Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:40:41.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bionomics and polymorphism in Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J.H. Appleby  and
P.F. Credland
J.H. Appleby
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK
P.F. Credland*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK
*
*Fax: 01784 470756 E-mail: P.Credland@rhul.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Pic) is the major insect pest of stored bambara groundnuts, Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdcourt, in sub-Saharan West Africa, but little is currently known about its biology or how it may be controlled. A series of laboratory studies was performed to investigate the bionomics of and differences between two apparently different morphs of adult of each sex of this species, here termed ‘active’ and ‘normal’. Major differences in their morphology, physiology and behaviour were identified and are described in detail for the first time. They provide clear evidence of the existence of an adult polymorphism among populations of this species, which is comparable in certain respects to that previously described for C. maculatus (Fabricius) and C. chinensis Linnaeus. Adults can be separated into the correct morph based on characteristic differences in elytral and pygidial colour and pattern. ‘Normal’ adults are characterized by having high fecundity, short adult life and are relatively sedentary while ‘active’ adults exhibit reproductive diapause (suspension of reproductive activity), are long lived, and show (at least in females) increased dispersal tendencies. These characteristics suggest adaptation of the ‘active’and ‘normal’ morphs respectively to the different environments of field and seed stores, and the significance of the polymorphism in the life history of C. subinnotatus is discussed in this context. The design of any effective control regime for this bruchid needs to take account of and could potentially be based upon the existence of polymorphism in C. subinnotatus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 91 , Issue 4 , August 2001 , pp. 235 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amuti, K. & Larbi, M. (1981) Post-harvest losses in the bambara and geocarpa groundnut seeds stored under traditional conditions in Ghana. Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin 23, 20–22.Google Scholar
Caswell, G.H. (1960) Observations on an abnormal form of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) Bulletin of Entomological Research 50, 671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Credland, P.F. (1990) Biotype variation and host change in bruchids: causes and effects in the evolution of bruchid pests. pp. 271–287 in Fujii, K., Gatehouse, A.M.R., Mitchell, R., Johnson, C.D. & Yoshida, Y. (Eds) Bruchids and legumes: economics, ecology and coevolution. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danilevskii, A.S. (1965) Photoperiodism and seasonal development in insects. Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Denlinger, D.L. (1986) Dormancy in tropical insects. Annual Review of Entomology 31, 239–264..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doku, E.V., Hammonds, T.W. & Francis, B.J. (1978) On the composition of Ghanaian bambara groundnuts (Voandzeia subterranea (L.) Thouars). Tropical Science 20, 263–270.Google Scholar
Dunn, O.J. (1964) Multiple contrasts using rank sums. Technometrics 6, 241–252.Google Scholar
Germain, G.F., Huignard, J. & Monge, J.P. (1985) Influence de la plante hôte (Vigna unguiculata) sur la levée de la diapause reproductrice de Bruchidius atrolineatus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 39, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glitho, I.A. & Huignard, J. (1990) A histological and ultrastructural comparison of the male accessory reproductive glands of diapausing and non-diapausing adults in Bruchidius atrolineatus (Pic) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). International Journal of Insect Morphology & Embryology 19, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, D., Pajni, H.R. & Tewari, P.K. (1999) Morphological and reproductive dimorphism in Zabrotes subfasciatus (Boh.). pp. 1821–1832 in Zuxun, J., Quan, L., Yongsheng, L., Xianchang, T. & Lianghua, G. (Eds) Proceedings of the 7th International Working Conference on Stored-product Protection Volume 2, 14–19 October 1998,Beijing.Google Scholar
Lenga, A., Thibeaudeau, C. & Huignard, J. (1991) Influence of thermoperiod and photoperiod on reproductive diapause in Bruchidius atrolineatus (Pic) (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Physiological Entomology 16, 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenga, A., Glitho, I. & Huignard, J. (1993) Interactions between photoperiod, relative humidity and host-plant cues on the reproductive diapause termination in Bruchidius atrolineatus Pic (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 24, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbata, G.N. (1990) Some aspects of the biology of Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Pic) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) a pest of stored bambara groundnuts. Insect Science and its Application 11, 227–234.Google Scholar
Mbata, G.N. (1991) The seasonal incidence and abundance of insect pests of stored bambara groundnuts. pp. 452–459 in Wolf, J.N. (Ed.) Influence du climat sur la production des cultures tropicales. Stockholm and Wageningen, Foundation Internationale pour la Science; Centre Technique de Cooperation et Rurale.Google Scholar
Mbata, G.N. (1993) Some factors affecting oviposition and development of Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Pic) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 100, 155–164.Google Scholar
Mbata, G.N. (1994) Effect of infestation of cultivars of bambara groundnuts (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc) by Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Pic) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on biochemical deterioration and germination of the seeds. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 101, 350–356.Google Scholar
Mbata, G.N., Shu, S. & Ramaswamy, S.B. (1997) Rhythmicity and oviposition in Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Pic) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Insect Behaviour 10, 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbata, G.N., Shu, S. & Ramaswamy, S.B. (1999) Responses of normal and active males of Callosobruchus subinnotatus to female sex pheromone. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 92, 594–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, F.J. (1987) Genetic contribution to the dispersal polymorphism of the cowpea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 80, 12–16.Google Scholar
Messina, F.J. and Renwick, J.A.A. (1985) Dispersal polymorphism of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): variation among populations in response to crowding. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 78, 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monge, J. & Germain, J.F. (1988) Analyse des stimulations issues de la plante hôte influencant la recherche d'un substrat de ponte et induisant la ponte de Bruchidius atrolineatus (Pic) (Coleptere: Bruchidae) importance des conditions experimentales. Insect Science and its Application 9, 89–94.Google Scholar
Pajni, H.R. (1986) Polymorphism in the Bruchidae. Biologica 1, 242–250.Google Scholar
Pearce, F. (2000) Ripe for revival: opinion interview with Stefano Padulosi, Head of underutilised food crops for the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. New Scientist 167 (2254), 42–45.Google Scholar
Prevett, P.F. (1966) Observations on the biology of six species of Bruchidae (Coleoptera) in northern Nigeria. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 102, 174–180.Google Scholar
Prevett, P.F. (1970) Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Pic) (Coleoptera, Bruchidae) – a potential pest of stored groundnuts. Journal of Stored Products Research 6, 279–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellschop, J.P.F. (1962) Cowpeas, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Field Crop Abstracts 15, 259–266.Google Scholar
Silim-Nahdy, M., Silim, S.N. & Ellis, R.H. (1999) Effect of field infestations of immature pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) pods on production of active (flight) and sedentary (flightless) morphs of Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). Journal of Stored Products Research 35, 339–354.Google Scholar
Southgate, B.J. (1958) Systematic notes on species of Callosobruchus of economic importance. Bulletin of Entomological Research 49, 591–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, B.J., Howe, R.W. & Brett, G.A. (1957) The specific status of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) and Callosobruchus analis Bulletin of Entomological Research 48, 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, T.A. & Agbaje, L.A. (1974) Flight activity in normal and active forms of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) in a store in Nigeria. Journal of Stored Products Research 10, 9–16.Google Scholar