Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:07:17.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coffee berry borer in conilon coffee in the Brazilian Cerrado: an ancient pest in a new environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2017

C.M. Oliveira ,
M.J. Santos ,
R.F. Amabile ,
M.R. Frizzas  and
G.F. Bartholo
C.M. Oliveira*
Affiliation:
Embrapa Cerrados, Rod. BR 020 km 18 (Brasília/Fortaleza), C. Postal 08223, Planaltina, Brasília/DF, 73310-970, Brazil
M.J. Santos
Affiliation:
UPIS – Faculdades Integradas, Departamento de Agronomia, Rodovia BR 020, km 18/DF 335, km 4,8, Planaltina, Brasília/DF, Brazil
R.F. Amabile
Affiliation:
Embrapa Cerrados, Rod. BR 020 km 18 (Brasília/Fortaleza), C. Postal 08223, Planaltina, Brasília/DF, 73310-970, Brazil
M.R. Frizzas
Affiliation:
Universidade de Brasília, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Brasília/DF, 70910-900, Brazil
G.F. Bartholo
Affiliation:
Embrapa Café, Parque Estação Biológica (PqEB), Av. W3 Norte (final), Brasília/DF, 70770-901, Brazil
*
*Author for correspondence: Phone: +55 6133889861 Fax: +55 6133889879 E-mail: charles.oliveira@embrapa.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to verify the occurrence of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari), and to evaluate the population fluctuation of the pest in the Brazilian Cerrado (Federal District). The study was conducted, between November 2014 and October 2015, at Embrapa Cerrados (Planaltina/DF, Brazil) in an irrigated conilon coffee production area. In November 2014, 120 samples (ten berries/sample) were collected from berries that had fallen on the ground from the previous harvest. Between November 2014 and October 2015, insects were collected weekly, using traps (polyethylene terephthalate bottles) baited with ethyl alcohol (98 GL), ethyl alcohol (98 GL) with coffee powder, or molasses. Between January and July 2015, samples were collected fortnightly from 92 plants (12 berries per plant). All samples were evaluated for the presence of adult coffee berry borers. Samples from the previous harvest had an attack incidence of 72.4%. The baited traps captured 4062 H. hampei adults, and showed no statistical difference in capture efficiency among the baits. Pest population peaked in the dry season, with the largest percentage of captured adults occurring in July (31.0%). An average of 18.6% of the collected berries was attacked by the borer and the highest percentage incidence was recorded in July (33.2%). Our results suggest that the coffee berry borer, if not properly managed, could constitute a limiting factor for conilon coffee production in the Brazilian Cerrado.

Keywords

Hypothenemus hampeiCoffea canephorarobusta coffeepopulation dynamicsincidenceirrigation
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 108 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 101 - 107
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonzo, P.F. (1984) El problema de la broca (i (Ferr).) (Col: Scolytidae) y la caficultura. Aspectos relacionados con importancia. Danõ, identificación, biología, ecología y control. Guatemala, IICA, PROMECAFE.Google Scholar
Aristizabal, L.F., Salazar, H.M. & Mejia, C.G. (2002) Changes in the adoption of the components of coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) integrated management, through participative methodologies. Revista Colombiana de Entomologia 28, 153–160.Google Scholar
Aristizábal, L.F., Jiménez, M., Bustillo, A.E., Trujillo, H.I. & Arthurs, S.P. (2015) Monitoring coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), populations with alcohol-baited funnel traps in coffee farms in Colombia. Florida Entomologist 98, 381–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P.S. (1999) The coffee berry borer in Colombia. Final report of the DFID-Cenicafé-CABI Bioscience IPM for coffee project. Chinchiná (Colombia), DFID-CENICAFE.Google Scholar
Baker, P.S. & Barrera, J.F. (1993) A field study of a population of coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in Chiapas, Mexico. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 70, 351–355.Google Scholar
Baker, P.S., Ley, C., Balbuena, R. & Barrera, J.F. (1992) Factors affecting the emergence of Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) from coffee berries. Bulletin of Entomological Research 82, 145–150.Google Scholar
Barrera, J.F., García, A., Domínguez, V. & Luna, C. (2007) La broca del café en América tropical: hallazgos y enfoques. pp. 1–141. Chiapas, Mexico, Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología y El Colegio de la Frontera Sur.Google Scholar
Bergamin, J. (1943) Contribuição para o conhecimento da biologia da broca do café ‘Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari, 1867)’ (Col. Ipidae). Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 14, 31–72.Google Scholar
Box, G.E.P. & Cox, D.R. (1964) An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 26, 211–234.Google Scholar
Bridson, D.M. and Verdcourt, B. (1988) Rubiaceae (Part 2). pp. 703–723 in Polhill, R.M. (Ed.) Flora of Tropical East Africa. Rotterdam, Balkema.Google Scholar
Bustillo, A.E., Cárdenas, R., Villalba, D., Benavides, P., Orozco, J. & Posada, F.J. (1998) Manejo integrado de la broca del café, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) em Colombia. pp. 1–134. Chinchiná (Colombia), Cenicafé.Google Scholar
Castro, L., Benavides, P. & Bustillo, A.E. (1998) Dispersion y mortalidad de Hypothenemus hampei, durante la recoleccion y beneficio del café. Manejo Integrado de Plagas 50, 19–28.Google Scholar
CONAB (2016) Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Acompanhamento da safra brasileira. Café. Safra 2016. Primeiro levantamento, janeiro, 2016. Available online at http://www.conab.gov.br/lalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/16_01_20_17_01_56_boletim_cafe_-_janeiro_2016.pdf (accessed 12 April 2016).Google Scholar
Costa, F.G. & Faria, C.A. (2001) Por que fêmeas da broca do café perfuram preferencialmente a coroa dos frutos? Academia Insecta 1, 1–4.Google Scholar
Costa, J.N.M., Silva, R.B.D., Ribeiro, P.D.A., Teixeira, C.A.D. & Santos, J.C.F. (2001) Flutuação populacional da broca-do-café (Hypothenemus hampei, Ferrari) no estado de Rondônia. pp. 1944–1950 in II Simpósio de Pesquisa dos Cafés do Brasil, Vitória. Brasília, Embrapa Café.Google Scholar
Coste, R. (1992) Coffee: The Plant and the Product. 1st edn. pp. 1–328. London, MacMillan Press. Google Scholar
DaMatta, F.M., Chaves, A.R., Pinheiro, H.A., Ducatti, C. & Loureiro, M.E. (2003) Drought tolerance of two field-grown clones of Coffea canephora . Plant Science 164, 111–117.Google Scholar
DaMatta, F.M., Ronchi, C.P., Maestri, M. & Barros, R.S. (2010) Coffee: environment and crop physiology. pp. 181–216 in DaMatta, F.M. (Ed.) Ecophysiology of Tropical Tree Crops. New York, Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Damon, A. (2000) A review of the biology and control of the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 90, 453–465.Google Scholar
Davis, A., Tosh, J., Ruch, N. & Fay, F.M. (2011) Growing coffee: Psilanthus (Rubiaceae) subsumed on the basis of molecular and morphological data, implications for the size, morphology, distribution and evolutionary history of Coffea . Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 167, 357–377.Google Scholar
Davis, A.P., Govaerts, R., Bridson, D.M. & Stoffelen, P. (2006) An annotated taxonomic conspectus of the genus Coffea (Rubiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 152, 465–512.Google Scholar
Dell Inc. (2015). Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13. Available online at http://software.dell.com./products/statistica/.Google Scholar
Dufour, B.P. & Frérot, B. (2008) Optimization of coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari (Col., Scolytidae), mass trapping with an attractant mixture. Journal of Applied Entomology 132, 591–600.Google Scholar
Fanton, C.J. (2001) Ecologia da broca-do-café Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) na Zona da Mata de Minas Gerais. pp. 1–48. Thesis, Viçosa, Federal University of Viçosa.Google Scholar
Farah, A. (2012) Coffee constituents. pp. 21–58 in Chu, Y.F. (Ed.) Coffee: Emerging Health Effects and Disease Prevention. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Fernandes, F.L., Picanco, M.C., Campos, S.O., Bastos, C.S., Chediak, M., Guedes, R.N.C. & Silva, R.S. (2011) Economic injury level for the coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) using attractive traps in Brazilian coffee fields. Journal of Economic Entomology 104, 1909–1917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandes, F.L., Picanço, M.C., Silva, R.S., Silva, Í.W., Fernandes, M.E.S. & Ribeiro, L.H. (2014). Controle massal da broca-do-café com armadilhas de garrafa Pet vermelha em cafeeiro. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 49, 587–594.Google Scholar
Ferrão, R.G., Fonseca, A.F.A.D., Ferrão, M.A.G., Bragança, S.M. & Ferrão, L.M.V. (2000) EMCAPER 8151 – Robusta Tropical: variedade melhorada de café conilon de propagação por sementes para o estado do Espírito Santo. pp. 669–672 in I Simpósio de Pesquisa dos Cafés do Brasil, Poços de Caldas. Brasília, Embrapa Café.Google Scholar
Ferreira, A.J., Bueno, V.H., Moraes, J.C., Carvalho, G.A. & Bueno-Filho, J.S.D.S. (2000). Dinâmica populacional da broca-do-café Hypothenemus hampei (Ferr.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) em Lavras, MG. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 29, 237–244.Google Scholar
Fonseca, A.F.A., Ferrão, R.G., Ferrão, M.A.G., Verdin Filho, A.C. & Volpi, P.S. (2007) Qualidade do café Conilon: operações de colheita e pós-colheita. pp. 498–517 in Ferrão, R.G., Fonseca, A.F.A., Bragança, S.M., Ferrão, M.A.G. & Muner, L.H. (Eds) Café Conilon. Vitória, Incaper.Google Scholar
Fornazier, M.J., Fanton, C.J., Benassi, V.L.R.M. & Martins, D.S. (2007) Pragas do café Conilon. pp. 404–449 in Ferrão, R.G., Fonseca, A.F.A., Bragança, S.M., Ferrão, M.A.G. & Muner, L.H. (Eds) Café Conilon. Vitória, Incaper.Google Scholar
ICO. (2016) International Coffee Organization. Production: total production by exporting countries. Available online at http://www.ico.org/prices/po-production.pdf (accessed 12 April 2016).Google Scholar
Jaramillo, J., Borgemeister, C. & Baker, P. (2006) Coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): searching for sustainable control strategies. Bulletin of Entomological Research 96, 223–233.Google Scholar
Jaramillo, J., Chabi-Olaye, A., Borgemeister, C., Kamonjo, C., Poehling, H.M. & Vega, F.E. (2009) Where to sample? Ecological implications of sampling strata in determining abundance and impact of natural enemies of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei . Biological Control 49, 245–253.Google Scholar
Le Pelley, R.H. (1968) Las plagas del café. Barcelona, Editorial Labor, S.A.Google Scholar
Mathieu, F., Brun, L.O., Frérot, B., Suckling, D. & Framptom, C. (1999) Progression in field infestation is linked with trapping of coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 123, 535–540.Google Scholar
Mendesil, E., Jembere, B. & Seyoum, E. (2004) Population dynamics and distribution of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari)(Coleoptera: Scolytidae) on Coffea arabica L. in southwestern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Science 27, 127–134.Google Scholar
Oliveira, C.M., Auad, A.M., Mendes, S.M. & Frizzas, M.R. (2013) Economic impact of exotic insect pests in Brazilian agriculture. Journal of Applied Entomology 137, 1–15.Google Scholar
Pereira, A.E., Vilela, E.F., Tinoco, R.S., Lima, J.O.G., Fantine, A.K., Morais, E.G. & França, C.F. (2012) Correlation between numbers captured and infestation levels of the coffee berry-borer, Hypothenemus hampei: a preliminary basis for an action threshold using baited traps. International Journal of Pest Management 58, 183–190.Google Scholar
Pereira, G., Aguiar, J.D., Moreira, L. & Bezerra, H.D.S. (1997) Área e população do Cerrado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 32, 759–763.Google Scholar
Poncet, V., Dufour, M., Hamon, P., Hamon, S., De Kochko, A. & Leroy, T. (2007) Development of genomic microsatellite markers in Coffea canephora and their transferability to other coffee species. Genome 50, 1156–1161.Google Scholar
Rocha, O.C., Guerra, A.F., Silva, F.A.M., Machado Júnior, J.R.R., Araujo, M.C. & Silva, H.H. (2006) Programa para monitoramento de irrigação do cafeeiro no cerrado. pp. 61–64 in VIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Pesquisa em Cafeicultura Irrigada, Araguari. Araguari, ACA.Google Scholar
Sano, E.E., Rosa, R., Brito, J.L.S. & Ferreira, L.G. (2008) Mapeamento semidetalhado do uso da terra do Bioma Cerrado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 43, 153–156.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. (2001) PROC User's Manual. Version 6th edn. Cary, NC, SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Silva, F.C.D., Ventura, M.U. & Morales, L. (2006 a) Capture of Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in response to trap characteristics. Scientia Agricola 63, 567–571.Google Scholar
Silva, F.C.D., Ventrura, M.U. & Morales, L. (2006 b) O papel das armadilhas com semioquímicos no manejo da broca-do-café, Hypothenemus hampei . Semina Ciências Agrárias 27, 399–406.Google Scholar
Silva, R.A., Machado, J.L., Carvalho, T.A.F., Matos, C.S.M. & Pereira, A.B. (2013) Influência das condições climáticas na flutuação populacional da broca-do-café Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari, 1867) (Coleoptera – Scolytidae) no sul de Minas Gerais. In VIII Simpósio de Pesquisa dos Cafés do Brasil, Salvador Brasília, Embrapa Café.Google Scholar
Souza, J.C. & Reis, P.R. (1997) Broca-do-café: histórico, reconhecimento, biologia, prejuízos, monitoramento e controle, 2nd edn, pp. 1–40. Belo Horizonte, Epamig (Epamig. Boletim Técnico, 50).Google Scholar
Vega, F.E., Infante, A., Castillo, F. & Jaramillo, J. (2009) The coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): a short review, with recent findings and future research directions. Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews 2, 129–147.Google Scholar
Vega, F.E., Infante, F. & Johnson, A.J. (2015) The genus Hypothenemus, with emphasis on H. hampei, the coffee berry borer. pp. 427–494 in Vega, F.E. & Hofstetter, R.W. (Eds) Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species. San Diego, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Villacorta, A., Possagnolo, A.F., Silva, R. & Rodrigues, P.S. (2001) Um modelo de armadilha com semioquímico para o manejo integrado da broca do café Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) no Paraná. pp. 2093–2098 in II Simpósio de Pesquisa dos Cafés do Brasil, Vitória. Brasília, Embrapa Café.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, D.F. & Norris, K.R. (1989) Biological control: pacific prospects. Supplement 1. pp. 56–75. Canberra, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Wegbe, K., Cilas, C., Decazy, B., Alauzet, C. & Dufour, B. (2003) Estimation of production losses caused by the coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and calculation of an economic damage threshold in Togolese coffee plots. Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 1473–1478.Google Scholar
Willson, K.C. (1999) Coffee, Cocoa and Tea. Cambridge, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar