Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:04:07.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The current and future potential geographical distribution of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

A.E.A. Stephens ,
D.J. Kriticos  and
A. Leriche
A.E.A. Stephens
Affiliation:
HortResearch, PO Box 51, Lincoln, New Zealand
D.J. Kriticos*
Affiliation:
Ensis, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua, New Zealand
A. Leriche
Affiliation:
Ensis, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua, New Zealand
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +64 7 343 5333 E-mail: Darren.Kriticos@ensisjv.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), is a major pest throughout South East Asia and in a number of Pacific Islands. As a result of their widespread distribution, pest status, invasive ability and potential impact on market access, B. dorsalis and many other fruit fly species are considered major threats to many countries. CLIMEX™ was used to model the potential global distribution of B. dorsalis under current and future climate scenarios. Under current climatic conditions, its projected potential distribution includes much of the tropics and subtropics and extends into warm temperate areas such as southern Mediterranean Europe. The model projects optimal climatic conditions for B. dorsalis in the south-eastern USA, where the principle range-limiting factor is likely to be cold stress. As a result of climate change, the potential global range for B. dorsalis is projected to extend further polewards as cold stress boundaries recede. However, the potential range contracts in areas where precipitation is projected to decrease substantially. The significant increases in the potential distribution of B. dorsalis projected under the climate change scenarios suggest that the World Trade Organization should allow biosecurity authorities to consider the effects of climate change when undertaking pest risk assessments. One of the most significant areas of uncertainty in climate change concerns the greenhouse gas emissions scenarios. Results are provided that span the range of standard Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scenarios. The impact on the projected distribution of B. dorsalis is striking, but affects the relative abundance of the fly within the total suitable range more than the total area of climatically suitable habitat.

Keywords

CLIMEXclimate changepest distribution
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 97 , Issue 4 , August 2007 , pp. 369 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. & Smith, M. (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. 300 pp. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper. Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
Allwood, A. (2000) Regional approach to the management of fruit flies in the Pacific. pp. 439–448 in Joint Proceedings of the International Conference on area-wide control of Insect Pests, May 28–June 2, 1998 and the Fifth International Symposium on Fruit flies of Economic Importance. Penang, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Andrewartha, H.G. & Birch, L.C. (1954) The distribution and abundance of animals. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Andrewartha, H.G. & Birch, L.C. (1984) The ecological web: more on the distribution and abundance of animals. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baker, R.H.A. (2002) Predicting the limits to the potential distribution of alien crop pests. pp. 207–241in Hallman, G.J. & Schwalbe, C.P. (Eds) Invasive arthropods in agriculture: problems and solutions. Enfield, New Hampshire, Science Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Baker, R.H.A., Sansford, C.E., Jarvis, C.H., Cannon, R.J.C., MacLeod, A. & Walters, K.F.A. (2000) The role of climate mapping in predicting the potential geographical distribution of non-indigenous pests under current and future climates. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 82, 57–71.Google Scholar
Brown, J.H., Stevens, G.C. & Kaufman, D.M. (1996) The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27, 597–623.Google Scholar
Burditt, A.K. Jr. & Balock, J.W. (1985) Refrigeration as a quarantine treatment for fruits and vegetables infested with eggs and larvae of Dacus dorsalis and Dacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 78, 885–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Meteorology (1975) Climatic averages Australia. Metric edn. 499 pp. Department of Science and Consumer Affairs. Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Christie, J.R., Clarke, R.A., Gruza, G.V., Jouzel, J., Mann, M.E., Oerlemans, J., Salinger, M.J. & Wang, S.-W. (2001) Observed climate variability and change. pp. 99–181in Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P.J., Dai, X., Maskell, K. & Johnson, C.A. (Eds) Climate Change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, A.J., Lawton, J.H., Shorrocks, B. & Jenkinson, L.S. (1998) Individualistic species responses invalidate simple physiological models of community dynamics under global environmental change. Journal of Animal Ecology 67, 600–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, R.A.I. & Hancock, D.L. (1994) The Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in Asia. Bulletin of Entomological Research Supplement Series 2, 68 pp.Google Scholar
Duyck, P.F., David, P. & Quilici, S. (2004) A review of relationships between interspecific competition and invasions in fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ecological Entomology 29, 511–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EPPO (1997) Bactrocera dorsalis. In Smith, I.M., McNamara, D.G., Scott, P.R. & Holderness, M. (Eds) EPPO/CABI quarantine pests for Europe. 2nd edn. Wallingford, Oxon, CAB International.Google Scholar
Fitt, G.P. (1989) The role of interspecific interactions in the dynamics of tephritid fruit flies. pp. 281–300 in Robinson, A.S. & Hooper, G.H.S. (Eds) Fruit flies: their biology, natural enemies and control Volume 3b. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Flitters, N.E. & Messenger, P.S. (1953) Bioclimatic studies of Oriental fruit fly in Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology 46, 401–403.Google Scholar
Hirst, A.C., O'Farrell, S.P. & Gordon, H.B. (2000) Comparison of a coupled ocean-atmosphere model with and without oceanic eddy-induced advection. 1. Ocean spin-up and control integrations. Journal of Climate 13, 139–163.Google Scholar
Hulthen, A.D. & Clarke, A.R. (2006) The Influence of soil type and moisture on pupal survival of Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Australian Journal of Entomology 45, 16–19.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.E. (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Symposium on Quantitative Biology; Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 415–427. v. 22.Google Scholar
IPCC (2000) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 612 pp. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC-TGCIA (1999) Guidelines on the use of scenario data for climate impact and adaptation assessment. 69 pp. Prepared by Carter, T.R., Hulme, M. & Lal, M.Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change.Google Scholar
Kriticos, D.J. (1996) The role of modelling in weed management. pp. 560–569. in Shepherd, R.C.H. (Ed.) Proceedings of the Eleventh Australian Weeds Conference. Weed Science Society of Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Kriticos, D.J. & Randall, R.P. (2001) A comparison of systems to analyse potential weed distributions. pp. 61–79in Groves, R.H., Panetta, F.D. & Virtue, J.G. (Eds) Weed risk assessment. Melbourne, Australia, CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Kriticos, D.J., Sutherst, R.W., Brown, J.R., Adkins, S.A. & Maywald, G.F. (2003a) Climate change and biotic invasions: a case history of a tropical woody vine. Biological Invasions 5, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriticos, D.J., Sutherst, R.W., Brown, J.R., Adkins, S.A. & Maywald, G.F. (2003b) Climate change and the potential distribution of an invasive alien plant: Acacia nilotica ssp. indica in Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology 40, 111–124.Google Scholar
Mangan, R.L. & Moreno, D.S. (2002) Application of insect behavior and population ecology to reduce risk of introduction and establishment of exotic fruit flies. pp. 207–242in Hallman, G.J. & Schwalbe, C.P. (Eds) Invasive arthropods in agriculture: problems and solutions. Enfield, New Hampshire, USAScience Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Manoto, E.C. & Mitchell, W.C. (1976) Effect of temperature and fruit ripeness on the development of Oriental fruit fly larvae (Dacus dorsalis) in avocado. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 22, 323–328.Google Scholar
Mearns, L.O., Giorgi, F., Whetton, P., Pabon, D., Hulme, M. & Lal, M. (2003) Guidelines for use of climate scenarios developed from regional climate model experiments. Data Distribution Centre of International Panel on Climate Change TGCIA [http://ipcc-ddc.cru.uea.ac.uk/guidelines/dgm_no1_v1_10-2003.pdf]. Last accessed 23 June 2006.Google Scholar
Messenger, P.S. & Flitters, N.E. (1954) Bioclimatic studies of three species of fruit fly in Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology 47, 756–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pest management in the Pacific project (PMP-FFM) (2004) Pacific fruit fly web. http://www.spc.int/pacifly/. Last accessed 20 June 2006.Google Scholar
Ruosteenoja, K., Carter, T.R., Jylhä, K. & Tuomenvirta, H. (2003) Future climate in world regions: an intercomparison of model-based projections for the new IPCC emissions scenarios. 84 pp. Helsinki, Finnish Environment Institute.Google Scholar
Shi, W., Kerdelhue, C. & Ye, H. (2005) Population genetics of the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae), in Yunnan (China) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Environmental Entomology 34, 977–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, R.P. & Prasad, V.G. (1985) Population fluctuations of the oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis Hendel in relation to hosts and abiotic factors. Tropical Pest Management 31, 273–275.Google Scholar
Sriramaratnam, R. (1996) Fruit fly: a major threat to New Zealand's fruit and vegetable industries? http://www.maf.govt.nz/mafnet/rural-nz/research-and-development/pest-control/fruitfly-threat/httoc.htm. Last accessed 20 June 2006.Google Scholar
Stephenson, B.P., Gill, G.S.C., Randall, J.L. & Wilson, J.A. (2003) Biosecurity approaches to surveillance and response for new plant pest species. New Zealand Plant Protection 56, 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherst, R.W. (2003) Prediction of species geographical ranges. Journal of Biogeography 30, 805–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherst, R.W., Collyer, B.S. & Yonow, T. (2000) The vulnerability of Australian horticulture to the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera (Dacus) tryoni, under climate change. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 467–480.Google Scholar
Sutherst, R.W., Maywald, G.F., Bottomley, W. & Bourne, A. (2004) CLIMEX v2 CD and User's Guide. Melbourne, Hearne Scientific Software Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
US National Research Council (2002) Predicting invasions of nonindigenous plants and plant pests. 194 pp. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Vargas, R.I., Walsh, W.A., Jang, E.B., Armstrong, J.W. & Kanehisa, D.T. (1996) Survival and development of immature stages of four Hawaiian fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) reared at five constant temperatures. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89, 64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas, R.I., Walsh, W.A., Kanehisa, D.T., Jang, E.B. & Armstrong, J.W. (1997) Demography of four Hawaiian fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) reared at five constant temperatures. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 90, 162–168.Google Scholar
Vargas, R.I., Walsh, W.A., Kanehisa, D.T., Stark, J.D. & Nishida, T. (2000) Comparative demography of three Hawaiian fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) at alternating temperatures. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93, 75–81.Google Scholar
Vera, M.T., Rodriguez, R., Segura, D.F., Cladera, J.L. & Sutherst, R.W. (2002) Potential geographical distribution of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae), with emphasis on Argentina and Australia. Environmental Entomology 31, 1009–1022.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, D.F. (1993) The major arthropod pests and weeds of agriculture in Southeast Asia. Aciar Monograph No. 21.Google Scholar
Weems, H.V., Heppner, J.B., Nation, J.L. & Fasulo, T.R. (2004) Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera (=Dacus) dorsalis (Hendel) (Insecta: Diptera: Tephritidae). University of Florida Featured Creatures http://creatures.ifas.ufl.edu/fruit/tropical/oriental_fruit_fly.htm.Google Scholar
Wharton, T.N. & Kriticos, D.J. (2004) The fundamental and realised niche of the Monterey pine aphid, Essigella californica (Essig) (Hemiptera: Aphididae): implications for managing softwood plantations in Australia. Diversity and Distributions 10, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worner, S.P. (1988) Ecoclimatic assessment of potential establishment of exotic pests. Journal of Economic Entomology 81, 973–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, P., Carey, J.R. & Dowell, R.V. (1994) Temperature influences on the development and demography of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) in China. Environmental Entomology 23, 971–974.Google Scholar
Yonow, T. & Sutherst, R.W. (1998) The geographical distribution of the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera (Dacus) tryoni, in relation to climate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 935–953.Google Scholar