Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:27:45.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attraction of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) to four varieties of Lathyrus sativus L. seed volatiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2014

P. Adhikary
Affiliation:
Ecology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan – 713 104, West Bengal, India
A. Mukherjee
Affiliation:
Ecology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan – 713 104, West Bengal, India
A. Barik*
Affiliation:
Ecology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan – 713 104, West Bengal, India
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: 0342 2634200 E-mail: anandamaybarik@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) is an important stored grain pest of Lathyrus sativus L. (Leguminosae), commonly known as khesari, in India, Bangladesh and Ethiopia. Volatiles were collected from four varieties, i.e., Bio L 212 Ratan, Nirmal B-1, WBK-14-7 and WBK-13-1 of uninfested khesari seeds, and subsequently identified and quantified by gas chromatography mass spectrometry and gas chromatography flame ionization detector analyses, respectively. A total of 23 volatiles were identified in the four varieties of khesari seeds. In Bio L 212 Ratan and WBK-13-1 seeds, nonanal was the most abundant followed by farnesyl acetone; whereas farnesyl acetone was predominant followed by nonanal in Nirmal B-1 and WBK-14-7 khesari seeds. The olfactory responses of female C. maculatus toward volatile blends from four varieties of khesari seeds, and individual synthetic compounds and their combinations were examined through Y-shaped glass tube olfactometer bioassays. Callosobruchus maculatus showed significant preference for the whole volatile blends from Bio L 212 Ratan seeds compared to whole volatile blends from other three varieties. The insect exhibited attraction to five individual synthetic compounds, 3-octanone, 3-octanol, linalool oxide, 1-octanol and nonanal. A synthetic blend of 448, 390, 1182, 659 and 8114 ng/20 μl methylene chloride of 3-octanone, 3-octanol, linalool oxide, 1-octanol and nonanal, respectively, was most attractive to C. maculatus, and this combination might be used for insect pest management program such as baited traps.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adhikary, P. & Barik, A. (2012) Effect of temperature on biology of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Indian Journal of Entomology 74, 261266.Google Scholar
Arnold, S.E.J., Stevenson, P.C. & Belmain, S.R. (2012) Odour-mediated orientation of beetles is influenced by age, sex and morph. PLoS ONE 7(11), e49071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049071 Google Scholar
Babu, A., Hern, A. & Dorn, S. (2003) Sources of semiochemicals mediating host finding in Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 93, 187192.Google Scholar
Bogamuwa, M.M.S., Weerakoon, K.C. & Karunaratne, S.H.P.P. (2002) Insecticide resistance in the bruchid Callosobruchus maculatus, a storage pest of legumes. Ceylon Journal of Science (Biological Science) 30, 5566.Google Scholar
Bruce, T.J.A. & Pickett, J.A. (2011) Perception of plant volatile blends by herbivorous insects − finding the right mix. Phytochemistry 72, 16051611.Google Scholar
Bruce, T.J.A., Wadhams, L.J. & Woodcock, C.M. (2005) Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trends in Plant Science 10, 269274.Google Scholar
Collins, L.E., Bryning, G.P., Wakefield, M.E., Chambers, J. & Cox, P.D. (2007) Progress towards a multi-species lure: identification of components of food volatiles as attractants for three storage beetles. Journal of Stored Products Research 43, 5363.Google Scholar
De Moraes, C.M., Lewis, W.J., Paré, P.W., Alborn, H.T. & Tumlinson, J.H. (1998) Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids. Nature 393, 570573.Google Scholar
Fox, C.W. (1993) The influence of maternal age and mating frequency on egg size and offspring performance in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Oecologia 96, 139146.Google Scholar
Fox, C.W., Bush, M.L. & Messina, F.J. (2010) Biotypes of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus have differing effects on the germination and growth of their legume hosts. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 12, 353362.Google Scholar
Gaur, V. & Maloo, S.R. (2011) Genetic divergence in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 80, 172173.Google Scholar
Girma, D. & Korbu, L. (2012) Genetic improvement of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) in Ethiopoia: an unfulfilled promise. Plant Breeding 131, 231236.Google Scholar
Howe, R.W. & Currie, J.E. (1964) Some laboratory observations on the rates of development, mortality, and oviposition of several species of Bruchidae breeding in stored pulses. Bulletin of Entomological Research 55, 437477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignacimuthu, S., Wäckers, F.L. & Dorn, S. (2000) The role of chemical cues in host finding and acceptance by Callosobruchus chinensis . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 96, 213219.Google Scholar
Loughrin, J.H., Potter, D.A. & Hamilton-Kemp, T.R. (1995) Volatile compounds induced by herbivory act as aggregation kairomones for the Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica Newman). Journal of Chemical Ecology 21, 14571467.Google Scholar
Magalhães, D.M., Borges, M., Laumann, R.A., Sujii, E.R., Mayon, P., Caulfield, J.C., Midega, C.A.O., Khan, Z.R., Pickett, J.A., Birkett, M.A. & Blassioli-Moraes, M.C. (2012) Semiochemicals from herbivory induced cotton plants enhance the foraging behaviour of the cotton boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis . Journal of Chemical Ecology 38, 15281538.Google Scholar
Mbata, G.N. (2004) Cowpea: United States of America. pp. 151158 in Hodges, R.J. (Ed.) Crop Post-harvest: Science and Technology. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mbata, G.N. & Payton, M.E. (2013) Effect of monoterpenoids on oviposition and mortality of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) under hermetic conditions. Journal of Stored Products Research 53, 4347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, F.J. (1991) Life-history variation in a seed beetle: adult egg-laying vs. larval competitive ability. Oecologia 85, 447455.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A., Sarkar, N. & Barik, A. (2013) Alkanes in flower surface waxes of Momordica cochinchinensis influence attraction to Aulacophora foveicollis Lucas (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Neotropical Entomology 42, 366371.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A., Sarkar, N. & Barik, A. (2014) Long-chain free fatty acids from Momordica cochinchinensis leaves as attractants to its insect pest, Aulacophora foveicollis Lucas (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 17, 229234.Google Scholar
Parr, M.J., Tran, B.M.D., Simmonds, M.S.J., Kite, G.C. & Credland, P.F. (1998) Influence of some fatty acids on oviposition by the bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus . Journal of Chemical Ecology 24, 15771593.Google Scholar
Pierce, A.M., Pierce, H.D. Jr., Borden, J.H. & Oehlschlager, A.C. (1991) Fungal volatiles: semiochemicals for stored-product beetles (Coleoptera: Cucujidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 17, 581597.Google Scholar
Riffell, J.A., Lie, H., Christensen, T.A. & Hildebrand, J.G. (2009) Characterization and coding of behaviourally significant odor mixtures. Current Biology 19, 335340.Google Scholar
Roy, N., Laskar, S. & Barik, A. (2012) The attractiveness of odorous esterified fatty acids to the potential biocontrol agent, Altica cyanea . Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 15, 277282.Google Scholar
Sarkar, N. & Barik, A. (2014) Alkanes from bitter gourd as allelochemicals in olfactory responses of Epilachna dodecastigma (Wied.). Allelopathy Journal 33, 4351.Google Scholar
Sarkar, N., Mukherjee, A. & Barik, A. (2013 a) Long-chain alkanes: allelochemicals for host location by the insect pest, Epilachna dodecastigma (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 48, 171179.Google Scholar
Sarkar, N., Mukherjee, A. & Barik, A. (2013 b) Olfactory responses of Epilachna dodecastigma (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to long-chain fatty acids from Momordica charantia leaves. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 7, 339348.Google Scholar
Sarkar, N., Mukherjee, A. & Barik, A. (2014) Attraction of Epilachna dodecastigma (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to Momordica charantia (Cucurbitaceae) leaf volatiles. Canadian Entomologist. doi: 10.4039/tce.2014.37.Google Scholar
Schoonhoven, L.M., Van Loon, J.J.A. & Dicke, M. (2005) Insect–Plant Biology. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinha, R.N. (1991) Role of odor volatiles in the stored-grain ecosystem. pp 3–14 in Fleurat-Lessard, F. & Ducom, P. (Eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Working Conference on Stored-Product Protection, 9–14 September 1990, Bordeaux, France.Google Scholar
Tabata, J., De Moraes, C.M. & Mescher, M.C. (2011) Olfactory cues from plants infected by powdery mildew guide foraging by a mycophagous ladybird beetle. PLoS ONE 6, e23799, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023799.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (1998) Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, 1998: Assessment of Alternatives to Methyl Bromide. Methyl Bromide Alternatives Committee, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Utida, S. (1967) Damped oscillations of population density at equilibrium. Researches on Population Ecology 9, 19.Google Scholar
Utida, S. (1972) Density dependent polymorphism in the adult of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 8, 111125.Google Scholar
Webster, B., Bruce, T., Pickett, J. & Hardie, J. (2010) Volatiles functioning as host cues in a blend become nonhost cues when presented alone to the black bean aphid. Animal Behaviour 79, 451457.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Adhikary Supplementary Material

Figure S1 and Tables S1-S3

Download Adhikary Supplementary Material(File)
File 566.3 KB