Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:14:32.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of parous rates in Phlebotomine sandflies with special reference to Amazonian species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. J. Lewis ,
R. Lainson  and
J. J. Shaw
D. J. Lewis
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council, External Staff, c/o British Museum (Nat. Hist.), London, S.W.7
R. Lainson
Affiliation:
The Wellcome Parasitology Unit, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Belém, Pará, Brazil
J. J. Shaw
Affiliation:
The Wellcome Parasitology Unit, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Belém, Pará, Brazil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Previous work on Phlebotomines has shown that most parous flies in many species may be recognised by the dark residual secretion in the accessory glands; parity can be confirmed by inspection of ovarioles. In the present study 12 species of Lutzomyia were caught in forests near Belém, Brazil, mainly with rodent-baited oil-traps. Many females of the predominant species, L. flaviscutellata (Mangabeira), were parasitised by the protozoan Monocystis. Parous rates based on examination of ovaries were subject to an error of about 5% due to diminution or disappearance of follicular relics. Two successive dilatations of the tunica were seen in L. davisi (Root), suggesting that it had laid two batches of eggs. Biting rates by parous flies varied little during the night, and were somewhat less than those of nullipars. In eight species the dark-gland rate approximated to the parous rate as shown by the ovaries; a small error may have been due to discharge of all secretion, disappearance of follicular relics and premature activity of glands. In contrast to this concordant pattern, four species showed discordance, possibly due to autogeny. It seems advisable to omit oil-trapped blood-fed flies when estimating parous rates by examining glands. Monocystis may increase the dark-gland rate, but it is non-pathogenic or has little effect on life span, and does not hinder blood-sucking.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , December 1970 , pp. 209 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, S. & Mayrink, W. (1961). A gregarine, Monocystis chagasi n. sp., of Phlebotomus longipalpis. Remarks on the accessory glands of P. longipalpis.—Revta Inst. Med. trop. S Paulo 3, 230–238.Google Scholar
Adler, S. & Theodor, O. (1935). Investigations on Mediterranean kala azar VIII.—Proc. R. Soc. (B) 116, 505–515.Google Scholar
Adler, S. & Theodor, O. (1957). Transmission of disease agents by phlebotomine sandflies.—A. Rev. Ent. 2, 203–226.Google Scholar
Bertram, D. S. (1962). The ovary and ovarioles of mosquitoes.—Monograph Ser. W.H.O. no. 47, 195–210.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, B. N. & Anderson, J. R. (1967). Age structure, population dynamics and vector potential of Phlebotomus in northern California. Part I.—J. med. Ent. 4, 251–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaniotis, B. N. & Anderson, J. R. (1968). Part II.—J. med. Ent. 5, 273–292.Google Scholar
Detinova, T. S. (1962). Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance.—Monograph Ser. W.H.O. no. 47, 13.Google ScholarPubMed
Detinova, T. S. (1968). Age structure of insect populations of medical importance.—A. Rev. Ent. 13, 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disney, R. H. L. (1966). A trap for phlebotomine sandflies attracted to rats.—Bull. ent. Res. 56, 445–151.Google Scholar
Disney, R. H. L. (1968). Observations on a zoonosis: leishmaniasis in British Honduras.—J. appl. Ecol. 5, 1–59.Google Scholar
Dolmatova, A. V. (1942). The life cycle of Phlebotomus papatasii Scopoli. [In Russian]—Medskaya Parazit. 11 no. 3, 52–70.Google Scholar
Dolmatova, A. V. (1946). The autogenous development of eggs in Phlebotomus papatasii Scop. [In Russian]—Medskaya Parazit. 15 no. 3, 58–62.Google Scholar
Dyce, A. L. (1969). The recognition of nulliparous and parous Culicoides without dissection.—J. Aust. ent. Soc. 8, 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnham, P. C. C. & Lewis, D. J. (1959). Parasites of British Honduras with special reference to leishmaniasis.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 53, 12–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertig, M., Fairchild, G. B., Johnson, C. M., Johnson, P. T., McConnell, E. & Hanson, W. J. (1960). Leishmaniasis transmission-reservoir studies.—Rep. Gorgas meml Lab. 1959, 5–11.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. T. (1961). Autogeny in Panamanian Phlebotomus sandflies.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54, 116–118.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. T. & Hertig, M. (1961). The rearing of Phlebotomus sandflies II…—Ann. ent Soc. Am. 54, 764–776.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. T., McConnell, E. & Hertig, M. (1963). Natural infections of leptomonad flagellates in Panamanian Phlebotomus sandflies.—Expl Parasit. 14, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lainson, R. & Shaw, J. J. (1968). Leishmaniasis in Brazil: I…—Trans. R. Soc. trop Med Hyg. 62, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, D. J. (1965). Internal structural features of some Central American phlebotomine sandflies.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 59, 375–385.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. J. & Minter, D. M. (1960). Internal structural changes in some African Phlebotominae.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 54, 351–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linley, J. R. (1965). Changes in the ovaries of certain biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) following completion of the gonotrophic cycle.—Mosquito News 25, 306–310.Google Scholar
Minter, D. M. (1964). Seasonal changes in populations of phlebotomine sandflies (Dipt, Psychodidae) in Kenya.—Bull. ent. Res. 55, 421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scorza, J. V., Ortiz, I. & Gómez, I. (1968). Observaciones biológicas sobre algunos flebotomos de Rancho Grande (Venezuela) 5…—Acta biol. Venez. 6, 52–65.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. J. & Lainson, R. (1968). Leishmaniasis in Brazil: II…—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Meet. Hyg. 62, 396–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoshina, M. A. (1951). Determination of a repeated gonotrophic cycle in sandflies. [In Russian]—Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 78, 181–183.Google Scholar
Thatcher, V. E. (1968). Studies on phlebotomine sandflies using castor oil traps baited with Panamanian animals.—J. med. Ent. 5, 293–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vyukov, V. N. (1964). Daily activity of sandflies in the burrows of Rhombomys opimus. [In Russian with English summary]—Zool. Zh. 43, 779–782.Google Scholar
Williams, P. (1965). Observations on the phlebotomine sandflies of British Honduras.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 59, 393–404.Google Scholar
Williams, P. (1966 a). The biting rhythms of some anthropophilic phlebotomine sandflies in British Honduras.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 60, 357–364.Google Scholar
Williams, P. (1966 b). Experimental transmission of Leishmania mexicana by Lutzomyia cruciata.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 60, 365–372.Google Scholar