Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:50:14.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in the susceptibility of normal and resistant house-flies (Musca domestica L.) to diazinon with age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. M. Sawicki  and
G. Green
R. M. Sawicki
Affiliation:
Department of Insecticides and Fungicides, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
G. Green
Affiliation:
Department of Insecticides and Fungicides, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In both a susceptible and a diazinon-resistant strain of house-flies (Musca domestica L.), adults of both sexes were most susceptible to diazinon immediately after they had emerged from the pupae. Their resistance increased for two days after emergence and remained steady for the next three days, and the increase was proportionately larger in the resistant strain. Taking flies 2 ± 2 hr. old as a basis, the increases in resistance by the third day were 1−2½ and 3½−6½ times for susceptible and resistant males, respectively, and 2−5½ and 9−18½ for susceptible and resistant females. In both strains, the two sexes were equally susceptible to diazinon during the first day, but later the females were more resistant than the males. The resistance factor (ratio of LD50's of resistant and susceptible strains) was least immediately after emergence and increased with age; it was 15–30 in flies 2 ± 2 hr. old and 50–90 three days later. There was no direct relation between changes in resistance and changes in the weight of the flies on aging. The resistance factor to diazinon should be measured not earlier than three days after emergence to obtain reproducible values. Removal of the ovaries in flies less than one day old did not affect the increase in resistance with age.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , May 1965 , pp. 715 - 725
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babers, F. H. & Pratt, J. J. Jr. (1950). Studies on the resistance of insects to insecticides. I. Cholinesterase in house flies (Musca domestica L.) resistant to DDT.— Physiol. Zool. 23 pp. 58–63.Google Scholar
Bigley, W. S. & Plapp, F. W. Jr. (1961). Esterase activity and susceptibility to parathion at different stages in the life cycle of organophosphorus-resistant and susceptible house flies.—J. econ. Ent. 54 pp. 904–907.Google Scholar
Burnett, G. F. (1962). The susceptibility of tsetse flies to topical applications of insecticides. III. The effects of age and pregnancy on the susceptibility of adults of Glossina morsitans Westw.—Bull. ent. Res. 53 pp. 337–345.Google Scholar
David, W. A. L. & Bracey, P. (1946). Factors influencing the interaction of insecticidal mists on flying insects. Part III.—Bull. ent. Res. 37 pp. 177–190.Google Scholar
Fay, R. W., Kilpatrick, J. W. & Morris, G. C. (1958). Malathion resistance studies on the house fly.—J. econ. Ent. 51 pp. 452–453.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1952). Probit analysis.—2nd edn., 318 pp. Cambridge, Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
Kerr, R. W. (1954). Variation with age in the susceptibility to DDT and the respiration rate of male and female Drosophila melanogaster Mg.—Bull, ent. Res. 45 pp. 323–328.Google Scholar
Kupryanova, E. S. (1962). Cholinesterase activity in the females of the house fly, (Musca domestica L.) at different stages of oogenesis. [In Russian.] —Nauch. Dokl. vyssh. Shk. (Ser. Biol. Nauki) 4 pp. 55–58.Google Scholar
March, R. B. (1960). Biochemical aspects of organophosphorus resistance.— Misc. Publ. ent. Soc. Amer. 2 pp. 139–144.Google Scholar
Michelsen, A. (1960). Experiments on the period of maturation of the male house-fly, Musca domestica L.—Oikos 11 pp. 250–264.Google Scholar
Rockstein, M. (1950). The relation of Cholinesterase activity to changes in cell number with age in the brain of the adult worker honeybee.—J. Cell, comp. Physiol. 35 pp. 11–23.Google Scholar
Saccà, G. (1957). La resistenza di Musca domestica L. agli esteri fosforici in provincia di Latina.—Riv. parassitol. 18 pp. 289–292.Google Scholar
Sacktor, B. (1950). A comparison of the cytochrome oxidase activity of two strains of house flies.—J. econ. Ent. 43 pp. 832–838.Google Scholar
Sawicki, R. M. (1965). Similarity in response to diazinon, dieldrin and pyrethrum extract by allatectomised and normal house-flies (Musca domestica L.).—Butt. ent. Res. 55 pp. 727–732.Google Scholar
Sawicki, R. M. & Holbrook, D. V. (1961). The rearing, handling and biology of house flies (Musca domestica L.) for assay of insecticides by the application of measured drops.—Pyrethrum Post 6 no. 2 pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Tamarina, N. A. (1962). The sensitivity to poisons of synanthropic flies at various stages of oogenesis. [In Russian.]—Nauch. Dokl. vyssh. Shk. (Ser. Biol. Nauki) 3 pp. 27–32.Google Scholar