Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:35:53.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of original host on chemotaxic behaviour and parasitism in Telenomus podisi Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2014

R. Tognon ,
J. Sant'Ana  and
S.M. Jahnke
R. Tognon*
Affiliation:
Crop Protection Department, Faculty of Agronomy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 7712, 91540-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
J. Sant'Ana
Affiliation:
Crop Protection Department, Faculty of Agronomy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 7712, 91540-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
S.M. Jahnke
Affiliation:
Crop Protection Department, Faculty of Agronomy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 7712, 91540-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: 5551 3308-7414 Fax: 5551 3308-6015 E-mail: roberta.tognon@ufrgs.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The egg parasitoid Telenomus podisi is a natural control agent of pentatomids, including Euschistus heros and Tibraca limbativentris, and success of parasitism is dependent upon the parasitoid finding the host. We tested the influence of host egg volatiles and the synthetic sex pheromone (zingiberenol) of T. limbativentris on chemotaxic behaviour of T. podisi, as well as, the impact of the original host on parasitoid selection. We used mated female T. podisi (48 h old) that emerged from the eggs of T. limbativentris or E. heros. The bioassays related to chemotaxy were performed in a Y-tube olfactometer and, to parasitism success, in laboratory and semi-field conditions. Telenomus podisi females that emerged from either the stink bug eggs, chose the pheromone more than control, or the pheromone plus eggs of E. heros in the semi-field bioassay, led to greater parasitism. Females that emerged from E. heros eggs chose egg volatiles from their original host rather than those from T. limbativentris, while females emerging from T. limbativentris, chose the egg volatiles of both hosts equally. When T. limbativentris was the original host, T. podisi females parasitized T. limbativentris over E. heros, while those emerging from E. heros exclusively parasitized E. heros eggs. These results demonstrated that T. podisi is more likely to parasitize the host in which it developed and that the original host can exert influence on the choice by those parasitoids. Understanding how the factors that mediate host–parasitoid communication are interrelated can help biological control programmes establish more effective and reliable tools with T. podisi.

Keywords

Telenomus podisiPentatomidaebiological controlchemotaxykairomonehost preference
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 104 , Issue 6 , December 2014 , pp. 781 - 787
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afsheen, S., Wang, X., Li, R., Zhu, C. & Lou, Y. (2008) Differential attraction of parasitoids in relation to specificity of kairomones from herbivores and their by-products. Insect Science 15, 381–397.Google Scholar
Arakaki, N., Wakamura, S. & Yasuda, T. (1997) Two regional strains of a phoretic egg parasitoid, Telenomus euproctidis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), that use different sex pheromones of two allopatric tussock moth species as kairomones. Journal of Chemical Ecology 23, 153–161.Google Scholar
Ayres, M., Ayres, M. Jr., Ayres, D.L. & Santos, A.A.S. (2007) BioEstat 5.0 Aplicações Estatísticas nas Áreas da Ciências Bio-médicas. Belém, Sociedade Civil Mamirauá.Google Scholar
Bin, F., Vinson, S.B., Strand, M.R., Colazza, S. & Jones, W.A. Jr. (1993) Source of an egg kairomone for Trissolcus basalis a parasitoid of Nezara viridula . Physiological Entomology 18, 7–15.Google Scholar
Borges, M., Schmidt, F.G.V., Sujii, E.R., Medeiros, M.A., Mori, K., Zarbin, P.H.G. & Ferreira, T.B. (1998) Field responses of stink bugs to the natural and synthetic pheromone of the Neotropical brown stink bug, Euschistus heros (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Physiological Entomology 23, 202–207.Google Scholar
Borges, M., Costa, M.L.M., Sujii, E.R., Cavalcanti, M. Das G., Redígolo, G.F., Resck, I.S. & Vilela, E.F. (1999) Semiochemical and physical stimuli involved in host recognition by Telenomus podisi (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) toward Euschistus heros (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Physiological Entomology 24, 227–233.Google Scholar
Borges, M., Laumann, A.R., Silva, C.C.A., Moraes, M.C.B., Santos, H.M. & Ribeiro, D.T. (2006) Metodologias de Criação e Manejo de Colônias de Percevejos da Soja (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) para Estudos de Comportamento e Ecologia Química. Brasília, EMBRAPA/CNPSo (Documentos, 182).Google Scholar
