Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:15:18.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of crop residue management on damage by Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), its egg parasitoids and the ants associated with sugarcane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2020

María L. del P. Pérez Open the ORCID record for María L. del P. Pérez [Opens in a new window] ,
Marcos G. Isas ,
Francois R. Goebel ,
Ma. Marta Ayup ,
Agustín E. Padilla ,
Analía R. Salvatore  and
Gerardo Gastaminza
María L. del P. Pérez*
Affiliation:
Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC), Sección Zoología Agrícola, Avenida William Cross 3150, C.P. T4101XAC. Las Talitas, Tucumán, Argentina
Marcos G. Isas
Affiliation:
Bulacio Argenti SA, Cevil Pozo, Tucumán
Francois R. Goebel
Affiliation:
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, Unité de Recherches AIDA, Avenue Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier cedex 5, France
Ma. Marta Ayup
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Tucumán/Facultad de Ciencias Naturales E Instituto Miguel Lillo/Instituto de ecología Regional, Tucumán, Argentina
Agustín E. Padilla
Affiliation:
Instituto de Tecnología Agroindustrial del Noroeste Argentino (ITANOA), Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Av. William Cross 3150, C.P. T4101XAC. Las Talitas, Tucumán, Argentina
Analía R. Salvatore
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Tucumán/Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia/Cátedra, Tucumán, Argentina
Gerardo Gastaminza
Affiliation:
Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC), Sección Zoología Agrícola, Avenida William Cross 3150, C.P. T4101XAC. Las Talitas, Tucumán, Argentina
*
Author for correspondence: María L. del P. Pérez, Email: mlpp_abcd@hotmail.com; mlperez@eeaoc.org.ar.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the American continent, the sugarcane borer Diatraea saccharalis (F.) is the main pest in sugarcane producing areas. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of crop residue management on damage by D. saccharalis, its egg parasitoids and the ants associated with sugarcane. The study was carried out during 2011–2012, 2012–2013 and 2013–2014 crop cycles, in three commercial fields located in different regions of Tucumán state, Argentina. Two types of crop residue management (= treatments) were compared: conservation of trash at the soil surface (CT) and trash burning (TB). In ‘trash conservation’ treatment, crop residue was allowed to remain over the soil surface during the whole sugarcane growing season, while the second treatment consisted of complete burning of trash blanket approximately 2 weeks after harvest. The injury level was measured by recording the number of stalks bored and internodes bored. Parasitism was estimated by counting the total number of eggs and number of black eggs (which indicates the occurrence of egg parasitoids). Ants (Formicidae) richness was calculated by two estimators; abundance-based coverage estimator and incidence-based coverage estimator, using the non-parametric richness estimators: Chao 2 and Jackknife. Finally, the indicator value was estimated through the measurement of specificity and fidelity. In all the parameters studied no significant difference was found between TB and CT treatments.

Keywords

Antsborer managementcrop residuesugarcanetrash blanket
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 111 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 91 - 99
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlgren, IF (1974) The effect of fire on soil organisms. In Kozlowski, TT (ed.), Fire and Ecosystems. Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, MM (1980) Biological and ecological factors affecting populations of sugarcane moth-borer, Diatraea Saccharalis, Barbados. Wisconsin Entomophaga 25, 401–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, AN (1997) Ants as indicators of restoration success following mining: a functional group approach. In Hale, P and Lamb, D (eds), Conservation Outside Nature Reserves. Queensland, Australia: Centre for Conservation Biology, University of Queensland, pp. 319–344.Google Scholar
