Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:11:56.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oviposition deterrents for the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) from fly faeces extracts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. Arredondo  and
F. Díaz-Fleischer
J. Arredondo
Affiliation:
Campaña Nacional Contra Moscas de la Fruta, Desarrollo de Métodos, Central Poniente No. 14 Altos, Tapachula, Chiapas, CP 30700, México
F. Díaz-Fleischer*
Affiliation:
Campaña Nacional Contra Moscas de la Fruta, Desarrollo de Métodos, Central Poniente No. 14 Altos, Tapachula, Chiapas, CP 30700, México LABIOTECA, Apartado Postal 250, Xalapa, Veracruz, CP 91090, Mexico
*
*Fax: 52 (228) 8422773 E-mail: fleische@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After oviposition, females of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata Wiedemann deposit a host-marking pheromone on the fruit surface that deters oviposition by conspecifics. Methanolic extracts of fruit fly faeces elicit a similar deterrent effect. The results of laboratory and field experiments using raw methanolic extracts of C. capitata faeces as an oviposition deterrent are reported. Laboratory bioassays revealed a significant positive relationship between concentration of faeces and the inhibition of oviposition responses by C. capitata. Treatment of halves of coffee bushes with methanolic extracts containing 0.1, 1.0 and 10 mg faeces ml−1 resulted in a significant reduction of infestation only at the highest concentration (P = 0.03). Treatment of blocks of coffee bushes with an extract of 10 mg faeces ml−1 resulted in an 84%reduction in infestation by C. capitata in sprayed plants and a 56% reduction in adjacent untreated coffee bushes surrounding treated plots, probably due to the deterrent effect of host-marking pheromone on fly oviposition. We conclude that faeces contain oviposition deterrent substances that effectively reduce fruit infestations by C. capitata, suggesting a clear potential for the use of this infochemical in integrated management programmes targeted at this pest.

Keywords

Ceratitis capitataTephritidaeoviposition deterrenceinfochemicals
Type
Review Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 96 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 35 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abacus Concepts, Inc. (1991) SuperAnova, Version 1.11. Berkeley, California, USA.Google Scholar
Abasa, R.O. (1972) The Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata Wied.: laboratory investigations of its reproductive behaviour in Coffea arabica in Kenya. East African Agriculture and Forestry Journal 37, 181–184.Google Scholar
Abbott, W.S. (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology 18, 265–267.Google Scholar
Aluja, M. & Boller, E.F. (1992a) Host marking pheromone of Rhagoletis cerasi: foraging behaviour in response to synthetic pheromonal isomers. Journal of Chemical Ecology 18, 1299–1311.Google Scholar
Aluja, M. & Boller, E.F. (1992b) Host-marking pheromone of Rhagoletis cerasi: field deployment of synthetic pheromone as a novel cherry fly management strategy. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 65, 141–147.Google Scholar
Aluja, M., Guillén, J., de la Rosa, G., Cabrera, M., Celedonio, H., Liedo, P. & Hendrichs, J. (1987) Natural host plant survey of the economically important fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of Chiapas, Mexico. Florida Entomologist 70, 329–338.Google Scholar
Aluja, M., Prokopy, R.J., Elkinton, J.S. & Laurence, F. (1989) Novel approach for tracking and quantifying the movement patterns of insects in three dimensions under seminatural conditions. Environmental Entomology 18, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aluja, M., Díaz-Fleischer, F., Edmunds, A.J.F. & Hagmann, L. (2003) Isolation, structural determination, synthesis, biological activity and application as agent of control of the host marking pheromone (and derivatives thereof) of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the genus Anastrepha. Invention and Use Patent. United States Patent. Patent Number 6,555,120 B1.Google Scholar
Anderson, P., Hilker, M., Hansson, B.S., Bombosch, S., Klein, B. & Schildknecht, H. (1993) Oviposition deterring components in larval frass of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): behavioural and electrophysiological evaluation. Journal of Insect Physiology 39, 129–137.Google Scholar
Averill, A.L. & Prokopy, R.J. (1987) Intraspecific competition in the tephritid fruit fly Rhagoletis pomonella. Ecology 68, 878–886.Google Scholar
Averill, A.L. & Prokopy, R.J. (1989) Host-marking pheromones. pp. 207–219 in Robinson, A.S. & Hooper, G. (eda) Fruit flies, their biology, natural enemies and control. Vol. 3A: World Crop Pests. Amsterdam, Netherlands, Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Boller, E.F. (1968) An artificial egging device for the European cherry fruit fly Rhagoletis cerasi. Journal of Economic Entomology 61, 850–852.Google Scholar
Boller, E.F. & Aluja, M. (1992) Oviposition deterring pheromone of Rhagoletis cerasi: biological activity of four synthetic isomers and HMP discrimination of two host races as measured by an improved bioassay. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 113, 113–119.Google Scholar
Boller, E.F. & Hurter, J. (1985) Oviposition deterring pheromone in Rhagoletis cerasi: behavioural laboratory test to measure pheromone activity. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 39, 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boller, E.F., Hippe, C., Prokopy, R.J., Enkerlin, W., Katsoyannos, B.I., Morgante, J.S., Quilici, S., Crespo, de, Stilinovic, D. & Zapater, M. (1994) Response of wild and laboratory-reared Ceratitis capitata Wied. (Dipt., Tephritidae) flies from different geographic origins to a standard host marking pheromone solution. Journal of Applied Entomology 118, 84–91.Google Scholar
Bradbury, J.W. & Vehrencamp, S.L. (1998) Principles of animal communication, 882 pp. Sunderland, Massachusetts Sinauer Associates, IncGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Fleischer, F., Papaj, D.R., Prokopy, R.J., Norrbom, A.L. & Aluja, M. (2000) Evolution of fruit fly oviposition behavior. pp. 811–841 in Aluja, M. & Norrbom, A.L. (eds) Fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. Boca Raton, Florida CRC Press.Google Scholar
Díaz-Fleischer, F., Aluja, M., Hurter, J., Enkerlin, W. & Boller, E. (2004) Propiedades físico-químicas de la feromona marcadora de hospedero (FMH) de tres especies de moscas de la fruta del género Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae). Folia Entomológica Mexicana 43, 45–53.Google Scholar
Dicke, M. & Sabelis, M.W. (1988) Infochemical terminology: based on cost-benefit analysis rather than origin of compounds. Functional Ecology 2, 131–139.Google Scholar
Ernst, B. & Wagner, B. (1989) Synthesis of the oviposition-deterring pheromone (ODP) in Rhagoletis cerasi L. Helvetica Chimica Acta 72, 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitt, G.P. (1986) The influence of shortage of hosts on the specificity of oviposition behaviour in species of Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Physiological Entomology 11, 133–143.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. & Carey, J. (1990) Interaction of host stimuli in the ovipositional response of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environmental Entomology 19, 1075–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, B. & Thiery, D. (1994) Semiochemicals from Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) eggs deter oviposition of the codling moth Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). European Journal of Entomology 91, 353–359.Google Scholar
Gabel, B. & Thiery, D. (1996) Oviposition response of Lobesia botrana females to long chain free fatty acids and esters from its eggs. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22, 161–171.Google Scholar
Hilker, M. (1989) Intra- and interspecific effects of larval secretions in some chrysomelids (Coleoptera). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 53, 237–245.Google Scholar
Hilker, M. & Klein, B. (1989) Investigation of oviposition deterrent in larval frass of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.). Journal of Chemical Ecology 15, 929–938.Google Scholar
Hurter, J., Boller, E.F., Städler, E., Blattman, H., Buser, R., Bosshard, N.U., Damm, L., Kozlowski, M.W., Schöni, R., Raschdorf, F., Dahinden, R., Schlumpf, E., Fritz, H., Richter, W.J. & Schreiber, J. (1987) Oviposition-deterring pheromone in Rhagoletis cerasi L.: purification and determination of the chemical constitution. Experientia 43, 157–164.Google Scholar
Katsoyannos, B.I. & Boller, E.F. (1976) First field application of oviposition-deterring marking pheromone of the European cherry fruit fly. Environmental Entomology 5, 151–152.Google Scholar
Katsoyannos, B.I. & Boller, E.F. (1980) Second field application of oviposition-deterring pheromone of the European cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi L. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 89, 278–281.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, O.P.J.M., Tatar, M. & Rosenheim, J.A. (1992) Egg load as a major source of variability in insect foraging and oviposition behaviour. Oikos 65, 134–142.Google Scholar
Nufio, C.R. & Papaj, D.R. (2001) Host marking behaviour in phytophagous insects and parasitoids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 99, 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaj, D.R. (1994) Use and avoidance of occupied host as a dynamic process in tephritid flies. pp. 25–46 in Bernays, E.A. (ed). Insect–plant interactions. Vol. V. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Papaj, D.R., Roitberg, B.D. & Opp, S.B. (1989a) Serial effects of host infestation on egg allocation by the Mediterranean fruit fly: a rule of a thumb and its functional significance. Journal of Animal Ecology 58, 955–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaj, D.R., Hendrichs, J. & Katsoyannos, B. (1989b) Use of fruit wounds in oviposition by the Mediterranean fruit fly. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 53, 203–209.Google Scholar
Papaj, D.R., Roitberg, B.D., Opp, S.B., Aluja, M., Prokopy, R.J. & Wong, T.T.Y. (1990) Effect of marking pheromone on clutch size in the Mediterranean fruit fly. Physiological Entomology 15, 463–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R.J. (1981) Epideitic pheromones that influence spacing patterns of phytophagous insects. pp. 181–213 in Nordlund, D.A., Jones, R.L. & Lewis, W.J. (eds) Semiochemicals: their role in pest control. New York, Wiley Press.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., Ziegler, J.R. & Wong, T.T.Y. (1978a) Deterrence of repeated oviposition by fruit marking pheromone in Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 4, 55–63.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., Papaj, D.R., Opp, S.B. & Wong, T.T.Y. (1978b) Intra-tree foraging behavior of Ceratitis capitata flies in relation to host fruit density and quality. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 45, 251–258.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., Averill, A.L., Bardinelli, C.M., Bowdan, E.S., Cooley, S.S., Crnjar, R.M., Dundulis, E.A., Roitberg, C.A., Spatcher, P.J., Tumlinson, J.H. & Weeks, B.L. (1982) Site of production of an oviposition deterring pheromone component in Rhagoletis pomonella flies. Journal of Insect Physiology 28, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roitberg, B.D. & Prokopy, R.J. (1987) Insects that mark host plants. BioScience 37, 400–406.Google Scholar
Roitberg, B.D., van Lenteren, J.C., van Alphen, J.M.M., Galis, F. & Prokopy, R.J. (1982) Foraging of Rhagoletis pomonella, a parasite of hawthorn (Crataegus), in nature. Journal of Animal Ecology 48, 307–325.Google Scholar
Roitberg, B.D., Cairl, R.S. & Prokopy, R.J. (1984) Oviposition deterring pheromone influences dispersal distance in tephritid fruit flies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 35, 217–220.Google Scholar
Schoonhoven, L.M., Baerling, E.A.M., Klijnnstra, J.W., van Vuggt, Y. (1990) Two related butterfly species avoid oviposition near each other 's eggs. Experientia 46, 526–528.Google Scholar
Städler, E., Ernest, B., Hurter, J., Boller, E. & Kozlowski, M. (1992) Tarsal contact chemoreceptors of the cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi: specificity, correlation with oviposition behaviour, and response to the synthetic pheromone. pp. 143–145 in Menken, S.B.J., Visser, J.H., Harrewijn, P. (eds) Proceedings of the 8th Symposium of Insect–Plant Relationships. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Williams, A.L., Mitchell, E.R., Heath, R.R. & Barfield, C.S. (1986) Oviposition deterrents of armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from larval frass, corn leaves, and artificial diet. Environmental Entomology 15, 327–330.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1984) Biostatistical analysis. 718 pp. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. (1979) Oviposition behavior and the existence of an oviposition-deterring pheromone in Hylemya. Environmental Entomology 8, 277–279.Google Scholar