Bruni, R., Sant'Ana, J., Aldrich, J.R. & Bin, F. (2000) Influence of host pheromone on egg parasitism by scelionid wasps: comparison of phoretic and nonphoretic parasitoids. Journal of Insect Behavior 13, 165–173.Google Scholar
Colazza, S., Peri, E., Salerno, G. & Conti, E. (2010) Host searching by egg parasitoids: exploitation of host chemical cues. pp. 97–147 in Cônsoli, F.L., Parra, J.R.P. & Zucchi, R.A. (Eds) Egg Parasitoids in Agroecosystems with Emphasis on Trichogramma. London, Springer.Google Scholar
Conti, E. & Colazza, S. (2012) Chemical ecology of egg parasitoids associated with true bugs. Psyche 2012, 1–11.Google Scholar
Conti, E., Salerno, G., Bin, F., Williams, H.J. & Vinson, B. (2003) Chemical cues from Murgantia histrionica eliciting host location and recognition in the egg parasitoid Trissolcus brochymenae . Journal of Chemical Ecology 29, 115–130.Google Scholar
Corbet, S.A. (1985) Insect chemosensory responses: a chemical legacy hypothesis. Ecological Entomology 10, 143–153.Google Scholar
Farias, P.M., Klein, J.T., Sant'Ana, J., Redaelli, L.R. & Grazia, J. (2012) First records of Glyphepomis adroguensis (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae) and its parasitoid, Telenomus podisi (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae), on irrigated rice fields in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 56, 383–384.Google Scholar
Fatouros, N.E., Dicke, M., Mumm, R., Meiners, T. & Hilker, M. (2008) Foraging behavior of egg parasitoids exploiting chemical information. Behavioral Ecology 19, 677–689.Google Scholar
Gazit, Y., Lewis, W.J. & Tumlinson, J.H. (1996) Arrestment of Telenomus remus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) by a kairomone associated with eggs of its host, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biological Control 6, 283–290.Google Scholar
Gillot, C. (2002) Insect accessory reproductive glands: keys players in production and protection of eggs. pp. 35–59 in Hilker, M. & Meiners, T. (Eds) Chemoecology of Insect Eggs and Egg Deposition. Berlin, Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Godoy, K.B., Galli, J.C. & Ávila, C.J. (2005) Parasitismo em ovos de percevejos da soja Euschistus heros (Fabricius) e Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) em São Gabriel do Oeste, MS. Ciência Rural 35, 455–458.Google Scholar
Goulart, M.M.P., Bueno, A. de F., Bueno, R.C.O. de F. & Diniz, A.F. (2011) Host preference of the egg parasitoids Telenomus remus and Trichogramma pretiosum in laboratory. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 55, 129–133.Google Scholar
Hilker, M., Blaske, V., Kobs, C. & Dippel, C. (2000) Kairomonal effects of sawfly sex pheromones on egg parasitoids. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26, 2591–2601.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M.P., Ode, P.R., Walker, D.L., Gardner, J., Nouhuys, S. & Shelton, A.M. (2001) Performance of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) reared on factitious hosts, including the target host, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Biological Control 21, 1–10.Google Scholar
Idalgo, T.D.N., Sant´Ana, J., Redaelli, L.R. & Pires, P.D.S. (2013) Parasitismo de ovos de Tibraca limbativentris Stal (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) em lavoura de arroz irrigado, Eldorado do Sul, RS. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 80, 453–456.Google Scholar
Laumann, R.A., Aquino, M.F.S., Moraes, M.C.B., Pareja, M. & Borges, M. (2009) Response of the egg parasitoids Trissolcus basalis and Telenomus podisi to compounds from defensive secretions of stink bug. Journal of Chemical Ecology 35, 8–19.Google Scholar
Maciel, A.A.S., Lemos, R.N.S., Souza, J.R., Costa, V.A., Barrigossi, J.A.F. & Chagas, E.F. (2007) Parasitismo de ovos de Tibraca limbativentris Stål (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) na cultura do arroz no Maranhão. Neotropical Entomology 36, 616–618.Google Scholar
Matthews, R.W. & Matthews, J.R. (2010) Insect Behavior. New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Medeiros, M.A., Schimidt, F.V.G., Loiácono, M.S., Carvalho, V.F. & Borges, M. (1997) Parasitismo e predação em ovos de Euschistus heros (Fab.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) no Distrito Federal, Brasil. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 26, 397–401.Google Scholar
Meiners, T., Westerhaus, C. & Hilker, M. (2000) Specificity of chemical cues used by a specialist egg parasitoid during host location. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 95, 151–159.Google Scholar
Pacheco, D.J.P. & Corrêa-Ferreira, B.S. (1998) Potencial reprodutivo e longevidade do parasitóide Telenomus podisi Ashmead, em ovos de diferentes espécies de percevejos. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 27, 585–591.Google Scholar