Andersen, AN, Hoffmann, BD, Müller, WJ and Griffiths, AD (2002) Using ants as bioindicators in land management: simplifying assessment of ant community responses. Journal of Applied Ecology 39, 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araújo, MS, Castro Della Lucia, TM, da Veiga, CE and Cardoso do Nascimento, I (2004a) Efeito da queima da palhada de cana-de-açúcar sobre comunidade de formicídeos. Ecología austral 14, 191–200.Google Scholar
Araújo, MS, Castro Della Lucia, TM and Picanço, MC (2004b) Impacto da queima da palhada da cana-de-açúcar no ritmo diário de forrageamento de Atta Bisphaerica Forel (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Rev. Bra. of Zool 21, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, WI and Kogan, M (2004) Cultural practices: springboard to IPM. In Koul, O, Dhaliwal, GS, & Cuperus, GW (eds), Integrated Pest Management: Potential, Constraints and Challenges. Massachusetts, USA: CABI, pp. 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzarini, MG, Gonzalez, L, Tablada, M, Casanoves, F, Di Rienzo, JA and Robledo, CW (2008) Infostat, Manual del Usuario, Editorial Brujas, Córdoba, Argentina.Google Scholar
Benedetti, P and Valeiro, A (2011) Seguimiento de quemas de cañaverales en Tucumán a través de sensores remotos durante el año 2009. Ciencia y Tecnología de los Cultivos Industriales. Caña de azúcar. Volumen 1, No 1. ISSN 1853–7677. INTA – IFFIVE, Argentina.Google Scholar
Beuzelin, JM, Akbar, W, Mészaros, A, Reay-Jones, FPF and Reagan, TE (2010) Field assessment of novaluron for sugarcane borer, Diatraea Saccharalis (F.) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), management in Louisiana sugarcane. Crop Protection 10, 1168–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beuzelin, JM, Mészáros, A, Akbar, W and Reagan, TE (2011) Sugarcane planting date impact on fall and spring sugarcane borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) infestations. Florida Entomologist 94, 242–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, G (1994) Overwintering strategies of egg parasitoids. In Wajnberg, E and Hassan, SA (eds), Biological Control with Egg Parasitoids. Wallingford: CABI Publishing, pp. 219–244.Google Scholar
Bolton, B, Palacios, EE and Fernández, F (2003) Capítulo 14: Morfología y glosario. In Fernández, F (ed.), Introducción a las hormigas de la región neotropical. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto de Recursos Biológicos Alexander Von Humboldt, p. 398.Google Scholar
Box, H (1927) Apuntes preliminares respecto al descubrimiento de algunos parásitos de los huevos de Diatraea saccharalis. Tucumán. Rev. Ind. Agr. Tuc 18, 5–8.Google Scholar
Bynum, EK, Halley, WE and Charpentier, LJ (1938) Sources of infestation by the sugarcane borer and trash treatment for the destruction of overwintering borers. Proceedings of International Society of Sugarcane Technology 6, 597–611.Google Scholar
Chazdon, RL, Colwell, RK, Denslow, JS and Guariguata, MR (1998) Statistical methods for estimating species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rain forests of northeastern Costa Rica. Man and the Biosphere Series Vol. 20. In Dallmeier, F and Comiskey, JA (eds.), Forest biodiversity research, monitoring and modeling: conceptual background and old world case studies, pp. 285–309.Google Scholar
Cheli, GH and Corley, JC (2010) Efficient sampling of ground-dwelling arthropods using pitfall traps in arid steppes. Neotropical Entomology 39, 912–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, KR and Gorley, RN (2001) PRIMER v5: User Manual/Tutorial. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth.Google Scholar
Colwell, RK and Coddington, JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 345, 101–118.Google ScholarPubMed
Consoli, FL, Botelho, PSM and Parra, JRP (2001) Selectivity of insecticides to the egg parasitoid Trichogramma galloi Zucchi, 1988, (Hym., Trichogrammatidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 125, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuezzo, F and Campero, CG (2010) Invertebrados en la selva pedemontana Austral. El caso de Formicidae como ejemplo de caracterización de comunidades de insectos. Ecología, historia natural y conservación de la Selva Pedemontana de las Yungas australes.Google Scholar
Degaspari, N, Botelho, PSM, de Almeida, LC, Macedo, N and de Araujo, JR (1983) A queima da cana-de-acucar, os efeitos sobre a populacao da broca, Diatraea Saccharalis (Fabr. 1794) seus predadores e parasitos [Saccharum officinarum]. STAB mayo-junio 1983, 34–40.Google Scholar
del P. Pérez, ML, Guadalupe Del Río, M and Lanteri, AA (2012) Posición taxonómica de Acrotomopus Atropunctellus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) y descripción del daño producido en el cultivo de caña de azúcar en la Argentina. Rev. de la Soc. Entomol. Arg 71, 3–4.Google Scholar
Dinardo Miranda, LL (2008) Pragas. In Dinardo-Miranda, LL, Vasconcelos, ACM and de A. Landell, MG (eds), Cana-de-açúcar. Brasil: Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, pp. 349–404.Google Scholar
Dinardo Miranda, LL and Fracasso, JV (2013) Sugarcane straw and the populations of pests and nematodes. Science and Agriculture, 70, 305–310.Google Scholar
Di Rienzo, JA, Casanoves, F, Balzarini, MG, Gonzalez, L, Tablada, M and Robledo, CW (2013) InfoStat versión 2013. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. [En línea]. Disponible en http://www.infostat.com.ar.Google Scholar
Dufrene, M and Legendre, P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67, 345–366.Google Scholar
Fandos, C, Soria, F, Carreras Baldrés, JI, Scandaliaris, J and Scandaliaris, P (2010) Relevamiento del área cañera tucumana expuesta a procesos de quema durante la zafra 2009. Avance Agroind 31, 22–26.Google Scholar
Fandos, C, Scandaliaris, J, Scandaliaris, P, Carreras Baldrés, JI, Soria, FJ, Giardina, J, de Ullivarri, JF and Romero, ER (2019) Área cosechable y producción de caña de azúcar y azúcar para la zafra 2019 en Tucumán. Reporte Agroindustrial [en línea]. pp. 1–11. Disponible en http://www.eeaoc.org.ar/publicaciones/categoria/22/985/Area-cosechable-y-produccion-de-cana-de-azucar-y-azucar-para-la-zafra-2019-en-Tucuman.html.Google Scholar
Fernández, F and Feitosa, R (2012) Hormigas neotropicales: Claves para las subfamilias y géneros y sinopsis. (unpublished).Google Scholar
Fogliata, FA, Leiderman, J and Matiussi, RE (1967) Efectos de la quema de la malhoja sobre temperatura y flora microbiana del suelo. Rev. Ind. y Agri. de Tucumán 45, 27–53.Google Scholar
Fournier, F and Boivin, G (2000) Comparative dispersal of Trichogramma evanescens and Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in relation to environmental conditions. Environmental Entomology 29, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goebel, FR and Sallam, N (2011) New pest threats for sugarcane in the new bioeconomy and how to manage them. Cooperative in Environmental Systems 3, 81–89.Google Scholar
Goebel, FR, Tabone, E, Do Thi Khanh, H, Roux, E, Marquier, M and Frandon, J (2010) Biocontrol of Chilo Sacchariphagus (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) a key pest of sugarcane: lessons from the past and future prospects. International Sugar Journal 28, 128–132.Google Scholar
Gomez Laverde, LA and Lastra Borja, LA (1998) Insectos y caña verde. Carta trimestral. 20. 4.Google Scholar
Gomez, LA and Vargas, G (2014) Los barrenadores de la caña de azúcar, Diatraea spp. en el Valle del Río Cauca: investigación participativa con énfasis en el control biológico. Documento de trabajo, 734.Google Scholar
Hayward, KJ (1943) El gusano chupador de la caña de azúcar Diatraea Saccharalis (Fabricius) en Tucumán. Rev. Ind. y Agri. de Tucumán 38, 25.Google Scholar
Hinds, WE and Osterberger, BA (1935) Recommendations for control of the sugarcane borer in Louisiana. In Proceedings of International Society Sugarcane Tech. 5th Congress, Brisbane. pp. 476–483.Google Scholar
Isas, MG, Albarracin, E, del P. Pérez, ML and Salvatore, AR (2016) Trichogramma Species (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), Egg Parasitoids of Diatraea Saccharalis (F.) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on Sugarcane in Argentina. Florida Entomology 99, 133–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaynes, HA and Bynum, EK (1941) Experiments with Trichogramma minutum Riley as a control of the sugarcane borer in Louisiana (Vol. 743). US Dept. of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Kaspari, M (2003) Introducción a la Ecología de las hormigas de la región Neotropical. Introducción a las Hormigas de la región Neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia. pp. 97–106.Google Scholar
King, JR, Andersen, AN and Cutter, AD (1998) Ants as bioindicators of habitat disturbance: validation of the functional group model for Australia's humid tropics. Biodiversity & Conservation 7, 1627–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirst, LD and Hensley, SD (1974) A study of overwintering populations of Diatraea Saccharalis (F.) in Louisiana. Proceedings of International Society of Sugarcane Technology 15, 475–487.Google Scholar
Kuno, E (1986) Evaluation of statistical precision and design of efficient sampling for the population estimation based on frequency of occurrence. Researches on Population Ecology 28, 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, N and Araujo, JR (2000) Efeitos da queima do canavail sobre insetos predadores. An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil 29, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, N. and Macedo, D. 2005. O desenvovimento da mesofauna na cana crua e o controle de cigarrinha da raiz, broca da cana e hyponeuma taltula. [En línea]. Disponible en http://www.agencia.cnptia.embrapa.br/Repositorio (consultado 18 de junio 2010).Google Scholar
Magurran, AE (1988) Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makhdum, AH, Cock, MJW and Shehzad, A (2001) Effect of trash mulching on the infestation of stem borer Chilo Infuscatellus Snellen, its natural enemies and on over all sugar productivity in the Habib Sugar Mills area at Nawabshah. Sindh Pakistan Sugar Journal 16, 6–14.Google Scholar
Matthews, TJ and Whittaker, RJ (2014) Fitting and comparing competing models of the species abundance distribution: assessment and prospect. Frontiers of Biogeography 6, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, J (2004) Guía para el reconocimiento y manejo de insectos plagas y roedores de la caña de azúcar, en el Ecuador. El Triunfo, Ecuador. CINCAE, Publicación Técnica N° 2. 34 p.Google Scholar
Moreno, EC (2001) Manual de métodos para medir la biodiversidad. México: Universidad Veracruzana.Google Scholar
Moreno, CE, Sánchez Rojas, G, Verdú, JR, Numa, C, Marcos García, MA, Martínez Falcón, E, Galante, AP and Halffter, G (2007) Biodiversidad en ambientes agropecuarios semiáridos en la Reserva de la Biosfera Barranca de Metztitlán, México. Hacia una cultura de la conservación de la diversidad biológica 6, 97–107.Google Scholar
Navarro, FR, Saini, ED and Leiva, PD (2009) Clave pictórica de polillas de interés agrícola, agrupadas por relación de semejanza. Primera Edición. INTA EEA Pergamino e IMyZACNIA Castelar/ Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
Oliveira, RDFD, Almeida, LCD, Souza, DRD, Munhae, CB, Bueno, OC and Morini, MSDC (2012) Ant diversity (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and predation by ants on the different stages of the sugarcane borer life cycle Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). EJE 109, 381–387.Google Scholar
Osores, VM, Willink, E and Costilla, MA (1981) Generaciones de Diatraea Saccharalis y daño producido en cañaverales de la provincia de Tucumán. Rev. Ind. y Agri. de Tucumán 58, 49–56.Google Scholar
Ostengo, S, Espinosa, MA, García, MB, Delgado, N and Cuenya, MI (2012) Distribución varietal del cultivo y de la caña de azúcar y aplicación de otras tecnologías en la provincia de Tucumán. Relevamiento de la campaña 2010/2011. Gacetilla agroindustrial EEAOC.Google Scholar
Ostengo, S, Espinosa, MA, Díaz, JV, Chavanne, ER, Aybar Guchea, M, Costilla, DD and Cuenya, MI (2019) Aplicación de tecnologías en caña de azúcar Tucumán 2015/2017. Avanc. Agroind 40, 14–16.Google Scholar
Palacio, EE and Fernández, F (2003) Claves para Subfamilias y géneros. En Fernández, F (ed.). Introducción a las hormigas de la región neotropical. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos Alexander Von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia, pp. 233–260.Google Scholar
Pannuti, LEDR, Baldin, ELL, Gava, GJDC, Silva, JPGFD, Souza, EDS and Kölln, OT (2015) Interaction between N-fertilizer and water availability on borer-rot complex in sugarcane. Brag 74, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, MLP, Brunet, JI, Isas, MG and Varela, LM (2010) Relevamiento del parasitismo natural en larvas invernantes de Diatraea saccharalis (Lep., crambridae) en caña de azúcar en distintas zonas de Tucumán. Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores, UNT-CONICET.Google Scholar
Perovic, P, Trucco, C, Tálamo, A, Quiroga, V, Ramallo, D, Lacci, A, Baungardner, A and Mohr, F (2008) Guía técnica para el monitoreo de la biodiversidad. Programa de Monitoreo de Biodiversidad - Parque Nacional Copo, Parque y Reserva Provincial Copo, y Zona de Amortiguamiento. APN/GEF/BIRF. Salta, Argentina.Google Scholar
Questel, DD and Bregger, T (1959) Internal temperatures in pre-harvest burned cane and mortality of the sugar cane borer. In Proceedings of International Society of Sugar Cane Technolology, 10th Congress. pp. 921–923.Google Scholar
Rana, ZA, Haq, I, Malik, NA and Akhtar, AS (2007) Effects of trash mulching and Trichogramma Chilonis (Ishii) on sugarcane borers infestation. Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 161–164.Google Scholar
Ridge, DR, Hurney, AP and Chandlor, KJ (1979) Trash disposal after green cane harvesting. Proceedings of Australian Society of Sugarcane Technology, 89–93.Google Scholar
Rochat, J, Goebel, R, Tabone, E, Begue, JM, Fernandez, E, Tibère, R and Vercambre, B (2001) Integrated control of the sugarcane spotted stalk borer Chilo sacchariphagus (Lep: Pyralidae) in Réunion Island. Proceedings of South African Sugar Technology Association 75, 253–254.Google Scholar
Romero, R, Scandaliaris, J, Digonzelli, P, Leggio Neme, F, Giardina, J, Tonatto, J, Giardina, J, Fernández de Ullivarri, J, Casen, S, Alonso, L and Tonatto, M (2009) La caña de azúcar, características y ecofisiología. En Romero, ER, Digonzelli, PA, Scandaliaris, J (eds), Manual del Cañero. Las Talitas: Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres, pp. 13–34. 232 pp.Google Scholar
Sajjad, A, Ahmad, F, Makhdoom, AH and Imran, A (2012) Does trash burning harm arthropod biodiversity in sugarcane? International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 14, 1021–1023.Google Scholar
Salvatore, AR, Lopez, G and Willink, E (2009) Plagas en el cultivo de la caña de azúcar En Romero, ER, Digonzelli, PA and Scandaliaris, J (eds), Manual del cañero. Las Talitas: Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres. 232 pp.Google Scholar
Sandhu, HS, Nuessly, GS, Webb, SE, Cherry, RH and Gilbert, RA (2010) Temperature-dependent development and life table of Elasmopalpus Lignosellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on sugarcane. Florida Entomology 96, 380–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandhu, HS, Gilbert, RA, Kingston, G, Subiros, JF, Morgan, K, Rice, RW, Baucum, L, Shine, JM Jr and Davis, L 2013. Effects of sugarcane harvest method on microclimate in Florida and Costa Rica. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology, 177, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, EG (1938) Trichogramma proves itself in sugarcane borer control. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Tech. 6th Cong.Google Scholar
Souza, DR, Stingel, E, de Almeida, LC, Munhae, CB, Mayhé Nunes, AJ, Bueno, OC and Morini, MDC (2010) Ant diversity in a sugarcane culture without the use of straw burning in southeast, São Paulo, Brazil. American Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 5, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, EC and Fisher, BL (2006) The role of ants in conservation monitoring: if, when, and how. Biological Conservation 132, 166–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vejar Cota, G, Rodriguez del Bosque, LA and Caro, A (2009) Impact of sugarcane burning on the stalkborer Diatraea Considerata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and its parasitoid Macrocentrus prolificus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Western Mexico. Southwestern Entomology 34, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigil, D (2012) Principales plagas y enfermedades en el cultivo de caña de azúcar. Guía Técnica: Manejo Integrado de Plagas en el cultivo de caña de azúcar. Oficina Académica de Extensión y Proyección Social de la Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina 1, 7–19.Google Scholar
White, WH, Viator, RP and White, PM (2011) Effect of post-harvest residue and methods of residue removal on ground inhabiting arthropod predators in sugarcane. Journal of American Society of Sugarcane Technology 31, 39–50.Google Scholar
Willink, E, Osores, VM and Costilla, MA (1991) Parasitoides larvales de Diatraea Saccharalis en Tucumán. Revista industrial y agrícola de Tucumán 68, 117–129.Google Scholar
Zaslavski, VA and Umarova, TY (1990) Environmental and endogenous control of diapause in Trichogramma species. Entomophaga 35, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuccardi, R and Fadda, G (1985) Bosquejo Agroecológico de la Provincia de Tucumán. Miscelánea N° 86, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia. 68 pp.Google Scholar