Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:24:08.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attraction of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) towards volatiles from various Tetranychus urticae-infested plant species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

C.E.M. van den Boom ,
T.A. van Beek  and
M. Dicke
C.E.M. van den Boom*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Phytochemical Section, Wageningen University, Dreijenplein 8, 6703 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands
T.A. van Beek
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Phytochemical Section, Wageningen University, Dreijenplein 8, 6703 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands
M. Dicke
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, PO Box 8031, 6700 EH Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
*Fax: 00 31 70 3502517 E-mail: cvandenboom@milieukeur.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Plants infested with the spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch, may indirectly defend themselves by releasing volatiles that attract the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot. Several plants from different plant families that varied in the level of spider mite acceptance were tested in an olfactometer. The predatory mites were significantly attracted to the spider mite-infested leaves of all test plant species. No differences in attractiveness of the infested plant leaves were found for predatory mites reared on spider mites on the different test plants or on lima bean. Thus, experience with the spider mite-induced plant volatiles did not affect the predatory mites. Jasmonic acid was applied to ginkgo leaves to induce a mimic of a spider mite-induced volatile blend, because the spider mites did not survive when incubated on ginkgo. The volatile blend induced in ginkgo by jasmonic acid was slightly attractive to predatory mites. Plants with a high degree of direct defence were thought to invest less in indirect defence than plants with a low degree of direct defence. However, plants that had a strong direct defence such as ginkgo and sweet pepper, did emit induced volatiles that attracted the predatory mite. This indicates that a combination of direct and indirect defence is to some extent compatible in plant species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 92 , Issue 6 , December 2002 , pp. 539 - 546
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

W., Boland, Hopke, J., Donath, J., Nüske, J. & Bublitz, F. (1995) Jasmonic acid and coronatin induce odor production in plants. Angewandte Chemie: International Edition in English 34, 1600–1602.Google Scholar
Boom, C.E.M., van den van Beek, T.A. & Dicke, M. (2002) Differences among plant species in acceptance by the spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. Journal of Applied Entomology. in press.Google Scholar
Bruin, J., Dicke, M. & Sabelis, M.W. (1992) Plants are better protected against spider-mites after exposure to volatiles from infested conspecifics. Experientia 48, 525–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C.A.M., Pettersson, J., Pickett, J.A., Wadhams, L.J. & Woodcock, C.M. (1993) Spring migration of damson-hop aphid, Phorodon humuli (Homoptera, Aphididae), and summer host plant-derived semiochemicals released on feeding. Journal of Chemical Ecology 19, 1569–1576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dabrowski, Z.T. (1973) Studies on the relationships of Tetranychus urticae Koch and host plants. II. Gustatory effect of some plant extracts. Bulletin Entomologique de Pologne 43, 127–138.Google Scholar
Dicke, M. (1994) Local and systemic production of volatile herbivore-induced terpenoids: their role in plant–carnivore mutualism. Journal of Plant Physiology 143, 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, M. (1999a) Direct and indirect effects of plants on performance of beneficial organisms. pp 105–153. in Ruberson, J.R. (Ed.) Handbook of pest management. New York, Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Dicke, M. (1999b) Evolution of induced indirect defense of plants. pp. 62–88. in Tollrian, R. & Harvell, E.D. (Ed.) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, M. & Sabelis, M.W. (1988) How plants obtain predatory mites as body guards. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 38, 148–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, M. & Sabelis, M.W. (1988) Infochemical terminology: based on cost-benefit analysis rather than origin of compounds? Functional Ecology 2, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, M., van Beek, T.A., Posthumus, M.A., Ben Dom, N., van Bokhoven, H. & de Groot, A. (1990) Isolation and identification of volatile kairomone that affects acarine predator–prey interactions. Journal of Chemical Ecology 16, 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, M., Sabelis, M.W., Takabayashi, J., Bruin, J. & Posthumus, M.A. (1990) Plant strategies of manipulating predator–prey interactions through allelochemicals: prospects for application in pest control. Journal of Chemical Ecology 16, 3091–3118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dicke, M., Takabayashi, J., Posthumus, M.A., Schütte, C. & Krips, O.E. (1998) Plant-phytoseiid interactions mediated by herbivore-induced plant volatiles: variation in production of cues and in response of predatory mites. Experimental and Applied Acarology 22, 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, M., Gols, R., Ludeking, D. & Posthumus, M.A. (1999) Jasmonic acid and herbivory differentially induce carnivore-attracting plant volatiles in lima bean plants. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25, 1907–1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drukker, B., Bruin, J., Jacobs, G., Kroon, A. & Sabelis, M.W. (2000) How predatory mites learn to cope with variability in volatile plant signals in the environment of their herbivorous prey. Experimental and Applied Acarology 24, 881–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gols, R., Posthumus, M.A. & Dicke, M. (1999) Jasmonic acid induces the production of gerbera volatiles that attract the biological control agent Phytoseiulus persimilis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 93, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, A., Bruin, J., Jacobs, G., Schraag, R. & Sabelis, M.W. (1997) Predators use volatiles to avoid prey patches with conspecifics. Journal of Animal Ecology 66, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahl, J., Siemens, D.H., Aerts, R.J., Gäbler, R., Kühnemann, F., Preston, C.A. & Baldwin, I.T. (2000) Herbivore-induced ethylene suppresses a direct defense but not a putative indirect defense against an adapted herbivore. Planta 210, 336–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krips, O.E., Willems, P.E.L. & Dicke, M. (1996) Suitability of the ornamental crop Gerbera jamesonii for spider mites and the attraction of predators in response to spider mite damage. Bulletin IOBC/WPRS 19, 81–87.Google Scholar
Krips, O.E., Willems, P.E.L., Gols, R., Posthumus, M.A. & Dicke, M. (1999) The response of Phytoseiulus persimilis to spider mite-induced volatiles from gerbera: influence of starvation and experience. Journal of Chemical Ecology 12, 2623–2641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paré, P.W. & Tumlinson, J.H. (1997) Induced synthesis of plant volatiles. Nature 385, 30–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P.W. (1981) Semiochemicals in evolutionary time. pp 251–271. in Nordlund, D.A., Jones, R.L. & Lewis, W.J. (Ed.) Semiochemicals, their role in pest control. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Price, P.W., Bouton, C.E., Gross, P., McPheron, B.A., Thompson, J.N. & Weis, A.E. (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoades, D.F. (1985) Offensive-defensive interactions between herbivores and plants: their relevance in herbivore population dynamics and ecological theory. American Naturalist 125, 205–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoades, D.F. & Cates, R.G. (1976) Toward a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. pp 168–213. in Wallace, J.W. & Mansell, R.L. (Ed.) Recent advances in phytochemistry, 10: Biochemical interaction between plants and insects. New York, Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, G.A. & Berenbaum, M.R. (1991) Herbivores, their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. 2nd edn, Vol. 1. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sabelis, M.W. (1981) Biological control of two-spotted spider mites using phytoseiid predators. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Sabelis, M.W. & Dicke, M. (1985) Long-range dispersal and searching behaviour. pp 141–160. in Helle, W. & Sabelis, M.W. (Ed.) Spider mites. Their biology, natural enemies and control. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sabelis, M.W. & van de Baan, H.E. (1983) Location of distant spider mite colonies by phytoseiid predators: demonstration of specific kairomones emitted by Tetranychus urticae and Panonychus ulmi. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 33, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabelis, M.W., Afman, B.P. & Slim, P.J. (1984) Location of distant spider mite colonies by Phytoseiulus persimilis: localization and extraction of a kairomone. Acarology VI 1, 431–440.Google Scholar
Sabelis, M.W., Janssen, A., Pallini, A., Venzon, M., Bruin, J., Drukker, B. & Scutareanu, P. (1999) Behavioral responses of predatory and herbivorous arthropods to induced plant volatiles: from evolutionary ecology to agricultural applications. pp 269–296. in Agrawal, A.A., Tuzun, S. & Bent, E., (Ed.) Induced plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores: biochemistry, ecology, and agriculture. St Paul, Minnesota, APS Press.Google Scholar
Takabayashi, J. & Dicke, M. (1992) Response of predatory mites with different rearing histories to volatiles of uninfested plants. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 64, 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takabayashi, J. & Dicke, M. (1996) Plant-carnivore mutualism through herbivore-induced carnivore attractants. Trends in Plant Science 1, 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takabayashi, J., Dicke, M. & Posthumus, M.A. (1991) Variation in composition of predator-attracting allelochemicals emitted by herbivore-infested plants: relative influence of plant and herbivore. Chemoecology 2, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takabayashi, J., Dicke, M. & Posthumus, M.A. (1994) Volatile herbivore-induced terpenoids in plant–mite interactions: variation caused by biotic and abiotic factors. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20, 1329–1354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takabayashi, J., Dicke, M., Takahashi, S., Posthumus, M.A. & van Beek, T.A. (1994) Leaf age affects composition of herbivore-induced synomones and attraction of predatory mites. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20, 373–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turlings, T.C.J., Wäckers, F.L., Vet, L.E.M., Lewis, W.J. & Tumlinson, J.H. (1993) Learning of host-finding cues by hymenopterous parasitoids. pp 51–78. in Papaj, D.R. & Lewis, A.C. (Ed.) Insect learning. New York, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrieling, K., Smit, W. & van der Meijden, E. (1991) Tritrophic interactions between aphids (Aphis jacobaeae Schrank), ant species, Tyria jacobaeae L., and Senecio jacobaea L. lead to maintenance of genetic vatiation in pyrrolizidine alkaloid concentration. Oecologia 86, 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar