Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:44:39.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigating the validity of the species status of the false codling moth in South African deciduous fruit orchards using mating studies and mtDNA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2016

N. Mgocheki  and
P. Addison
N. Mgocheki*
Affiliation:
Soil and Plant Sciences Department, Faculty of AgricultureZimbabwe Open University, P O Box MP1119, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa
P. Addison
Affiliation:
Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa
*
*Author for correspondence Tel: +263771121823 E-mail: nmgocheki@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The false codling moth is a polyphagous pest of various kinds or fruit, and it has expanded its geographical distribution and host range. The expanding host range could result in subspecies requiring varied pest management options. Laboratory no-choice cross-mating tests were conducted to establish whether Thaumatotibia leucotreta individuals from six areas and three host species, in South Africa, share mating characteristics and belong to the same subspecies or strain. The no-choice cross-mating tests indicated that all individuals in self- and out-crosses readily mated within 24 h with those derived from different hosts and areas. The mtDNA results confirmed that all individuals formed one group or clade. Overall, the results indicate that T. leucotreta individuals from the six areas and three host species in the Western Cape Province and two other provinces in South Africa represent a single genetical species. The results imply that similar control options can be effective across host ranges and distribution areas.

Keywords

cross-matingThaumatotibia leucotretahostclademtDNA
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 106 , Issue 5 , October 2016 , pp. 598 - 605
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloem, S., Carpenter, J.E. & Hofmeyr, J.H. (2003) Radiation biology and inherited sterility in false codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 1724–1731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron, S.L. (2014) Insect mitochondrial genomics: implications for evolution and phylogeny. Annual Review of Entomology 59, 95–117.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J.E., Bloem, S. & Hofmeyr, J.H. (2004) Acceptability and suitability of eggs of false codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) from irradiated parents to parasitism by Trichogrammatoidea cryptophlebiae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Biological Control 30, 351–359.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J.E., Bloem, S. & Hofmeyr, J.H. (2007) Area-wide control tactics for the false codling moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta in South Africa: a potential invasive species. pp. 351–359 in Vreysen, M.J.B., Robinson, A.S. & Hendrichs, J. (Eds) Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests. From Research to Field Implementation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer.Google Scholar
CLCBIO. (2011) CLC genomics workbench 4.0.1. Finlandsgade 10–12, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.Google Scholar
Daiber, C.C. (1980) A study of the biology of the false codling moth (Cryptophlebia leucotreta Meyr.): the adult and generations during the year. Phytophylactica 12, 187–193.Google Scholar
Daiber, C. (1981) False codling moth, Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyr.) in peach orchards and home gardens of the summer rainfall area of South Africa. Phytophylactica 13, 105–107.Google Scholar
Goyer, R.A., Paine, T.D., Pashley, D.P., Lenhard, G.J., Meeker, J.R. & Hanlon, C.C. (1995) Geographic and host associated differentiation in the fruit tree leafroller (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 88, 391–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, M.V. & Zmasek, C.M. (2009) Phylo XML: XML for evolutionary biology and comparative genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmeyr, J.H. & Pringle, K.L. (1998) Resistance of false codling moth, Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), to the chitin synthesis inhibitor, trißumuron. African Entomology 6, 373–375.Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck, J.P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R. & Bollack, J.P. (2001) Bayesian influence of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294, 2310–2314.Google Scholar
Kaneshiro, K.Y. (1976) Ethological isolation and phylogeny in the Planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila . Evolution 30, 740–745.Google Scholar
Kirkman, W. & Moore, S.D. (2007) A study of alternative hosts for the false codling moth, Thaumatotibia (=Cryptophlebia) leucotreta in the Eastern Cape. South African Fruit Journal 6, 33–38.Google Scholar
Kondo, R., Satta, Y., Matsuura, E.T., Ishiwa, H., Takahata, N. & Chigusa, S.I. (1990) Incomplete maternal transmission of mitochondrial DNA in Drosophila . Genetics 126, 657–663.Google Scholar
La Croix, E. & Thindwa, H. (1986) Macadamia pests in Malawi. III. The major pests. The biology of bugs and borers. Tropical Pest Management 32, 11–20.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1963) Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Newcombe, D., Moore, P.J. & Moore, A.J. (2015) The role of maternal effects on the adaptation to different diets. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 114, 202–211.Google Scholar
Newton, P.J. & Odendaal, W.J. (1990) Commercial inundative releases of Trichogrammatoidea cryptophlebiae (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in citrus. Entomophaga 35, 545–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishiguchi, M.K., Doukakis, P., Egan, M., Kizirian, D., Phillips, A., Prendini, L., Rosenbaum, H.C., Torres, E., Yael Wyner, Y., DeSalle, R. & Giribet, G. (2002) DNA isolation procedures. pp. 247–287 in DeSalle, R., Giribet, G., & Wheeler, W. C. (Eds) Techniques in Molecular Systematics and Evolution. Basel, Birkhäuser Verlag.Google Scholar
Opoku-Debra, J.K. (2008) Geographic variation in the susceptibility of false codling moth, Thaumatotibia leucotreta, populations to a granulovirus (CrleGV-SA). MSc Thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa.Google Scholar
Paterson, H.E.H. (1978) More evidence of speciation by reinforcement. South African Journal of Science 74, 369–371.Google Scholar
Paterson, H.E.H. (1980) A comment on “mate recognition systems”. Evolution, 34, 330–331.Google Scholar
Paterson, H.E.H. (1981) The continuing search for the evolution of the unknown and unknowable-a critique of contemporary ideas of speciation. South African Journal of Science 77, 113–119.Google Scholar
Peppe, F.B. & Lomônaco, C. (2003) Phenotypic plasticity of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) raised on Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala (kale) and Raphanus sativus L. (radish). Genetics and Molecular Biology 26, 189–194.Google Scholar
Posada, D. (2008) jModel test: phylogenetic averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25, 1253–1256.Google Scholar
Ratasingham, S. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2007) BOLD: the barcode of life data system (www.barcodinglife.org). Molecular Ecology Notes 7, 355–364.Google Scholar
Ritchie, M.G. (2000) Inheritance of a mate recognition system. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 267, 327–332.Google Scholar
Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2003) MR BAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic influence under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–1574.Google Scholar
Rosen, D. (1986). The role of taxonomy in effective biological control programs. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 15, 121–129.Google Scholar
Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H. & Flook, P. (1994) Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87, 651–702.Google Scholar
Sreejith, K. & Sebastian, C.D. (2015) Molecular phylogeny of Thaia subrufa (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) based on the Mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit I (COI) gene. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 3, 135–139.Google Scholar
Stamos, D.N. (2003) The Species Problem: Biological Species, Ontology and the Metaphysics of Biology. Oxford, UK, Lexington Books, pp. 47–52.Google Scholar
Stofberg, F.J. (1954) False codling moth of citrus. Farming South Africa 29, 27–276.Google Scholar
Swoford, D. (2002) Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony, PAUP* version 4.0. Massachusetts, Sinauer Associates, Inc, Publishers.Google Scholar
Timm, A.E., Geertsema, H. & Warnich, L. (2008a) Morphological and molecular identification of economically important Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) on deciduous fruit tree crops in South Africa. African Entomology 16, 209–219.Google Scholar
Timm, A.E., Geertsema, H. & Warnich, L. (2008b) Population genetic structure of Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in South Africa. Annals of Entomological Society of America 101, 197–203.Google Scholar
Timm, A.E., Geertsema, H. & Warnich, L. (2010) Population genetic structure of economically important Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) in South Africa: a comparative analysis. Bulletin of Entomological Research 100, 421–431.Google Scholar
Watanabe, T.K. & Kawanishi, M. (1979) Mating preference and the direction of evolution in Drosophila . Science 205, 906–907.Google Scholar
Weir, B.S. & Cockerham, C.C. (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370.Google Scholar
Whiting, M.F., Carpenter, J.C., Wheeler, Q.D. & Wheeler, W.C. (1997) The Stresipera problem: Phylogeny of the homometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Systematic Biology 46, 1–68.Google Scholar
WHO. (2008) Anopheline species complexes in South and South East Asia. SEARO Technical Publication 57, 7–8.Google Scholar
Zmasek, C.M. & Eddy, S.R. (2001) ATV: display and manipulation of annotated phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 383–384.Google Scholar