Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:26:48.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of host-plant and delayed mating on the fecundity and lifespan of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (Denis & Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): their influence on population dynamics and relevance to pest management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

S. R. Leather ,
A. D. Watt  and
D. A. Barbour
S. R. Leather
Affiliation:
Forestry Commission Research Station, Alice Holt Lodge, Wrecclesham, Surrey, GU10 4LH, UK
A. D. Watt
Affiliation:
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 OQB., UK
D. A. Barbour
Affiliation:
Forestry Commission Research Station, Alice Holt Lodge, Wrecclesham, Surrey, GU10 4LH, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adult females of Panolis flammea (Denis & Schiffermüller) in the laboratory laid more eggs on some provenances of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) than on others, even when offered no choice. Their preoviposition period was inversely related to the suitability of the host for larval growth and development. The shorter the preoviposition period the greater the number of eggs that were laid. Delayed mating resulted in reduced fecundity and reduced egg fertility. Female moths lived longest on those hosts on which they oviposited most. Oviposition preferences were correlated with the ratio of the two monoterpenes α- and β-pinene within the host-plants. The effects of provenance, delayed mating and adult mortality were demonstrated through a simulation model; the effect of delayed mating was particularly marked when adult survival was poor. Egg production in the field in Scotland varied from 30 to 123 eggs per female, but this variation could largely be explained by spring temperature. It was concluded that this relationship was due to the influence of temperature on mating and egg laying. The relationship between temperature and egg production forms a basis for predicting damaging levels of Panolis flammea from either pupal or adult numbers. The effects of provenance and delayed mating demonstrate that the frequency of P. flammea outbreaks in the UK may be reduced by the planting of less preferred lodgepole pine provenances and by mating-disruption methods.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , December 1985 , pp. 641 - 651
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altenkirch, W. (1978). Kieferngrossschädlinge in Niedersachsen 1977/78.—Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift 14, 367.Google Scholar
Barrer, P. M. (1976). The influence of delayed mating on the reproduction of Ephestia cautella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae).—J. stored Prod. Res. 12, 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dajoz, R. (1980). Écologic des insectes forestiers.—489 pp. Paris, Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Deseö, K. V. (1971). Study of factors influencing the fecundity and fertility of codling moth (Laspeyresia pomonella L., Lepid.; Tortr.).—Acta Phytopathol. Acad. Sci. Hung. 6, 243–252.Google Scholar
Forrest, G. I. (1980). Geographical variation in the monoterpenes of Pinus contorta oleoresin.—Biochem. Syst. & Ecol. 8, 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, P. D. & Thorsteinson, A. J. (1960). Food plant relationships of the diamond-back moth (Plutella maculipennis (Curt)). II. Sensory regulation of oviposition of the adult female.—Entomologia exp. appl. 3, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, G. T. (1977). Mean weight and rearing performance of successive egg clusters of eastern spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).—Can. Ent. 109, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiritani, K. & Kanoh, M. (1984). Influence of delay in mating on the reproduction of the oriental tea tortrix, Homona magnanima Diakonoff (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), with reference to pheromone-based control.—Protection Ecology 6, 137–144.Google Scholar
Klimetzek, D. (1972). Die Zeitfolge von Übervermehrungen nadeifressender Kiefernraupen in der Pfalz seit 1810 und die Ursachen ihres Rückganges in neuerer Zeit.—Z. angew. Ent. 71, 414–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, S. R. (1984). The effect of adult feeding on the fecundity, weight loss and survival of the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (D&S).—Oecologia 65, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leather, S. R. (1985). Oviposition preferences in relation to larval growth rates and survival in the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea.—Ecol. Entomol. 10, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, S. R. & Barbour, D. A. (1983). The effect of temperature on the emergence of pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea Schiff. (Lep., Noctuidae).—Z. angew. Ent. 96, 445–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lekander, B. (1955). Skogsinsekternas uppträdande i Sverige under tiden 1946–1950.—Meddn St. SkogsforskInst. 44, (1), 46 pp.Google Scholar
Lines, R. (1976). The development of forestry in Scotland in relation to the use of Pinus contorta.—pp. 2–5in Lines, R. (Ed.). Pinus contorta provenance studies.—128 pp. Edinburgh, Forestry Commission (Forestry Commission Research and Development Paper 114).Google Scholar
Lines, R. (1980). Pinus contorta—another viewpoint.—Scott. For. 34, 114–116.Google Scholar
Saalas, U. (1949). Suomen Metsähyönteiset.—719 pp. Helsinki, Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö.Google Scholar
Schwenke, W. (1978). Die Forstschäadlinge Europas. Vol. 3. Schmetterlinge.—467 pp. Hamburg & Berlin, Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Stoakley, J. T. (1977). A severe outbreak of the pine beauty moth on lodgepole pine in Sutherland.—Scott. For. 31, 113–125.Google Scholar
Stoakley, J. T. (1979). The pine beauty moth—its distribution, life cycle and importance as a pest in Scottish forests.—pp. 7–12in Holden, A. V. & Bevan, D. (Eds.). Control of pine beauty moth by fenitrothion in Scotland.—176 pp. Edinburgh, Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
Stoakley, J. T. (1983). Use of pheromones to monitor pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (Noctuidae).—p. 1068 in 10th International Congress of Plant Protection 1983. Volume 3. Proceedings of a conference held at Brighton, England, 20–25.November, 1983. Plant protection for human welfare.—pp. 885–1228. Croydon, Br. Crop. Prot. Coun.Google Scholar
Wiklund, C. & Fagerström, T. (1977). Why do males emerge before females? A hypothesis to explain the incidence of protandry in butterflies.—Oecologia 31, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwölfer, W. (1931). Studien zur Ökologie und Epidemiologie der Insekten. 1. Die Kieferneule. Panolis flammea Schiff.—Z. angew. Ent. 17, 475–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar