Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:41:12.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Biology of Nausibius clavicornis (KUG.) (Col., Cucujidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. H. Breese  and
Thelma E. Wise
M. H. Breese
Affiliation:
The Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad, The West Indies.
Thelma E. Wise
Affiliation:
The Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad, The West Indies.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Nausibius clavicornis (Kug.) is a cosmopolitan Cucujid that has frequently been recorded from sugar. It is commonly found in this commodity in Trinidad, where it has not been collected from any other.

The adult and other stages are described, and an account is given of the life-history on Haydak's formula at 85°F. and 75 per cent. R.H. Development has also been studied on two types of unrefined sugar.

Copulation can take place within one day of the emergence of either sex and the female may begin laying within four days of copulation. The average number of eggs laid was 275 and the overall viability was 85 per cent. The average incubation period was just under five days.

The larvae of both sexes may undergo only five moults in development, but the more usual number for females is six. When larvae are disturbed during development, both sexes tend to have six larval instars. Severe disturbance may induce a seventh moult. The mean development period from oviposition to the emergence of the adult was 30 days when there were five larval instars; when there were six, development took about two days longer. Larval mortality on Haydak's formula was low.

Ovipositing females lived for up to 163 days under controlled conditions, but males tended to outlive females by about 50 days.

On unrefined sugars (e.g., raw or yellow-crystal sugar), adults lived for almost as long (73:99) as on Haydak's formula, but oviposition was greatly reduced and the viability of the eggs was much lower. Larval mortality was high, especially in the first instar, and the total development period was greatly increased.

It is unlikely that N. clavicornis could multiply rapidly in raw or unrefined sugar, and any deterioration in stored sugar directly attributable to it would probably be small in comparison with that caused by other factors.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , August 1959 , pp. 237 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1933). Exhibition of, and notes on local material, April 7, 1932.—Proc. Hawaii, ent. Soc. 8 pp. 217–219.Google Scholar
Back, E. A. & Cotton, R. T. (1926). Biology of the saw-toothed grain beetle, Oryzaephilus surinamensis (Linné).—J. agric. Res. 33 pp. 435–452.Google Scholar
Blackwelder, R. E. (1944–57). Checklist of the Coleopterous insects of Mexico, Central America, the West Indies, and South America. Parts 1–6.—Bull. U.S. nat. Mus. no. 185, 1492 pp.Google Scholar
Böving, A. G. (1921). The larvae and pupae of the social beetles Coccidotrophus socialis (Schwarz and Barber) and Eunausibius wheeleri (Schwarz and Barber) with remarks on the taxonomy of the family Cucujidae.—Zoologica, N.Y. 3 pp. 195–221.Google Scholar
Carr, D. S. & Harris, B. L. (1949). Solutions for maintaining constant relative humidity.—Industr. Engng Chem. 41 pp. 2014–2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, G. & Blewett, M. (1943 a). Vitamins of the B-group required by insects.—Nature, Lond. 151 pp. 703–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, G. & Blewett, M. (1943 b). The natural foods and the food requirements of several species of stored products insects.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 93 pp. 457–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haydak, M. H. (1936). A food for rearing laboratory insects.—J. econ. Ent. 29 p. 1026.Google Scholar
Howe, R. W. (1953). The rapid determination of the intrinsic rate of increase of an insect population.—Ann. appl. Biol. 40 pp. 134–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R. W. (1956). The biology of the two common storage species of Oryzaephilus (Coleoptera, Cucujidae).—Ann. appl. Biol. 44 pp. 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kugelann, J. G. (1794). Verzeichniss der in einigen Gegenden Preussens bis jetzt entdeckten Käferarten nebst kurzen Nachrichten von denselben.—Neu. Mag. Ent. 1 pp. 513–582.Google Scholar
Lepesme, P. (1945). Les coléoptères des denrées alimentaires et des produits industriels entreposeés.—Encycl. Ent.(A) 22, 335 pp. Paris, Lechevalier.Google Scholar
Marsham, T. (1802). Entomologia Britannica, sistens insecta Britanniae indigena, secundum methodum Linnaeanum disposita. Vol. I.—548 pp. London.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. (1931). Insects, ticks, mites and venomous animals of medical and veterinary importance. Part II. Public health.—740 pp. [Liver-pool Sch. trop. Med.]Google Scholar
Redtenbacher, L. (1858). Fauna Austriaca. Die Käfer. Nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet.—2nd edn., 1017 pp. Vienna.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. L. & Shepard, H. H. (1940). The influence of temperature, moisture, and food upon the development and survival of the saw-toothed grain beetle.—J. agric. Res. 60 pp. 605–615.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. M. (1921). Notes on the habits of European and North American Cucujidae (sens. auct.).—Zoologica, N.Y. 3 pp. 171–183.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. W. (1930). The genitalia and wing venation of the Cucujidae and related families.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 23 pp. 305–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolcott, G. N. (1927). Entomologie d'Haiti.—440 pp. Port-au-Prince, Serv. tech. Dep. Agric.Google Scholar