Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:02:36.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A simple Method for the Estimation of Contact Insecticides*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

B. J. Krijgsman
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Comparative Physiology, University of Utrecht.
Nelly E. Berger
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Comparative Physiology, University of Utrecht.

Extract

The great increase, in recent years, in the number of contact insecticides has created a demand for methods whereby the content of active substance in samples of these insecticides may be estimated quantitatively in a simple manner. Such methods are important, because on the one hand the producer wishes to know if his product meets the necessary requirements and on the other hand the official services concerned with the control of insect pests must be able to test the fundamental value of commercial preparations. Moreover quantitative methods for the estimation of contact insecticides are useful for scientific research in this field.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bliss, C. I. (1935). Ann. appl. Biol., 22, pp. 134167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, C. I. (1935a). Ann. appl. Biol., 22, pp. 307333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresden, D. & Krijgsman, B. J. (1948). Bull. ent. Res., 38, pp. 575578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewlett, P. S. (1947). Ann. appl. Biol., 34, pp. 357375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkin, E. A. & Green, A. A. (1943). Ann. appl. Biol., 30, pp. 279292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tattersfield, F. & Potter, C. (1943). Ann. appl. Biol., 30, 259279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilemans, E. (1941). Bull. agric. Congo belge, 32, pp. 126193.Google Scholar
Tilemans, E. (?1947). Rep. 1st int. Congr. Plant Prot. Heverlee, 1946, pp. 433440.Google Scholar