Pacheco, D.J.P. & Corrêa-Ferreira, B.S. (2000) Parasitismo de Telenomus podisi Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) em populações de percevejos pragas da soja. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 29, 295–302.Google Scholar
Renou, M., Nagnan, P., Berthier, A. & Durier, C. (1992) Identification of compounds from the eggs of Ostrinia nubilalis and Mamestra brassicae having kairomone activity on Trichogramma brassicae . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 63, 291–303.Google Scholar
Riffel, C.T., Prando, H.F. & Boff, M.I. (2010) Primeiro relato de ocorrência de Telenomus podisi (Ashmead) e Trissolcus urichi (Crawford) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) como parasitoides de ovos do percevejo-do-colmo-do-arroz, Tibraca limbativentris Stål (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), em Santa Catarina. Neotropical Entomology 39, 447–448.Google Scholar
Roriz, V., Oliveira, L. & Garcia, P. (2006) Host suitability and preference studies of Trichogramma cordubensis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Biological Control 36, 331–336.Google Scholar
Rukmowati-Brotodjojo, R.R. & Walter, G.H. (2006) Oviposition and reproductive performance of a generalist parasitoid (Trichogramma pretiosum) exposed to host species that differ in their physical characteristics. Biological Control 39, 300–312.Google Scholar
Salmanova, L.M., Chernyshev, W.B., Olifer, V.V., Grinberg, S.M. & Afonina, V.M. (1993) Gradual changes of Trichogramma evanescens (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) during laboratory rearing. Entomological Review 72, 92–99.Google Scholar
Santis, F., Conti, E., Romani, R., Salerno, G., Parillo, F. & Bin, F. (2008) Colleterial glands of Sesamia nonagrioides as a source of the host-recognition kairomone for the egg parasitoid Telenomus busseolae . Physiological Entomology 33, 7–16.Google Scholar
Silva, C.C., Moraes, M.C.B., Laumann, R.A. & Borges, M. (2006) Sensory response of the egg parasitoid Telenomus podisi to stimuli from the bug Euschistus heros . Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 41, 1093–1098.Google Scholar
Siqueira, J.R., Bueno, R.C.O. de F., Bueno, A. de F. & Vieira, S.S. (2012) Preferência hospedeira do parasitoide de ovos Trichogramma pretiosum . Ciência Rural 42, 1–5.Google Scholar
Steidle, J.L.M. & van Loon, J.J.A. (2002) Chemoecology of parasitoid and predator oviposition behaviour. pp. 291–317 in Hilker, M. & Meiners, T. (Eds) Chemoecology of Insect Eggs and Egg Deposition. Berlin, Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Storeck, A., Poppy, G.M., Van Emden, H.F. & Powell, W. (2000) The role of plant chemical cues in determining host preference in the generalist aphid parasitoid Aphidius colemani . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 97, 41–46.Google Scholar
Sujii, E.R., Costa, M.L.M., Pires, C.S.S., Colazza, S. & Borges, M. (2002) Inter and intra-guild interactions in egg parasitoid species of the soybean stink bug complex. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 37, 1541–1549.Google Scholar
Tillman, P.G. (2010) Parasitism and predation of stink bug (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) eggs in Georgia corn fields. Environmental Entomology 39, 1184–1194.Google Scholar
Tillman, P.G. (2011) Natural biological control of stink bug (heteroptera: pentatomidae) eggs in corn, peanut, and cotton farmscapes in Georgia. Environmental Entomology 40, 303–314.Google Scholar
Tognon, R., Sant'Ana, J. & Jahnke, S.M. (2013) Aprendizagem e memória de Telenomus podisi (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae). Iheringia Série Zoologia 103, 266–271.Google Scholar
Van Emden, H.F., Sponagl, B., Wagner, E., Baker, T., Ganguly, S. & Douloumpaka, S. (1996) Hopkins’ ‘host selection principle’, another nail in its coffin. Physiological Entomology 21, 325–328.Google Scholar
Vet, L.E.M. & Dicke, M. (1992) Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 141–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vet, L.E.M., Lewis, W.J. & Cardé, R.T. (1995) Parasitoid foraging and learning. pp. 65–101 in Cardé, R.T. & Bell, W.J. (Eds) Chemical Ecology of Insects 2. New York, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Vinson, S.B. (1984) Parasitoid–host relationships. pp. 205–233 in Cardé, R.T. & Bell, W.J. (Eds) Chemical Ecology of Insects. New York, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Vinson, S.B. (1985) The behaviour of parasitoids. pp. 417–469 in Kerkut, G.A. & Gilbert, L.I. (Eds) Comprehensive Insect Physiology Biochemistry and Pharmacology. New York, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Vinson, S.B. (1998) The general host selection behavior of parasitoid Hymenoptera and a comparison of initial strategies utilized by larvaphagous and oophagous species. Biological Control 11, 79–96.Google Scholar