Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:51:50.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biology and ecology of the garden chafer, Phyllopertha horticola (L.). VIII.—Temperature and larval growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Roger Laughlin
Roger Laughlin
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Fecundity in the garden chafer, phyllopertha horticola (L.), is extremely variable. Fecundity depends entirely on reserves laid down by the larva.

Previous work in Britain showed that (a) early larval feeding periods in the field produce heavy pupae; (b) in an experiment comparing early with late-hatched larvae, the heavier diapause larvae developed from the early batch; (c) in the field, the earliest larvae to enter diapause were the heaviest.

Further data (hitherto unpublished) showed that larvae reared at 25°C. entered diapause heavier than larvae reared at field temperature, although mortality was high. The above data also indicated that time of entry into diapause was fixed and unaffected by temperature.

A repeat of the field experiment (b) showed the same result and also showed how a population of feeding third-instar larvae can be destroyed by frost while larvae in diapause deeper in the soil are unaffected. Thus a late season produces light larvae and a high risk of death before diapause.

Observations on larvae kept at constant temperatures (12, 16 and 18°C.) showed that the temperature threshold of development is about 12°C. in the first instar but is lower in succeeding stages; the length of the first and the second instars decreases with rise in temperature; high temperature probably produces larger larvae by the end of the second instar, but the effect was small and none at all was detected at the first moult.

The length of the third-instar feeding period is not affected by temperature in the range 12–20°C. Kate of growth (increase in weight) increases with temperature. The higher temperatures (perhaps as a result) produce heavy diapause larvae and pupae in both sexes. Entry into diapause is hindered at 20°C. The weight of a larva at the second moult is positively correlated with its diapause weight.

It is suggested that the temperature effects described can be most simply explained by postulating the existence of differential temperature coefficients for the various growth processes.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , January 1964 , pp. 745 - 759
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, G. M. (1958). Diapause and the regulation of development in Anthrenus verbasci (L.) (Col., Dermestidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 49 pp. 751–775.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests.—Biometrics 11 pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
Harter, H. L. (1960). Critical values for Duncan's new multiple range test.—Biometrics 16 pp. 671–685.Google Scholar
Hurpin, B. (1953). Reconnaissance des sexes chez les larves de coleoptères Scarabaeidae.—Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 58 pp. 104–107.Google Scholar
Kramer, C. Y. (1956). Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replicates.—Biometrics 12 pp. 307–310.Google Scholar
Laughlin, R. (1957). Biology and Ecology of the garden chafer, phyllopertha horticola (L.). III.—The growth of the larva.—Bull. ent. Res. 48 pp. 127–154.Google Scholar
Milne, A. & Laughlin, R. (1956). Biology and ecology of the garden chafer, phyllopertha horticola (L.). I.—The adult and egg production.—Bull. ent. Res. 47 pp. 7–22.Google Scholar
Milne, A. (1964). Biology and ecology of the garden chafer, phyllopertha horticola (L.). IX.—Spatial distribution.—Bull. ent. Res. 54 pp. 761–795.Google Scholar
Rittershaus, K. (1927). Studien zur Morphologie und Biologie von phyllopertha horticola L. und Anomala aenea Geer (Coleopt.)—Z. Morph. Oekol. Tiere 8 pp. 271–408.Google Scholar
Thompson, D'A. W. (1942). On growth and form.—Cambridge Univ. Pr. 1,116 pp. London.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1950). The principles of insect physiology.—4th edn., 544 pp. London, Methuen; New York, E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar