Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:28:33.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combined autogenous and anautogenous ovarian development in individual Culex tarsalis Coq. (Dipt., Culicidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. E. Bellamy  and
Philip S. Corbet
R. E. Bellamy
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario, Canada
Philip S. Corbet
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ability to mature eggs without feeding on blood (autogeny), occurring in most populations of Culex tarsalis Coq., approaches an incidence of 50% in the Bakersfield, California strain. Females that were not allowed to lay eggs matured autogenously would occasionally feed on blood but much less readily than anautogenous females. When such females did feed on blood, additional eggs started maturing in other follicles. This produced a heterogeneous assemblage of eggs, some matured autogenously in primary follicles interleaved with others in secondary follicles (on other ovarioles) that matured following the blood-meal. During or soon after autogenous maturation of eggs in some primary follicles, the contemporary primary follicles were resorbed, forming ovariolar dilatations, a condition commonly interpreted as signifying a parous condition.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , December 1973 , pp. 335 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aslamkhan, M. & Laven, H. (1970). Inheritance of autogeny in the Culex pipiens complex. — Pakistan J. Zool. 2, 121–147.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. E. & Kardos, E. H. (1958). A strain of Culex tarsalis Coq. reproducing without blood meals.—Mosquito News 18, 132–134.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. E. & Kardos, E. H. (unpublished). Unpublished notes and observations on autogeny in Culex tarsalis at Bakersfield. California, 1958–1960.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. E., Reeves, W. C. & Scrivani, R. P. (1958). Relationships of mosquito vectors to winter survival of encephalitis viruses. II. Under experimental conditions.—Am. J. Hyg. 67, 90–100.Google ScholarPubMed
Christophers, S. R. (1911). The development of the egg follicle in anophelines.—Paludism 2, 73—88.Google Scholar
Corbet, P. S. (1967). Facultative autogeny in Arctic mosquitoes.—Nature, Lond. 215, 662—663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detinova, T. S. (1962). Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance with special reference to some vectors of malaria. —Monogr. Ser. W.H.O. 47, 1–216.Google ScholarPubMed
Hudson, Anne (1970). Factors affecting egg maturation and oviposition by autogenous Aedes atropalpus (Diptera: Culicidae).—Can. Ent. 102, 939–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laven, H. (1953). Genetical aspects offered by the Culex pipiens complex.—Int. Congr. Ent. 2, 293–296.Google Scholar
Moore, C. G. (1966). Environmental factors influencing the proportion of autogenous ovarian development in populations of the mosquito Culex tarsalis Coq.—108 pp. Davis, California. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California.Google Scholar
Rouband, E. (1929). Cycle autogène d'attente et générations hivernales suractives inapparentes chez le moustique commun Culex pipiens L. — C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris 188, 735–738.Google Scholar
Spielman, A. (1957). The inheritance of autogeny in the Culex pipiens complex of mosquitoes.—Am. J. Hyg. 65, 404–425.Google ScholarPubMed
Spielman, A. (1971). Bionomics of autogenous mosquitoes.—A. Rev. Ent. 16, 231–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed