Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:34:59.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of methoxy-DDT as a residual spray against mosquitoes in verandahtrap huts at Magugu, Tanzania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. E. Hudson
Affiliation:
East African Community, Tropical Pesticides Research Institute, P.O. Box 3024, Arusha, Tanzania

Extract

The effects of residual sprays of methoxy-DDT wettable powder at 2 g/m2 on the mortality and behaviour of Anopheles gambiae Giles, Mansonia uniformis (Theo.) and Culex pipiens fatigans Wied. females were investigated in four verandah-trap huts, one of which was used as control. The overall mortality of no species ever exceeded 29%, and no consistent deterrent effect on entry was demonstrated. The proportions of mosquitoes in the exit traps were, for A. gambiae 80–90% in treated huts and 29–70% in the control, for M. uniformis 90–100% in treated and control huts, and for C. p. fatigans 26–84% in treated huts and 38–66% in the control. There were more unfed mosquitoes of all three species in the treated huts than in the control, for A. gambiae 35–64% and 10–53%, respectively, for M. uniformis 38–84% and 35–64%, respectively, and for C. p. fatigans 22–58% and 21–43%, respectively. Bioassays with wild-caught A. gambiae exposed to the treated surfaces for one hour, showed that the deposits remained highly toxic for 16 weeks on grass, six weeks on iron and two weeks, or less, on mud.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, A. W. A. & Abedi, Z. H. (1960). Cross-resistance characteristics of a malathiontolerant strain developed in Aedes aegypti.—Mosquito News 20, 118124.Google Scholar
Burnett, G. F. (1957). Trials of residual insecticides against Anophelines in African-type huts.—Bull. ent. Res. 48, 631668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busvine, J. R. & Coker, W. Z. (1958). Resistance patterns of DDT-resistant Aedes aegypti.Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 18, 651656.Google ScholarPubMed
Coz, J., Eyraud, M., Venard, P., Attiou, B., Somda, D. & Ouedraogo, D. (1965). Experiences en Haute-Volta sur Futilisation de cases pieges pour la mesure de l'activite' du DDT contre les moustiques.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 33, 435452.Google Scholar
Davidson, G. (1957). Insecticide resistance in Anopheles sundaicus.—Nature, Lond. 180, 13331335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadaway, A. B. & Barlow, F. (1951). Studies on aqueous suspensions of insecticidesBull. ent. Res. 41, 603622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadaway, A. B. & Barlow, F. (1953). Studies on aqueous suspensions of insecticides. Part IV: Behaviour of mosquitos in contact with insecticidal deposits.—Bull. ent. Res. 44, 255271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamon, J., Sales, S. & Eyraud, M. (1963). Etude biologique de la remanence du DDT dans les habitations de la region de Bobo Dioulasso, Republique de Haute-Volta.—Riv. Malar. 42, 154.Google Scholar
Hetrick, L. A. (1957). Ten years of testing organic insecticides as soil poisons against the eastern subterranean termite.—J. econ. Ent. 50, 316317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaschef, A. H. (1970). Effects of temperature on the irritability caused by DDT and DDT analogues in Anopheline mosquitoes.—Bull. Wld tilth Org. 42, 917930.Google Scholar
Ludvick, G. F. (1953). Topical application of insecticide solutions to Anopheles quadrimaculatus.—J. econ. Ent. 46, 364365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marth, E. H. (1965). Residues and some effects of chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides in biological material. In Gunther, F. A. (Ed.) Residue Reviews 9, 189. New York, Springer.Google Scholar
Negherbon, W. O., Compiler. (1959). Handbook of Toxicology, Volume III: Insecticides. 854 pp. Philadelphia, Saunders.Google Scholar
Olney, C. E., Donaldson, W. E. & Kerr, T. W. (1962). Methoxychlor in eggs and chicken tissues.—J. econ. Ent. 55, 477479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, R. L. & Gahan, J. B. (1949). Residual toxicity of DDT analogs and related chlorinated hydrocarbons to houseflies and mosquitoes.—J. econ. Ent. 42, 113116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. (1964). The behaviour of malaria vectors in huts sprayed with DDT and with a mixture of DDT and malathion in Northern Nigeria.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 58, 7279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1964). Studies on Anopheles gambiae Giles and malaria transmission in the Umbugwe area of Tanganyika.—Bull. ent. Res. 55, 125137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1965 a). A verandah-trap hut for studying the house-frequenting habits of mosquitos and for assessing insecticides. I: A description of the verandah-trap hut and of studies on the egress of Anopheles gambiae Giles and Mansonia uniformis (Theo.) from an untreated hut.Bull. ent. Res. 56, 161167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1965 b). A verandah-trap hut for studying the house-frequenting habits of mosquitos and for assessing insecticides. II: The effect of dichlorvos (DDVP) on egress and mortality of Anopheles gambiae Giles and Mansonia uniformis (Theo.).—Bull. ent. Res. 56, 275282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., Obudho, W. O. & Esozed, S. (1967). The egress of Anopheles gambiae and Mansonia uniformis from experimental huts with corrugated iron roofs.—E. Afr. med. J. 44, 169172.Google Scholar
Smith, A. & Webley, D. J. (1969). A verandah-trap hut for studying the house-frequenting habits of mosquitoes and for assessing insecticides. Ill: The effect of DDT on behaviour and mortality.—Bull. ent. Res. 59, 3346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
jrWeikel, J. H. (1957). The metabolism of methoxychlor [l,l,l-trichloro-2,2-bis (paramethoxyphenyl) ethane]—1: the role of the liver and biliary excretion in the rat.—Archs. int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 110, 423432.Google Scholar
Who (1970). Insecticide resistance and vector control. 17th report of WHO Expert Committee on Insecticides.Techn. Rep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. no. 443, 279 pp.Google Scholar