Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:44:39.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The cytotaxonomy of Simulium sanctipauli sensu stricto (Diptera: Simuliidae) in Ghana and the Côte d’Ivoire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

D.A. Boakye*
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, University of Leiden, PO Box 9516, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands: Onchocerciasis Control Programme, World Health Organization, BP 549 Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
G.K. Fiasorgbor
Affiliation:
Onchocerciasis Control Programme, World Health Organization, BP 549 Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
B.K. Bougsere
Affiliation:
Onchocerciasis Control Programme, World Health Organization, BP 549 Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
S. Naniogue
Affiliation:
Onchocerciasis Control Programme, World Health Organization, BP 549 Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
*
*Fax: 31 715 27 4900 E-mail: yawadjei@juno.com

Abstract

The status of the different cytological variants of Simuliumsanctipaulisensu stricto Vajime & Dunbar (sensu b8Post, 1986) found in Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire is cytotaxonomically evaluated in view of recent revisions of the S. sanctipauli subcomplex. Three geographical variants designated as ‘Pra’, ‘Comoé’ and ‘Sassandra’forms of S. sanctipauli are described. The ‘Pra’ form is genetically differentiated from the other two forms by a distinct sex-determining system. The ‘Comoé’ and ‘Sassandra’ forms are considered as the two ends of an interspecific stepped cline with the River Bandama basin as the zone of contact. The possibility that the ‘Comoé’ form populations breeding in southwestern Ghana could serve as reinvading S. sanctipauliinto the Onchocerciasis Control Programme (OCP) area in West Africa is discussed.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boakye, D.A. (1993) A pictorial guide to the chromosomal identification of members of the Simulium damnosum Theobald complex in West Africa with particular reference to the Onchocerciasis Control Programme area. Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 44, 223244.Google Scholar
Boakye, D.A., Post, R.J., Mosha, F.W., Surtees, D.P. & Baker, R.H.A. (1993) Cytotaxonomic revision of the Simulium sanctipauli subcomplex including the description of two new species within the Simulium damnosum complex in Guinea and surrounding countries. Bulletin of Entomological Research 83, 171186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R.W. (1972) Polytene chromosome preparations from tropical Simuliidae. World Health Organization mimeographed document. WHO/ONCHO/72.95.Google Scholar
Guillet, P., Escaffre, H., Ouédraogo, M. & Quillévéré, D. (1980) Mise en évidence d'une résistance au téméphos dans le complexe Simulium damnosum (S. sanctipauli et S. soubrense) en Côte d'Ivoire (Zone du Programme de lutte Contre l'Onchocercose dans la Région du Bassin de la Volta). Cahiers ORSTOM, Série Entomologie Médicale et Parasitologie 18, 291299.Google Scholar
Kurtak, D., Ouédraogo, M., Ocran, M., Barro, T. & Guillet, P. (1982) Preliminary note on the appearance in the Ivory Coast of resistance to Chlorphoxim in Simulium soubrense/sanctipauli larvae already resistant to temephos (Abate®). WHO unpublished document. WHO/VBC/82.850.Google Scholar
Meredith, S.E.O., Cheke, R.A. & Garms, R. (1983) Variation and distribution of forms of Simulium soubrense and S. sanctipauli in West Africa. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 77, 627640.Google Scholar
Meredith, S.E.O., Kurtak, D. & Adiamah, J.H. (1987) Following movements of resistant populations of Simulium soubrense/sanctipauli by means of chromosomal inversions. Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 37, 290294.Google Scholar
Post, R.J. (1986) The cytotaxonomy of Simulium sanctipauli and Simulium soubrense (Diptera: Simuliidae). Genetica 69, 191207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, R.J. & Kurtak, D. (1987) Identity of the OP-insecticide resistant species in the Simulium sanctipauli subcomplex. Annales de la Societé Belge de Médicine Tropicale 67, 7173.Google Scholar
Procunier, W.S. (1982) A cytological study of species in Cnephia s.str. (Diptera: Simuliidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 60, 28662878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Procunier, W.S. (1989) Cytological approaches to simuliid biosystematics in relation to the epidemiology and control of human onchocerciasis. Genome 32, 559569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quillévéré, D. (1975) Etude du complexe Simulium damnosum en Afrique de l'Ouest. I – Techniques d'étude. Identification des cytotypes. Cahiers ORSTOM, Série Entomologie Médicale et Parasitologie 13, 87100.Google Scholar
Quillévéré, D., Guillet, P. & Séchan, Y. (1981) La répartition géographique des especes du complexe Simulium damnosum dans la zone du projet Senegambie (ICP/MPD/007). Cahiers ORSTOM, Série Entomologie Médicale et Parasitologie 19, 303309.Google Scholar
Surtees, D.P., Fiasorgbor, G., Post, R.J. & Weber, E.A. (1988) The cytotaxonomy of the Djodji form of Simulium sanctipauli (Diptera: Simuliidae). Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 39, 120122.Google ScholarPubMed
Vajime, C.G. & Dunbar, R.W. (1975) Chromosomal identification of eight species of the subgenus Edwardsellum near and including Simulium (Edwardsellum) damnosum Theobald (Diptera: Simuliidae). Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie 26, 111138.Google Scholar