap for sampling dung beetle populations (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 80, 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herd, R.P. (1990) Equine parasite control - problems associated with intensive anthelmintic therapy. Equine Veterinary Education 2(1), 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holter, P. (1979) Effects of dung beetles (Aphodius spp.) and earthworms on the disappearance of cattle dung. Oikos 32, 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holter, P. (1983) Effects of earthworms on the disappearance of cattle droppings. pp. 49–57in Satchell, J.E. (Ed.) Earthworm ecology. From Darwin to vermiculture. London, Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houlding, B., Ridsdill-Smith, T.J. & Bailey, W.J. (1991) Injectable abamectin causes delay in scarabaeine dung beetle egglaying in cattle dung. Australian Veterinary Journal 68, 185–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, T.A., Buhs, R.P., Carlin, J.R., Chiv., S.H.L., Miwa, G. & Rosegay, A. (1984) The metabolism and tissue residue profiles of ivermectin. pp. 56–97in Leaning, W.D. (Ed.) Recent developments in the control of animal parasites. Proceedings of MSD AGVET Symposium, Perth, Australia, August, 1983.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D.E., Pilkington, J.G., Fisher, M.A. & Fox, M.T. (1988) Ivermectin therapy and degradation of cattle faeces. Veterinary Record 123, 400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo, P.-K.A., Fink, D.W., Williams, J.B. & Blodinger, J. (1985) Pharmacokinetic studies of ivermectin: effects of formulation. Veterinary Research Communications 9, 251–268.Google ScholarPubMed
Lumaret, J-P. (1986) Toxicité de certains helminthicides vis-à-vis des insectes coprophages et consequences sur la disparition des exrements de la surface du sol. Acta Oecologica/Oecologia Applicata 7, 313–324.Google Scholar
McKeand, J., Bairden, K. & Ibarra-Silva, A.-M. (1988) The degradation of bovine faecal pats containing ivermectin. Veterinary Record 122, 587–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKellar, Q., Marriner, S. & Bogan, J. (1988) Comparisons of ivermectin, oxfendazole and levamisole for use as anthelmintics during the periparturient period in sheep. Veterinary Record 122, 588–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenna, P.B. (1986) The persistence of the anthelmintic activity of ivermectin in sheep. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 34, 94–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madsen, M., Grenvold, J. & Nansen, P. (1988) Effects of treatment of cattle with some anthelmintics on the subsequent degradation of their dung. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 29, 515–517.Google ScholarPubMed
Madsen, M., Overgaard Nielsen, B., Holter, P., Pedersen, O.C., Brochner Jespersen, J., Vagn Jensen, K.-M., Nansen, P. & Gronvoid, J. (1990) Treating dung with ivermectin: effects on the fauna and decomposition of dung pats. Journal of Applied Ecology 27, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marriner, S.E., McKinnon, I. & Bogan, J.A. (1987) The pharmacokinetics of ivermectin after oral and subcutaneous administration to sheep and horses. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 10, 175–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, J.A., Simco, J.S. & Lancaster, J.L. (1980) Control of face fly larval development with ivermectin, MK-933. Southwestern Entomologist 5, 207–209.Google Scholar
Miller, J.A., Kunz, S.E., Oehler, D.D. & Miller, J.W. (1981) Larvicidal activity of Merck MK-933, an avermectin, against horn fly, stable fly, face fly and house fly. Journal of Economic Entomology 74, 608–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelder, J.A. & Wedderburn, R.W.M. (1972) Generalised linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (A) 135, 370–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prichard, R.K., Steel, J.W., Lacey, E. & Hennessy, D.R. (1985) Pharmacokinetics of ivermectin in sheep following intravenous, intra-abomasal or intraruminal administration. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 8, 88–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridsdill-Smith, T.J. (1988) Survival and reproduction of the bush fly and a scarabaeine dung beetle in dung of cattle treated with avermectin B1. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 27, 175–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncalli, R.A. (1989) Environmental aspects of the use of ivermectin and abamectin in livestock: effects on cattle dung fauna. pp. 173–181in Campbell, W.C. (Ed) Ivermectin and abamectin. New York, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, C.D. (1983) Activity of avermectin against selected insects in ageing manure. Environmental Entomology 12, 455–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, E.T., Campbell, J.B. & Boxler, D.J., Petersen, J.J. (1987) Comparison of beetles collected from the dung of cattle untreated and treated with fenvalorate ear tags on two range types in Western Nebraska. Environmental Entomology 16, 1135–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, L. & Brown, T.A. (1987) Avermectins in insect control and biology: a review. Bulletin of Entomological Research 77, 357–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, L. & Wall, R. (1988) Ivermectin in cattle: non-specific effects on pastureland ecology. Aspects of Applied Biology 17, 231–238.Google Scholar
Wall, R. & Strong, L. (1987) Environmental consequences of treating cattle with the antiparasitic drug ivermectin. Nature (London) 327, 418–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wardhaugh, K.G. & Rodriguez-Menendez, H. (1988) The effects of the antiparasitic drug, ivermectin, on the development and survival of the dung breeding fly, Orthelia cornicina (F.) and the scarabaeine dung beetles, Copris hispanus L., Bubas bubalus (Oliver) and Onitis belial F. Journal of Applied Entomology 106, 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar