Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:14:33.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host preference in Aedes simpsoni (Theo.) (Diptera, Culicidae) with special reference to the anthropophilic and non-anthropophilic forms in Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

L. G. Mukwaya
L. G. Mukwaya
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, East African Virus Research Institute, P.O. Box 49, Entebbe, Uganda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Precipitin tests of the blood-meals of the non-anthropophilic population of Aedes simpsoni (Theo.) in Bwayise showed that at least 62% of the meals were mammalian; none was certainly avian or reptile. The remaining 38% were mostly too far digested for identification. Of the positive mammalian feeds, 84% were of rodents and only 5%; were of primates, probably human. In laboratory choice experiments, approximately two-thirds of a sample of the Bwayise strain fed on rodent in preference to monkey. Precipitin tests on blood-meals of the Bwamba strain of Ae. simpsoni confirmed earlier findings that this strain is strongly anthropophilic. At least 86% of wild-caught individuals had fed on mammals, 65% of these specifically identified: 28% of the feeds were of rodents and 72% were of primates, mostly human. During a five-month study at Bwayise in 1969, eleven species of rodents were caught; 91% of the rodents diurnally active were Arvicanthis niloticus which contributed 38% of the total collection and was twice as active during the afternoon as in the morning. The remaining species were predominantly nocturnal. A close relationship was found between the times of activity of A. niloticus and the biting cycle of Ae. simpsoni. In feeding tests using the three commonest rodent species, Ae. simpsoni selected A. niloticus as often as, or more often than, the nocturnal rodent species. This preference was maintained over one generation reared in culture. It is suggested that A. niloticus is the major natural host of the Bwayise strain by reason of the synchrony between rodent and mosquito activity rhythms. The Bwayise strain does not normally feed upon wild primates, so explaining further the almost total absence of human cases of yellow fever in areas of Uganda where this mosquito is non-anthropophilic.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , August 1974 , pp. 129 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chippaux, A., Chippaux-Hyppolite, C., Diederich, & Decoux, (1970). Contribution à Pétude d'un réservoir de virus animal dans le cycle de certains arbovirus en Centrafrique II. Virénie expérimentale chez des rongeurs sauvages avec les virus amaril et West Nile.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 63, 173–180.Google Scholar
Chitty, D. & Southern, H. N. (1954). Control of rats and mice. Vol. I-II Rats, Vol. III House mice.—305 pp., 226 pp., 225 pp. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cloudsley-Thomson, J. L. (1960). Adaptive functions of circadian rhythms.—Cold Spring Harb. Symp, quant. Biol. 25, 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, P. S. (1960). Patterns of circadian rhythms in insects.—Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 25, 357–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbins, E. G. (1942). On the habits and breeding places of Aüdes (Stegomyia) simpsoni Theobald in Uganda.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 36, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillett, J. D. (1951). The habits of the mosquito Aüdes (Stegomyia) simpsoni Theobald in relation to the epidemiology of yellow fever in Uganda.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 45, 110–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillett, J. D. (1955). Further studies on the biting behaviour of Aüdes (Stegomyia) simpsoni Theobald in Uganda.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 49, 154–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillett, J. D. (1969). Aedes simpsoni in Chaggaland, Tanzania.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 63, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillett, J. D. (1972). Aedes simpsoni in Chaggaland. II.—Breeding in banana axils.—E. Afr. med. J. 49, 285–290.Google ScholarPubMed
Haddow, A. J. (1945). The mosquitoes of Bwamba county, Uganda. II.—Biting activity with special reference to the influence of microclimate.—Bull. ent. Res. 36, 33–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, A. J. (1954). Studies of the biting-habits of African mosquitos. An appraisal of methods employed, with special reference to the twenty-four-hour catch.—Bull. ent. Res. 45, 199–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, A. J. (1968). The natural history of yellow fever in Africa.—Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. (B) 70, 191–227.Google Scholar
Haddow, A. J., Gillett, J. D. & Highton, R. B. (1947). The mosquitoes of Bwamba county, Uganda. V.—The vertical distribution and biting-cycle of mosquitoes in rain-forest, with further observations on microclimate.—Bull. ent. Res. 37, 301–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, A. J., Smithburn, K. C., Mahaffy, A. F. & Bugher, J. C. (1947). Monkeys in relation to yellow fever in Bwamba county, Uganda.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 40, 677–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumsden, W. H. R. (1951). The night-resting habits of monkeys in a small area on the edge of the Semliki Forest, Uganda. A study in relation to the epidemiology of sylvan yellow fever.—J. Anim. Ecol. 20, 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahaffy, A. F., Smithburn, K. C. & Hughes, T. P. (1946). The distribution of immunity to yellow fever in Central and East Africa.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 40, 57–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahaffy, A. F., Smithburn, K. C., Jacobs, H. R. & Gillett, J. D. (1942). Yellow fever in western Uganda.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 36, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, A. W. R., Henderson, B. E., Ssenkubuge, Y., Kirya, G. B. & Sempala, S. D. K. (1968). Studies at Lunyo and EAVRI compound.—Rep. E. Afr. Virus Res. Inst. no. 18, 23–25.Google Scholar
Mukwaya, L. G. (1971). Host preference in Aedes (Stegomyia) species mosquitoes with special reference to the anthropophilic and non-anthropophilic forms of Aedes (Stegomyia) simpsoni Theobald (Dipt. Culicidae) in Uganda.—197 pp. Ph.D. thesis, University of East Africa.Google Scholar
Mukwaya, L. G. (in press). Host preference in Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquitoes in Uganda. II.—Studies on indoor and outdoor biting and resting behaviour with special reference to Aedes aegypti L.—Acta trop.Google Scholar
Philip, C. B. (1929). Preliminary report of further tests with yellow fever transmission by mosquitoes other than Aedes aegypti.—Am. J. trop. Med. 9, 267–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithburn, K. C. & Haddow, A. J. (1946). Isolation of yellow fever virus from African mosquitoes.—Am. J. trop. Med. 26, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smithburn, K. C., Haddow, A. J. & Lumsden, W. H. R. (1949). An outbreak of sylvan yellow fever in Uganda with Aëdes (Stegomyia) africanus Theobald as principal vector and insect host of the virus.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 43, 74–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed